Sheepish mullahs of Iran

Heck, why don't the mullahs just admit it, that they want to build the bomb. What are they worried about. Surely they think they are better than the rest of the world, and that their cause is just.

Fact is, that they know that the people of Iran will really go mad in putting Iran in harms way, if they openly admitted it. Fact is, that they would use the weapons against Iranians as well.

As it is, they have wasted our money in WMDs.

in reference to:

"The two pressure transducers, which can be used in gas centrifuge plants to measure gas pressure of uranium hexafluoride, have commercial functions in industrial, aviation, and meteorological processes. Yadegari allegedly tried to hide the specifications of the transducers in order to export them without the required export license. Setra Systems found the purchase suspicious and tipped off U.S. export officials who in turn alerted Canadian authorities."
- Iran proceeds in obtaining nuke technology | EnerPub - Energy Publisher (view on Google Sidewiki)

Comment on The Hindu

If only more Iranians wrote to newspapers.

in reference to:

"Can you please not give so much credit to this illegal government in Iran that has not the slightest interest to help Iranians. They are definitely not interested in Iranian culture. I do not need to explain that Iranian spirit is rooted in Zend Avesta which is close to the Rig Veda. I hope that with the news that the regime wants to build ten more reactors, when the people of Iran are dying of hunger, The Hindu starts to help the people of Iran to non-violently resist this regime that is putting Iran in harms way. We need to counter this regime the same the Indians resisted aliens in peaceful manner."
- The Hindu : Opinion / Lead : Barack Obama’s myopic Iran policy (view on Google Sidewiki)

Comment on WP article on Ian's Seyyeds' 10 uranium plants

It is amazing how the world just mixes the Seyyeds with Iranians.

in reference to:

"As a reminder, these are a the IRGC who have taken the Iranian people and their resources, just like a foreign invader, as hostage. Proper intelligent legitimately elected Iranians would not act like this."
- Iran announces plans for 10 new uranium enrichment plants - washingtonpost.com (view on Google Sidewiki)

Talk the right way to the mullahs

I commented on this article.

in reference to:

"Yes the US should talk to the mad mullah, but treat them as aliens that have taken the Iranian people as hostage. The US has to tell them that the people of Iran are stronger than the IRGC and will switch everything off if they want to. This dialogue, if it were to ensue would trigger the necessary chain reaction to get rid of these monsters once and for all. Easily done, and the US will never do it, because it wants a punch bag in the area."
- Maziar Bahari - Maziar Bahari: Why the U.S. should still talk with Iran - washingtonpost.com (view on Google Sidewiki)

Stealing a Nobel Prize

The mullahs will do anything to make headlines.

in reference to:

"OSLO – Norway’s Foreign Ministry says it has lodged a formal complaint with Iran after authorities there confiscated human rights activist Shirin Ebadi’s Nobel Peace Prize medal."
- Iran seizes Nobel laureate Ebadi’s medal (view on Google Sidewiki)

The real opposition is not green.

They are not the main opposition. They are the supposed opposition they all created to divert public attention.

in reference to:

"The country's opposition is led by former premier Mir-Hossein Moussavi, former parliament speaker Mehdi Karroubi and ex-presidents Mohammad Khatami and Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani."
- Iran's supreme leader says efforts by opposition futile - Monsters and Critics (view on Google Sidewiki)

Tell this to Obama AI

It is absolutely rediculous that President Carter and now President Obama want to recognise this illegal regime in Iran. Why don't they listen to AI.

in reference to:

"“The Ayatollah’s statement seeks to criminalise legitimate peaceful dissent and dissatisfaction with the political process,” said Malcolm Smart, Director of Amnesty International's Middle East and North Africa Programme."
- Ayatollah must retract Iran election comments | Amnesty International (view on Google Sidewiki)

US companies in China need to think again

How can the US companies invest in China, when they supports dangerous countries like North Korea and the mullahs in Iran's nuke plan.

in reference to:

