We do not worship Iran

We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Neocon_accused_of_misquoting_Irans_leader_1119.html

Oh I remember AKh making this comment. In fact SB should know better. We were both at Princeton at the time. We all know, how AKh did not want to even have Iran, included in the name of the Islamic Republic. Fact is, he did not even want to leave Iraq. He is famous for being so unmoved returning to Iran. He was quite happy to have a Seyyed Empire from Baghdad as and when. But we must give credit to Iranians from the first day. The Seyyeds began losing against the nation of Iran, right from the word go. Akh could not persue all his radical thoughts and had to shut up. But that did not mean that there was a political alternative to him. The Shah died and we all know the rest. So what are we to do? Quite simple really, carry on as we are modernizing Iran, in spite of what these Seyyeds are doing. They need their own land. Let them go to southern Iraq, and have a seat right next to the Holy See in the UN. But leave Iran, that is thousands of years older alone. Heck if it was not for people like Mani, you would not have the likes of Salman Parsi and Islam. The people who come from Babylon have a distinctively different outlook to Life than Iranians. We look at the God within. Akh and his lot, are idealists. One book and that's it. Fine go and run your country with that one booK. Don't come and burn all ours. The Earth is big enough for all of us. If you are going to stay in Iran, put Iran and its history, above everything else. You will have your peaceful departure, and we Iranians will not harm you. We are too civilized for that. Look out for the shut down.

Cruise site hit in Iran

A series of explosions rocked the Parchin Military Site (where missiles, including "cruise" type missiles, are manufactured) at Varamin south of Tehran.

http://noiri.blogspot.com/2007/11/breaking-news-explosions-in-iran.html

How much money, yes money that could have been used to make hospitals and schools, was wasted by the Seyyeds, to build these sites. And now we have to get rid of them. The arms companies are having a laugh. What suckers we Iranians are. We let the Seyyeds in, and they suck our oil to build rubbish like this that is no good to anyone.

Shah vs Musharraf

"When the challenge to the Shah arose we procrastinated too long", he told me late last month, "I think we should have fished or cut bait more quickly, either making a clear choice to support the Shah in some effort to repress the opposition or to prevent Khomeini from coming back.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C11%5C19%5Cstory_19-11-2007_pg3_3

The radical chic of both present day Pakistan, and the then Iran, both sided with the Islamists. The radical chic in Iran was not anti-nationalistic, but when the Shahanshah died, and the military sided with the Seyyeds, Iran was lost. The flag changed, the national anthem changed. Iran became an Islamic Republic. At the time I said, Iran has now become another Pakistan. These two Islamic Republics both put Islam above nationalistic values. Now if you ask any Iranian then and now, you will find that they put the Spirit of Nowrooz over and above Islam. Khomeini tried to ban Nowrooz. Iran as a nation and Empire consisted of Pakistan. As Iranians we go back at least 7000 years. The Pakistani people should do the same as the Afghanis, and trace their ancient roots, and seek the secular nationalistic foundation, and not act as an upstart young nation with no heritage and just revolutionary fervour. This revolutionary fervour has been used by the US military and peak oil advocates, to find a reason to be in West Asia. If the Shahanshah was not poisoned, and had recovered, the Seyyeds would not have been able to hijack Iran and run amok. As it is, the people of Iran have now learnt what the Shahanshah meant by the alliance of Red and Black. The Seyyeds have had to resort to Iranian nationalistic virtues in order to attract the public interest, by playing the nuclear card. But the people know that the Seyyeds put Islam above Iran, and they want to siphon the oil to prepare for the return of the 12th Shiite Emperor. Ironically the Spirit of Iran is more in Iranians' minds than ever. People gather and celebrate Iranian festivals much more than any Islamic ones. Iran will become a new Iran and the whole area will find its proper roots. Maybe then ZB and his ilk will realise what the history of the area is.

Why Iran's Seyyeds would never block the Straits of Hormuz

'We would never look to use oil as a weapon', Ahmadinejad said in response to a Thomson Financial News question.

