National Pride of Iran

"This has become an issue of national pride," he said during an hourlong interview at Iran's permanent mission in New York. Regardless of what Iran is offered in talks, he said, "the Iranian people will not accept suspension" of its enrichment program as the UN Security Council has demanded.Still, he said, Iran is seeking to resume negotiations over a wide range of topics, including some aspects of its nuclear program

http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2008/05/31/iran_cool_to_suspending_nuclear_agenda/

This idiot is the Seyyeds' representative not Iranians' representative.  Iranians would listen to the UN resolution more than any Seyyed resolution.

In fact, it is the Iranian nation that is helping the IAEA, to uncover what the Seyyeds are doing illegally with Iran's oil fund. The amount of money that is wasted on Mahdi projects that serve the Seyyeds' own agenda is immense. Iranians know that gas energy projects are a better solution, and they do not raise undue suspicion.

So what is the "National Pride of Iran"? Is it to become a Seyyed nation; that acts on its own and becomes labelled more and more as a rogue nation by all other nations? No it is not.  The Seyyed regime is that way, not Iran.  The Seyyeds say that the US has forced the UN.  But the US or other nations cannot force the UN. The Chinese have been bribed by the Seyyeds to stop the UN from taking tougher measures.

So Iranians are being misrepresented and the world has actually now finally realised that. There is a slow non-violent process of change afoot.  The non-violent regime change will be the main national pride of Iran for years to come.  Non-violence is key, and that is one of the main national prides of Iran.  It is the most revered and ancient pride that stems from our holy book, the Zend-Avesta.

It has taken thirty years now, and the Seyyeds have been identified, and in Iran it is an "us and them" situation. Clearly the self-selection process, that has just put the new set of Seyyeds in control of the machinery of state, know that the masses did not vote for them. Iranians are even more proud of what it means to be an Iranians, ironically thanks to the Seyyeds' self-selection process.

The people want the UN to throw out the Seyyed representative. They want a government in exile.  These last two steps are not that easy. There is a problem that we Iranians have; that is that we think that the world should ignore the Seyyeds, and listen to the people of Iran. But we do not have anyone to represent the real Iranians.  Iranians are divided in a political sense. We might be one of the oldest nations in the world, but politically we are very young. However most of the Iranians have had a crash course in politics now for the past thirty years. In fact we might have too many opinions about politics and have forgotten our "National Pride".

Most Iranians that have the intelligence to take over the machinery of state have put commerce over and above national pride, and have contributed to the brain drain. Even if you remove the political differences, many are still suspicious of the business interests behind any potential future leader in Iran.

National pride actually is the one thing we need right now over and above politics, religion, and commerce.  We need to have a selection of Iranians that the UN will approve that will put nationalism above everything else. They will be the people to handle what is Iranian first and regain Iran's national pride, whilst the Seyyeds are still in Iran. Slowly the Iranians that put Iran's interests above everything else, will be trusted by the world more than the Seyyeds.  At some point they will take over the machinery of the state non-violently.  National pride will then be restored in Iran and a new Iran will be born.  Once that is done, then politicians can be selected and so on and so forth.

Rice's Bush Policy On Iran 'Successful' statement, is wrong.

"I think this is called a successful multilateral coalition of states that have the same view" that Iran should be rewarded for dropping any nuclear weapons ambitions or isolated for pursuing them.

http://www.newsroomamerica.com/leadstory/story.php?id=419023

Rice is wrong. All that has happened is that the Russians and Chinese have become even more with the Seyyeds, than they were before. Financially there is nothing the US could do to make countries or companies not deal with the Seyyeds.

The US can't even stop the various US companies from trading with the Seyyeds. In fact the US needs the violent Seyyeds in power to justify its military buildup in the world.

There is a very simple way to remove the Seyyeds and that is to promote the idea of non-violent General Strike. But that requires media penetration. It would take a week. So the problem is US not the Seyyeds.

Reality check for Seyyeds

Ahmadinejad regards the talks as a "breach" of Iranian-Syrian commitments, the reports said, and Iranian authorities have instructed Iranian media not to report the news about Israel and Syria until Iran prepares a statement. Other media also have noted Iran's silence on the matter.