"''No force on earth can break the unity of the armies and peoples of the two countries, and it will last forever,'' said Liang Guanglie, who is a serving general with the People's Liberation Army, as quoted by Pyongyang's Central News Agency. General Liang said he had seen how friendly relations between the two countries were ''sealed in blood'' while he served as a Chinese soldier in the war. Last week, in Beijing, US President Obama placed great weight on persuading China to agree in principle to tough measures to isolate North Korea and Iran if they did not agree to reduce their nuclear programs."
- US rebuff as Beijing backs Pyongyang (view on Google Sidewiki)

China Sindrome

China, Iran’s second-largest crude buyer, lifted crude imports under term supply agreements from Tehran by a third in 2008 versus 2007.

http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm?aid=2572

It really sickens me, to think that if US was doing this, they would have gotten criticised to the teeth. And it is not just the support of the mad mullahs in Iran, the Chinese are behind all the trouble makers like Zimbabwe, Venezuela. You would think it would be easily solved. But it isn't. The funny part of it is that Wal-Mart's earnings came out today and they made a nice billion a month. Where do they make their stuff for the US consumer? China. Now imagine the room you are living in without anything made in China. Imagine the things you are wearing or would not be wearing, without China. Food for thought. How about a Chinese take away?

Iran's Seyyeds want to move the capital of Iran from Tehran to elsewhere by 2025.

The Seyyeds have decided to move the Capital of Iran from Teheran to somewhere else because of the danger of Earthquakes by 2025.

All of Iran is Earthquake prone. Perhaps Isfahan is least prone, and politically it could be possible that Rafsanjani wants to do this for his own sake. Having a more decentralised Iran, with the cultural, administrative, legislative, and commercial centres, in different cities, on the dutch model seems very sensible, but quite hard to do.

Legislating slower building growth and higher Earthquale standards is less costly. But then tell Rafsanjani that.

The Iran Problem with Hanson & Baer: Chapter 1 of 5 - Uncommon Knowledge on National Review Online

Go to the link below and watch how wrong these Americans are when it comes to Iran.

The Iran Problem with Hanson & Baer: Chapter 1 of 5 - Uncommon Knowledge on National Review Online

But it is our problem. We see that they do not know that ethnically Iran is not divided. Do they want Balkanize Iran? We know that the Democrats did this to Yugoslavia. They probably would want to divide the whole of the Middle into tiny manageable pieces.

Sanction China, not Iran

What can we do with the Chinese? They have the world by the ...., and nothing can be done about it. There is far too much money invested in there with all the cheap oil coming from Iran's Seyyeds. The worlds' industrial complex is there. Sanctions need to be placed on China not Iran.

Iranians should organize more

Britain sparked controversy yesterday by sending its second most senior diplomat in Tehran to the ceremony at which Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader, officially endorsed President Ahmadinejad’s hotly disputed re-election. Iran’s opposition leaders, who say the election was rigged, boycotted the event.

We Iranians have a major problem. We want other governments to sort out our problems, and then when they don't we blame them.

We are the oldest civilization on Earth and at the moment we cannot get ourselves organized, just because we blame others. The way to remove the aliens is by not working for them. It is that simple.

If enough people said that if we all united along peaceful lines, giving peace a chance to unite us all who are against them, then nothing can break our simple but very strong bond, and we can organize ourselves against them. Fact is that they are better organized than us. Simple.

Zakaria needs to learn about Iranians

It doesn't appear the three forces are all pointed against the Iranian government. Democracy is certainly working against the regime, but is religion? It's unclear. Iranians don't like theocracy, but they are religious, and clearly (President Mahmoud) Ahmadinejad got the votes of the more rural and observant masses. As for nationalism, neither side can truly claim it.

Again, like Taheri, Zakaria claims he knows about Iran, when he statements are assumptions. The people of Iran put Nowrooz above Islam, and he should know that. Finally the reason that Mr Mousavi had so many people with him, was that the nationalists came out and voted for him.

Amir Taheri of Iran does not know the word Gozineshi found in the Avesta

Taheri points out that until the end of the nineteenth century neither Farsi nor any of the other main Muslim languages had words for republic, let alone democracy.

Sometimes in life, the problems we have become so clear. The world thinks that Mr Taheri knows it all. Moreover a number of journalists, typically of Moslem origin, think they know it all. Well they are wrong. The oldest book in the world The Zend Avesta speaks of free will and choice with words like gozineshi.

