Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Western press cannot help the Seyyeds in Iran

Defying threats of arrest or worse, witnesses to protests in Iran are managing to leak reports of violence after the country's disputed presidential elections

The fact that there is so little info coming out of the IRI by IRI reporters, and other agencies that have to give a "balanced" report, means that for the first time ever, the Iranian Bloggers and Twitters are able to take charge of their destiny.

After 30 years of pain, every Iranian is an expert on politics, and are superb at communicating verbally, written and in multimedia, just like all the youth in the world. Social networking has empowered the massive 60% of Iranian population, that are very very young.

To me this is a dream come true. I remember the days when Christiane Amanpour had to seem sympathetic to AhMADinejad; not asking awkward questions, and we all would think that she would put him on the spot, and she wouldn't, because she was worried about being kicked out of Iran.

But now because the social networking site are the only source, the propaGANDa machine of IRI that worked through BBC, AP, is not effective. What IRI should do is to give the foreign press freedom to give a balanced report and make the IRI look good. How ironical is that.

Old National Anthem of Iran in Tehran Metro



At 3:15 mins into this clip, the protesters will start to sing the old national anthem of Iran, called Ey Iran.

This goes to show, that nationalists is the Spirit that drives the people of Iran.

Tell U.N. Atomic Energy Chief to not mix Iranians' nuke policy with the Seyyeds'

“It is my gut feeling that Iran would like to have the technology to enable it to have nuclear weapons,” Dr. ElBaradei, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency said in the interview at the organization’s headquarters in Vienna. ... “They want to send a message to their neighbors, to the rest of the world, ‘don’t mess with us,’” he said, urging outside powers to engage with Iran to remove the incentive for making a bomb. ... He said he believed Iran’s “ultimate aim” was to be “recognized as a major power in the Middle East.”

What do you do with ElBaradei. First of all he refers to Iran, when it is the Doomsday Khomeinists or Seyyeds, that are followers of their 12th Imam, who are hell bent in creating Armageddon, not the Iranians.

Secondly, who in Iran wants to be so powerful, to then allow the US government to reason with its people, to use US tax payer money, to build permanent bases in the area. The best solution anyone with an ounce of brain, is for Iranians, real Iranians, to come across as decent civilized people, as they were when Iran was the cross-roads of civilization.

What ElBaradei wants is to use the Seyyeds to suck the oil revenue of Iran and teach the Americans a lesson, that the fanatic Arabs like him can't. If he is saying this stuff now, imagine what he can say later when he retires.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Russia recognises Ahmadinejad as Iran president

"Russia welcomed Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Russia on Tuesday and said the disputed election was a domestic matter. ... 'The Iranian elections are the internal affair of Iran,' Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told reporters in the Urals city of Yekaterinburg."

Well it is madness, but it is true. These Ruskies love him.

Picture: How election fraud took place in Iran


Picture to the left shows that Rezaee at 09:47 had received 633.048 votes, four hours later his voted are dropped to 587.913 !!

Saturday, June 13, 2009

Why doesn't Mr Mousavi call for National Strikes against election rigging?


It is with deepest regret that we see the people of Iran act in this uncivilized way to show their resentment towards election rigging.

Mr Mousavi, if he truly cared, would announce a national strike and bring the country to a halt against the IRGC thugs.

Friday, June 05, 2009

"Violence is dead end" says Obama to the Muslims



In his speech to the Moslem world, he refers to Algebra as Islamic, when it is Iranian. He says Islam is part of USA, when the Seyyeds see US as part of Islam. He does not name the Seyyeds, but refers to their anti-Israeli, and violent views.

This indirect criticism helps the Seyyeds. He either tackles them head on, or just cites moral philosophy like so many preachers. After all what is the difference between a politician and a preacher? A time goes by, Obama sounds like a preacher, with no concrete actions. He reminds me of typical Sunday sermons.