OPEC SUMMIT ROUNDUP Ahmadinejad attacks US dollar, says won't use oil as weapon - Forbes.com

You know, if he did use it as a weapon, that would certainly end things for all the peak oil and Seyyed supporters.  Think of this scenario.   The US and its allies have enough power in the Persian Gulf to stop and monitor any traffic through the Straits of Hormuz.  It would not take that long for the world to realize that the oil is better used if it is all piped across to the Mediterranean, Arabian Sea or Red Sea.  The price would jump, but it would fall even more, as the contingency plans would kick in, and the whole world would be in the Persian Gulf.  Heck they would seal off Iran.  Moreover there would be a huge embargo on everything Iran did, Seyyed or otherwise.  Yes the monkey knows this.  Anyway with this comment of his, he is sure to drop the insurance rates, and so the price of oil will collapse.  And he wanted the price to go up.  What a nutter.  What a laugh.

Iran's Seyyeds ruling over China, helping slavery

China now gets at least 14 percent of its imported oil from Iran, making it China's largest supplier and the source of as much as $7 billion worth of oil this year, according to David Kirsch, a manager at PFC Energy.

Deepening China-Iran Ties Weaken Bid to Isolate Iran - washingtonpost.com

This is a clear case of the tail wagging the "Chinese" dog.  And of course it is the Seyyeds that are ultimately controlling the cost of cheap energy to China's industrial zones.  And ironically it is the big western firms that are taking advantage of this situation.  For example Wal-Mart is making $USD 1 billion a day in revenue. And the weak dollar helps them sell their stuff.  The next time you go to Wal-Mart, and you see something without a name or location where it is made, you know that is was made by a prisoner, using Iranian Oil.  Don't buy it.  Buy a product made in your own country.  Don't help 21st Century slavery.

How many Opecs for a peanut?

The Iranian president called for drawing up of a comprehensive plan for OPEC and establishment of an specialized bank called "OPEC Bank" to safeguard the hard currencies of OPEC member states.

http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-234/0711181674163039.htm

First the madman said that Iran will not trade in US dollars. But did that mean that the Chinese bought crude oil in Euros? No. Next he went on about creating a new oil bourse in Kish. Did that change anything? No. The world still looks at the WTI and Brent in US dollars. Finally he learnt how feable and pathetic he is, when the major banks of Iran were thrown out of the world's financial system. So the poor chap and his brigade of zombies are so arrogant, that they want the world to trade in what presumably would be called Opecs. Can you imagine going to a bar in London, and asking "how many Opecs is it for a beer?" You know that is why we call him Anatarinejad (Anatar means monkey). This monkey is full of tricks and he thinks he is so clever. Any peanuts anyone for the monkey?

Acrimonious World

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called his French counterpart, Nicolas Sarkozy, "young and inexperienced" in an acrimonious and threatening letter, the daily newspaper Le Monde reported Friday.

Report: Iran president sends "acrimonious" letter to France's Sarkozy - International Herald Tribune

I came across this comment first, and then thought, "ah well, yet another quip, from that madman".  But as I was reading the newswires, I came across the word acrimonious again.

In a statement following the vote on the resolution on moratorium on the use of the death penalty, the representative of Singapore congratulated the co-sponsors of the resolution on their “pyrrhic victory”. He said the vote had proved that there was no international consensus on the resolution, as almost half of the delegations had not voted in its favour. That should be an indication that many delegations were uncomfortable with the text. Co-sponsors had brought the resolution forward fully aware of how acrimonious and divisive the issue was.

TWO-DAY DELIBERATIONS END WITH CONTENTIOUS RESOLUTION CALLING FOR MORATORIUM ON USE OF DEATH PENALTY APPROVED BY THIRD COMMITTEE AFTER VOTE

There is something weird, and yet wonderful about coincidence, and with the internet, it happens a lot.  It defies logic, because how often is it, that one comes across such a word as acrimonious.

Now maybe there is a hidden meaning to all this?  One can talk about the split world we live in.  That all those for capital punishment are with the likes of the Seyyeds.  Is this the great divide in the world?

I know that on a personal note, when I first meet someone, I don't ask about their religion or their politics.  What I do ask is their position on Capital Punishment.  And I ask you, dear reader,  where do you stand?