Maybe that is why Iran is stuck in these doldrums. Learn about the Zoroastrian or ancient philosophy of Iran.

Iranians must unite along a non-violent approach

The video above sums up very well the scenes of the bloody struggles against the alien Seyyed regime. This is exactly what I did not want.

What we can do, is to agree along a peaceful non-violent unity. That we can all agree on. Anyone who does not agree is with them. They are violent. The Iranian Spirit will only live in a non-violent person.

Simple.

Iran on Strike - is it happening correctly?

This picture is pretty close to what I think people perception of a National Strike is in Iran. They are wrong. It is as if I am trying to squeeze an elephant, through a small door.

The Iranian mind does not want to think out of the aggressive, confrontational box. The street marches put us on the wrong tracks.

But you kids insisted, and you made heros. I hated to see all that blood. But now what? The country is besieged by the Basij. It is as if the Russian army has moved in.

A National Strike is a concept that is used in the mind first, and then made into reality. We need to describe very fully its power, and its consequences to the other side. It is designed to change the nature of the other side to think it can talk to us and negotiate along civil lines.

The only time I will know that National Strike is working, is when the other side mentions it, and asks to talk to us.

Right here would be fine. Mr Mousavi is not part of this side of the equation. He is on the other side of the equation as well.

In the mean time, my task it to educate the people who are on this side of the equation, to act accordingly as you are not. And that is why you are where you are.

We are all part of the formula.

Mapping the protests in Tehran - BBC disinformation

Protests have erupted on the streets of Tehran following the disputed presidential poll, which saw Mahmoud Ahmadinejad returned to power. With many foreign media correspondents facing restrictions on their reporting, the people of Iran have been using mobile phones to tell the world what is going on. Some of the images sent to the BBC from the people of Tehran have been plotted on this map.

If you look the map, you get the feeling that there must have been more. Hmm ... another disinformation ploy by BBC.

Who's who in BBC's Iran

"As the situation in Iran becomes increasingly volatile, we take a look at the players in Iranian society."

What the BBC really means, is that these are the people the BBC PR machine has kept in power.

They must be worried about the tweets.

Silence is Golden: Iranians defeat Seyyeds with Peace.

For so long I have said that the way to save Iran, is with silence. The silence will shatter the Seyyeds.

Western press cannot help the Seyyeds in Iran

Defying threats of arrest or worse, witnesses to protests in Iran are managing to leak reports of violence after the country's disputed presidential elections

The fact that there is so little info coming out of the IRI by IRI reporters, and other agencies that have to give a "balanced" report, means that for the first time ever, the Iranian Bloggers and Twitters are able to take charge of their destiny.

After 30 years of pain, every Iranian is an expert on politics, and are superb at communicating verbally, written and in multimedia, just like all the youth in the world. Social networking has empowered the massive 60% of Iranian population, that are very very young.

To me this is a dream come true. I remember the days when Christiane Amanpour had to seem sympathetic to AhMADinejad; not asking awkward questions, and we all would think that she would put him on the spot, and she wouldn't, because she was worried about being kicked out of Iran.

But now because the social networking site are the only source, the propaGANDa machine of IRI that worked through BBC, AP, is not effective. What IRI should do is to give the foreign press freedom to give a balanced report and make the IRI look good. How ironical is that.

Old National Anthem of Iran in Tehran Metro

At 3:15 mins into this clip, the protesters will start to sing the old national anthem of Iran, called Ey Iran.

This goes to show, that nationalists is the Spirit that drives the people of Iran.

Tell U.N. Atomic Energy Chief to not mix Iranians' nuke policy with the Seyyeds'

“It is my gut feeling that Iran would like to have the technology to enable it to have nuclear weapons,” Dr. ElBaradei, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency said in the interview at the organization’s headquarters in Vienna. ... “They want to send a message to their neighbors, to the rest of the world, ‘don’t mess with us,’” he said, urging outside powers to engage with Iran to remove the incentive for making a bomb. ... He said he believed Iran’s “ultimate aim” was to be “recognized as a major power in the Middle East.”

