UN voted 15-0 to approve treaty against Islamist Fascists in Iran

UK's, Parry was right when he said:

"I expect the resolution to be adopted in the next hour," Ambassador Emyr Jones Parry told reporters.

Now the world has to comply to the list of sanctions. The Islamist Fascists were hoping to divide the world, and they have clearly failed.

Iranians did not vote, and won.

Perhaps one of the most embarrassing situations we Iranians abroad have is to witness modern educated Iranian reporters not reporting the whole truth.

One such person is Ali Akbar Dareini of AP. He very cunningly omits certain news. For example if you read his latest report, you get the feeling that, democracy took place in Iran, and then Ahmadinejad lost.

Fact is that the people of Iran did not vote. A look at the the following report from IRNA, the government news agency, gives the figures for the top five winners.

The election headquarters of the Interior Ministry here Wednesday released the result of its latest vote count for the Tehran City Council election as follows:

1- Mehdi Chamran: 413,216
2- Morteza Talaie: 374,161
3- Rasoul Khadem: 291,071
4- Hadi Sa'ie: 279,075
5- Abbas Sheibani: 268,552

And at the bottom of the report, it states very clearly states:

In this latest count, 1,254,608 votes were counted from 2.2 million ballots cast.

There are 15 million people in Teheran. We also know that there are 6 million members of the Basij, or the Islamist vigilantes (rather like the Hitler Youth). So what happened to them? It seems that no one really participated.

So why is it that reporters like Dareini do not highlight this? Why is it that the whole world is not made aware that the people of Iran were the real winners? They gave a resounding "No" to the bogus election by boycotting the elections. But do we have one report in AP or Reuters, or the liberal minded BBC? Of course not.

The situation in Iran is now in the hands of the Iranian people. They are in charge. For too long we have waited for the world to get its act together and condemn the Islamist Fascists. Nothing of the sort is happening. The major news agencies are not interested. Conspiracy theorists can say what they like; everything from Islamist Fascists filling PR agencies with money to all sorts of other ideas.

But it does not matter. The good news is that the Iranian people are the winners, and the tin pot rulers are standing on very very shaky ground - and they know it.

UN Bans Death Penalty

One hundred and four countries voted in favour of the draft resolution, 54 states voted against and 29 abstained.

http://southasia.oneworld.net/article/view/156273/1/1893

One day I hope that we do not have the death penalty in Iran. I hope the UN bans the Seyyed government. That would be another non violent way of removing this regime. The people of Iran are held at gun point inhumanely. Nothing is sacred enough to kill people for. Life takes care of life. Love and understanding for the sake of righteousness is what is needed. Righteousness for the sake of Righteousness, as stated in the Zend Avesta is what is needed. We Iranians said this thousands of years before everyone else.

No Hijab = death, where are you UN?

"I do not understand how these women who do not respect the hijab, 28 years after the birth of the Islamic Republic, are still alive," he said.

"These women and their husbands and their fathers must die," said Hassani, who is the representative of the Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei in eastern Azerbaijan.

http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Religion/?id=1.0.1687095144

How ironical, that a day after the UN votes to ban capital punishment, we get this Seyyed mouthing death. What is it about morality, that in its most potent form, it advocates the most uncivilized solutions. Surely the instrument of law should as honourable as the moral code it is advocating. Maybe sometimes there are perverts around, but to call all Iranian men, or other men, perverts, and then cover yourself up, is a false accusation. A women who refuses to shake my hand, or looks at me through a hole in the chador is insulting me, before she knows anything about me in the first place. Of course we all know that this is just crazy dogma at its best. But would that Seyyed really shoot some girl in a mini skirt if she walked passed him? Yes he would, and this same buffoon, would not hesitate to press the nuclear button, if he knew it was being fired at Israel. Does the UN Assembly care that they have such thinkers in their midst, illegally representing the oldest civilization in the world? And does the world media, whose job it is to point out these things, and make the world aware, do its bit? Well it is getting better, is the answer. It is not enough, but at least these monsters are making some "news" to some. You won't see this in the bulletins of corporations or national press of those doing business with the Seyyeds. If this news made front page all over the world, then something would be done about the fate of women in Iran. Ya Ahuramazda, we will be peaceful within, and continue with non violent conscious objection.

