UN voted 15-0 to approve treaty against Islamist Fascists in Iran

UK's, Parry was right when he said:

"I expect the resolution to be adopted in the next hour," Ambassador Emyr Jones Parry told reporters.

Now the world has to comply to the list of sanctions. The Islamist Fascists were hoping to divide the world, and they have clearly failed.

Iranians did not vote, and won.

Perhaps one of the most embarrassing situations we Iranians abroad have is to witness modern educated Iranian reporters not reporting the whole truth.

One such person is Ali Akbar Dareini of AP. He very cunningly omits certain news. For example if you read his latest report, you get the feeling that, democracy took place in Iran, and then Ahmadinejad lost.

Fact is that the people of Iran did not vote. A look at the the following report from IRNA, the government news agency, gives the figures for the top five winners.

The election headquarters of the Interior Ministry here Wednesday released the result of its latest vote count for the Tehran City Council election as follows:

1- Mehdi Chamran: 413,216
2- Morteza Talaie: 374,161
3- Rasoul Khadem: 291,071
4- Hadi Sa'ie: 279,075
5- Abbas Sheibani: 268,552

And at the bottom of the report, it states very clearly states:

In this latest count, 1,254,608 votes were counted from 2.2 million ballots cast.

There are 15 million people in Teheran. We also know that there are 6 million members of the Basij, or the Islamist vigilantes (rather like the Hitler Youth). So what happened to them? It seems that no one really participated.

So why is it that reporters like Dareini do not highlight this? Why is it that the whole world is not made aware that the people of Iran were the real winners? They gave a resounding "No" to the bogus election by boycotting the elections. But do we have one report in AP or Reuters, or the liberal minded BBC? Of course not.

The situation in Iran is now in the hands of the Iranian people. They are in charge. For too long we have waited for the world to get its act together and condemn the Islamist Fascists. Nothing of the sort is happening. The major news agencies are not interested. Conspiracy theorists can say what they like; everything from Islamist Fascists filling PR agencies with money to all sorts of other ideas.

But it does not matter. The good news is that the Iranian people are the winners, and the tin pot rulers are standing on very very shaky ground - and they know it.

UN Bans Death Penalty

One hundred and four countries voted in favour of the draft resolution, 54 states voted against and 29 abstained.

http://southasia.oneworld.net/article/view/156273/1/1893

One day I hope that we do not have the death penalty in Iran. I hope the UN bans the Seyyed government. That would be another non violent way of removing this regime. The people of Iran are held at gun point inhumanely. Nothing is sacred enough to kill people for. Life takes care of life. Love and understanding for the sake of righteousness is what is needed. Righteousness for the sake of Righteousness, as stated in the Zend Avesta is what is needed. We Iranians said this thousands of years before everyone else.

No Hijab = death, where are you UN?

"I do not understand how these women who do not respect the hijab, 28 years after the birth of the Islamic Republic, are still alive," he said.

"These women and their husbands and their fathers must die," said Hassani, who is the representative of the Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei in eastern Azerbaijan.

http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Religion/?id=1.0.1687095144

How ironical, that a day after the UN votes to ban capital punishment, we get this Seyyed mouthing death. What is it about morality, that in its most potent form, it advocates the most uncivilized solutions. Surely the instrument of law should as honourable as the moral code it is advocating. Maybe sometimes there are perverts around, but to call all Iranian men, or other men, perverts, and then cover yourself up, is a false accusation. A women who refuses to shake my hand, or looks at me through a hole in the chador is insulting me, before she knows anything about me in the first place. Of course we all know that this is just crazy dogma at its best. But would that Seyyed really shoot some girl in a mini skirt if she walked passed him? Yes he would, and this same buffoon, would not hesitate to press the nuclear button, if he knew it was being fired at Israel. Does the UN Assembly care that they have such thinkers in their midst, illegally representing the oldest civilization in the world? And does the world media, whose job it is to point out these things, and make the world aware, do its bit? Well it is getting better, is the answer. It is not enough, but at least these monsters are making some "news" to some. You won't see this in the bulletins of corporations or national press of those doing business with the Seyyeds. If this news made front page all over the world, then something would be done about the fate of women in Iran. Ya Ahuramazda, we will be peaceful within, and continue with non violent conscious objection.

