Warmonerging US vs Non Violent Regime Change

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Tuesday that sending a second U.S. aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf could serve as a "reminder" to Iran, but he said it's not an escalation of force.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080430/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/gates_iran

I suppose the best way to change the regime officially and respectively, is to first contain it, and then threaten it with gun boat diplomacy.

Normally that pisses off the liberals all over the world; starting from India, who are naturally anti-US, indirectly benefits the Seyyeds.

And that's been the story all along since the Seyyed take over. And that is why the oil price has gone through the roof and Exxon makes 1 billion a day.

Put all that together and you can see why they would rather not have a peaceful non violent regime change.

Mass Abstention of Seyyed selection in Iran will happen

Some 21 million Iranians are eligible to vote in the Friday run-offs.

http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/000200804250921.htm

No one but the Seyyeds and Basij will vote.

Wipe out vs Obliterated

"While it is reasonable to warn Iran of the consequence of it continuing to develop nuclear weapons and what those real consequences bring to its security, it is not probably prudent... in today's world to threaten to obliterate any other country and in many cases civilians resident in such a country," he said.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jEp2ukq1nzsx5Q...

Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, should really have pointed this out sooner. It is so embarrassing to see a seasoned politican, such as Hilary Clinton, who raves on about being so much more experienced, making a comment like this, just to get conservative votes from would be McCain supporters.

We Iranians have now gotten used to politicians throwing the name of Iran, and misrepresenting Iran. Obviously one is lead to believe that both the "Obliterated" comment will be seen along side the "Wipe Out" comment from now on. But would you think that Clinton is as irresponsible a person as that Seyyed poodle in Iran?

UN rules remove Seyyed missiles

Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak said Iranian companies were ordered out of the Defense Services Asia show Tuesday because their exhibition was deemed "offensive."

"Unfortunately, when we came around to inspecting their stand, they displayed equipment that clearly contravened the UN resolution - equipment such as missiles and missile systems and others," Najib told reporters.

Najib said the exhibit was in defiance of UN resolutions that ban Iranian arms exports and forbid countries from providing Iran with technical and financial assistance that could contribute to its alleged nuclear weapons program.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1208870479864&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

It is with great thanks to UN and the Malaysians that we Iranians that have a peaceful nature have to look up to. We cannot fight these monsters in any other way but through the application of International Law, until decent ancient laws of Iran come back.

Does Anxiety Lead People to Religion?

An intriguing new vein of psychological research, however, does show that religion can act as a buffer against existential anxieties. Mike Friedman and W. Steven Rholes at Texas A&M University have shown that when Christian fundamentalists are shown inconsistencies in the Bible, those who acknowledge them become more anxious, compared with fundamentalists who maintain the inerrancy of the Bible.When asked to complete a number of word stems such as D E _ _, for example, fundamentalists who acknowledged the contradictions in their faith were more likely to reach for the word DEAD, as opposed to DEER, DEBT or DEED.The connection between faith and anxiety seems to run in both directions, in that increased religiosity predicts lower anxiety, while higher anxiety causes people to cling ever more tightly to their faith. Thomas Pyszczynski at the University of Colorado once found that when Islamic students in Iran were made to feel anxious, they were more likely to gravitate toward fundamentalist religious claims -- and endorse religiously motivated suicide attacks against the United States

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/20/AR2008042001893.html

It seems to make a lot of sense to me.

Seyyeds' minister in parting shot at Ahmadinejad

"Mr Ahmadinejad and I did not have common views on some issues," he told the Shahrvand Emrouz weekly in an interview."I was critical of the policies which caused money supply growth," Danesh Jaafari said

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g6cUcvHJClkUg5OIZIGCkMNNB8sg

Some people are coming to their senses at least. Seyyed economics is a load of rubbish.

China keeps Seyyeds alive

In 2004, Iran agreed to sell a Chinese corporation $20 billion worth of natural gas per year for 25 years - representing the world's largest natural gas purchase. By 2007, China had become the largest trading partner of rogue states Iran, North Korea and Sudan, and the second-largest of Burma and Zimbabwe.

http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20080420/focus/focus4.html

This is a quite well written article on what a monster China has become.

Moaning Iranian Professor

The reality is that 70% of Iranians are less than 30 years of age, many are Internet-savvy, glued to satellite television and have very little toleration for the Islamic utopia promised by their leaders when the evidence of national decline is apparent everywhere.

http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/story.html?id=456102

And yet another Iranian Professor complains about Iranian misrepresentation in the Press. That is exactly why one should call these despots Seyyeds. They put their allegaince to Islam first. And so the west recognises them as Iranains.

So the best thing to do is to kick out the Seyyeds from the UN until they have their own country, somewhere in southern Iraq.

