Oil drops 2 percent after weak US jobs data and no Seyyed warmongering

Oil drops 2 percent after weak US jobs data - Forbes.com:

"Oil fell more than 2 percent Thursday as weak U.S. economic data reinforced worries about shrinking fuel demand in the world's top energy consumer."

It is good to see the economic news is moving markets, and not warmongerings.

Israelis like Seyyeds not true Iranians

AxisofLogic/ Palestine:

"Why then does Israel occupy so central a place in the hostile pronouncements of Ahmadinejad and other Iranians? The reason has to do with Iran`s internal difficulties: underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, oppression and religious compulsion. In order to channel the frustration of the masses away from these problems, Iran uses the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The latter has also served it in southern Lebanon, where it has built an advance front with Hezbollah. The development of nuclear capability is aimed, therefore, toward domestic concerns. Iran has adopted nuclear power, like Pakistan before it, as a means of boosting national pride."

With all this analysis which is quite correct, why do the Israelis concern themselves with the Seyyeds. Why don't they impress the Chinese and Russians not to support the Seyyeds. Why is it, that the Israelis want to associate the whole of the Iranian population as being in tone with these Seyyeds. Sometimes the people of Iran think, that the Israelis themselves love to have the Seyyeds, because their threat means that they get handouts from the US. The solution is simple. Recognize Iranians not Seyyeds. Next, help us to form a government in exile to instruct a General Strike, to bring the Seyyeds to the negotiation table with Iranians, who want to change Iran for the better. We are the people who can change our country, and not US or Israelis with their air-strikes.

Joe Klein on Neoconservatives and Iran

Jeffrey Goldberg (July 29, 2008) - Joe Klein on Neoconservatives and Iran:

'Given the level of threats that they've been getting from the United States, and from Israel, it's a logical thing for Iran to want nuclear weapons as a deterrent.'

Wow, talking about getting things completely the wrong way round. The Seyyeds would have created the bomb even if the US was not there. They have their own agenda.

Iran's Seyyeds' Secret N-plant discovered at Al-Zarqan area

This is just the sort of news you get, whenever the nuclear debate looks as if it is coming to an equitable conclusion.

read more | digg story

Diplomat close to IAEA says Iran's Seyyeds inflates atom progress

Diplomat close to IAEA says Iran inflates atom progress | World | Reuters:

"Iran appears to have overstated the expansion of its uranium enrichment programme at a sensitive juncture in talks with world powers, a diplomat close to the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency said on Monday."

It is obvious that the Seyyed Neocons, like their US Neocons, are blowing the flame of oil prices, as much as they can, but it just keeps going out.

Brian Williams and Iran's Monkey face sit under a tree.

"They submitted a package and we responded by submitting our own package," Ahmadinejad said, referring to a July 19 meeting in Switzerland involving the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, plus Germany."We are going to negotiate over the common ground as it exists inside the two packages," he said. "If the two parties succeed...that will help us to work on our differences as well to reach an agreement."

Ahmadinejad cites `common ground' with West - Yahoo! News

Obviously the Seyyeds do not like the West's package, and vice-versa.  These are two completely different packages with nothing in common.

Mr Brian Williams acts as if he is running for President of United States, stating, " that there is a new stance".  The only new stance, is the fact the NBC news went into that garden for the first time.  Big deal.  What a waste of time.

Iran's Seyyeds try to raise the Rial vs US dollar

Samsami made the remark in response to a question about recent reports
on a possible government decision to more than halve the value of the
US dollar against the Iranian currency and set it at 4500 rials. The
green back is currently valued at 9300 rials.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=64912&sectionid=3510213

First the Seyyeds decided, to sell the petty 2.5 mln b/d (when the
world's demand is 85 mln b/d), in Euros. As the threats of war raised
commodities, so Gold and notably oil went up in US Dollar terms. But
the world media, for some absurd reason, made this assertion; that the
commodities are being bought, because the US dollar is down, and they
are cheaper.

But normally, when there is a crisis, like in the 70's, safe havens
benefit. The Gold went up and so did the US dollar high security
assets, like US Treasuries. In those days there was no Euro, and there
were no counter trades for the Yen to benefit from. But this time
round, the Euro, and those people borrowing in Yen (which is making it
extraordinarily highs, as the debt mountain has mushroomed), have gone
up against the US dollar.