On Iran from 34 mins. Recongises Mossadegh vs CIA. Supports human rights, but did not condemn the lack of it in Iran. Talks of concensus vs coercion. He talks about tolerance in Islam when in Iran people are being killed for reverting back to Zoroastrianism. Then he critisizes liberals picking on Women's rights, when they are stoned in Iran. No mention of any country. He just talks in broad terms, and subtley hits at Islam, when he knows that Islam is strictly intolerant to women's right to liberal thoughts.

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Iran's Human Rights Agencies Suffer

Read this first.

Quite an amazing drawing by a Cancer child in Iran.

"Speak to God, and tell him I have a Problem,
Speak to The Problem, and tell him I have God."
Below, on amazing man who is trying to help the youth on Seyyeds' death row. His name is so similar to mine.

Mohamad Mostafaie doesn’t operate an NGO — he runs a private law practice, but is still facing increasing pressure from the government. The human rights lawyer represents 30 of the 135 criminals under the age of 18 on Iran’s death row.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

Hitler of Iran to visit anti-racism conference


Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran is the only major leader to accept an invitation to the forum, which he will address.
This man is the Hitler of Iran. His Hitler youth take instruction from the Seyyeds in Qom who think they are the chosen few to rule over the world, until their Mahdi arrives. To that end they believe that they have the moral right to exclude The Ancient Iranians whose roots stem from the Spirit of Iranians as written in The Zend-Avesta, from any election. No true Iranian participated in their theocratic democracy. We abstained en-masse very peacefully, and will continue to do so. The Zend-Avesta and The Rig-Veda preach non-violence and tolerance, and we Iranians have stood tolerant and steadfast in non-violent opposition, controlling our anger within ourselves. We wish the world recognises the Spirit of Iranians and its Free Will. Please abstain from this conference if this man or any of his ilk are there. Show respect for what we Iranians did for the world, when we in recognised the plight of the Jews, and the birth of Jesus Christ.

Friday, April 10, 2009

Barack Obama loves Iran's Seyyeds now


The US State Department says from now on it will be represented when the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany meet with Iranian officials to discuss the nuclear issue.

There is absolutely nothing new that the US and the Seyyeds can say, that they have not said to each other before hand.

The good news is that for the first time, the US can ignore its intermediaries, such as Russia and EU. Now ask yourself, what have these intermediaries done all these years. Absolutely nothing for Iran or US, but plenty for themselves to get aid, financial or otherwise, for various projects not related to Iran, that they wouldn't have, if they had not had such a "closer than US" relationship with the Seyyeds.

It seems the US is fed up, or cannot afford to pay for go betweens or power brokers. It is saying, "hey I am all for disarmament, and what have you got to say" and it is calling the Seyyeds and their web of contacts bluff.

Good. But that still brings me to the question, "what are they going to say?" I mean they deal with the North Koreans directly, and they have the bomb. Heck they deal with Pakistanis, and many of them hate the US. So what's the big deal?

The big deal is this. The people of Pakistan can trade and come and go as they like. Their government does not create barriers on their people like the Seyyeds do. There is more freedom there. But in Iran the Seyyeds are ruthless and paranoid about their power base. They are there precisely for being anti-US. Take that away, and there is no so called "moral high ground" for the Seyyeds.

That all means that the people of Iran actually have the power, as they are the people who have ignored the Seyyed so called elections en-masse, and will abstain in totality. They made sure that the Seyyeds dig themselves into their own Mahdi bunkers and pushed them all to the top, so they can be seen clearly in the public eye. No true sane Iranian, that puts Iran First holds a public office.

So think of the situation the US has. It kept the mullahs in power to justify its military in the area now that its proxy the Shahanshah is no longer there. It knows that the mullahs in Iran have no foundation, and they will be thrown out soon, as soon as a massive non-violent general strike is carried nationwide in Iran. So it has to make them look good. And that's why it is showing them respect.

How about showing the people of Iran respect instead? The US never has. It knows that the economic might of the people of Iran, as resourceful business people, with a country rich in mineral resources, slap bang in the middle of the world, with such enormous pride, will be too much for them. The US industries cannot afford to see the likes of the East Asian industries coming out of West Asia. The US industries have to keep Iranian people down, and if it is not the mullahs, then they will find some other monster.

Yah Ahura we won't let them