Tone of the press on Iran's horrible regime

With the Islamist regime in Tehran making clear that it has no intention of complying with U.N. Security Council

Options on Iran -- The Washington Times, America's Newspaper


One look at the above tone, and you can see how the world is now clearly separating the Islamist regime from the people of Iran.  That was not the case not so long ago.

The more the Seyyeds are seggragated in the media as distinct from the rest of Iranians, the better and easier the regime change will be.

Iraq crisis is Iran's Seyyeds' trap

Iran may well provide the glue that keeps that from happening - all the more reason for the US and its allies not to view every Iranian involvement in Iraq negatively, or as an act of subversion.

Asia Times Online :: Middle East News - Iraq crisis is Iran's opportunity


Sometimes you read comments, and you think, "well that goon is not aware of Iranian history", and you let it go.  But we Iranians have some real weirdos.  Above is a perfect example.  In wanting to be different, this character always says the wrong things.  He highlights the fact that the Seyyeds are over the moon because the Brits are out of the Basra area.

In fact what will happen, is that the Seyyeds will rush in, and be spotted very clearly, and held accountable for what they are doing, as the Sunnis and Kurds will start to complain.  Up to this point, the Seyyeds where pretty much camoflaged by the Brits, who were silent, too silent about the Seyyed involvement in Iraq.  So it is just as well that the apologists for the Seyyeds are out of the area, and we can all see the real interferrence taking place right on TV.

Personally I think that the sooner the Seyyeds have their own country in southern Iraq the better.

New Seyyed Commander Takes Over Revolutionary Guards in Iran

So we hear that a new Seyyed Commander has been appointed.  Big deal.  Fact is that the true Iranian Army is held together, and is not polutted by these aliens.  So many correspondents miss this point as shown below:

But the Iranian military is not -- in the manner of some Latin American states in the past or Turkey -- prominently involved in domestic politics. Those officers who go on to fill political or administrative positions do so as civilians and are seen as elements with an assured loyalty to the political system more than to the IRGC as a corps.

Iran: New Commander Takes Over Revolutionary Guards - RADIO FREE EUROPE / RADIO LIBERTY

Culture vs Religion in Iranians

"His family had been only culturally Islamic, not devout Muslims, but the conversion still upset his father."

More:

http://www.al.com/living/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/living/1188981799316130.xml&coll=2&thispage=2

There is an amazingly strong culture in Iran. Actually it is more akin to a Spirit. But as the above article shows, even educated military in Iran, did not know enough. They ran away.

One of the strange situations we have in Iran, is that unlike other societies, where they had to opt for knowledge of secular politics, to fend off the interference of religion in the society, Iran has its own ancient morality far far older than any of the religions. This Spirit of Nowrooz preserves the idenity of an Iranian, no matter whatever else he or she likes in Life.

It must be said that only under the blatant vulgarity of the Seyyed rulers, has the Nowrooz Spirit become very cherished and dear to all true Iranians. How many Iranians put any younger "holy book" on the haftseen instead of the oldest book of truth, namely the Zend Avesta?

Christians and many other religions, lump everything philosophical or spiritual, under the wings of Zoroastrianism. In fact Iran, just like China or Greece, had plenty, if not more philosophers, but only one remains very distinct above all else, namely Zoroaster or Zarathushtra. Diversity of thought and choice is at the heart of what is called "Gozinesh" in the Zend Avesta. The concept of choice and Free Will existed in the Zend Avesta before anywhere else.

So why are we in this mess? Iran lost all its art and literature because its high priest converted to Christianity, and then created what is now called Islam to prevent proselytizing. Salman Parsi then burnt all of Iran's art and demolished all art meticulously, and said one needed just the Koran. As Cyrus the Great demonstrated, we Iranians tolerate, and do not like proselytizing.