Now within this background, this Seyyed utter nutter, wants to
overnight change the value of the rial. With all the sanctions on any
financing outside HSBC, Standard Chartered Bank, and all those Hawala
traders in the Persian Gulf, it is going to be almost impossible for
this bozo to implement his task.

Who cares what he says, the markets decide, and at the moment,
everyone is dumping Rial, as no one wants it, with these animals in
charge.

Obama charges Iranian-Americans, but would pay Seyyeds

"The Obama campaign has promised to have a private meeting with Iranian Americans if we as a group can raise $250,000 for this coming Sunday's event," Manouch Moshayedi, a prominent Iranian-American...Wow that is disgusting. I bet Obama would pay a lot more than that to see Ahmadinejad, and guarrantee his election.

read more | digg story

Spiegel says Cyrus Cylinder and myth are fake

Matthias Schulz needs to realise that Cyrus was brought up as a Zoroastrian, and read books like Zend-Avesta which would have educated him in the high morals he had. As for the doubts, then he needs to read Cyropaedia, and the Bible, which were not written by the Shah.

read more | digg story

Obama's "Big Idea" on Iran's Seyyeds

RapidCityJournal.com - Rapid City, South Dakota's News Leader » Ap » Headlines:

"'My whole goal in terms of having tough, serious direct diplomacy is not because I'm naive about the nature of any of these regimes. I'm not,' Obama said at a press conference. 'It is because if we show ourselves willing to talk and to offer carrots and sticks in order to deal with these pressing problems, and if Iran then rejects any overtures of that sort, it puts us in a stronger position to mobilize the international community to ratchet up the pressure on Iran.'"

Suddenly Obama thinks that he can be morally correct if he goes to the Seyyeds and make overtures, that the EU and many others have failed to do. And you know what, the Seyyeds will make him look special. They will lie to him to get him elected, and then carry on doing what they are doing. Obama will get elected, and he will find out that the Seyyeds have lied to him, and he will turn very nasty. There is, in this young President of USA to be, a very angry side, which the US military needs, in order to defeat the Seyyeds. With all due respect, McCain has no got what it takes. He legacy is far too polluted by GWB. The US military needs a young blood, who realises what the real truth is. At that point the people of United States will believe the new President, as he really did try his best to negotiate.

But all of this is political posturing by the US politicians to get the hearts and minds of their voters is very pathetic. As I have said a hundred times before, it is really easy to get rid of the Seyyeds. We do not need Mr Obama to trot off to Iran. Just get the world media to ask the Seyyeds, how would they cope, if the people of Iran decided not to work for them. The discussion threads will be a lot more powerful than the threats of sanctions. A general strike is a lot better than an air strike. But then that is far too easy, and it would remove the need for US military in the area, and allow the real Iranians to build the new economic force in west Asia. And you know what, it is us Iranians' own fault for not organizing ourselves well enough from abroad to regain our land. The country has been hijacked by a bunch of nutters and no one can get into the cockpit to stop the plane from a crash landing or to be blown up in the sky.

Iran's Seyyeds have a "Black Night"

reportonbusiness.com: Iran's gasoline imports prime target for sanctions:

"Thirdly, target countries often get help from so-called 'black knight' allies, who undermine the effectiveness of sanctions and grow rich in the process. And finally, sanctions may drive wedges between the economic interests of allies who share the same policy goals."

China is the Seyyeds' "Black Night". So will the US government, or can the US government actually influence US and other world corporations to stop trading with China? Stupid question really.

Do you believe Ahmadinejad's deputy?

Ahmadinejad's deputy: Iran is a friend of Israel - Haaretz - Israel News: "

'Iran wants no war with any country, and today Iran is friend of the United States and even Israel.... Our achievements belong to the whole world and should be used for expanding love and peace,' said Iranian Vice President Esfandiar Rahim-Mashaei, who is also head of the Cultural Heritage Organization.

Have you noticed that all kinds of people are getting involved in this saga, trying to appease the media. These people have never passed opinions before.

Simple solution for getting Iran back

Iran won't discuss enrichment freeze in next talks - Yahoo! News:

"Iran's top nuclear negotiator ruled out on Saturday discussion of freezing uranium enrichment at any subsequent round of talks with major powers."

So why do the world powers bother. Why don't they think of helping the Iranians around the world to select a new set of Iranians, that are leaders in their industry. We have Iranians who run the JPL and sent the Mars lander on Mars. We have Iranians that are number two in Google. We have Iranians that founded Ebay. For crying out loud, what is it with the UN, US and the Iranian diaspora. Let's create an Iranian government in exile, that puts Iran first. That means it is answerable to the people's law of Iran, and then to politics, religion, and commerce. The UN has to ask for these people to be nominated.

