Thompson wants Iranians to overthrow Seyyeds

Isn't it odd that the present US government does not publically propose the overthrow of the Seyyeds in Iran. We have to wait for a Presidential contender with almost no chance for election to say something like that. So who is it that wants to help the secular Iranian population?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070427/ap_on_el_pr/on_the2008_trail

Iranian women face Seyyed bullies

It is good to see the Iranian women put up with the Seyyeds in Iran, but they are facing madmen who say:

"During the first four days [since the code came into effect] we have picked up 150,000 women who were not properly veiled, but many of them were released after they signed an admission of guilt and a formal apology," General Ismail Ahmadi Moghaddam said Thursday. An unspecified number of the women taken into custody were also forced to undergo psychological counseling, Moghaddam said.

Public vs Private Debate over Iran

How often do we hear that the little man with a big mouth in Iran wants to have a little tete-a-tete with GW Bush in public. But with the world of Blogosphere all their discussions have already been made. The article below suggests that we should never have these two have it out in public. I think that the world has already judged these two extremists quite accurately, and if both were put on a public debate along side with people from other non violent sources in the world, then both of them would be shown up in full blown light of the media, what a bunch of warmonering baffoons they are, who do nothing but satisfy their own petro-economic agendas.

http://www.yakima-herald.com/page/dis/288743816089432

Margaret Beckett hits Seyyeds

The article below was written by Margaret Beckett, and it really does show the change in tone, as compared to Jack Straw. UK is now taking a tougher stand, and has started to search suspicious boat again.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3391778,00.html

Why can't Iranian Reporters Tease Seyyeds?

It is really annoying, that the Israelis do so much to defend their own country against any Seyyed antagonism, but the Iranian Opposition newspapers, or even the ones in Iran that are not state run, do not ask the Seyyeds annoying questions, like the one in the article below, and provoke a reaction.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1177251161352&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

How Iranian Women Can Strike Back

For how long have the Iranian women had to put up with all the grief the Seyyeds give them. Now that the weather is getting hotter, we hear that the bullies are picking on the women.

The women of Iran never covered themselves before the Islamic Inquistion some 1400 years ago. But these same women did not know about non violent resistance did they. Some would go bezerk and shout and go violent, and suffer the consequences under Islamic dogma.

But these days someone needs to tell the women in Iran, that the Seyyeds depend on them to run their machinery of war and politics. All you women need to do is to theorize about what ifs. You think about, and then write the situation, that would exist if you all did nothing. Yes nothing. Let the men of Iran, including me, know what it is like if you did nothing.

The Seyyeds need to hear how a new netwrok is developing, that is based on what ifs of non violent resistance. This is the foundation that is necessary, before the real General Strikes start. You could say that this is more important than the Strikes themselves.

And finally it would be nice if the people who write articles, like the one below, actually showed, like me, a positive solution to it all.

http://www.playfuls.com/news_10_25746-At-Least-100-Iranian-Women-Arrested-For-Not-Covering-Their-Hair.html

Sanctions grow

I am all for sanctions on the Seyyeds. But we all know that the people on the list from the link below will find other ways. At least the US is trying. Question to ask is why did it take so long. Why didn't we have this list when the US hostages were taken? And why aren't more French companies on the list?

http://www.adn.com/24hour/politics/story/3605272p-12888880c.html

Inflation wins against Seyyeds in Iran

In as much as no one likes the people of Iran to suffer, it is comforting to see how badly the Seyyeds have managed to run the economy. This will force Iranians to judge the Seyyeds and think about judging them more and more. Of course we all know the old nuclear scapegoat.

So far the people have fallen for the nuclear drama so much that the Seyyeds feel that they have the backing of the whole country. But this is not so. No one is stupid enough to believe that all the funds being wasted on enrichment are not going for making a Seyyed bomb. Of course it is. Otherwise all the plants would be seen by all.

Why don't the Seyyeds open the nuclear facilities for Iranian people to see. They dare not. We have then a siphoning of the oil funds to areas to fund the fanatic ideology of Qom and its quest for Armageddon for the Shiite Mahdi etc etc. The people of Iran have now realised that the economy is suffering, and as the article below states, people are willing to go on strike.

And so the people of Iran will have to show that they can demand a safer Iran than what these alien Seyyeds preach. They have put secular Iranians in harms way. No Iranian wants to be the odd member of the international community. The Shahanshah of Iran and the nuclear scientists certainly did not want Iran's nuclear establishment to be used for bombs.

So the only action to take is for Iranian Bloggers, and if any news media dares, to provoke the Seyyeds with questions, as to what they are going to do if the people do go for a General Strike, in the wake of the economic condition of our country, and the dangerous abuses of the nuclear industry.

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=3&article_id=81641

Stop child executions in Iran

No Gas for Iranians

Just think, Iran has more Gas resevoirs than even the world needs, and yet its own people cannot have pipelines to their homes. It means more to the Seyyeds in Iran to develop centrifuges, head for 'nuclear nation' status, and not to help the infrastructure of Iran. If there is one country in the world that could be an example of clean energy, it is Iran. But as the article below states, the Iranian people have to be held ransome with rationing. No foreign invasion could do better than this to suffocate a nation. The people of Iran have no choice but to learn the hard way. They will grin and bear it all, because the people will not want to create civil war. Those of us abroad know the solution, that involves news media reporting how the people of Iran could topple the Seyyeds with General Strike. But they don't. Do we need to have anger on the streets for regime change, when the argument can be provoked and debated with the Seyyeds. I do not have the microphone. I am not a public authority of any sort. Why is it the those in high public office in any country do not warn the Seyyeds in Iran that they can be toppled so easily with a General Strike? The debate over the real support and strength of the Seyyeds will force them to admit that they are weak.

http://www.businessportal24.com/en/Iran_175795.html