Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Message to Hillary: It's not Iran funding terrorism, it's the Seyyeds


U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters that Iran intended to “interfere with the internal affairs” in the region by funding terrorism, “whether it’s Hizbollah, Hamas or other proxies”.
She has always been fond of gun-boat diplomacy hasn't she? Why doesn't she think out of the box. Think about and address the plight of the Iranians', who are peacefully resisting this regime. Help them in their non-violent approach.

Friday, March 20, 2009

Obama was wrong on Iran's Saadi


What Saadi said was this:

The Children of Adam are limbs of each other 
Having been created of one essence. 
When the calamity of time afflicts one limb 
The other limbs cannot remain at rest. 
If thou hast no sympathy for the troubles of others 
Thou art unworthy to be called by the name of a man.

Saadi wrote this to say that when someone suffers, others feel their suffering.  The whole purpose of this poem is to talk about suffering, and the sympathy we all should have for each other, wherever we are, and from whatever origin.

That brings up the question, "Does Mr Obama realise the calamity on Iranians that have tried to celebrate Nowruz for 1400 years?".  How dare he talk to the Seyyed/Theocrats about this truely Iranian occasion, when the Seyyeds/Theocrats' sole task is to destroy what is Iranian.

Mr Obama, you should be addressing the Iranians that put Nowruz over and above everything else.  You should not be trying to cut a deal with these people who hate Iran and its culture so symbolised by Nowruz.

Iran has The Best Calendar in the World



The Ancients of Iran chose to celebrate the beginning of each season, as it related to the inteplay of light and darkness, and the position of the Earth in the larger scheme of things in the Universe. This year Spring Equinox or Nowrooz will be celebrated at exactly 11:43:39 GMT today all over the world.

Ancient dualism or what they call Mithraic is part of the precession of Equinoxes as explained in this video.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

The Economist tries to reason with the illegal Seyyed/Theocrat regime in Iran


This leads to speculation that the supreme leader may yet quietly promote a rival, but less controversial, principlist figure, such as Mohamed Qalibaf, who has proved himself a skilled administrator as mayor of Tehran, rather than Mr Ahmadinejad. Some leading principlists have also proposed a coalition conservative government that would dilute Mr Ahmadinejad’s role. Such quiet manoeuvring inside the principlist camp suggests a fear that either they, too, could find themselves split, or that the reformists will, despite Mr Khatami’s absence, actually succeed in galvanising new voters.
Quite amazing that a magazine like The Economist, takes these monsters in Iran seriously, when the people of Iran don't. The Economist even speculates about outcomes.

A Seyyed/Theocrat reading such articles, thinks he is being taken seriously by the Western press. It is a sad day when the decent Iranians living abroad have to witness such errors in Western press. No wonder these illegal monsters are still in Iran.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Iran's Seyyeds'/Theocrats' man advises Obama

Brzezinski bears more responsibility for the fact that the Iranian people are subjected to — and everyone else in the world is threatened by — an authoritarian Islamist regime than any single Westerner besides, perhaps, ex-President Carter. Eleven years ago, Brzezinski revealed the gaping breach in his brain through which the mullahs poured in 1979.
I suppose he thought that a Shah Abbas type of Iran was better, with Shiite doctrines being able to fend of USSR.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Obama team is no different than Bush on Iran

'The key issue is now to find a channel to Khamenei,' said a senior Western diplomat briefed on the Obama administration's policy review in recent days. 'If the supreme leader moves, he's going to do it in a very prudent and incremental way.'

The discussions are part of a larger Iran-policy review that the Obama administration is aiming to complete this month, according to U.S. officials."
You read commentaries like this, and it makes you think, "wow, this Obama guy is really up to something good". We all like him. And I know you are thinking here comes his sentence starting with the word "But ....".

Let's look at it objectively. Fact is that the Obama team has just renewed the Clinton 1995 sanctions on Iran on Thursday. So all the hoo haa about the new guy at White House, is different from the others is wrong. Moreover he is going to go for the top Seyyed in Iran. Maybe that makes him different.

Fact is, that this non-Iranian bunch of bandits that control some of the instruments of power in Iran, are standing on shaky ground. In fact their only legitimacy is the slogan "Death to America". Take that away, and they have nothing. Obama just needs to utter the words, "non violent general strike", and the people of Iran will shut down Iran. But he does not do that. Why?

Oh actually the Seyyed/Theocrats have done something no power has ever managed to do since Cambyses II. The Arabs and Israelis and US, have now agreed to fear the Seyyeds nuclear endeavours, developed of course with stolen money of secular Iranian people, via their illegitimate representatives in their so called parliament. That Israeli, Arab and US unity, is costing innocent Iranians far too much. But the world does not want true and proper Iranians to be in charge. That would propose a formidable challenge.