Only a handful of voters showed up at many polling stations today in Tehran in Iran’s parliament elections, a sign of frustration with a vote that hard-liners allied with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are expected to dominate.
http://www.columbiatribune.com/2008/Mar/20080314News017.asp
That is music to my ears. One small step towards a civilized regime change in Iran. May this be a warning to the Seyyeds of the might and power of the Iranians' apathy towards the Seyyeds. We will remove you from power in a civil way, such that it will be an example of the glory of 7000 years of Iran. Our Iranian Spirit is peaceful and much much more powerful than anything else.
Showing posts with label seyyed elections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label seyyed elections. Show all posts
Friday, March 14, 2008
Sunday, January 20, 2008
Seyyeds buying votes and cooperation from Iranians
Can the Iranian nation be bribed?
We all know how inefficient government and quasi-government organizations are in the best democracies. Countless books have been written comparing government services with private enterprises.
The religious domains that the Seyyeds have created, and use to channel funds to the poor, remains highly suspect. Dare one criticize a religious domain, or point the finger of suspicion to it? Will the poor and depraved have benefited from these handouts, when the inflation in Iran is so rampant.
Are Iranians truly going to get "ripped off" even more and do nothing, or have they been enlightened by the greater secular force, and will not vote. Can the Iranian nation discuss mass boycott and non cooperation via blogs? Can a public debate occur where the strength on nil participation be discussed? The Seyyeds know that if a public debate does arise, they will be out. Will the world have this debate?
Or will GWB say something to piss the people of Iran off, and make them vote, just to prove him wrong? It is funny how GWB can actually help the Seyyeds stay in power if he says the wrong things. Why don't the vociferous left wing that brought the Seyyeds to power, and hate GWB, not talk about the non violent regime change that can be made in Iran, via the media.
Why doesn't the world media make it, its responsibility to question the power of the Seyyeds against a mass boycott of all Iranians, and non cooperation in all areas of the Iranian economy that serve the Seyyeds. Why don't the left wing of the world not use Iran as a tool to critisize the US. Why doesn't the world media not show the Iranian people how easy it is to topple the Seyyeds by just talking about it in public.
Think of the lead article in the London Times, or the New York Times, addressing the people of Iran, and presenting a non violent solution to regime change in Iran. What is wrong with that? All it would do is to force the Seyyeds' own newspapers and government spokesmen to react. And their reaction against a mass general strike, where people do not leave their homes is hopeless. The Seyyeds cannot drag 70 millions out of their homes to keep the economy running.
Fact is that the world media does not want to remove the Seyyeds. Fact is that the US and China do not want to remove the Seyyeds. The people of Iran in the satellite TVs do not even talk along these lines. Why doesn't VOA bring this topic up?
It seems I am the only one. Nuts.
We all know how inefficient government and quasi-government organizations are in the best democracies. Countless books have been written comparing government services with private enterprises.
The religious domains that the Seyyeds have created, and use to channel funds to the poor, remains highly suspect. Dare one criticize a religious domain, or point the finger of suspicion to it? Will the poor and depraved have benefited from these handouts, when the inflation in Iran is so rampant.
Are Iranians truly going to get "ripped off" even more and do nothing, or have they been enlightened by the greater secular force, and will not vote. Can the Iranian nation discuss mass boycott and non cooperation via blogs? Can a public debate occur where the strength on nil participation be discussed? The Seyyeds know that if a public debate does arise, they will be out. Will the world have this debate?
Or will GWB say something to piss the people of Iran off, and make them vote, just to prove him wrong? It is funny how GWB can actually help the Seyyeds stay in power if he says the wrong things. Why don't the vociferous left wing that brought the Seyyeds to power, and hate GWB, not talk about the non violent regime change that can be made in Iran, via the media.
Why doesn't the world media make it, its responsibility to question the power of the Seyyeds against a mass boycott of all Iranians, and non cooperation in all areas of the Iranian economy that serve the Seyyeds. Why don't the left wing of the world not use Iran as a tool to critisize the US. Why doesn't the world media not show the Iranian people how easy it is to topple the Seyyeds by just talking about it in public.
Think of the lead article in the London Times, or the New York Times, addressing the people of Iran, and presenting a non violent solution to regime change in Iran. What is wrong with that? All it would do is to force the Seyyeds' own newspapers and government spokesmen to react. And their reaction against a mass general strike, where people do not leave their homes is hopeless. The Seyyeds cannot drag 70 millions out of their homes to keep the economy running.
Fact is that the world media does not want to remove the Seyyeds. Fact is that the US and China do not want to remove the Seyyeds. The people of Iran in the satellite TVs do not even talk along these lines. Why doesn't VOA bring this topic up?
It seems I am the only one. Nuts.
Sunday, November 04, 2007
Obama, go and see the Ayatollahs now
Clinton last summer condemned Obama for declaring that, as president, he would personally negotiate with Iranian leaders without preconditions. But in October, she said that, if elected, she would direct her subordinates to begin unconditional negotiations. The difference, Clinton argued, is that she would withhold the prestige of a presidential-level meeting until progress warranted it.Brownstein: The great Iran divide - National Journal - MSNBC.com
Why doesn't Mr Obama go right now to Qom, and see Mesbah Yazdi face to face, and then Khamenei, and then AhMADinejad, with the certainty that he will come back as a hero, and be elected with a huge majority?
For crying out loud, how many times have we had the US elections, and the Seyyed elections, use each other to get the people scared, and come out to vote for the war lobby, and the peak oil advocates? Can the people of United States and Iran see through this? Yes of course they can. But can the press and its commentators realise this.
Fact is, that if the people of Iran, were given the dignity and respect, and were told that they can get rid of the Seyyeds with just talking about a national strike, instead of a US strike, then maybe things will change in Iran more peacefully. But nobody wants that boring solution do they.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)