What do you do with ElBaradei. First of all he refers to Iran, when it is the Doomsday Khomeinists or Seyyeds, that are followers of their 12th Imam, who are hell bent in creating Armageddon, not the Iranians.

Secondly, who in Iran wants to be so powerful, to then allow the US government to reason with its people, to use US tax payer money, to build permanent bases in the area. The best solution anyone with an ounce of brain, is for Iranians, real Iranians, to come across as decent civilized people, as they were when Iran was the cross-roads of civilization.

What ElBaradei wants is to use the Seyyeds to suck the oil revenue of Iran and teach the Americans a lesson, that the fanatic Arabs like him can't. If he is saying this stuff now, imagine what he can say later when he retires.

Russia recognises Ahmadinejad as Iran president

"Russia welcomed Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to Russia on Tuesday and said the disputed election was a domestic matter. ... 'The Iranian elections are the internal affair of Iran,' Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told reporters in the Urals city of Yekaterinburg."

Well it is madness, but it is true. These Ruskies love him.

Picture: How election fraud took place in Iran

Picture to the left shows that Rezaee at 09:47 had received 633.048 votes, four hours later his voted are dropped to 587.913 !!

Why doesn't Mr Mousavi call for National Strikes against election rigging?

It is with deepest regret that we see the people of Iran act in this uncivilized way to show their resentment towards election rigging.

Mr Mousavi, if he truly cared, would announce a national strike and bring the country to a halt against the IRGC thugs.

"Violence is dead end" says Obama to the Muslims

In his speech to the Moslem world, he refers to Algebra as Islamic, when it is Iranian. He says Islam is part of USA, when the Seyyeds see US as part of Islam. He does not name the Seyyeds, but refers to their anti-Israeli, and violent views.

This indirect criticism helps the Seyyeds. He either tackles them head on, or just cites moral philosophy like so many preachers. After all what is the difference between a politician and a preacher? A time goes by, Obama sounds like a preacher, with no concrete actions. He reminds me of typical Sunday sermons.

On Iran from 34 mins. Recongises Mossadegh vs CIA. Supports human rights, but did not condemn the lack of it in Iran. Talks of concensus vs coercion. He talks about tolerance in Islam when in Iran people are being killed for reverting back to Zoroastrianism. Then he critisizes liberals picking on Women's rights, when they are stoned in Iran. No mention of any country. He just talks in broad terms, and subtley hits at Islam, when he knows that Islam is strictly intolerant to women's right to liberal thoughts.

Iran's Human Rights Agencies Suffer

Read this first.

Quite an amazing drawing by a Cancer child in Iran.

"Speak to God, and tell him I have a Problem,

Speak to The Problem, and tell him I have God."

Below, on amazing man who is trying to help the youth on Seyyeds' death row. His name is so similar to mine.

Mohamad Mostafaie doesn’t operate an NGO — he runs a private law practice, but is still facing increasing pressure from the government. The human rights lawyer represents 30 of the 135 criminals under the age of 18 on Iran’s death row.

Hitler of Iran to visit anti-racism conference

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran is the only major leader to accept an invitation to the forum, which he will address.

This man is the Hitler of Iran. His Hitler youth take instruction from the Seyyeds in Qom who think they are the chosen few to rule over the world, until their Mahdi arrives. To that end they believe that they have the moral right to exclude The Ancient Iranians whose roots stem from the Spirit of Iranians as written in The Zend-Avesta, from any election. No true Iranian participated in their theocratic democracy. We abstained en-masse very peacefully, and will continue to do so. The Zend-Avesta and The Rig-Veda preach non-violence and tolerance, and we Iranians have stood tolerant and steadfast in non-violent opposition, controlling our anger within ourselves. We wish the world recognises the Spirit of Iranians and its Free Will. Please abstain from this conference if this man or any of his ilk are there. Show respect for what we Iranians did for the world, when we in recognised the plight of the Jews, and the birth of Jesus Christ.

Barack Obama loves Iran's Seyyeds now

The US State Department says from now on it will be represented when the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany meet with Iranian officials to discuss the nuclear issue.