How to definitely win an election in Iran - again

Well am I really surprised to see the Ahmadinejad camp be at it again? Of course not.

Ahmadinejad took fright from initial reports that the Reform-Seekers camp headed by Tehran mayor (and former RG officer) Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf were pulling ahead of his own candidates. When this trend showed in the early returns from a small number of provincial towns, our Tehran sources report, Ahmadinejad tried approaching the supreme ruler for a directive to “adjust” the ballot count and switch votes to his supporters.

So of course folks, we can guess who, or should I say what, these bogus elections will produce as the "winner". And the people of Iran will just laugh it off as some sort of a joke, just like the people of Iraq thought that Saddam's election was a joke.

Iranian students disrupt Pres. Ahmadinejad's speech, burning his picture

I am just a bit curious. Could this be a set up? I mean, these guys could just be actors. Usually this sort of action never gets going, and the protesters are arrested. Could this be the Islamist Fascists' fake way of showing tolerance? I hate to say this, but only if they are arrested will it be regarded as genuine.

Now if these students, do not meet any angry Islamist Fascists, then the movement will grow. But the Islamist Fascists have 6 million chomagdars; all very eager to bash secular Iranians on the head. I do not want to see people get hurt. Bravery is not required.

Withstanding the Islamists' hate, and rising above it, is important. The Islamist Fascists are driven by anger and hate, and they do not tolerate. So the best way to fight them, is to do as I said. Talk about the failure of the Islamist Fascists, to answer a total National Strike, in what I call a Non Violent National Strike (NVNS).

Once the people talk about NVNS, and the whole country speaks this Good Thought, then we get to Good Words. Once Good Words dominate, then Good Deeds will paralyse them, without one drop of blood on the sacred soil of Iran.

We need to talk and teach the whole of Iran to believe in NVNS.

Incentives apply to human beings not Islamist Fascists in Iran

It is quite remarkable to see a Nobel Prize winner, ElBaradei, apply secular logic to Islamist Fascists in Iran. He states:

"The same applies to the situation in Iran," he said. "You can use sanctions but sanctions alone as we know by experience will not resolve issues. You need to use incentives and disincentives."

The folks who live in Qom and face Mecca, pay no attention to anyone else. As such, the people of Iran are solely responsible for their disposal; in a clean peaceful non violent manner; leaving no excuse for retaliation against future generations of Iranians. Once a higher global body, such as the UN, officially recognises the struggle of the secular Iranians, against Islamist angry attitude to the world, then the IAEA will realise not to take the Islamist Fascists in Iran seriously.

It would be nice of course if Mr ElBaradei did this attitude now, but he has a bone of contention with the all nuclear powers; and wants to use the Islamists in Iran's nuclear ambitions, as a threatening tool against the old nuclear powers. But why should the people of Iran suffer, and become guinea pigs for a much larger world problem. Mr ElBaradei must realise, that to give so much respect to Islamist Fascists in Iran, makes them feel as if they have legitimate rule in Iran.

Mr ElBaradei, the people of Iran will take note of your appeasement attitude towards the Islamist Fascists, as and when the Islamist Fascists of Iran, and brought against the a new Iranian court, just like Saddam Hossein is being tried in Iraq today by his own people. The people of Iran are the sons of Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great. We are the founders of Human Rights, and know very well how aggression cannot be overcome with more aggression.

Mr ElBaradei, you have been given the authority to judge the Islamist Fascists in Iran, and you attract a lot of attention and revel in it. You enjoy dragging the issue as long as you can, because when diplomacy ends war begins. But you are not helping the Iranian people, by discussing these issue solely with the Islamist Fascists in Iran. There are plenty of Iranians, both in Iran and outside Iran, who are better qualified to discuss, and represent the feeling of Iranian people all over the world.

We Iranians in opposition are more capable, and more intelligent than the Islamist Fascists in Iran. We therefore ask you in the name of Peace, not to deal with the Islamist Fascists seriously. When you speak to the Islamist Fascists in Iran, tell them that you know that the people of Iran, do not want Iran to be put in harms way. Cite example of other countries that threatened world peace and how world wars began.

You are an important person, and must represent the secular views of all Human Beings, especially those that live in Iran. Please do the right thing, and speak to the Islamist Fascists in Iran, as if you were a secular peace loving Iranian, and did not want the oil money to be used to make dangerous weapons of mass destruction.