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/108721.html

Just when everyone thought, the Seyyeds had a lot of leverage over Iraqis and Syrians, it turns out they don't.

U.S. brands hang on in sanctions-hit Sudan, Iran

Pop into Paytakht shopping centre in Iran's capital and you can snap up a new Dell laptop, choose from a range of Motorola handsets and compare them with the latest Apple iPhone.

These products are among prominent U.S. brands that have stayed on shop shelves in Sudan and Iran in the face of some of the toughest trade restrictions ever imposed

http://us.mobile.reuters.com/mobile/m/AnyArticle/p.rdt?URL=http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersEdge/idUSL143118120080522

Seriously folks the Americans can't even control their own people, and they want to impose sanctions.

Another nuke diversion

"Our plan also provides that the multilateral partnership would take over all Iranian enrichment related facilities, not just the centrifuges," Thomson said. "In addition there would be international personnel on duty at every stage of the enrichment operation - on each shift in the plant, in personnel management ... in the guard rooms, etc."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/may/23/iran.nuclear

This is just another effort by the Seyyeds to waste time whilst they carry on making their Mahdi bomb.

Iran's Seyyeds captured Iraq, Palestine, and Lebanon

The Arab Passivity allowed Iran to capture Iraq, Palestine, and Lebanon through Mahdi Army and Al Maleki, Hamas and Hezbollah. This is the beginning.

Oil and Brains of Iran

If rice at $1,000 per ton will add 100 million to the ranks of the very poor, how many people will be impoverished by a $200 oil?

Rice will probably climb to $2,000 per ton too because there seems to be a direct correlation now between the price of oil and the price of the cereal which is consumed by half of the world's population.

To speculators, rice and oil are one and the same thing--a commodity to be traded, hoarded, bartered and damn the consumers.

http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2008/may/17/yehey/opinion/20080517opi4.html

What Tony says is not difficult to imagine. This a very good summary of what might well happen. There is no mention of alternative energy and other efficiencies that will be more cost effective.

We had this situation in that last oil spike in the late 70's when the Seyyeds' Peak Oil men were at work. At that time the North Sea was going to be explored and once they came on stream, the price of oil hit $10. So the same sort of thing will happen.

Why will that happen? Well, companies like Exxon are not about to shift into solar or wind or any other energy. They stand to lose a lot of money, and the world is pretty much ruled by them. So they want the price to go up, so that they can find oil in more expensive areas, even though it literally comes out of the ground on its own in Iran.

One day the oil will not come from the Persian Gulf and that is what the West wants. When you factor all the head-aches associated with getting oil from such characters as the Seyyeds or Arabs, who make such a fuss about everything, then the West would rather dig deeper somewhere else.

But if Iran had its civilized citizens work for its own country; yes that means returning to Iran from Los Angeles and other megapopulated Iranian centres of the world, then Iran would become the most advanced nation in Western Asia. So the main problems is the oil and brain drain of Iran.

Sad to say it, but ask a poor man in Iran, what does he want to do, and he will tell you, that he wants to go to America. He has fallen for the life style he has seen on TV programmes. He knows he can have Ghormehsabzi in LA and he has more money in his pocket than staying in Iran.

This situation is nothing new. How many doctors I used to come across every holiday when I used to fly back to Iran in 70's when I was at a British boarding school. The doctors used to tell me, "oh you are from Shemiran", and your family is well connected. But I used to hit back saying,"but the people need your services" and they would say, how am I going to live to a high standard?

So we had a nightmare scenario in Iran in the 70's. Iran was not developing fast enough. The Shahanshah was told that he was aloser, and the money was going into his pocket, instead of basic infrastructure, so that doctors could serve and make money in Iran. I will not give you a boring history lesson of what happened next.

But look at the situation now. We have after a decade or so of relative calm, the country again being sqweezed big times for its intelligencia, and restricted even more by both the Seyyeds and their policies, which have had dire consequences for trade. People have had to set up shop in Dubai, and use all kinds of nifty ways to by-pass the American banks. In summary they ended up doing business with China. So Iran is dealing with China instead of US as it used in the times of Shahanshah.