Once we have 20 people, then they can decide for Iran what is right. The Seyyed regime can do what it likes, but the people of Iran, and the UN will not listen to them. The people will then threaten a General Strike, and the Seyyeds can go to Najaf, and stay there. We do not need air strikes or blood on the streets.

Civil disobedience by 300 truck drivers in Iran

Truckers blocked team-mate highway in protest to police corruptions. The participating drivers explained to vehicles stopping that the police was allowed only to intervene when a crime was in the making or to issue tickets for traffic violations. However, they [police] stop us on the road and demand bribes for something they made up as traffic violations.

http://www.ncr-iran.org/content/view/5396/1/

Truck drivers in Iran, are slowly becoming a force to be reckoned with. Strategically what they and other groups are building up to, will build up to a general strike one day. The threat of a general strike will save Iran from any alien, be they external, or internal like the Seyyeds.

Talks with Iran's Seyyeds will save US economy

Iran calls nuclear talks positive - Yahoo! News:

"Iran's Foreign Minister said Friday that forthcoming nuclear talks in Geneva and the participation of a U.S. diplomat for the first time look positive and he expects progress."

Which means that the price of oil is not going to go up soon. So maybe the US has to participate, in order that its economy does not suffer anymore.

How John Bolton has helped Iran's fanatic Seyyeds

John Bolton is making sense | FP Passport

Over the past two or three years, we have been treated to one sensational threat after another about the likelihood of imminent war with Iran. All of these alarms and predictions have one thing in common: they never happened. Perhaps it is time for us to join Bolton in looking at the real indicators. When Bolton quits writing his jeremiads or when he begins to express satisfaction with the direction of U.S. policy, that is when we should start to get worried.

So are we seriously seening a shift in US policy, or is it that the US knows, that the Seyyeds are never going to change. We know that this flavour of Seyyeds, namely the IRGC, is very bitter, compared to the ones who run the foreign ministry. Ironically these Seyyed neocons are not too different from their US counterparts. But it took the likes of Bolton and of Cheney, to get the poodles of Jannati and Mesbah-Yazdi to come to power. Once these titans of the Seyyed Empire were in, and failed to move from their policy enrichment for the sake of their Mahdi cause, then the Seyyeds reform minded foreign ministry, gave up any form of sweeteners to the US. The die-hards had won the battle, and spear-headed a huge propaganda campaign to move towards China and Russia even more, as the US and UN sanctions forced EU corporations to quit. Just look at how the Russian Gasprom is so eager to pick up where Total of France leaves behind. So it is becoming quite clear, that the Seyyeds are going to be labelled as Chinese/Russian poodles. So it is up to the new US administration to deal with the Chinese and Russians with the appropriate threats to sort out the Seyyeds.

How crazy can the Israeli media get?

We only get one strike | Op-Ed Contributors | Jerusalem Post

Iran has the same virus inherent in every totalitarian power - to gain imperial dominion. Totalitarian Iran wants to recreate its empire east of the Mediterranean. The leaders of modern Iran, long before the present Islamic regime, toyed with the idea of reviving the empire of Cyrus and Darius.

You sometimes think these Israelis are mad. After all if it was not for Cyrus, where would they be now?

Oil vultures over Iran

Arab Monitor - Sito di informazione dal mondo arabo:

"The Iranian-Russian joint venture, if implemented, would help Gazprom to boost its supplies in order to meet its delivery obligations, whereas it would effectively undermine Western powers' and Israel's concerted efforts to isolate Iran. Therefore, Kommersant reports, analysts are still cautious about the prospects of cooperating with Iran. On the other hand, Kommersant argues, if Russia renounces cooperation with Iran alligning itself with Western powers and Israel, it will cede the rich Iranian oil and gas market to Japan, India and China."

Like vultures swirling over a rotten corpse, the industrialised countries (the West and Japan), are bickering over what is under the land of Iran, with the up and coming nations (India, Russia, China). They don't give a damn about the people of Iran, who are trying to make a living on the land of Iran.

Iran's Seyyeds seek closer ties with China, support for nuclear programme

Iran seeks closer ties with China, support for nuclear programme:

"Tehran expects China, as well as all its friendly countries, to express support for the country's nuclear programme and its close cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, Hosseini said."