How to definitely win an election in Iran - again

Well am I really surprised to see the Ahmadinejad camp be at it again? Of course not.

Ahmadinejad took fright from initial reports that the Reform-Seekers camp headed by Tehran mayor (and former RG officer) Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf were pulling ahead of his own candidates. When this trend showed in the early returns from a small number of provincial towns, our Tehran sources report, Ahmadinejad tried approaching the supreme ruler for a directive to “adjust” the ballot count and switch votes to his supporters.

So of course folks, we can guess who, or should I say what, these bogus elections will produce as the "winner". And the people of Iran will just laugh it off as some sort of a joke, just like the people of Iraq thought that Saddam's election was a joke.

Iranian students disrupt Pres. Ahmadinejad's speech, burning his picture

I am just a bit curious. Could this be a set up? I mean, these guys could just be actors. Usually this sort of action never gets going, and the protesters are arrested. Could this be the Islamist Fascists' fake way of showing tolerance? I hate to say this, but only if they are arrested will it be regarded as genuine.

Now if these students, do not meet any angry Islamist Fascists, then the movement will grow. But the Islamist Fascists have 6 million chomagdars; all very eager to bash secular Iranians on the head. I do not want to see people get hurt. Bravery is not required.

Withstanding the Islamists' hate, and rising above it, is important. The Islamist Fascists are driven by anger and hate, and they do not tolerate. So the best way to fight them, is to do as I said. Talk about the failure of the Islamist Fascists, to answer a total National Strike, in what I call a Non Violent National Strike (NVNS).

Once the people talk about NVNS, and the whole country speaks this Good Thought, then we get to Good Words. Once Good Words dominate, then Good Deeds will paralyse them, without one drop of blood on the sacred soil of Iran.

We need to talk and teach the whole of Iran to believe in NVNS.

Incentives apply to human beings not Islamist Fascists in Iran

It is quite remarkable to see a Nobel Prize winner, ElBaradei, apply secular logic to Islamist Fascists in Iran. He states:

"The same applies to the situation in Iran," he said. "You can use sanctions but sanctions alone as we know by experience will not resolve issues. You need to use incentives and disincentives."

The folks who live in Qom and face Mecca, pay no attention to anyone else. As such, the people of Iran are solely responsible for their disposal; in a clean peaceful non violent manner; leaving no excuse for retaliation against future generations of Iranians. Once a higher global body, such as the UN, officially recognises the struggle of the secular Iranians, against Islamist angry attitude to the world, then the IAEA will realise not to take the Islamist Fascists in Iran seriously.

It would be nice of course if Mr ElBaradei did this attitude now, but he has a bone of contention with the all nuclear powers; and wants to use the Islamists in Iran's nuclear ambitions, as a threatening tool against the old nuclear powers. But why should the people of Iran suffer, and become guinea pigs for a much larger world problem. Mr ElBaradei must realise, that to give so much respect to Islamist Fascists in Iran, makes them feel as if they have legitimate rule in Iran.

Mr ElBaradei, the people of Iran will take note of your appeasement attitude towards the Islamist Fascists, as and when the Islamist Fascists of Iran, and brought against the a new Iranian court, just like Saddam Hossein is being tried in Iraq today by his own people. The people of Iran are the sons of Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great. We are the founders of Human Rights, and know very well how aggression cannot be overcome with more aggression.

