UNSC 1803, 90 more days for Seyyeds to make the bomb

Below is the best bit of the resolution.  Waste of time.  As if it will do anything.

(c) that it shall, in the event that the report shows that Iran has not complied with resolution 1696 (2006), resolution 1737 (2006), resolution 1747 (2007) and this resolution, adopt further appropriate measures under Article 41 of Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations to persuade Iran to comply with these resolutions and the requirements of the IAEA, and underlines that further decisions will be required should such additional measures be necessary;


“20. Decides to remain seized of the matter.”


Resolution Annex I


1. Amir Moayyed Alai (involved in managing the assembly and engineering of centrifuges)

2. Mohammad Fedai Ashiani (involved in the production of ammonium uranyl carbonate and management of the Natanz enrichment complex)

3. Abbas Rezaee Ashtiani (a senior official at the AEOI Office of Exploration and Mining Affairs)

4. Haleh Bakhtiar (involved in the production of magnesium at a concentration of 99.9%)

5. Morteza Behzad (involved in making centrifuge components)

6. Dr. Mohammad Eslami (Head of Defence Industries Training and Research Institute)

7. Seyyed Hussein Hosseini (AEOI official involved in the heavy water research reactor project at Arak)

8. M. Javad Karimi Sabet (Head of Novin Energy Company, which is designated under resolution 1747 (2007))

9. Hamid-Reza Mohajerani (involved in production management at the Uranium Conversion Facility (UCF) at Esfahan)

10. Brigadier-General Mohammad Reza Naqdi (former Deputy Chief of Armed Forces General Staff for Logistics and Industrial Research/Head of State Anti-Smuggling Headquarters, engaged in efforts to get round the sanctions imposed by resolutions 1737 (2006) and 1747 (2007))

11. Houshang Nobari (involved in the management of the Natanz enrichment complex)

12. Abbas Rashidi (involved in enrichment work at Natanz)

13. Ghasem Soleymani (Director of Uranium Mining Operations at the Saghand Uranium Mine)


Resolution Annex II


A. Individuals listed in resolution 1737 (2006)


1. Mohammad Qannadi, AEOI Vice President for Research & Development

2. Dawood Agha-Jani, Head of the PFEP (Natanz)

3. Behman Asgarpour, Operational Manager ( Arak)


B. Individuals listed in resolution 1747 (2007)


1. Seyed Jaber Safdari (Manager of the Natanz Enrichment Facilities)

2. Amir Rahimi (Head of Esfahan Nuclear Fuel Research and Production Centre, which is part of the AEOI’s Nuclear Fuel Production and Procurement Company, which is involved in enrichment-related activities)


Resolution Annex III


1. Abzar Boresh Kaveh Co. (BK Co.) (involved in the production of centrifuge components)

2. Barzagani Tejarat Tavanmad Saccal companies (subsidiary of Saccal System companies) (this company tried to purchase sensitive goods for an entity listed in resolution 1737 (2006))

3. Electro Sanam Company (E. S. Co./E. X. Co.) (AIO front-company, involved in the ballistic missile programme)

4. Ettehad Technical Group (AIO front-company, involved in the ballistic missile programme)

5. Industrial Factories of Precision (IFP) Machinery (aka Instrumentation Factories Plant) (used by AIO for some acquisition attempts)

6. Jabber Ibn Hayan (AEOI laboratory involved in fuel-cycle activities)

7. Joza Industrial Co. (AIO front-company, involved in the ballistic missile programme)

8. Khorasan Metallurgy Industries (subsidiary of the Ammunition Industries Group (AMIG) which depends on DIO. Involved in the production of centrifuges components)

9. Niru Battery Manufacturing Company (subsidiary of the DIO. Its role is to manufacture power units for the Iranian military including missile systems)

10. Pishgam (Pioneer) Energy Industries (has participated in construction of the Uranium Conversion Facility at Esfahan)

11. Safety Equipment Procurement (SEP) (AIO front-company, involved in the ballistic missile programme)

12. TAMAS Company (involved in enrichment-related activities. TAMAS is the overarching body, under which four subsidiaries have been established, including one for uranium extraction to concentration and another in charge of uranium processing, enrichment and waste)

http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs//2008/sc9268.doc.htm

Visit the Shah's Grave

Pay your respects to the Shahanshah of Iran and visit his grave in Egypt.