This guy is basically begging the Chinese not to switch sides. Now it is up to the US and EU to sort out China and to a lesser extent Russia. Chinese should be brought to the UN security council for its ambivalence towards any regime's human rights. It is not just in Iran, it is in Sudan, Zimbabwe, Venezuela; which are all the trouble spots. Fact is that Wal-Mart is big in China and no one asks Wal-Mart "what are you doing there, using cheap labour, and energy that is actually from Iran. Maybe the Saudis could threaten to cut off the energy supplies, to get the Chinese away from the Seyyeds.

Navy stops Iran's Seyyeds sending drugs into Britain

A secret mission by the Royal Navy has seized drugs worth £26m which were being smuggled to Britain from Iran.

read more | digg story

False Jitters Over Iran, and Israel

Jim Hoagland - Jitters Over Iran - washingtonpost.com:

"So you might want to consider battening down the hatches and getting the bomb shelters ready, just in case."

Actually Jim, look around this week-end, and you will notice that it is really quiet. No warmongering at all.

Why? Well they got the price of oil back up. So none of the Seyyed or Republican Peak Oil advocates is worried. But wait, once the price drops again, and their war of words will begin. We will have the Israelis firing missiles over the Mediterranean, and the Seyyed's IRGC firing more across the Straits of Hormuz, for target practice.

That will get the Arabs to go ape shit and start buying the futures contracts, and hey presto the price of oil will be well and truly near $200.

Congressman wants to stop US exports to Iran's madmen

Lawmaker wants review of US exports to Iran - Yahoo! News:

"Rep. David Scott, vice chairman of the House subcommittee on terrorism, nonproliferation and trade, said Friday that he will press for a congressional review of sanctions enforcement following an Associated Press investigation that found U.S. exports to Iran rose from about $8 million in 2001, Bush's first year in office, to nearly $150 million last year."

Well, it is about time, wakey wakey US.

No war with Iran's Seyyeds during Olympics?

Newshoggers.com: More Iranian Rumors:

"Once the six week negotiation period passes, and the real negotiations begin, the clock is ticking. This time period is not an accident, there is a reason why the six week time period was insisted upon by several nations of the six party talks, including China. The six week period insures that war will not break out during the Olympics, and with this condition established heads of state will be in attendance..."

That's the power of China, and Japan. But I think that would be the best time to raise the temperature. At that point the Chinese will push their Seyyed proxies to forget their dogmatic attitude.

Iran's Seyyed isolation grows leads to become China's proxy in Middle East

Iran isolation grows as France's Total cancels $10bn South Pars gas field project - Times Online:

"Efforts to isolate Tehran have scored a political and economic hit with a decision by France's Total group, the last big western energy company in Iran, to halt plans to develop huge natural gas reserves in the Gulf."

Does this mean that the Chinese are going to do this project as well. Why doesn't someone say something to the Chinese?

But Norway is still dealing with Iran's Seyyeds

Bloomberg.com: Europe: Total Postpones Plan to Invest in Iranian Gas Project:

"StatoilHydro ASA, Norway's biggest oil and gas producer, said today it will remain in Iran and complete a project to develop phases six to eight of South Pars."

Why? What's with the Scandinavians? They were all for banning the cartoons, and now this. What is the relationship between the Seyyeds and Norway? I know, Dynamite. Seyyeds love bombs. Where was it invented?

Iran's Seyyeds buying gold perhaps?

Bloomberg.com Commodities: Gold Gains on Mounting Iranian Tensions, Equity Market Slump :

"Crude-oil futures rose after Iran, the second-largest petroleum producer in the Middle East, tested more missiles in the Persian Gulf."

But what this report does not refer to, is that we had so much money being returned to Iran from EU after the closure of banks.

Why the U.S. (Probably) Won't attack Iran

Tom Engelhardt, talks as if the Iranians are a bunch of zombies, who cannot take care of the Seyyeds themselves, and like the Iraqis need the US to interfere.

read more | digg story

On Iran: Obama's "direct diplomacy" is a bad excuse

What is it that direct diplomacy would do? The Seyyed would tell him that he is an apostate.How much clearer can the UN get after all these years?

read more | digg story

War for Iran's Oil - an illusion.