Mr ElBaradei, you have been given the authority to judge the Islamist Fascists in Iran, and you attract a lot of attention and revel in it. You enjoy dragging the issue as long as you can, because when diplomacy ends war begins. But you are not helping the Iranian people, by discussing these issue solely with the Islamist Fascists in Iran. There are plenty of Iranians, both in Iran and outside Iran, who are better qualified to discuss, and represent the feeling of Iranian people all over the world.

We Iranians in opposition are more capable, and more intelligent than the Islamist Fascists in Iran. We therefore ask you in the name of Peace, not to deal with the Islamist Fascists seriously. When you speak to the Islamist Fascists in Iran, tell them that you know that the people of Iran, do not want Iran to be put in harms way. Cite example of other countries that threatened world peace and how world wars began.

You are an important person, and must represent the secular views of all Human Beings, especially those that live in Iran. Please do the right thing, and speak to the Islamist Fascists in Iran, as if you were a secular peace loving Iranian, and did not want the oil money to be used to make dangerous weapons of mass destruction.

One Islamist versus another in Iran

Nearly everyday one hears one character say one thing, and the next day, the die-hard bigoted Ahmadinejad, say something else. Here is a clear example:

Teheran considers a proposal to enrich uranium for Iranian use on Russian soil ‘attractive,’ Iranian Ambassador to Russia Gholamreza Ansari said Wednesday, the news agency Interfax reported.

The guys in the Foreign Ministry were swiftly changed when Ahmadinejad took over. This fella be might up for the chop soon. I bet anyone, that we will soon get an announcement from Ahmadinejad, that they will not agree to any enrichment outside Iran, and moreover, they will want to proliferate it.

Russia change in tune against the Islamist Fascists in Iran

Yup just as I said before, the Russians have suddenly changed their view on the Islamist Fascists in Iran. And it is interesting to see how the Indian press is one of the first to report this change in attitude.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov today expressed Moscow's "alarm" at Iran's plans to expand nuclear research and its refusal to accept proposals tabled by five permanent UNSC members and Germany to restart dialogue.

"We are alarmed, of course, by Iran's refusal to accept the sextet's proposals, which aim to create conditions for restarting the talks," Lavrov said in an interview published by the government-run Rossiiskaya Gazeta daily.

The Indians and their friends in the Non Aligned Movement (NAM) have always supported the Islamist Fascists in Iran. But they are more anti-US than the Russians, especially with the Communists Party in India being so big. I have always been very wary of the Indians, ever since the early days of the Islamist Inquisition of Iran in 1979, when I found out that Ayatollah Khomeini was educated at Lucknow. The Islamists there are very die hard, and recently were the first to criticize the new Pope. So the root of the problem is in Lucknow.

Russians turning against the Islamist Fascists in Iran

Is it really that much of a surprise to see the Russians change their tune?

"We want all 'blank spots' the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] has uncovered in Iran's program to be cleared up," Sergei Lavrov said. "The questions Iran has to answer are well known. Unfortunately, Iran has delayed its answers."

That membership of WTO really did change their minds, and get them to criticize the Islamist Fascists. It is obvious that the Chinese also want something in return for turning against the nuke mad mullahs.

Iranians must 'elect' Mesbah Yazdi

It is important that the phoney elections in Iran elect Mesbah Yazdi. There is no way that these Islamist Fascists, will ever go without killing a lot of Iranians, and burying Iranians in an unending endless spiral of violence.

To quote Steven Weinberg:

With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

By electing Mesbah Yazdi at least, we will have him in the open; directly visible, accountable to the secular people of Iran, and ultimately easily ignored by all the people of Iran once and for all.

Learn about all Iranians Mr Blair

It used to be just Donald Rumsfeld. But now ironically, after DR has gone, Tony Blair is harping about the Islamist Fascists. Never before have we had him, so clearly come out in the open and say:

"But at the moment - and this is particularly so in respect of what Iran is doing in supporting terrorism throughout the Middle East and acting in breach of its nuclear weapons obligations - you are behaving in such a way that makes such a partnership impossible."

