Why did Iran's Seyyeds pull out of Manama Dialogue?

THE credibility of a major security conference talking place in Bahrain has been thrown in doubt after Iranian officials pulled out at the last minute.

http://www.gulf-daily-news.com/Story.asp?Article=202283&Sn=BNEW&IssueID=30263

One of the more interesting twists to this whole nuclear saga with the Seyyeds is what The Economist stated in its last paragraph when it states:

But to keep the world on side, America may have to show new flexibility. For example, while tightening sanctions, it could offer to talk to Iran about all aspects of their troubled relations, even before work at Natanz stopped. Iran might refuse. But that would at least make it clear which side was the spoiler.

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10251997

Now here is the first time, since the US decided to declare a slightly softer tone towards the Seyyeds, with the publication of the NIE report. AhMADinejad has welcomed the US's more positive outlook. So why don't the Seyyeds show up at the Manama Dialogue?

The reason I think is that they have no excuse to blame the US for anything now. The Seyyeds have had to rewrite the speech for Manama. All that anti-US stuff cannot work anymore.

Weaponization vs Enrichment

For that very reason, however, relieved doves who think the spectre of a nuclear Iran or of an American attack has now disappeared had better read the report again. Its final sentence says ("high confidence") that Iran has the scientific, technical and industrial capacity eventually to produce nuclear weapons if it chooses. As to what "eventually" means, the assessment has not changed: it was always late 2009 at the earliest but more probably the middle of the next decade.

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10251997

We know that the so called "spies" of United States, had seen some notes of some whisperings from some Seyyed thugs. That led them to deduce that the weaponization program, which is not that hard, has been halted. The world press, of course, the ones inside United States to begin with, and then the ones outside United States, used this as ammunition to beat neocons like Dick Cheney. What a shame that none of these correspondents actually know much about the nuclear cycle. As you can see from the article above, the crucial part of the nuclear cycle is the enrichment process. That bit has not stopped, and those centrifuges in Natanz have cost Iran so much both financially and internationally. We have let the Seyyeds ruin our reputation as the Birth Land of Human Rights. The fact that the enriched Uranium has no use for any power station in Iran, means that the Seyyeds want to use it for their own global Armaggeddon in respect of their Mahdi. They will press the button. The MAD (Multually Assured Destruction) principle does not apply for the Seyyeds. They see themselves as over and above UN or any international body that exists, has existed, or will exist. So what is the solution? The solution is that the world press should spend more time praising the Iranian diaspora, that has managed to create a new understanding of Iran for the future. We have people of incredibly high intellectual calibre who are keeping the dignity and respect of Iranians. These professionals are the future of Iran. We all want peaceful regime change. The one power we do not have is a world press that understands and appreciates the simplest way to get rid of the Seyyeds without bloodshed. We need the world press to not ask about the nuclear programs, but to ask what the Seyyeds could do in light of a non violent general strike. Once the Seyyeds are faced with questions centred on General Strikes, then they will realise that their bandits, can do nothing against a population of 65 million, if it decided to shut down Iran for even a couple of days. Our problem is not the Seyyeds, but the world press's blackout on forces of peaceful regime change in Iran.

Diplomacy with false teeth

"We will now press for a further sanctions resolution,'' the British minister wrote in the opinion piece published today. ``We cannot be afraid of diplomacy with teeth. The alternatives are all worse.''

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601102&sid=aQKIB92PC240&refer=uk

What is the point of diplomacy with teeth that does not include oil trading? The Chinese have clearly stated, that they will not be party to any aggreement, that would stop the flow of oil. And then you have the UK being the centre of military precurement. Unlike the US, the UK is not forcing companies to choose between the Seyyeds and UK.

Putin is naive towards the Seyyeds

President Vladimir Putin has urged Iran to freeze its controversial uranium enrichment programme, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Wednesday, Interfax reported.

In a meeting Tuesday with Iranian nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, Putin repeated his "call for freezing work on uranium enrichment," Interfax quoted Lavrov as saying.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071205/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpoliticsrussiaenrich

How strange that the Russians are toeing the US line. After China stopping a lot of credit lines to the Seyyeds, everyone was thinking that the Russians were going stump the coalition. Obviously the world values its trade relations with the US more than the Seyyeds. The US has made it quite clear that it will not allow companies that trade with the Seyyeds to trade with the US as well.

China falls into line

Asadollah Asgaroladi, head of the Iran-China chamber of commerce, was quoted as saying that Chinese banks "did not open letters of credit for Iranian traders during the past week."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/feedarticle?id=7122871

When we look back in years to come, we will realise this to be a very important event.

It has been quite difficult to get the Chinese to fall in with the rest of the world.

Obviously Russia does not want Iran out of the NPT, because of all the investments it has made in Bushehr NPP. But there are quite a few people there, that are not too pleased with Lavrov.