The problem is purely based on speculative trading on the oil contracts. In fact if there was a war, the price would crash, as the Seyyeds would be defeated, and the Straits of Hormuz would be safe. False fear pricing is a lot worse, than the actual reality.

read more | digg story

A look at state exports to Iran's terrorist regime

Simple question. Why?Or to put it elaborately, why does the US not stop this, before attacking Iran?

read more | digg story

Putin didn't talk about enrichment with Iran's madman

The madman Ahmadinejad sits in front of Putin, and gets no grief. Why does the US do business with Russians?

read more | digg story

Seyyeds of Iran love Obama

Asked specifically about Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama, Mottaki declined to comment, saying Obama had run into trouble in the past for expressing a willingness to negotiate with Iran."So by commenting on this we do not want to create further problems for the U.S. presidential candidates," Mottaki said

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080706/wl_nm/iran_mottaki_dc

The foreign ministry of the Seyyed Empire is the more reformed part. They lost power a long time ago. They would love to negotiate, and not put Iranians in harms way.

The foreign ministry buys time for the Seyyed cause. Their cause or ideology, is what drives them to be over and above all other human causes. That is why they are interested in siphoning the secular Iranians oil fund to build nukes.

Of all the international violations, the world has picked on the nukes issue. Why you may ask? It is because it helps Peak Oil advocates.

BBC chooses to report stark choices for Iran

Later, he appeared to clarify his position, when he told Iranian state television: "In my interview, I talked about accepting negotiations, and not accepting the proposed package. I said to accept negotiations based on Iran's usual policies."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7489430.stm

Two things come to mind right away from that comment in that article. First of all, what is BBC doing condoning, so naively, people who care more for their Seated Empire, than Iran? Secondly, the article is written in such a definitive fatalistic tone.

We are told, "That's it. There are no other options, and it is a stark choice". Total rubbish I say. It really shows how "stark" the BBC is. Lucid Wittiest said, "uttering a word is like striking a note on the keyboard of imagination." And there is no imagination in that article.

The most appropriate word I say is "strike". We Iranians, like any nation, have ignored the Seated rituals, no matter how much the US and Israelis, have given them an excuse; to put the fear of their views of "God" in the Norris believers of Iran. Our imagination says that we can all go on a General Strike, and do not need air strikes, to get Iran back. It would really be nice if the BBC had the same imagination.

All the years that the BBC has involved with Iran, it is a shame, or a sham, that they just do not express the Norris culture of Iran, which has for so long fostered civilisation for mankind. It is morally superior to any religion, being based on Free Will and imagination of a person's own right to live. It is in fact a threat to the existing Abrasive dogmatic religions.

If Carter was around, he would point to the likes of Carter; and how he allowed dogma, to poison and mesmerism Iranians, to change the flag and name of Iran. The democratic process was abused, to try to uproot all the essential elements of Iranian nation hood in the name of dogma.

People now know better, and enemas abstained in that process, and the result is that, the silent majority know that the Seated Selection process should be used to dis till them from the Iranian nation hood.

We Iranians stand united on own carpets. Each carpet is uniquely different and second to nothing else in the world. The Spirit that is woven through all Iranians, is so deep, strong, and distinct; that it has shone brilliantly in all the palaces of the world, from the beginning of culture itself, reminding all what it means to be Persian.

So there is so much of Iranian culture, that is flowering and blossoming in front of those "stark" choices BBC loves to emphasise. The BBC chooses to turn a blind eye to all what is Iran now, just like they did in 1978, when there was no internet, and it was pretty much only radio station we all listened to. They relayed the communists' orders, as and when people should go on strike. But will they relay what the Iranian opposition says? No.

The BBC led the revolution against Iranian nation hood, and brought dogma under the guise of democracy. That is why so many Iranians are now correspondents in their Blogs. The world is flabbergasted, to see the avalanche of Persian Blogs second only to English. And the BBC ignores them. Thank goodness that Iranians that put Iran first, are there, and we are in control of our own destiny.

Iran should use thorium for its nuclear power.

Thorium is an alternative to Uranium in nuclear reactors, albeit with notable differences. You can't make weapons with it.

read more | digg story

Who is in charge in Iraq?

You can't have the US and Seyyeds together in one place.

read more | digg story

Seyyeds destroy Iran's economy

Do they care? No, but this time they are going to sink with it.

read more | digg story

Real Iranians want peace.

Seyyeds want Israelis to kill Iranians. World must speak to real Iranians. It is rediculous to think who else would benefit, but Peak Oil advocates, and the economic threat Iranians pose. Bring back real Iranians, and a lot of money will go to Iran from US and Dubai. You will see the equivalents to Sony and GE in Iran. Iranians are smart and hard working. Connect the dots. The potential for West Asia is enormous.

read more | digg story