But there is no referrence in his comments, about intelligent Iranians both inside Iran, or outside Iran, who want modern peaceful regime change?

If you had kept your big mouth shut

One really does feel very sorry for this idiot pretending to run Iran. At first one thought, "well he has a PHD", maybe, just maybe he has more sense than the old folk in Qom. After all one cannot blame the old folk saying their old songs over and over again. For years the world just put up with it. But last year everyone thought, "hey this kid, seems to have a lot of energy, has a modern education, maybe, just maybe, he is going to bring a breath of fresh air. But this is what we hear:

"It is most embarrassing that the U.N Security Council, which should be the defender of nations' security and rights, threatens countries pursuing nuclear fuel under the law to provide fuel for peaceful purposes," Ahmadinejad said.

And that just about sums it up for me. He refuses to accept the world order. Why? Because he has his own utopia that he thinks is over and above UN. The Russians have tried and tried to educate him, but as I said earlier, they are using him for getting into WTO. So this new kid on the block is crying out loud like a cry baby. That has moved Iran closer and closer into a pariah state, which does not help him at all. He is cornered and all he can do is moan and groan and shout out loud, whilst we all laugh at him.

The main reason why Russia pretends to support the Islamist Fascists in Iran

For so long the world press, has been suckered into believing that Russia and China have a "moral" obligation to be anti-US, and by deduction pro Islamist Fascist in Iran.

Some analysts have said that a deal on the WTO could persuade Moscow to soften its opposition to punishing Iran for refusing to halt sensitive uranium enrichment.

Of course this is not the case. Once the Western countries, formally approve their membership, then the Islamist Fascists are on their own, and irrelevant.

Iranians must ignore US elections

With most of the vote in, it seems that with the conservative Democrats taking charge of the House, ironically GWB will actually have agreement in certain areas like Immigration. The only real challenge to GWB will be San Fransiconian politics of Liberal Democrat Nancy Pelosi. Iranians will need her help to fight for women's rights in Iran. As the most Liberal Democrat she will have to keep the sanity of United States in the challenging times ahead. Go Nancy hit GWB hard! But alas, and ironically she has the most conservative bunch of Democrats she has had to deal with.

So Centre Politics is King, and the moderates are now in charge. Extremism is off the table, unless it is provoked by some incident like 9/11. And we don't really know what the oil companies and the military machine will cook up for the US. You all know the conspiracy theories; from US sinking their own ships to whateva, blaming it on Islamists etc etc, because the Islamists could not do it anyway. But with the US military machine facing cut backs and some Democrats talking about impeaching GWB, these theories can become reality.

And so I say, we Iranians have to ignore the Americans. We are a nation of our own, and we need to not get caught up, in the what if's. Remember how Iranians got suckered by the Republicans, thinking that they would have the US engage the Islamists very soon. And what happened? Nothing. Every day Iranians outside Iran get up and wish, "oh let's hope that the Russians or Chinese side with the EU and US, and everyone bashes the mad mullah in the head, and kicks them out." This is the classical posh Iranians' living abroad mentality. And because of that, the antithesis it produces, is the no frills Islamist Iranians in Iran, who fell for Ahmadinejad. So at one extreme you have the modern Iranians like the Crown Prince, and at the other end Mesbah Yazdi. But they both react to US politics. None try to motivate the silent majority of Iranians. And the key word is motivate. The Crown Prince has a duty to run the Royal Institution, but he is not doing anything in a focused practical way. The Iranian Opposition has not come together in a coordinated way as I have stated.

What have I stated? And is it new? Nothing is new in this game. Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great said it thousands and thousands of years ago. And do any of the so called "Leaders of Iran" say anything along the line of non violent regime change everyday? Not one of them does. How many articles have we Iranians written about non violent regime change? I have, but who else? Shame on all editors and all the Iranian Bloggers and anyone who is interested in the future of Iran if they do not talk about peaceful regime change. More people are interested in how Iran does in global politics, than taking direct action towards non violent regime change by themselves.