So why is it that no one screams and shouts in the Western liberal press like they did then about this Chinese monopoly. The most we have heard was the leading article in the Economist about the new colonialist role of China. But that's it. There are no cartoons of Chinese rulers with the Seyyeds, like the ones we used to get of the Shah.

So the world has reduced Iran to an exclusive supplier of energy to western industries in China; the people will be siphoned off to America and Australia; and no one will be bothered to unite the intelligencia all over Iran in exile. The reason is simple. They do not want another Japan in Western Asia. Just suck our oil and brains.

Seyyeds think US is under threat.

Iran's ambassador to Russia said Tehran sees no reason to receive any sort of security guarantee.

Iran believes that this is the US which needs to be given such a guarantee; Interfax news agency quoted Gholam Reza Ansari as saying at a press conference.

http://www.isna.ir/Main/NewsView.aspx?ID=News-1132769&Lang=E

Can anyone understand what this guy means, by stating that the US needs to be given such a guarantee? It is implying that the US is under great threat and will suffer. Perhaps he thinks that the great Shiite Mahdi will hit the US. Is he nuts? But the fact that the Russians take them seriously is very funny.

Iran's subprime crisis looming

However, now it has become clear to all that massive liquidity and constant rises in government expenditures are the driving forces behind inflation.

All this occurred because the billions of dollars that poured into Iran's coffers due to the unprecedented oil prices of the past few years were converted into rials and injected into the economy.

To create more jobs, the banks started providing easy loans, but the money was channeled into speculative real estate and commercial activities rather than production activities, which drove prices up.

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=168384

Wow doesn't this have similarities to what has just happened to the US?

Hizballah received 35 new Iranian speedboats shortly before current crisis

Hizballah received 35 new Iranian speedboats shortly before current crisisThe DEBKAfile's military sources report that three weeks before the recent Hizbullah takeover of western Beirut, the Shiite terrorist group recieved 35 speedboats from Iran. The speedboats have the capability to threaten international shipping in the region and could also be used to approach US and Israeli Navy ships near the Lebanese coast. The DEBKAfile reports that the speedboats were made for Hizbullah by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards shipyards at Bandar Abbas

http://www.infolive.tv/-/infolive.tv-22236-israelnews-debkafile-hizballah-received-35-new-iranian-speedboats-shortly-curren

Think of the money that went into making these. Then think of them being given to the Hezbollah in Lebanon for free.

How much better it would have been if the money was spent on the poor secular Iranians instead.

China's proxy

At the meeting, Mahmoud Salahi noted that one of Iran's major policy is to attract foreign investments.

"Iran's free trade and special economic zones have proper potentials for foreign investors," he said, noting, "All foreign investors are welcome in the FEZs."

Salahi further noted that the anti-Iran resolutions by United Nations Security Council had no effect on deals with European countries.

http://www.mathaba.net/rss/?x=591828

Obviously Salahi is being seriously dellusional. Someone should remind him of the effect of the German banks pulling out of Iran, and the recent pull out of Shell gas deal.

Basicaly Iran has become part of the Chinese economy.

The Poor in Iran

"We are staying here," said a protester who gave his name as Abu Rish. "We have money and support from Iran and Syria and we can go on like this for another 50 years."

http://mobile.nytimes.com/article;jsessionid=11E107F08E5E992C7A7D4BB922D2444E.w6?a=163297&f=20&p=1

Fact is that the oil fund is being siphoned, and used more in Lebanon than on the poor secular Iranians. The poor in Iran abstained en-masse from the recent Seyyed selection process in Iran.

The rest of Iran barely survive, and are bombarded by propaganda everyday; on how the Seyyeds are winning the Nuclear argument for secular Iranians on the world scene. It creates a false sense of success, when less and less funding is available, and the economic depression worsens.

Quo Bene? Peak Oil advocates, and all those corporations making use of the cheap oil contracts, that the Chinese have established for the world corporations in China with all those prisoners.

