One Islamist versus another in Iran

Nearly everyday one hears one character say one thing, and the next day, the die-hard bigoted Ahmadinejad, say something else. Here is a clear example:

Teheran considers a proposal to enrich uranium for Iranian use on Russian soil ‘attractive,’ Iranian Ambassador to Russia Gholamreza Ansari said Wednesday, the news agency Interfax reported.

The guys in the Foreign Ministry were swiftly changed when Ahmadinejad took over. This fella be might up for the chop soon. I bet anyone, that we will soon get an announcement from Ahmadinejad, that they will not agree to any enrichment outside Iran, and moreover, they will want to proliferate it.

Russia change in tune against the Islamist Fascists in Iran

Yup just as I said before, the Russians have suddenly changed their view on the Islamist Fascists in Iran. And it is interesting to see how the Indian press is one of the first to report this change in attitude.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov today expressed Moscow's "alarm" at Iran's plans to expand nuclear research and its refusal to accept proposals tabled by five permanent UNSC members and Germany to restart dialogue.

"We are alarmed, of course, by Iran's refusal to accept the sextet's proposals, which aim to create conditions for restarting the talks," Lavrov said in an interview published by the government-run Rossiiskaya Gazeta daily.

The Indians and their friends in the Non Aligned Movement (NAM) have always supported the Islamist Fascists in Iran. But they are more anti-US than the Russians, especially with the Communists Party in India being so big. I have always been very wary of the Indians, ever since the early days of the Islamist Inquisition of Iran in 1979, when I found out that Ayatollah Khomeini was educated at Lucknow. The Islamists there are very die hard, and recently were the first to criticize the new Pope. So the root of the problem is in Lucknow.

Russians turning against the Islamist Fascists in Iran

Is it really that much of a surprise to see the Russians change their tune?

"We want all 'blank spots' the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] has uncovered in Iran's program to be cleared up," Sergei Lavrov said. "The questions Iran has to answer are well known. Unfortunately, Iran has delayed its answers."

That membership of WTO really did change their minds, and get them to criticize the Islamist Fascists. It is obvious that the Chinese also want something in return for turning against the nuke mad mullahs.

Iranians must 'elect' Mesbah Yazdi

It is important that the phoney elections in Iran elect Mesbah Yazdi. There is no way that these Islamist Fascists, will ever go without killing a lot of Iranians, and burying Iranians in an unending endless spiral of violence.

To quote Steven Weinberg:

With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

By electing Mesbah Yazdi at least, we will have him in the open; directly visible, accountable to the secular people of Iran, and ultimately easily ignored by all the people of Iran once and for all.

Learn about all Iranians Mr Blair

It used to be just Donald Rumsfeld. But now ironically, after DR has gone, Tony Blair is harping about the Islamist Fascists. Never before have we had him, so clearly come out in the open and say:

"But at the moment - and this is particularly so in respect of what Iran is doing in supporting terrorism throughout the Middle East and acting in breach of its nuclear weapons obligations - you are behaving in such a way that makes such a partnership impossible."

But there is no referrence in his comments, about intelligent Iranians both inside Iran, or outside Iran, who want modern peaceful regime change?

If you had kept your big mouth shut

One really does feel very sorry for this idiot pretending to run Iran. At first one thought, "well he has a PHD", maybe, just maybe he has more sense than the old folk in Qom. After all one cannot blame the old folk saying their old songs over and over again. For years the world just put up with it. But last year everyone thought, "hey this kid, seems to have a lot of energy, has a modern education, maybe, just maybe, he is going to bring a breath of fresh air. But this is what we hear:

"It is most embarrassing that the U.N Security Council, which should be the defender of nations' security and rights, threatens countries pursuing nuclear fuel under the law to provide fuel for peaceful purposes," Ahmadinejad said.

And that just about sums it up for me. He refuses to accept the world order. Why? Because he has his own utopia that he thinks is over and above UN. The Russians have tried and tried to educate him, but as I said earlier, they are using him for getting into WTO. So this new kid on the block is crying out loud like a cry baby. That has moved Iran closer and closer into a pariah state, which does not help him at all. He is cornered and all he can do is moan and groan and shout out loud, whilst we all laugh at him.

The main reason why Russia pretends to support the Islamist Fascists in Iran

For so long the world press, has been suckered into believing that Russia and China have a "moral" obligation to be anti-US, and by deduction pro Islamist Fascist in Iran.

Some analysts have said that a deal on the WTO could persuade Moscow to soften its opposition to punishing Iran for refusing to halt sensitive uranium enrichment.