There is absolutely nothing new that the US and the Seyyeds can say, that they have not said to each other before hand.

The good news is that for the first time, the US can ignore its intermediaries, such as Russia and EU. Now ask yourself, what have these intermediaries done all these years. Absolutely nothing for Iran or US, but plenty for themselves to get aid, financial or otherwise, for various projects not related to Iran, that they wouldn't have, if they had not had such a "closer than US" relationship with the Seyyeds.

It seems the US is fed up, or cannot afford to pay for go betweens or power brokers. It is saying, "hey I am all for disarmament, and what have you got to say" and it is calling the Seyyeds and their web of contacts bluff.

Good. But that still brings me to the question, "what are they going to say?" I mean they deal with the North Koreans directly, and they have the bomb. Heck they deal with Pakistanis, and many of them hate the US. So what's the big deal?

The big deal is this. The people of Pakistan can trade and come and go as they like. Their government does not create barriers on their people like the Seyyeds do. There is more freedom there. But in Iran the Seyyeds are ruthless and paranoid about their power base. They are there precisely for being anti-US. Take that away, and there is no so called "moral high ground" for the Seyyeds.

That all means that the people of Iran actually have the power, as they are the people who have ignored the Seyyed so called elections en-masse, and will abstain in totality. They made sure that the Seyyeds dig themselves into their own Mahdi bunkers and pushed them all to the top, so they can be seen clearly in the public eye. No true sane Iranian, that puts Iran First holds a public office.

So think of the situation the US has. It kept the mullahs in power to justify its military in the area now that its proxy the Shahanshah is no longer there. It knows that the mullahs in Iran have no foundation, and they will be thrown out soon, as soon as a massive non-violent general strike is carried nationwide in Iran. So it has to make them look good. And that's why it is showing them respect.

How about showing the people of Iran respect instead? The US never has. It knows that the economic might of the people of Iran, as resourceful business people, with a country rich in mineral resources, slap bang in the middle of the world, with such enormous pride, will be too much for them. The US industries cannot afford to see the likes of the East Asian industries coming out of West Asia. The US industries have to keep Iranian people down, and if it is not the mullahs, then they will find some other monster.

Yah Ahura we won't let them

Giuliani should address the non-violent movement of Iran

'You have one chance to talk to the people of Iran. They are watching. You want to create a reformist element in Iran and you don't speak to that? ... This is why terrorist will say, we can take advantage of the guy.'

Here he is picking on Obama, like I did, but he could use his position to address the Seyyeds directly. Why doesn't he ask them point black, "what could you do, if the people of Iran went on a general strike?".

But that would be too easy. Fact is, that the US does not want to remove the Seyyeds. Otherwise what else would "morally justify" their gun-boat diplomacy.

Message to Hillary: It's not Iran funding terrorism, it's the Seyyeds

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters that Iran intended to “interfere with the internal affairs” in the region by funding terrorism, “whether it’s Hizbollah, Hamas or other proxies”.

She has always been fond of gun-boat diplomacy hasn't she? Why doesn't she think out of the box. Think about and address the plight of the Iranians', who are peacefully resisting this regime. Help them in their non-violent approach.

Obama was wrong on Iran's Saadi

What Saadi said was this:

The Children of Adam are limbs of each other 
Having been created of one essence. 
When the calamity of time afflicts one limb 
The other limbs cannot remain at rest. 
If thou hast no sympathy for the troubles of others 
Thou art unworthy to be called by the name of a man.

Saadi wrote this to say that when someone suffers, others feel their suffering.  The whole purpose of this poem is to talk about suffering, and the sympathy we all should have for each other, wherever we are, and from whatever origin.

That brings up the question, "Does Mr Obama realise the calamity on Iranians that have tried to celebrate Nowruz for 1400 years?".  How dare he talk to the Seyyed/Theocrats about this truely Iranian occasion, when the Seyyeds/Theocrats' sole task is to destroy what is Iranian.

Mr Obama, you should be addressing the Iranians that put Nowruz over and above everything else.  You should not be trying to cut a deal with these people who hate Iran and its culture so symbolised by Nowruz.