So I say to the people of Iran, especially those rich Iranians in sunny California. For the sake of Iran think about what I have said. Talk to all your relatives and friends about non violent regime change. Forget about what US politics is. We Iranians must handle our own affairs ourselves in our own civilized way. Take your first action. Argue about the how we are going to change Iran so that our children can live with the Islamists' children. Yes as Gandhi and all passive movement people have said, we have to win the peace. So start with a discussion about peace. Engage a conversation about how weak the Islamists are if the people of Iran go on a General Strike.

If you are an editor of an Iranian newspaper, I hope you really not sleep tonight if you do not think about how many people have not learnt from you, the benefits of General Strike and non violent regime change. The people of Iran must write as many articles about national peace for Iran. Iranian Love is stronger than Islam. Our culture is deeper than any other principle, and we can use it to show how civilized we really are. We have our own poets and philosophers, that bind us in our Iranian way. It is with these ideas that we can bind the people and show that we can resist working for the alien Islamist slave drivers, and be able to not feel guilty when we remove them in a civilized way without any harm to them.

Iranians participate more in a theocratic democracy than the US does in a secular democracy

It is quite remarkable to read, that compared to a theocratic democracy of the Islamists in Iran, the US people do not participate a lot.

Compare U.S. voting with foreign voting and it's not a pretty sight. Americans are less apt to vote than are people in other old democracies, in new ones, in dangerous places, dirt poor ones, freezing cold ones, stinking hot ones and highly dysfunctional ones.

Even that theocratic "axis of evil," Iran, has bragging rights over the United States in this regard. So does chaotic Iraq, where an estimated 70 percent of voters cast ballots in December parliamentary elections.

Maybe someone should tell Calvin Woodward of AP, that in Iran it was just a novelty, and in the US the novelty wore off a long long time ago.

Calling the Russian and Chinese bluff on Iran's Islamist Fascists

I ask the Chinese and Russians, why don't you write a draft resolution for sanctions against the Islamist Fascists in Iran.

Wang said the question is "what is the best way out."

"We want to have a solution of the Iranian nuclear issue, whether sanctions is the right way or whether further negotiation," he said.

That is the only way to stop these two countries from playing for time. It is time to call their bluff.

Guess who trades with Sudan?

You wonder how come the Islamist Fascists in Iran are able to do business in Sudan.

Iran’s major heavy vehicle maker Iran Khodro Diesel is planning to soon produce its buses and trucks in a number of African nations.

How come Sudan is suffering so much, and the Islamist Fascists just turn a blind eye?

Iran Becomes Jewish State

Spoof.com is funny.

"In fact," said Rice, "We now like Iran so much that we will start giving that country billions of dollars of aid and loans annually just like we give to Israel."

The thought that we cannot go beyond this, shows how stupid the situation really is.

No one won in Lebanon

It is so funny, you read the Islamist press in Iran, and they go on about how their Hezbollah friends won the war in Lebanon. And then you read the Israeli press, and you hear the same thing.

Ironically, the opportunity stems from the defeat that all camps suffered this summer: In the end nobody won anything.

I think as Zedillo says, neither won.

US picking a fight with Islamists in Iran whilst looking for mines in the Persian Gulf

The situation in the Persian Gulf is heating up.

We have now learned that U.S. minesweepers have been ordered to follow the U.S.S. Eisenhower. This is an even more ominous signal of preparation for military action, since such ships would not normally accompany a strike force on routine deployments.

And still the Iranian opposition does not care about how the Islamists will use this scenario to keep themselves in power. The US will not talk to the Iranian opposition and will instead deal with a force it can fight with, not a force that does not want to fight, but wants to write about what is right for Iran.

Russian and Chinese waste more time on Iran

Future historians will judge this episode of Iranian history with great humour. The Chinese and the Russians have been playing a game of charade, with the rest of the world when it comes to Iran.