Obliteration a phone call away?

We could obliterate Iran’s infrastructure and architecture with a simple phone call.

If you are an Iranian, ask yourself this. Why should Iran be in such a situation, to have people say such things?

What have the Seyyeds done to bring on this kind of reaction from your average commentator?

Why don't we have a decent group of people representing Iran, outside Iran, to bestow the respect this ancient nation deserves?

Who represents Iran?

Members of the United Iraqi Alliance had said the delegation was sent to Tehran to tell Iran to stop backing Shi'ite militias fighting U.S. and Iraqi security forces, underscoring Iraq's unease over the influence of its powerful neighbor.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080503/ts_nm/iraq_iran_dc

The Seyyeds oligarchy in Iran, are hardly in control of Iran, let alone some die-hards who have gone to Sadr City. But they are in control of the essential machinery of the state in Iran, to stop the regular army and the true Iranians to stop them.

I have already written at great length, about how Iranians can realise that they have the real power. Fact is that Iran has yet to have a social fabric on which it can create a instantaneous public outrage against the Seyyeds.

How do you create such a social fabric? Iranians are very good at making carpets, so why can't we weave one for all of us to stand on, and use to express our nationalistic sentiments? It is all part of being a primitive democracy. At the moment we have gone from voting to not voting.

Remember the first time the people of Iran went and voted; after Khomeini asked them to decide to trash Iran for an Islamic Republic. And they did, we are told. No one really knows. Nowadays people just abstain. So people do not participate socially any more.

Social participation will take time, but the new channels for it are being build along the modern networks such as internet blogging, and text messaging, which the Seyyeds are fighting. In this age of Aquarius the world will move forward via concensus. There really is no mouth piece such as a King anymore. So threads are started and concensus is sought.

Iranians have set up forums such as Iranian.com and the like, and are able to assimilate their thoughts. This process is fine for mutual understanding, but strategies to put into action any opposition for confrontation is difficult. It requires one of the Seyyeds to be part of the forum, and be defeated in a debate. That does not happen. And none of us can go on the Seyyed TV, to take them on and live.

So there needs to be as I have said, an appointment of a selected group of Iranians who are the best in the world at this time; who want to put Iran First and represent Iran in Exile. All forums will be linked in and concensus achieved. The UN needs to recognise this body, and kick out the Seyyed Rep.

It seems like a crazy idea, but there is no other non violent solution. Once the world listens and accepts this body, the Seyyeds, who are well known will be surrounded in their bunkers and faced with the threat of a General Strike. The rest is academic. No blood is spilled.

Disinformation for US attack on Iran

The immediate purpose of this disinformation campaign is apparently to help justify the planned US attack on a wide range of Iranian industrial and military targets.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8880

One the cleverest form of disinformation is to talk about disinformation.

Ultimately any nation can do whatever it likes to do. Media can write whatever. But people have the knowledge more than ever in human history to judge and share via internet. The world media is crumbling with the power of bloggers.

Politicians and their petty media supporters are playing a losing game. I am glad to say that we Iranians are the largest community of bloggers in the world. We know how the BBC put Khomeini in power.

It won't happen again. We are winning every day against the Seyyeds in Iran. The people of Iran have discovered a new Iran, after a lot of soul searching. Our new deeper roots have had to go to the realms of Vendidad in Zend Avesta to reignite the old Iranian flame that is 20000 years old which will inspire us forth. We happily ignore the Seyyeds.

No media mogul can pull the wool over our eyes anymore.

US warns China without mentioning the Seyyeds

"If Beijing begins to accept greater responsibility for the health of the international system -- as all global powers should -- we will remain on a constructive, even if competitive, path. If not, the rise of China begins to look more adversarial," he said.

http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/national_world/stories/2008/05/01/CIA_director_0501.ART_ART_05-01-08_A6_D8A33T3.html?sid=101

Why doesn't Hayden not mention the Seyyeds' collusion with China? Fact is that it is not the Chinese, but the US corporations and other western companies, that are using China's cheap industrial zones, that are to blame.