Annapolis, policing and US policy

This shift comes after Iran's "anger" at Syria because it attended the Annapolis Conference, while leaders of Palestinian organizations in Damascus did not accept an official Iranian invitation to meet with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Tehran, to coincide with the Annapolis Conference, and announce a counter-declaration, with the attendance of 10 Palestinian organizations. According to what sources told al-Hayat's correspondent in Damascus, the positions by the Palestinian organizations, came despite "considerable pressure exerted on and temptations offered to the leaders of the organizations," before the Iranian Embassy in Damascus was informed of the invitees' desire to "postpone" the visit to another time.

http://english.daralhayat.com/opinion/OPED/12-2007/Article-20071201-9518769f-c0a8-10ed-00c1-a41e440fe9ff/story.html

It is good to see, that the Seyyed foreign policy, has well and truly failed. It is however so sad, to see so much of secular Iranians' oil income, to be have been illegally siphoned for Seyyeds' bribes to other people outside Iran, rather than for poor secular Iranians.

Saudi Arabia has realised, that it must snub the Seyyeds, no matter how many times AhMADinejad, goes begging to them. Even the Syrians, Hamas and Hezbollah, have turned down the recent anti-Annapolis conference. But as you can see, the Annapolis Conference, is leading to a situation that would help put Iran before Lebanon.

For so long "the Middle East", was what was going on in the Levant, as the Seyyeds were busy trying to change Iran. The Seyyeds have failed, and no Moslem is with them. And the Iranians' 7000 old culture has been resurrected, ironically without a Shahanshah. Good. But why? Because the Shahanshahs used the principles of Human Right as written in the Zend Avesta. The Shahanshahs of Iran were the first believers of Human Rights. And the Iranians, out of necessity have had to do the same. Slowly the moral vacuum is filling up. Iran is reinventing itself - en masse, without a 2500 year old celebration.

But what did the Iranian Opposition do, when the Annapolis Conference took place? There was no one from the new Iranians there, who could tell the world of the clear non violent regime change in mind, that we all want. And does the world really know about us? Fact is we have no money or organization. Is there a need for it? Maybe not. Is the Spirit of Iran finding its own quiet way into our hearts? Yah Ahura it is.

All Iranians, like all decent human beings want peaceful change. Consciously resisting to anything Seyyed, is definitely there. It was not so obvious in The White Revolution we had. Ironically it has become obvious in a Black Revolution. So the non violent opposition is intuitively in all Iranians. It is part of our ancient 7000 year culture. But we need the world to know it, so that it is referred to as the new Iranian model, in lieu of the Seyyed Empire.

Ask any Iranian do you want change, and they will say yes. But they want it peacefully. It is not a case of the end justfying the means. It does not mean, that because the end will be peace, then we should attain it by any means. That's the trap the Iraqi people fell into.

And many multinationals corporations, like Exxon did not suffer one bit from the demise of what happened in Iraq. In fact they loved the fact that, everything apart from the flow of oil, has been destroyed. And the US government benefited too. The brain and financial drain to US, has been immmense. Can you imagine the equivalent effect to Iran, if it gets bombed? Quo Bene, again? US.

This rush to America was going on in the 70's, and then in 80's, after Akh's Tsunami hit our shores. And all the Iranians who fled to the "land of opportunity", just forgot the past and got on with the present and future. They had to. Now that is what I call a coup for the US.

But Iran struggled on. The poor secular Iranian people that remained, somehow conscientiously built their country, but this time with a Seyyed in the way. But they managed to get around the Seyyeds. They do not want politics, or religion. They love Iran. They see the immense opportunities there, and much to the surprise of the US, they have done very well. Hmm ... What can the Americans conjure up this time?

The world powers, that do not want secular Iran to be "the Japan of West Asia", have allowed the violent forces to be heard more, than the non violent forces of change in and out of Iran, with the nuclear fiasco stories, which help peak oil advocates. But ask any Iranian in Iran, and they will tell you that the Seyyeds' Chimp is powerless. The world press does not really like to report this, even though we have Iranian journalists now working for all the major newswires. That's criminal.

The last thing the media want, is for Iran to be able to manage change peacefully, with its own 7000 year old Free Will, as embodied in the oldest philosophical work known as Zend Avesta. That would be too boring, and would not sell at the newstands. War stories sell news, and effect commodity prices, and that's the bottom line.

Payback time

Personal stories are common of how the financial sanctions are affecting those mostly well-off people who have foreign bank accounts or earn income from abroad.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071128/wl_nm/iran_sanctions_people_dc

Sanctions is probably the most widely debated topic around. But it is quite clear that two sets of people will get hit by it. The first are the Seyyeds themselves, and the second group are the wealthy secular Iranians, who have managed to survive with the Seyyeds. The rest are the silent majority poor down-trodden Iranians, who won't feel the difference. The Seyyeds and their wealthy crowd have been feeding off them for ages, and it is payback time. Anyone who did not want to deal with the Seyyeds, or did not have connections in the appropriate places struggled. Their stories are too horrific to mention, and it is all based on the fact that they had different political and religious views to the Seyyeds. But if you were poor and passed all the relgious hurdles then yes you could get into the Seyyed merchant class. But if your Spririt had given you Iranian ideas, then you really struggled to implement them in Iran. And of course if you had global ideas, you had to get out, and let the folks in US to benefit from it, as Iran was not the "land of opportunity". So the US has benefited quite a lot from this. Do you think the US wants all the Iranian brains and money to go back to Iran? No. So they love the Seyyeds. They can get rid of the Seyyeds in no time if they wanted to. But Iranians like Parisa who write about Iran should talk more about the how the power of General Strike can bring the Seyyeds down.