The sanctions impose limits on a Russian project to build Iran's first nuclear power station in the southwestern city of Bushehr.

The people of Iran in opposition need to take charge, and let the world know that the new Iran is in the oppositions' hand, not in the hands of Russians, Chinese, and their proxies in Iran.

Islamist Engineers in Iran win prizes for making suicide flying machines

It is now really easy to win Engineering prizes in Iran

Isfahan University's Mechanical Energy College took first place in a Quds Day competition for its design of a pilotless plane that can be used for "suicide attacks."

Sad as it is, it is very true, and just goes to show how much the warmongering Islamist regime has influenced the Iranians.

Khan nuke gear for the Islamist Fascists in Iran

Here we go, it was just a matter of time. The Pakistanis and North Koreans in collusion with the Islamist Fascists.

The P2 nuclear centrifuges were also sent to North Korea, said the official, who did not want to be identified.

Reports in Pakistan yesterday quoted the official, who was speaking in Washington, as saying: "If you ask for an educated and intelligent guess, I would say, yes, they might have been sent to Iran too, but we have no evidence to prove it."

It does not really take a lot of imagination to figure that one out does it. Why is it that the people of Iran allow such proliferation. The people should bring this government to a halt, by threatening a General Strike. Better the people to go on strike, than to have the world strike Iran.

Finally Henry Kissinger figures it all out about Iraq

Kissinger is really slow to realise this:

A "new phenomenon" has emerged in recent months: the "state within a state" controlled by terrorists and beholden to no one, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said Tuesday.

Where have you been Henry? Wakey Wakey.

Russians delaying Islamist nuclear ambitions in Iran

Why is it that I am not totally convinced that he is not completely telling the truth, when he says:

“All delays to the launch of the Bushehr nuclear power plant in Iran are of a technical and management nature,” Sergei Shmatko, head of Russia’s state-run Atomstroiexport, was quoted as saying by the RIA-Novosti news agency.

Power old mullahs, now they are getting a taste of their own medicine, as the Russians keep delaying, and delaying the Bushehr NPP.

Bashing the heads of two neocons of Iran and US together

It is quite silly of Simon Tisdall, a typical left wing idealist, to ask the two neocons or US and Iran to talk.

"I believe in talking to your enemies ... It's got to be hard-nosed, it's got to be determined. You don't give away anything, but in my view it's not appeasement to talk to your enemies"

How naive. The whole point is that these two warmongers never talk, and be able to promote their very similar ideologies onto their respective countries. They both are spending far too much on the armed forces, and support their expenditures on some outdated utopias that should have been forgotten a long time ago.

UN sanctions including Russians and Chinese on the way for Islamist Fascists in Iran

It is good to see that no matter how hard the Russians like Lavrov try, they cannot disrupt the unity of the UN against the Islamist Fascists in Iran.

One of the diplomats, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the draft was not yet public, described all three measures as moderate and narrowly focused in an attempt to win Russian and Chinese backing to punish Iran's refusal to suspend uranium enrichment. The diplomat added that Moscow and Beijing could be formally presented with the draft as early as later this week.

This then represents a very agreeable first stage, that will ruffle the mullahs feathers.

ElBaradei is Neville Chamberlain reincarnated when it comes to Iran's Islamist nukes

I cannot but look back at the similarities. Wiki describes:

The repeated failures of the Baldwin government to deal with rising Nazi power are often laid, historically, on the doorstep of Chamberlain, since he presided over the final collapse of European affairs, resisted acting on military information, lied to the House of Commons about Nazi military strength, shunted out opposition which, correctly, warned of the need to prepare – and above all, failed to use the months profitably to ready for the oncoming conflict.

And now I read:

Unlike American officials, ElBaradei says that he is not convinced that Iran's ultimate goal is to build a weapon, though IAEA officials believe that Iran wants to have all of the major components of a weapon in hand so that it is clear that it could build one in weeks or months.