Iran has The Best Calendar in the World

The Ancients of Iran chose to celebrate the beginning of each season, as it related to the inteplay of light and darkness, and the position of the Earth in the larger scheme of things in the Universe. This year Spring Equinox or Nowrooz will be celebrated at exactly 11:43:39 GMT today all over the world.

Ancient dualism or what they call Mithraic is part of the precession of Equinoxes as explained in this video.

The Economist tries to reason with the illegal Seyyed/Theocrat regime in Iran

This leads to speculation that the supreme leader may yet quietly promote a rival, but less controversial, principlist figure, such as Mohamed Qalibaf, who has proved himself a skilled administrator as mayor of Tehran, rather than Mr Ahmadinejad. Some leading principlists have also proposed a coalition conservative government that would dilute Mr Ahmadinejad’s role. Such quiet manoeuvring inside the principlist camp suggests a fear that either they, too, could find themselves split, or that the reformists will, despite Mr Khatami’s absence, actually succeed in galvanising new voters.

Quite amazing that a magazine like The Economist, takes these monsters in Iran seriously, when the people of Iran don't. The Economist even speculates about outcomes.

A Seyyed/Theocrat reading such articles, thinks he is being taken seriously by the Western press. It is a sad day when the decent Iranians living abroad have to witness such errors in Western press. No wonder these illegal monsters are still in Iran.

Iran's Seyyeds'/Theocrats' man advises Obama

Brzezinski bears more responsibility for the fact that the Iranian people are subjected to — and everyone else in the world is threatened by — an authoritarian Islamist regime than any single Westerner besides, perhaps, ex-President Carter. Eleven years ago, Brzezinski revealed the gaping breach in his brain through which the mullahs poured in 1979.

I suppose he thought that a Shah Abbas type of Iran was better, with Shiite doctrines being able to fend of USSR.

Obama team is no different than Bush on Iran

'The key issue is now to find a channel to Khamenei,' said a senior Western diplomat briefed on the Obama administration's policy review in recent days. 'If the supreme leader moves, he's going to do it in a very prudent and incremental way.'

The discussions are part of a larger Iran-policy review that the Obama administration is aiming to complete this month, according to U.S. officials."

You read commentaries like this, and it makes you think, "wow, this Obama guy is really up to something good". We all like him. And I know you are thinking here comes his sentence starting with the word "But ....".

Let's look at it objectively. Fact is that the Obama team has just renewed the Clinton 1995 sanctions on Iran on Thursday. So all the hoo haa about the new guy at White House, is different from the others is wrong. Moreover he is going to go for the top Seyyed in Iran. Maybe that makes him different.

Fact is, that this non-Iranian bunch of bandits that control some of the instruments of power in Iran, are standing on shaky ground. In fact their only legitimacy is the slogan "Death to America". Take that away, and they have nothing. Obama just needs to utter the words, "non violent general strike", and the people of Iran will shut down Iran. But he does not do that. Why?

Oh actually the Seyyed/Theocrats have done something no power has ever managed to do since Cambyses II. The Arabs and Israelis and US, have now agreed to fear the Seyyeds nuclear endeavours, developed of course with stolen money of secular Iranian people, via their illegitimate representatives in their so called parliament. That Israeli, Arab and US unity, is costing innocent Iranians far too much. But the world does not want true and proper Iranians to be in charge. That would propose a formidable challenge.

World media supports Iran's Seyyeds/Theocrats

Oh it is madness.

It is the same old rubbish every day. Elbaradei this, Nuclear that, US says this, UN says that, the Chinese uming and erring, the Russians delivering missiles or not delivering missiles, and finally Israelis attack or not attack.

All of this helps the Seyyeds/Theocrats to be up there in the world news, for no reason at all. We all know that the people of Iran do not support them, and given half a chance to express their view, will let the pro-Seyyed/Theocrat world press know, that they could topple them in a general strike.

So why isn't it happening? Why is it that the people of Iran just get their act together, and start to write about a general strike. Truth is, that they have, but it does not get mass media publicity. If the mass media really wanted, it could bombard the Seyyed/Theocrats with questions about their inability to survive a general strike.


