Bollingers questions for President Ahmadinejad

Frankly, and in all candor, Mr. President, I doubt that you will have the intellectual courage to answer these questions. But your avoiding them will in itself be meaningful to us.

My questions for President Ahmadinejad | Salon.com

So Bollinger spoke his mind, and he wanted to tell AhMADinejad personally in public, and he did not care what the reply was.  See the 02:11 minute.

Mad comments from the Madman from Iran

"Our people are the freest in the world," he said. "The freest women in the world are the women in Iran." Those who make human rights charges against his government "are unaware of the situation in Iran," he added.

Iranian president answers Washington press corps | csmonitor.com

This is a sure sign of a madman.

Seyyed and Israeli clash like children

The exchange came after Iran's chief delegate Ail Asghar Soltanieh — like Arab delegates before him — said that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had acknowledged last year that his country possessed nuclear weapons — something Olmert says he never did.Soltanieh also criticized "the continuous silence of the U.S. ... vis a vis the atrocities, aggression, bloodshed and violations of over 30 resolutions of the United Nations."That, he said, is "shameful and (a) dark point in the history of the United Nations, and the IAEA and the modern century at large."In turn, Israeli delegate Israel Michaeli, alluding to claims that Olmert acknowledged Israel's nuclear weapons, said some previous speakers "continued to lie.""Those who call for the elimination of Israel" have no right to criticize "Israeli policies aimed at defending Israel's very existence," Michaeli said.

The Associated Press: Iran, Israel Clash at IAEA Conference

So now these two goons get to face each other face to face, and swear at each other.  It is really sad how childish these so called grown up men behave.  And the toys they are arguing over can take the world to Armaggedon.

Atomic Iran vs Nowrooz Spirit

"There are ways to live with a nuclear Iran," Abizaid said in remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank. "Let's face it, we lived with a nuclear Soviet Union, we've lived with a nuclear China, and we're living with (other) nuclear powers as well."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070918/ap_on_go_ot/abizaid_iran

It is not the case of becoming a nuclear power, it is the case of morality. The Iranian Nowrooz Spirit does not allow a threatening posture.

Russians coming to their senses

"We do not need a nuclear Iran or an Iran with the potential to create them," a Russian official whose name was not disclosed told Russian news agencies Monday. "We will not play any anti-U.S. games with it, should [Iran] decide against giving any answers to the IAEA's questions. Let them answer for themselves."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/12/AR2007031201296.html

Well with comments like that it seems that the Russians are not too keen in being an anti-US propaganda tool for the Seyyeds.

Iran's Seyyeds and the right to invade Iraq

"US forces will be targeted if they stay," Larijani has also told the press

Asia Times Online :: Middle East News - US and Europe drain Iran's half-full glass

This Seyyed, and the writer of the article, are talking through their Turban and hat respectively.  There is a proxy war going on in Iraq.  The Seyyeds are using Iran's wealth, to build a bomb and get back the old caliphate with its capital in Baghdad.  I bet you that in the Seyyeds' mind, he wants to build a new state stretching from Islamabad to Baghdad and to the Levant with Baghdad at it centre.

Trouble with that idea is that Ur in Iraq (which is why Iraq is called what it is in the first place) is where Abraham was born.  That brings in the two other religious fanatics from the Jewish and Christian side.  So Iraq does mean more than just oil to the US, with its Evangelists.

As far as Iranians are concerned, all three "religious" reasons, are just that, "religious".  The capital of Iran was called in the time of the Sassanians Cteisphon (and we Iranians pronounce it Teezfoon).  The Sassanians had plenty of tolerance and all the younger faiths than Iranian philosophy could live.  In fact in the light of Zoroastrian tolerance, other faith were encouraged.

Ironically the younger faith did not reciprocate did they, and apostates like Salman Parsi were encouraged to burn all of Iran's books.  So the younger faiths have lost their right to anything.  They broke the peace, and that is why they are where they are.  You cannot ignore history.

How Matt Lauer got it completely wrong on Iran

Watch this video

http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?g=923e4bfd-11ba-421f-9958-ab1308cc8ef2&f=00&fg=

First of all I like that ad with the dog chasing the owner. It just about sums up what you will see. The US at the moment is trying so hard to connect to the Seyyeds. The liberal news of US like MSNBC, which knows so pitifully little about the history of Iran, got Matt Lauer to state that Mossadegh was a President in 1953.

We all know how Mossadegh abused democracy for the first time, with rent-crowds, that later Khomeini used as well. And to this day the Seyyeds use rent-a-crowds in front of the TV. The US Democrats fell for all this in 1979, and it is happening again.

What is even funnier is amongst all the intellectuals of Iran, Matt Lauer goes and finds some Seyyed Professor who defends the nuke plans the Seyyeds have. It is all a laugh really. But you watched it on TV, so it must be true. You will see what I mean at the end, that the only clips worth were the ads.

Anyway, it shows one thing for sure. The Iranian Opposition has not managed to do anything in the past 30 years. Why is it the reporters like Matt Lauer do not know about the Iranian Opposition. Or maybe they do know, and they just want to use Iran to criticize the Republicans, instead of dealing with the Iranians' suffering under the Seyyeds. US reporter are again dragged into Iran because of the growing influence of the Seyyeds in Iraq, and the don't even know the geography of the area.

Why is the Seyyed Poodle sucking up to the West saying "sorry" to UK?

He also told the programme that "if the American government, and British government, corrects themselves, problems will be solved."

Channel 4 - News - Iranian president says "sorry" to UK

Up to this point, this Seyyed poodle was painted as some unyielding demon, and now he comes across as Mr Nice Guy.  Has all this got to do with a deal with the Brits getting out of the would be Seyyed Area in Iraq or present day Shiite dominated provinces in southern Iraq?

N.B. British Oil has invested a lot of money in these areas with a number of other Oil companies.

ElBaradei buys more time for Iran's Seyyeds' nuke bomb program

“Resolving all outstanding verification issues in the next two to three months, after a long deadlock, would go a long way towards building the confidence of the international community in the peaceful nature of Iran’s past nuclear programme,”

Despite progress, important issues of Iran’s nuclear programme still remain – UN


And what will ElBaradei do next January when nothing had happened, and the Seyyeds had not come completely clean?

True Iranians will never fight for Seyyeds

"Based on discussions at the Organization of the Islamic Conference, an attack against any Muslim country amount to an attack against all Muslim countries … That's a legitimate right," said Gholam Hussein Elham when asked whether Iran will defend Syria if it were attacked by Israel.

More at

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3447223,00.html

Sad as it seems, the present highly dellusional theocratic regime in Iran, thinks it has the support of all Iranians. Or maybe the above statement is just another pathetic sound bite as more and more Sunnis are becoming anti Seyyed. The people of Iran hardly participated in the so called elections last time. People spit on mullahs in Iran. And Iranians carry on doing things their way in Iran, ignoring the Seyyeds. The Seyyeds are losing the war against the non believers. The Iranian puts Iran's peace first for Iranian reasons, as opposed to any other reason that is not part of the Nowrooz Spirit of Free Will and Peace for all.