History repeats itself, but not exactly.

More babies needed for suicide bombs in Iran

The idiotic Islamist Fascist President obviously does not know how expensive it is to raise a family to a high standard.

'I am against saying that two children are enough. Our country has a lot of capacity. It has the capacity for many children to grow in it. Iran even has the capacity for 120 million people.'

Ever since he has started his rule, inflation has rocketed, and huge sums of money have left Iran, and the city slums have mushroomed. He is a butcher that has encouraged Iranians to commit suicide for his dogma. Maybe that is what he is really referring to. He will have a lot to answer for in the International Court of Human Rights one day, if we can capture him and get him there.

Sino-Islamist relations and Iran

Maybe China is coming around.

China reluctantly has backed Security Council efforts to call Iran to account, but its commitment to meaningful economic penalties is not assured. Acknowledging it needs China and a similarly skeptical Russia to make any punishment stick, the U.S. is crossing its fingers for a Chinese 'yes' vote but would settle for an abstention.

Again it comes down to the various corporations that are dealing with the Islamist Fascists, not the whole of China per se. The Islamists need the funds more to finance their "wipe out Israel" plan. So the Chinese need to talk to Israelis. Olmert go to China please.

Can the Islamists in Iran create trouble for the Chinese in their western provinces? And then you have the likes of Wal-Mart that have a lot of clout in China. Imagine them pulling out of China. That will give the Chinese something to think about.

Russian SuperJet gets hit as they support the Islamists Fascists in Iran

The Russians have to be taught a lesson. They cannot have it both ways. They cannot both support the Islamist Fascists and get business from the US.

The SuperJet-100, part of the Russian government's effort to revive the country's role in global aerospace, now has 20 international subcontractors, including six from the United States. The U.S. State Department decided in August to block U.S. companies from doing business with Sukhoi Aviation Holding and Rosoboronexport, the state-owned weapons exporter, for purportedly breaching a law against trading with Iran.

Mind you it is more to do with the corporations than with anything that the governments can do. It is corporations that are doing the deals and the governments and UN can do very little.

Iranian apathy defeats the Islamist Fascists bogus elections

Ever since Khomeini was flown in from Paris, the Iranians have been mesmerised. But ever since Khomeini has died, the cover has been well and truly blown, and the people are seeing the guns that defend Islam. It is then no surprise to see the people heed the call to non violent regime change that I have been proposing. It is necessary for the Oppposition not to have any blood on its hand. Just like Gandhi used the same principles to get the aliens out of India, so the Iranian will do the same.

It is then with great pleasure to read:

Iranian election officials are battling to arouse the interest of candidates and voters in the country's December 15 municipal polls, state-run television reported yesterday.

Iranians do not need a leader like Gandhi. Each and every Iranian is well versed in what needs to be done. If you are an Iranian and you want to show that you care for a peaceful Iranian regime change, that is not manipulated by any alien, be it Islamic, Western or Eastern, then ignore these bogus elections.

Fizzy sanctions by Islamist Fascists in Iran

So the sanctions game is fizzing up:

Coke re-entered Iran in 1994, signing franchise agreements with two bottlers, including Khoshgovar, which began sourcing its syrup from Ireland via the Coca-Cola Atlantic company, now Drogheda Concentrates.

And the upshot of all this, is that the multinationals will get squeezed, and more money is lost. Maybe wealthy people will put their money where their mouth is, and actually do something about changing the regime in Iran. Will it be something silly like, not having Coke on the table, to get people's attention?

Addressing Iran incorrectly

One of the main problems is how world leaders give undue credit to the false regime in Iran. For example the Israeli President states:

'The Iranians should be afraid -- they must understand if they object to every compromise there will be a price to pay'

Olmert should be addressing the Islamist Fascists in power directly, not the nation of Iran. That way the Islamist Fascists will know that they are not being regarded as representatives of Iran.