But the mass media does not do this. That is why we Iranian Bloggers are the third largest community of Bloggers in the world. No one expresses our views for us. Why you may ask? Conspiracy theorists would say, that the Seyyed/Theocrats need to be there to replace the threat of USSR.

Even now with Obama, we are told, that the US forces and all the military industries in the US, will die out, if Iran suddenly was not enemy number one. Or Pax Americana would be finished without the Seyyeds/Theocrats making ugly comments from Iran.

But still, we Iranians should be able to sort out our own mess. Why don't we? Yeah why don't we? Well look, even the TV stations that are anti-Seyyed/Theocrats, like the VOA or the new BBC Persian TV dare not mention anything to do with general strike. And the very little anti-Seyyed/Theocrat news that is mentioned, is deemed to be of Israeli origin. Or if there is an Iranian that is a true secular Iranian, he or she is labelled as pro-Israeli, or someone who believes in dictatorship.

That's how crazy it is. All the Iran loving people are excluded from the powerful world press. They can only be found in Blogs and Forums. None of the main newswires care about them. Even the newswires own Iran correspondents refuse to rise above politics, religion and commerce, and look at Iran's culture coming first. They refuse to understand that the culture of Iran is more important than politics, religion, and commerce.

Ask any Iranian what he will agree with another Iranian on, and it is on cultural matters. Things like the flag should not have changed, the national anthem should not have changed. The names of the streets should not have changed. But the world press refuses to comment on this, and does not help us regain our culture with peaceful non-violent general strikes.

Defending vs Defining Iran

Every year, we Iranians abroad, get sickened to the teeth, as we see images of the madness that overwhelmed our country in 1979. People cannot believe, how a cunning fanatic pushed on a soft nerve in the Iranian psyche, and propelled Iranians towards a fake salvation.We are given a carefully manicured list of all the things the Shahanshah of Iran did that was wrong. We are told that that was the cause for the need for change then. Like Obama's mesmerising speeches for Americans, the people of Iran then thought that money will be better distributed, and it is payback time for the super rich in Iran.I was not born in a super rich family, but even in our own family, the ones who were not there like my dad was, very close to the instruments of power, told us, "you had it real good, now it is our turn". No matter what we told them; that we should be united against this Tsunami that is about to hit us, our own cousins ignored us.So a moral high ground was lost. The very culture of being an Iranian was being threatened, and ultimately was removed from the public face. The name of Iran was changed. The flag was changed. The military who were supposed to be above politics had switched sides. The Shah had left and the Royal Institution was in disarray.Rudderless and left to float on this turbulent oceans of delusion, The Royal Institution of Iran, that for thousands and thousands of years had been the sacred cultural bastion against known external enemies, had been abandoned.I would hear from the military and all those Iran lovers "abandon ship". The captain was down with Cancer and no one knew. All the ones with vision had been mesmerised by the Seyyeds/Theocrats. We Astrologers knew what was happening, and even predicted it. All you needed to read was what Jamasp and Nostrodamus had written.But what could be done. Iran was an economic danger to the world. The military toys that the Shah had bought were too dangerous, just like they are thought to be so now for the Seyyeds/Theocrats.Iran whose main contribution to world culture was the triad method of self-righteousness for the sake of righteousness as written in the Zend-Avesta, and later Declaration of Human Rights, was being ridiculed by all the illiterate media in the world. Even professors were lauding the aliens within. No one trusted us. Most were jealous.Some of us who were sent amongst aliens from the moment we could walk, were prepared, and to this day, keep the kernel of what it meant to be Iranian. We have had to withstand the British righteousness and be better than that, by being a Righteous Iranian. We rose above anger and became refined and very much defined than those in Iran.We always wished that one day we wouldn't have to sit down and define rather than defend what it meant to be Iranian. But a lot of us Iranians still defend what it means to be Iranian, instead of defining clearly what it means to be Iranian and moving forward. We understood the dangers of pure democracy for the sake of democracy, or change for the sake of change.In these defining moments of Iranian history we are all filtering what we don't like and upon reflection, it clear that we should not have abandoned ship for the sake of democracy. We know that Iranian democracy is different from democracy for its own sake.We all now know that Iran is sacred, and it has to be above everything else. We can see, and the Seyyeds/Theocrats like so many previous aliens that have been melted by the Iranian culture slowly and subliminally, have had to use nationalistic propaganda to whip up popular support, by wasting money on capital intensive military projects.We in the non-violent movement know that resistance to weapons is futile, but our peaceful spirit grows everyday when we resist anger and not bear arms against the violent alien morality. We know that we must not stoop so low to their level. We have defined our new Iran, and clear path to change and preserve a new Iran has been set.To that end we have thousands of young hearts pumping out Blogs that are all Iranian First. The more the popular media repeats the same interpretations it has for the past thirty years, the more the people of Iran will look elsewhere for the truth.The boat's sail is new and its being driven by young Iranian hearts who are above politics, religion, and culture. The waves are calm, and the wind is in our sails. We have established our own network inside the boat non-violently.But no where do you see the old media speak of peaceful non-violent regime change through threats of general strikes. You just read about military strikes. Our war is already afoot, and the enemy is the old media that ruined Iran. Ya Ahura never again