The commentary is in Persian. Basically it states that we could not take care of him no thanks to the Seyyeds (or Akhoonds).

read more | digg story

China and its needs for oil welcomes Iran's Seyyeds

China also provides conventional weapons that could threaten U.S. military forces securing the Persian Gulf. Of particular concern are China's sales to Iran of anti-ship cruise missiles, which pose a threat to oil tanker traffic and American naval vessels operating there. This arms trafficking presents an increasing threat to U.S. global security interests, particularly in the Middle East and Asia.



Please look at this rather long but excellent video, on the whole China growth vs Energy needs. To me, it is the Chinese blind eye to Human Rights that bothers me. They openly state that they do not make judgements. So why are they on the UN security council. That is supposed to be some moral forum is it not. China has philosopher that set the best examples in human history, and yet they act like this. Where are you Laozi?

Without the Seyyeds huge oil exports to China, and without the slaves that the Chinese give to the foreign companies, such as Wal-Mart in China, you would not be able to enjoy your easy life in the west. For China read US proxy. Don't buy stuff made there. You help the Seyyeds in Iran and the Chinese radicals who hate the US.

Good Neighbours?

The Seyyeds in Iran have a religious agenda, that is dictated from the likes of Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, and not the Foreign Ministry. Ahmadinejad believes he is guided by some mystical force to establish the Caliphate state, and to ultimately reclaim Jerusalem for the return of the Shiite Mahdi. Iraq is the centre of the Shiite world and their holiest shrines are there. So to them everyone who is not Shiite is alien in that country. In that perspective "brotherly" comments from Ahmadinejad mean more than meets the eye. The US weakened the Sunnis who were the only force that stood up to the Shiites in Iraq. The US never managed to get any Shiite support in Iraq. So the US actually helped the Seyyeds' cause, even though their biggest foe are the Seyyeds in Iran. In conclusion the Seyyeds have enabled the neocons to rise to power, and vice-versa. They both need each other in this post Soviet era to keep energy prices up with pseudo threats to each other.

read more | digg story

Nuclear Bomb Making Seyyeds in Iran

For the first time, a command and control center, known as Mojdeh site, was established to head up the drive to complete a nuclear bomb. A development facility called the "Field for Expansion of Deployment of Advanced Technologies" was set up in the Lavizan 2 site (see satellite imagery).

Mojdeh site is managed by a scientist named Mohsen Fakhrizadeh Mahabadi. A nuclear physicist attached to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corp (IRGC), Mahabadi reports directly to the defense minister, Mostafa Mohammad Najar

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,333291,00.html

So why is it, that the Chinese, Russians, IAEA, and the rest of the world is so quiet about this, for so long? Why do so many people do business with these dangerous people, who are siphoning Iranian people's wealth illegally? But more importantly, why are we Iranians allowing our nation to be put in harms way by the Seyyeds?

Iran UNSC: Who speaks for Russia, Churkin or Lavrov?

"If Iran in the next few days does not stop the enrichment activities of its heavy water project then yes, Russia ... has taken upon itself certain commitments... to support the resolution that has been drafted in the past month," Churkin told reporters via a video link from New York.

"Russia is constantly insisting that the (U.N.) Security Council adopt certain sanctions against Iran," he said.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUKL2780291820080227?rpc=401&feedType=RSS&feedName=worldNews&rpc=451

Churkin says one thing, and Lavrov says another thing. They are opposites. Who speaks for Russia? Just wait for tomorrow, and Lavrov will say something which is more anti-American and pro Seyyed. It is crazy.

Sub-divisions in the Seyyed ranks.

"This is not a foreign policy. We need to find an accommodating way to decrease the threats and assure the interests of the country.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080227/wl_mideast_afp/iranpoliticsdiplomacyisrael

So for the first time, we see how the old guard, that ran the negotiations, and cunningly managed to limbo dance the IAEA rules so well for so long, is getting fed up with this madman. The Seyyeds are dividing and sub-dividing, as the Iranians are uniting more. Good news.

Who is calling who an apostate in Iran.

The European Union has criticised the new penal code being drafted in Iran, particularly a section that imposes the death penalty for giving up Islam.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7264810.stm

And of course the Moslems were the first apostates themselves, when they converted out of Zoroastrianism.

IOL: Rice and Yang don't see eye to eye

"We believe we should continue to adopt a dual-track approach," Yang said

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=3&art_id=nw20080226102445202C242722

But the US companies are all in China. So what is going on? Is China proxy for Wal-Mart?

U.S. Treasury asking emirates to help pressure Iran

Iran uses its state-owned banks to facilitate this conduct and those banks engage in a range of deceptive practices," Kimmitt told an Anti-Defamation League meeting in Palm Beach, Florida.

read more | digg story