Let me tell you where I stand and why.  I believe in Life.  I do not think there is such a thing as death.  But my definition of Life is different.  I believe that there is a greater existence, and that we are always part of that.  So nothing just disappears and is gone.  The energy of the person remains.  Astrologers and many non Astrologers connect to these energies.  So with that attitude, it is ridiculous to believe in death.

Now look at the all the political, nationalistic, religious and other movements or motives, that have been based on death, and have not done Good.  The world that we live in now, is only where it is, because on balance, more people on Earth are learning, that death is a divisive issue, and at best helps the person who kills the most.

As for Iran, it will be only a free society, as and when Capital Punishment is outlawed.  That will take care of the Seyyeds' dogma, and any other awkward political movement.  The Iranian Opposition needs to be fully united on this, and non-violent regime change.  This can be done by having peaceful General Strikes, whereby the Seyyeds' authority will be undermined, with no harm to anyone.

Why did the Chinese walk out and help Iran's Seyyeds?

A meeting of Western powers scheduled for next week to discuss tougher sanctions on Iran has been cancelled because China has pulled out, European diplomatic sources said on Friday.

European diplomats say Iran sanctions meeting cancelled | Markets | Reuters

What did I say?  It is the Chinese behind all this mess.  And it is not really the Chinese Generals in China, but the US multinational Generals eg: GE, GM, etc and of course Wal-Mart.

We have in China, the modern equivalent of slave trade.  Strong accusations?  Yup.  Follow this line of thought.  The US and EU companies, such as Wal-Mart, and many others, are making stuff in China.  And they are doing it with prisoners.  Almost every week, 100,000 people get arrested in the whole of China, and become slave labour in the specially selected "industrial" zones.

But to me, what is most important, is the energy supply.  Where does that come from?  Iran.  But the world press does not report it.  If anything, they will blame the Chinese human rights record.  And they, that is the US press, does a fine job of not disclosing the slave trade that Wal-Mart gets up to with the cheap land and energy.

So the last thing these "US Generals in China" can do, is to let Iranians become free, and part of the civilized world.  No, Iran has to remain a pariah state, and just give oil to US slave drivers in China.  If any civilized Iranian was in charge, no oil would go to them, especially with the view that they burn it badly and pollute the Earth aswell.

So the US will apply selective unilateral sanctions on some companies.  Will it include HSBC, or Standard Chartered Bank?  No way.  Will it include all those proxy companies working for the Seyyeds and the US?  No way.  They will just make a  token jesture.

The only answer to all this, is when the Iranian population decide, that enough is enough, and they decide to threaten the Seyyeds with General Strikes.

Seyyeds sucking up to the Chinese big time

China, which can veto further U.N. sanctions, gets about 12 percent of its oil imports from Iran and wants more.

Iran and China vow to boost ties - Yahoo! News

At the time of Shahanshah, the liberals used to criticize; saying "the US owns Iran", or "the Shah is US's puppet".  Where are the liberals, or the anti-US "radical chic" now?  Why don't they cry against the Chinese in the same way?

The other Islamic Republic

When a large group of eminent U.S. foreign policy experts was asked this summer to name the country most likely to transfer nuclear technology to terrorists in the next three to five years, Pakistan was the top choice.

COLUMN-Pakistan,Iran show U.S.influence's limits:Bernd Debusmann | Reuters

Connect the dots.  US used to support Taliban & Co, when the Soviets were a threat in Afghanistan.  The US helped them to be this new force in Waziristan.  Musharraf's (or should I call him Mozakhraf) military pretends to fight them.  AQ Khan and the Seyyeds get the nuke plans from the Chinese.  Their narc friends get all that snuff from Afghanistan.  Smells very familiar to the trade going on, as in the film Apocalypse Now.  So everyone is in the oldest trade.  Meanwhile the Israelis want to hit Natanz, when it should be Khost.  And can the AQ Khan's nukes hit Israel?  Sure can.  So why hit Iran, when all the trouble is in the other Islamic Republic, namely the Islamic Republic of Pakistan?  Now you see why the US wants to give them all more aid.