Can't have it both ways on Iran

You can't have Hillary Clinton say one thing, and then Turkey and Brazil, say another thing. Is the UN behind the sanctions or not? And what in the world is China up to; saying yes to both sides of the equation. This is all a bit silly.

Let's be practical. The day the fuel is about to be delivered to Turkey, Qom will say no. The likes of Jannati will not allow it, and they control the regime. The days when their Foreign Ministry (the old Reform Camp) had power, are gone. If anything the die-hards will kick out Ahmadinejad.

Now for those sanctions. If the US really wanted to do anything, they would close down banks that operated in Iran and US. They would stop those Chinese companies dealing in US and Iran. That will not happen.

So all of this is just a superb way to waste time. It makes good "news", and the media makes money printing it. Meanwhile the US stays in the area wasting money on military.

Nothing has changed. But the non-violent movement moves forward.

in reference to:

"Turkey said on Tuesday that Iran has shown political will to solve a dispute with the West over its nuclear program and said it was not time to discuss further U.N. sanctions."
- Turkey says not time to raise Iran sanctions | Reuters (view on Google Sidewiki)

Ayatollahs' Oil from Iran to China

Think of Ayatollahs' Oil, not Iranians' oil from now on. The reason is because they have invaded Iran with the help of world terrorism, to build their own Empire after Armageddon. Ayatollahs are not Iranians. Help Iranians remove them non-violently. Don't lend the Ayatollahs money.

in reference to:

"Iran has not attacked anyone literally through its conventional forces. The Ayatollahs that put Islam above Iranian culture have their own gangsters. Yes they are close to folks like Bin Laden, and the Chinese. This the new force that has taken on the world powers."
- rss iran: Chinese Press and Ayatollah Oil from Iran (view on Google Sidewiki)

Chinese Press and Ayatollah Oil from Iran

Notice how fast the Xinhua is on the uptake on some of the news relating to Iran. In this item the power of the gangsters in Iran (IRGC) and other areas in the world is seen.

Iran has not attacked anyone literally through its conventional forces. The Ayatollahs that put Islam above Iranian culture have their own gangsters. Yes they are close to folks like Bin Laden, and the Chinese. This the new force that has taken on the world powers.

The Chinese are not the real cause. The real cause are the Chinese Banks and other US companies that are manufacturing via slave labour, and cheap Ayatollah Oil from Iran.

If the US created a positive direct relationship via the Ayatollahs' Foreign Ministry in Iran, then another bunch of "nicer" gansters would be involved. They are the so called reformers, and they even included The Greens (Mousavi et al).

But from an Iranian culture perspective the Ayatollahs who put Iran after Islam, this is all part of their dogma. The Ayatollahs want to change the whole world with their allegiance to their Mahdi or their last Emperor that has disappeared. They want another Empire of their own for the world.

We Iranians have our own culture that is older than the Chinese culture. The Chinese refer to Iranians in ancient times as Persians, and everyone else as Barbarians. Yes that is true. The concept of dualism is from the Zend Avesta, that predates China by thousands of years. Our Ancients are from the last stellar alignment some 26000 years ago. All will be revealed in 2012 Yalda.

Why am I saying all this. Because the ancient that binds the Chinese and Persians is on a revival. This is what the Age of Aquarius is bringing on to the world. A new partnership has to be established on a firmer more ancient root.

in reference to:

""(U.S.) President Barack Obama has to mend Washington's policies in Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran and all these changes depend on fixing its ties with Iran," he was quoted as saying."
- Ahmadinejad: Fixing ties with Iran only chance for U.S. to solve problems in Mideast (view on Google Sidewiki)

From Theocracy to Democracy to Democrazy

It looks like HRH, or someone at Huffington Post has decided not to post this:

Your Royal Highness has a mandate to act. Unfortnately you have, once again, given us a sophomoric update instead. The Royal Institution of Iran acts when the culture is at risk of being wiped out. Please tell us what you want to do.

What do you think that means?  We Iranians have a Prince who is in charge of the Royal Institution, and does not carry out his job.  The Royal Institution defends the culture of the country.  His inaction has helped Iran to become an Islamic State.  Strong words?  Maybe, but necessary.

My ancestor, who was the last King of the Qajars, at least admitted that he did not want to carry out his duty, and left it to Reza Shah (his grand father) to ask to be a President, and the Parliament made him the new King.  HRH the Crown Prince is not doing his duty, in this time of need.  He writes like a Journalist.  He is not a Journalist.

What do we Iranian then do.  We then think of abandoning the Royal Institution, and sell our country to the abuses of democracy.  Yes democracy can kill a country's national character.  Think of this.  One day you wake up and you see the name of Mount Demavand changed to Mount Khomeini.  Then what?  It was voted by the Ayatollah poodles in their so called Majlis.  That is democracy becoming democrazy.

We in the Islamic State, and that is what it is, as it not Iran, have obviously no one to defend the history of Iran that defends Iran's culture.  People have literally hidden Iran's culture under their beds.  We get our Prince in exile lecturing us over and over again, but he does nothing.

If this was the past and HRH Crown Prince Cyrus Reza Pahlavi was stuck in Iran, the situation would have been different.  He would have had to act his job.  But he has not.  I would do it, and many better than me would do it, but he has to do what my ancestors did.  We gave our house in Saadabad for pittance to his grandad, and he did resurrect Iran.  His dad was born in that house.  But what has this Prince done.