Going back to the article, you can see how people are still proselytizing. They have no idea of the Spiritual roots of Iranian culture. To them old Iran had just a bunch of kings and tough men. Whilst most of the modern attitudes nowadays are to be found in Good Old Iranian culture. Iranians need not to run away, and go to younger religions, that Old Iran had created in the first place.

Perhaps people are converting to Christianity because at least it has some resemblance to our very much more ancient celebrations that it copied, or should I say, plagiarised incorrectly. You need to look at the roots of Christmas, and the Easter, and Thanks Giving, and see that the mimic Yalda, Nowrooz, and Mehregan.

ElBaradei hits the Seyyeds on nukes

"There are concrete elements of suspicion against Iran - so I am of the opinion that Iran has temporarily forfeited this right and must first win it back through confidence-building measures toward the international community," ElBaradei said.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAN_NUCLEAR?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

This time he is trying to buy time and critisize the Seyyeds.

US and Seyyed alliance in Iraq is broken

The frustration with Iran also helps explain the administration's growing disillusionment with Maliki, whose Shiite-led government might have been a joint US-Iranian project.

More:

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=5&article_id=84766

What is truly amazing is that the US administration tried to negotiate with the Seyyed Army. The Seyyed Army thinks it owns Iraq.

But at least the US has realised that it can only recognise the older divisions in the area, namely the national armies of the Arabs and Iranians.

Poll states Iranians cannot have velvet revolution by themselves

"It is perhaps due to the same lack of confidence in Western support that despite their clear wishes to the contrary 54% of Iranians felt that under current circumstances a 'Velvet Revolution' will not be possible."

More:

http://www.globalpolitician.com/articleshow.asp?ID=3312&cid=2

So Iranians want a velvet revolution, but it won't happen, because they think The West is not supportive.

Why are we Iranians so dependant on outside forces?

The media and terrorists

Below is a quote from a commentator. Whole article is written in a style which clearly differentiated between various elements in the middle east.

The killing of Iraqis by Iran's Revolutionary Guard should not be one a surprise to any who have followed the course of the Iraq war (and postwar). While Tehran is raising the outcry that the Kurdish freedom fighters (known as the PJAK) are "a terrorist outfit being sponsored and armed by the US to increase pressure on Iran" -- the IRGC is itself conducting a terrorist campaign within Iraq itself.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=22032

Day after day, we hear the word "Terrorist" being mentioned. Nowadays, unlike the past, news with the word "Terrorist" in it, effects people's political opinion, and moves markets. After 9/11 a "Terrorist" became a seriously legitimate entity, freely able to do what he or she wanted, and had loads of camera men and journalists chasing him or her everywhere.

It was not like that. You needed a national army to do things, to get the attention of the markets, politicians and public opinion. In many respects, it is all part and parcel of the development of the world media, that has created this situation. A stockbroker now sits behind a screen, has various news wires updating all the time in one window, and with a click of his mouse, he can change his investments in another window. The media knows this, and feeds his curiosity. So is it the terrorist or the media's fault?

And then you get the situation where terrorists are ruing a plot of land, control drugs and guns, or in the case of Iran, have subjugated the country, after tearing its national flag and history. But once you get the media mixing the terrorist with the national army, that becomes seriously damaging. When you get the name of Iran associated with the terrorists, that becomes very nerve racking. After all the media are supposed to be intelligent.

I blame the media

How come the US sold corn to Iran's Seyyeds?

The corn market also got a jolt Wednesday after the USDA reported that Iran - not a usual purchaser of U.S. grain - bought 120,000 metric tons of U.S. corn.

Finally the French turn against the Seyyeds in Iran

"We are considering additional measures, in the framework of a new Security Council resolution, against members and backers of the Iranian regime refusing to comply with demands of the international community," Hugues Moret, a French Foreign Ministry spokesman, said in an online briefing Friday.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070817/...a/iran_nuclear

That's where the change in government in France shows the difference. Chirac was never so blunt.

Allez La France!