Of course this is not the case. Once the Western countries, formally approve their membership, then the Islamist Fascists are on their own, and irrelevant.

Iranians must ignore US elections

With most of the vote in, it seems that with the conservative Democrats taking charge of the House, ironically GWB will actually have agreement in certain areas like Immigration. The only real challenge to GWB will be San Fransiconian politics of Liberal Democrat Nancy Pelosi. Iranians will need her help to fight for women's rights in Iran. As the most Liberal Democrat she will have to keep the sanity of United States in the challenging times ahead. Go Nancy hit GWB hard! But alas, and ironically she has the most conservative bunch of Democrats she has had to deal with.

So Centre Politics is King, and the moderates are now in charge. Extremism is off the table, unless it is provoked by some incident like 9/11. And we don't really know what the oil companies and the military machine will cook up for the US. You all know the conspiracy theories; from US sinking their own ships to whateva, blaming it on Islamists etc etc, because the Islamists could not do it anyway. But with the US military machine facing cut backs and some Democrats talking about impeaching GWB, these theories can become reality.

And so I say, we Iranians have to ignore the Americans. We are a nation of our own, and we need to not get caught up, in the what if's. Remember how Iranians got suckered by the Republicans, thinking that they would have the US engage the Islamists very soon. And what happened? Nothing. Every day Iranians outside Iran get up and wish, "oh let's hope that the Russians or Chinese side with the EU and US, and everyone bashes the mad mullah in the head, and kicks them out." This is the classical posh Iranians' living abroad mentality. And because of that, the antithesis it produces, is the no frills Islamist Iranians in Iran, who fell for Ahmadinejad. So at one extreme you have the modern Iranians like the Crown Prince, and at the other end Mesbah Yazdi. But they both react to US politics. None try to motivate the silent majority of Iranians. And the key word is motivate. The Crown Prince has a duty to run the Royal Institution, but he is not doing anything in a focused practical way. The Iranian Opposition has not come together in a coordinated way as I have stated.

What have I stated? And is it new? Nothing is new in this game. Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great said it thousands and thousands of years ago. And do any of the so called "Leaders of Iran" say anything along the line of non violent regime change everyday? Not one of them does. How many articles have we Iranians written about non violent regime change? I have, but who else? Shame on all editors and all the Iranian Bloggers and anyone who is interested in the future of Iran if they do not talk about peaceful regime change. More people are interested in how Iran does in global politics, than taking direct action towards non violent regime change by themselves.

So I say to the people of Iran, especially those rich Iranians in sunny California. For the sake of Iran think about what I have said. Talk to all your relatives and friends about non violent regime change. Forget about what US politics is. We Iranians must handle our own affairs ourselves in our own civilized way. Take your first action. Argue about the how we are going to change Iran so that our children can live with the Islamists' children. Yes as Gandhi and all passive movement people have said, we have to win the peace. So start with a discussion about peace. Engage a conversation about how weak the Islamists are if the people of Iran go on a General Strike.

If you are an editor of an Iranian newspaper, I hope you really not sleep tonight if you do not think about how many people have not learnt from you, the benefits of General Strike and non violent regime change. The people of Iran must write as many articles about national peace for Iran. Iranian Love is stronger than Islam. Our culture is deeper than any other principle, and we can use it to show how civilized we really are. We have our own poets and philosophers, that bind us in our Iranian way. It is with these ideas that we can bind the people and show that we can resist working for the alien Islamist slave drivers, and be able to not feel guilty when we remove them in a civilized way without any harm to them.

Iranians participate more in a theocratic democracy than the US does in a secular democracy

It is quite remarkable to read, that compared to a theocratic democracy of the Islamists in Iran, the US people do not participate a lot.

Compare U.S. voting with foreign voting and it's not a pretty sight. Americans are less apt to vote than are people in other old democracies, in new ones, in dangerous places, dirt poor ones, freezing cold ones, stinking hot ones and highly dysfunctional ones.

Even that theocratic "axis of evil," Iran, has bragging rights over the United States in this regard. So does chaotic Iraq, where an estimated 70 percent of voters cast ballots in December parliamentary elections.

Maybe someone should tell Calvin Woodward of AP, that in Iran it was just a novelty, and in the US the novelty wore off a long long time ago.

Calling the Russian and Chinese bluff on Iran's Islamist Fascists

I ask the Chinese and Russians, why don't you write a draft resolution for sanctions against the Islamist Fascists in Iran.

Wang said the question is "what is the best way out."

"We want to have a solution of the Iranian nuclear issue, whether sanctions is the right way or whether further negotiation," he said.

That is the only way to stop these two countries from playing for time. It is time to call their bluff.