As an Astrologer I know how bad Mars in Cancer can be, and the Prince has that.  So has the UN, and that is why there is not action in both.  If you do not understand Astrology then I am sorry, but that is the reason for this situation.  What we have here is a drummer, not a lead guitarist. He needs to get his band together now.

How wrong Walter Z. Laqueur was on Iran's Ayatollahs

Here is a very important comment made in 1979, and it shows how naive some of the biggest minds in the world were. The answer of course was given by this other famous commentator at this link:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IJ26Ak06.html

The Soviet Union then and Russia now supported the mullahs then and now, and the Chinese have the strongest business ties with the Communists and others.

Read Laqueur's long piece below first. You need to go to page 1.
in reference to: Why the Shah Fell (view on Google Sidewiki)

The Generals that sold Iran to the Ayatollahs

I have reprinted an extract from a book that is free on Google, that tells you of the exact events that led to the loss of Iran to the Moslems.  The Generals effectively took charge at around 10 am on Februrary 11 1979.  It was coordinated by a man called Fardust, because he stopped the loyalty to The Crown.

Fardust was the Shah's closest man, and he let Iran down.  Nowadays his friend is a man called AA Dareini and he works for AP.  For years I have been seeing his articles all over the world, as an AP correspondent.  Did he write fairly on Iran?  Did he write about how Iranians resisted the Islamification of Iran with the Nowruz Pagan culture and won.  Our ancient farm festivals in praise of nature and life have given Iranians the will to live and resist the death worship of Islam.

As you all know, I go to sites and take on anyone, but this guy Dareini was always hidding.  The other day I found his page in Newsvine, and I put the above questions there.  Recently I followed another link to his page and found I could not log in. Wow, my first ever.  Never has anyone blocked my non-violent approach, and that includes the pro-regime sites and forums.  So it goes to show where the problem is.  The problem is media, and it is a problem because people do not know how much influence these writers have.  People think they know everything, but they don't.

Oh it sickens me how educated Iranians, did not dwell into more philosophical, more Earthly, how does one say, more natural way of approaching life.  Iranians at the time of the Shah, were either the structured modern sort, you know Scientists, Doctors, Military people, or they were more common sense traders.  All of them blindly accepted Islam, because it did not interfere.  This is what caught us all by surprise.  But if we had respected our own pagan philosophy written in The Zend Avesta and followed Astrology then we would not be tempted by violence.

I am pleased to say that we are now finally beginning to see the non-violent approach and we are getting there.  Many of those born with Saturn in Libra are finally old enough to be involved in the new Iran.


The rise and fall of the Pahlavi ... - Google Books

Why Iranians Jump over Fire - Chaharshanbehsoori

The real reasoning behind this act of jumping through fire, is related to Astrology of the Twelfth House. The Twelfth House is related to the non-self, humility and selflessness of a person. The activities relate to facing all issues that are pending for a person so that the person may be able to start the new year properly. The last five days are called Hamspatmediamgah or as Parsi call it Hamaspathmaedaya.

Iran civil rights movement

Saw this site and put out all this there (don't know why, it just happened):

I do not agree with a lot that has been said. The Iranians, like myself began as conscientious objectors to this illegal regime from 12th Feb 1979.

I had relatives employed in the oil and petrochemicals, and they, like me, objected to the new directives being sent out by the mullahs.

Every place, every important meeting had an IRGC or mullah sniffing around. But the non-violent movement in Iran was born to stop them from the progress of Iran. Iranians defeated their wishes from the 12th February 1979.

But the problem was that the world refused to note the mullahs being defeated. The world focused on the warmongering of Khomeini and let the war with Iraq start. That killed Iranians. It was then very difficult to stop that. But we managed at the end. But a lot of Iranians became Basij and that sustained the mullahs.

Oh they managed to change the flag, the anthem, and many names. They even wanted to bulldoze Persepolis. But the ancient ruins remain, and more have been found as new roads had to be built. The people of Iran do not use Islamic names to name their children anymore. The backlash has been a blessing in disguise. A new Iran has been born in stealth out of this tragedy.

Clinton, Gibbs on Iran Nukes -- Out of the Mouths of Babes

@Caru



There is a level of doubt that has risen purely from the foreign policy of the mullahs, and their sense of world order. In the time of the Shah, the US did not mind even if Iran had the bomb. So it is the type of people that are running the country that matters. We have a lot of intelligent people in Iran and outside, who can represent Iran, and do not have wacko 7th Century ideas.



The question you need to be asking is, why did a modern state in 1979 get derailed by Carter. What was he worried about when he said Iran is an Island of Stability. Obviously that is exactly what he did not want. Just think what Iran would be now. Quo Bene?



It is very simple.
About Nuclear Weapons
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Poll on Freedom of Speech in Iran

The same WPO poll asked respondents to assess actual freedom of speech in Iran: “In Iran, how free do you think people are to express controversial political views, without fear of being harassed or punished?” Only 27% of Iranians said they were completely free in this regard, but another 44% said they were somewhat free; 23% said they were “not very free” (12%) or “not at all free” (11%).

IranElection_Feb10_rpt.pdf (application/pdf Object)

The interesting part of this whole report is that it makes Ahmadinejad look popular, whilst it knows too well that the people in Iran cannot answer any questions, just in case they get killed by the mullahs.