News made by people

Perhaps the best form of news and comments on news is the development of the Blog, and in particular sites like Digg. With Blog tool, every Iranian has published their view. But we Iranians do not have an equivalent of Digg. If you go to Digg and then placed "Iran" in the search field you would get what people think are good pieces of news on Iran, and then people give you credit for doing just that. Now that is the opposite of your BBC news service, that picks and chooses what it thinks is "News". Mind you Digg is occupied mostly by techies and US people, so again news on Iran is not that balanced.

News wires on Iran

There is a subtle difference between news feeds and news wires. NewsNow is at the moment the mother of all news wires. This is the link to the Iran feed in it. They even have a ranking system on the number of clicks on the right hand side of their page. So you can see what is really popular. Again a great tool to catch up on missed stories.

News feeds on Iran

Perhaps one of the best places to get a lot of news on Iran is the Google link for Iran news arranged in chronological order. This one really updates quickly, but gets repetitive. So you need to click the relevance link and that tends to tidy it up a bit. But then you can miss a lot of news with that option.

Religions don't deserve special treatment

Do you think anyone in Iran could ever make a comment like this:

"It is time to refuse to tip-toe around people who claim respect, consideration, special treatment, or any other kind of immunity, on the grounds that they have a religious faith, as if having faith were a privilege-endowing virtue, as if it were noble to believe in unsupported claims and ancient superstitions."

And stay alive afterwards?

Russia kisses Iranian mullah's ass

'We won't be able to support and will oppose any attempts to use the Security Council to punish Iran or use Iran's program in order to promote the ideas of regime change there'

AP reporter Dareini is a liar, millions did not march in Iran

Across Iran, millions took to the streets on 'Al-Quds Day,' — Arabic for Jerusalem — a national holiday established by the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini to assert Muslim claims on the holy city.

Islamist fascists must stop banning students in Iran

Iran must stop banning students from university because of their political views, a human rights group has said.

rss news for iranians

RSS is a simple XML-based system that allows users to subscribe to their favorite websites. Using RSS, webmasters can put their content into a standardized format, which can be viewed and organized through RSS-aware software or automatically conveyed as new content on another website.

Love Forgotten

Mihragan, Tiragan, and No Ruz, were the only Zoroastrian feasts be mentioned in the Talmud, which is an indication of their popularity.

More at:

http://www.avesta.org/mihragan.htm

How many of you knew that yesterday was Mehregan? The very concepts of law and culture that permeate and bind the world are rooted in Mehergan.

Not one Iranian, true Iranian wrote about it. A belated Happy Mehregan to all.

Dogma is gone ZB

Threats to use force on Iran are also counterproductive because they tend to fuse Iranian nationalism with religious fanaticism.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8487

Can we really say that a war with Iran, will fuse Iranian Nationalistic values such as Nowrooz with Seyyed dogma again as ZB and Carter planned it in the 80s. I believe, from the massive non violent protest Iranians showed; in boycotting the Seyyed selection process, the Iranians have shown that the Seyyeds do not have their hearts and minds. No one takes the slightest notice of them. The people of Iran are mostly young and are not mesmerised by Seyyed dogma. People of Iran have reached deeper into history and have found 20,000 years of Iranian history. They have sought the peaceful non violent approach to be rid of this dogma from their minds. Anyone who tries to wage war will be faced by peaceful general strike of millions of Iranians, that would paralyse the Seyyed rulers and their international trade partners. The US companies in China would lose out heavily, if Chinese's energy needs were interrupted. ZB really needs to realise that the people of Iran will not fall for the same trap twice. The future of Iran is with the youth who will continue to look for peaceful modern approaches. The old Seyyeds will not have the support to do what ZB thinks would happen if the US bombs Iran. Ask any Iranian and they will tell you that the Americans put the Seyyeds there in the first place. So any bombing would not create the environment ZB is on about.