Iran now is not the same as that of 1979 and would not support the Seyyeds if attacked

Many Iranians think that Iran now is the same as the Iran of 1979. They think that the Seyyeds can bring on the nationalism of Iran, and stay in power. Just read this pathetic dialogue, that everyone is huffing and puffing about.

At a farewell reception at Blair House for the retiring chief of protocol, Don Ensenat, who was President Bush's Yale roommate, the president shook hands with Washington Life Magazine's Soroush Shehabi. "I'm the grandson of one of the late Shah's ministers," said Soroush, "and I simply want to say one U.S. bomb on Iran and the regime we all despise will remain in power for another 20 or 30 years and 70 million Iranians will become radicalized."

"I know," President Bush answered.

"But does Vice President Cheney know?" asked Soroush.

President Bush chuckled and walked away.

What Shehabi does not realise, is that first of all the Seyyeds know jolly well that the people of Iran do not associate them as Iranians. Secondly that any call for arms is just a political ploy to keep themselves in power. The Seyyeds do not have the hearts and minds of the Iranian people. If anything any call for war will cause major peace marches in Iran, which will be a precursor to massive uprising against the Seyyeds. It is then to their benefit to come to a settlement with US and UN and their Oil trading partners.

Incentives apply to human beings not Islamist Fascists in Iran

It is quite remarkable to see a Nobel Prize winner, ElBaradei, apply secular logic to Islamist Fascists in Iran. He states:

"The same applies to the situation in Iran," he said. "You can use sanctions but sanctions alone as we know by experience will not resolve issues. You need to use incentives and disincentives."

The folks who live in Qom and face Mecca, pay no attention to anyone else. As such, the people of Iran are solely responsible for their disposal; in a clean peaceful non violent manner; leaving no excuse for retaliation against future generations of Iranians. Once a higher global body, such as the UN, officially recognises the struggle of the secular Iranians, against Islamist angry attitude to the world, then the IAEA will realise not to take the Islamist Fascists in Iran seriously.

It would be nice of course if Mr ElBaradei did this attitude now, but he has a bone of contention with the all nuclear powers; and wants to use the Islamists in Iran's nuclear ambitions, as a threatening tool against the old nuclear powers. But why should the people of Iran suffer, and become guinea pigs for a much larger world problem. Mr ElBaradei must realise, that to give so much respect to Islamist Fascists in Iran, makes them feel as if they have legitimate rule in Iran.

Mr ElBaradei, the people of Iran will take note of your appeasement attitude towards the Islamist Fascists, as and when the Islamist Fascists of Iran, and brought against the a new Iranian court, just like Saddam Hossein is being tried in Iraq today by his own people. The people of Iran are the sons of Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great. We are the founders of Human Rights, and know very well how aggression cannot be overcome with more aggression.

Mr ElBaradei, you have been given the authority to judge the Islamist Fascists in Iran, and you attract a lot of attention and revel in it. You enjoy dragging the issue as long as you can, because when diplomacy ends war begins. But you are not helping the Iranian people, by discussing these issue solely with the Islamist Fascists in Iran. There are plenty of Iranians, both in Iran and outside Iran, who are better qualified to discuss, and represent the feeling of Iranian people all over the world.

We Iranians in opposition are more capable, and more intelligent than the Islamist Fascists in Iran. We therefore ask you in the name of Peace, not to deal with the Islamist Fascists seriously. When you speak to the Islamist Fascists in Iran, tell them that you know that the people of Iran, do not want Iran to be put in harms way. Cite example of other countries that threatened world peace and how world wars began.

You are an important person, and must represent the secular views of all Human Beings, especially those that live in Iran. Please do the right thing, and speak to the Islamist Fascists in Iran, as if you were a secular peace loving Iranian, and did not want the oil money to be used to make dangerous weapons of mass destruction.

The main reason why Russia pretends to support the Islamist Fascists in Iran

For so long the world press, has been suckered into believing that Russia and China have a "moral" obligation to be anti-US, and by deduction pro Islamist Fascist in Iran.

Some analysts have said that a deal on the WTO could persuade Moscow to soften its opposition to punishing Iran for refusing to halt sensitive uranium enrichment.

Of course this is not the case. Once the Western countries, formally approve their membership, then the Islamist Fascists are on their own, and irrelevant.

No one won in Lebanon

It is so funny, you read the Islamist press in Iran, and they go on about how their Hezbollah friends won the war in Lebanon. And then you read the Israeli press, and you hear the same thing.

Ironically, the opportunity stems from the defeat that all camps suffered this summer: In the end nobody won anything.

I think as Zedillo says, neither won.

US picking a fight with Islamists in Iran whilst looking for mines in the Persian Gulf

The situation in the Persian Gulf is heating up.

We have now learned that U.S. minesweepers have been ordered to follow the U.S.S. Eisenhower. This is an even more ominous signal of preparation for military action, since such ships would not normally accompany a strike force on routine deployments.

And still the Iranian opposition does not care about how the Islamists will use this scenario to keep themselves in power. The US will not talk to the Iranian opposition and will instead deal with a force it can fight with, not a force that does not want to fight, but wants to write about what is right for Iran.