Guardian's or AP's Sally Buzbee is wrong on Iran

And Khamenei lacks the stern, spellbinding charisma that bound the first revolutionary leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, so strongly to his people.

But Iran's clerical regime ``has survived everything short of the plague'' in its 28 years, said Suzanne Maloney, a senior fellow at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy in Washington.

And no coherent, organized opposition has ever emerged.

Khalaji is blunt: Ahmadinejad may be unpopular and ``very fragile.'' But he says: ``The regime is not vulnerable at all.''

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-7100924,00.html

It is so easy to say it, and so The Guardian does. But The Guardian, like many other newspapers is wrong. I have found that the more liberal press like The Guardian, that does not like the nationalist opposition forces, and will not be seen to be supporting the Islamist ones, makes such crazy comments.

For crying out loud Sally Buzbee, ask any Iranian, and they will tell you, that these monsters are not Iranian. All the Blogs in the internet, that the Iranians are famous for, are there, because 65% of the Iranian population, that are young, all speak of Iranian values, that are opposed to the Seyyed ones. So why don't you do your work properly and read those blogs, and see the opposition.

And it is organised. Ok, maybe we don't all have one platform that we have one speaker to represent us. But we are all saying the same thing about the Seyyeds. So our Iranian culture has organized us. Our Iranian culture is beyond politics and religion. We do not have a religious or political opposition. We have a national opposition.

Iranians have recognised these Seyyeds as aliens.

Germany's price for Iranians' freedom

Der Spiegel reported that if Iranian Bank Melli, which handles most of Germany's trade with Iran, were placed on a European Union embargo list, it would cost the budget 700-800 million euros ($1-1.2 billion) next year because the government would be forced to pay damages to German firms.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071124/wl_nm/germany_iran_sanctions_dc

So what are we to make of EU? All these years, they and the Chinese, have turned a blind eye, to all the Seyyeds atrocities, on the secular people of Iran. To EU then, Iranians' freedom, is worth less than $2 billion. That is ludricous. The approach should be, to force the non-Iranian corporations, to make a choice, between Seyyeds and non Seyyeds. For example, in the United States, the banks like Deutsche Bank, were told to make a choice, between doing business with US or Iran. EU should do likewise. And in the long run, try to get the Chinese, Russians and Indians, to do the same. The Seyyeds, and their counter parties, cannot be allowed to use the very system they critisize. If they cannot be bothered, to be completely transparent over their nuclear activities; siphoning so much of secular Iranians' oil income for centrifuges, then they will be forced to be part of the pariah states of the world. Meanwhile the people of Iran, who are not benefiting under the Seyyeds, will know that at least something is being done to stop them. At this juncture, it is best for the Iranian Opposition, to be united as the alternative. The world needs to know, that if it supports the secular non violent movement regime change, then the intelligent Iranians, who reside in and outside Iran, will come to power, who will conform to international regulations, as opposed to some 1400 year old dogma, designed to resurrect an new Seyyed Empire. The world at the moment uses concepts like Human Rights, that were born in the Zend Avesta. It is high time, the world respected that, more than anything else that came later, in Iran's histroy. Respect Iran for what it really is, and not for what the Seyyeds say Iran is. We are the sons and daughters of Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great. Support the true Iranians, and build a better world for all.

Is Ebadi morally superior to the Seyyeds in Iran?

"What we want is that the two sides should respect international law, and we warn them on this," she said. "The United States cannot have the right to deal with Iran outside the framework of international law, and Iran cannot build a wall around itself and say, 'I have nothing to do with international law' and pay no attention to [UN] Security Council resolutions."

http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=T&ct=us/8-0&fd=R&url=http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2007/11/75B38EE4-E855-4617-9ADC-083C341BFCB6.html&cid=0&ei=yBpHR_T6C5DgqwPe9LzqCw


She is a devout Moslem. Iran's Spirit is older than Islam. She talks about Human Rights. Human Rights was invented in the Zend Avesta, in Iran, at least 7000 years ago.

So what is she on about? How can she go on about Human Rights, without the slightest reference to the roots of Human Rights. At least the UN has put a copy of Cyrus's Cylinder, as a sign of respect.

Many doubt her intentions. She has a Nobel Prize. Out of the blue we have an important person in Iran, but what does that person do with that respect? Is she any better than the Seyyeds? Is Cyrus or Zoroaster more meaningful to her than Halabi Qureshi (aka Mohammad)?