The nuclear balance of terror of Iran, Israel and Oil

So what would it take to get the oil price up, and get the US out of the area? Remember that ever since the US encircled Iran, it prevented both the Seyyeds from attacking anyone, and prevented the Arabs or Israelis to attack Iran. That crashed the oil price.

With news like this,

Israeli officials, shaken by the size and sophistication of Hamas' rocket arsenal, fear the country's nuclear center at Dimona may be targeted, the Times of London reports.

it really doesn't take much to connect the dots.

But let's reflect a bit. When GWB decided to jump into Iraq he knew that the US would be in charge of all matters in the area. That was different to the Democrat policy of letting the Israelis dictate matters. So this is what we are entering into. An era where the Israelis run the area, and the US pulls out most of its forces. That fits with what Obama wants. But this time there are no Iraqi threats to Israel. In those days the Seyyeds were involved big time with the Hamas and Hezbollah, but the world media would dare not mention it. Heck, the PLO helped Khomeini get into power, and brought that culture to secular Iran.

Thank goodness that finally the Seyyeds' influence in the area is under spotlight. Oh the western press will make a mountain out of a mole hill, and make the Seyyeds look terrible. The Seyyeds will love it, and will even think that they are going to get blessings more than other Islamic Arab states, that have done nothing against Israel. Ironically they will make the Arabs look pro-Israeli. No Arab state will ever push a button for a Mahdi, so they don't mind the Seyyed making all that noise, and winning the propaganda war.

But let's be practical. There needs to be a practical benefit for someone, for all this to happen. As usual we need to look at the price of Oil. It really did not go up, for all the Astrological reasons I have given, even with all the hoo haa the press made about Gaza and the Seyyeds. So ultimately it looks like any threat to the Israel nuclear facility will be the most scary proposition the Oil traders can be afraid of. That would balance out the threat of any attacks to Natanz or Bushehr.

This media theatre will be played out as and when they like. I can see a couple of scary comments coming from the Israeli about the imminent threat to their nukes, and how they might make pre-emptive strikes to Iran. They will all go long Oil futures just before that comment. That would wake up the US and they would try to play Mr Nice Guy to the Seyyeds. Or it would go the other way round, and the Seyyeds would tell the US to be nice to them, or else they would take out the nuke facilities in Israel, just before they went long Oil futures. Oh the media will have a field day with all these new permutations. The Oil price will fluctuate and everyone will make loads of money. A certain degree of inflation is better than deflation.

Once all these dots are connected in your average person's mind, then there will be a balance of terror, which will keep the peace, and maybe push the price of Oil higher to an unnecessary premium; enough to pay for all those ridiculous infrastructure projects, and military expenditures in the Southern Persian Gulf States.

But don't forget, the Seyyeds could be kicked out if the media wanted to, in just one week, with a massive bombardment of propaganda about how non violent general strikes can bring the Seyyeds to their knees. But until that day, Iran's Seyyeds will try to fill the ex-USSR's role as the biggest threat to the free world.