Seyyeds desperate for oil deal

The head of the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC), Seifollah Jashnsaz, suggested in comments carried by Iranian news agencies the two energy groups only have until Friday to decide on whether to invest in the giant South Pars field.

http://www.tradearabia.com/news/OGN_141785.html

This guy at the head og NIOC is desperate. What are his credentials anyway? The world knows better than to deal with people who did not follow the UN. Soon the UN will throw the Seyyed representatives out. OPEC should do the same. There are much better Iranians outside Iran who are not religious fanatics and can get on with the rest of the world. So please do not do business with these people until a non violent regime change pushes the Seyyeds to Iraq next to their religious centres.

Iraq and U.S. to pressure Iran with diplomacy, force

"The Iraqi government now understands more clearly what they (the Iranians) are doing. They will put diplomatic pressure to bear on Iran. That's a good thing," Hadley said on the "Fox News Sunday" television show."In addition, we will continue to do with Iraqi security forces what we've been doing for some time. We will go after their surrogate operations in Iraq that are killing our forces, killing Iraqi forces."We will disrupt their networks by which they move fighters, weapons and funds in and around Iraq. And we will cut off as best we can the flow of fighters, weapons and arms into Iraq," he said

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080413/pl_nm/iraq_usa_iran_dc

So the bait is set for the Seyyed fighters to be sucked into Iraq and meet their fate.

U.S. losing credibility over Iran

It turned out to be another in the series of Bush administration big talk that time exposed as hollow.

http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=680408&category=OPINION&newsdate=4/13/2008

I tend to agree with that view. The US administration promised so many Iranian Americans, that it would deal with the Seyyeds, but it never did. This is now so obvious, that most Iranians see a collusion between the Seyyeds and the US.

Delusional predicate for Petraeus

Ever since President Nouri al-Maliki ordered the attacks in Basra on the Mahdi Army, Gen. David Petraeus has been laying the predicate for U.S. air strikes on Iran and a wider war in the Middle East

http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20080411/cm_uc_crpbux/op_335802

Let's look at what the US is doing. It thinks that somehow the Shiite world will support it, just because of Maliki's order to attack Basra. Fact is that the Shiites or Seyyeds, do not give two hoots about Iraqi nationalism. Seyyeds do not care for the 5000 years of ancient Iraq or Babylon. They only care for their 1400 year of dogma. It is about time the US supported the very ancient roots of the area.

Chinese-Seyyed military alliance

Imagine a Chinese-Iranian alliance for a second--with the latest and greatest Russian weapons in their respective land and naval arsenals. Not a pretty picture.The kicker is that some of China's Sizzler missiles are reported to be nuclear-tipped. Yeah, the story just keeps getting better, doesn't it?What if Iran successfully develops nuclear weapons technology, and can tip their Sizzlers with nuclear warheads?

http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1116

Well the author of this article could well be onto something. We know that the Seyyeds are driven by their dogma. So they will feel as if they are acting according to your consciousness. As true Iranians we cannot allow these weapons put Iran in harms way.

Sunnis complain about US and Seyyed collaboration

"Then suddenly something went wrong, and last week Maliki (who is now equally close to the Iranians) went to war against the Sadrists. Some claim that an under-the-table deal was hammered out in Baghdad in March between the Americans, Maliki and Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad. The Iranian leader would let the Americans have their way - and crush the Sadrists - in exchange for softening pressure on the Iranian regime. In return, Ahmadinejad would help them bring better security to Iraq through a variety of methods stemming from Iranian cooperation. ...Other Shi'ite heavyweights in the Arab world, like Hasan Nasrallah of Hezbollah and Lebanese parliament speaker Nabih Berri, who are both very close to Iran, have been relatively silent over the ordeal."

http://uruknet.info/?p=m42790&s1=h1

It is marvelous to see how the Sunnis or Saddam Hussein heirs view the whole Iran-Iraq deal with the Sadr Brigade. Clearly the writer points to that Seyyed element, that is really out of place in Iran and Iraq. Ancient Iran and ancient Iraq (or Babylon) have a common peaceful root. It is only because of these younger religious dogmas and their bandits, that have served the pockets of oil companies, that the situation does not change. But the areas of Iraq where the Seyyed holy shrines are, will always be a bone of contention for them. Can one really call them "holy" if they have caused so much death? For me if anything causes death, then it is wrong. Nothing is above Life, and this has been said in our ancient Zend Avesta some 20000 years ago.

Russia is US's proxy against US

"I appreciate his leadership on the Iranian issue," Bush said at a joint news conference following talks with Putin at this southern Russian resort city, which had included discussion about Iran

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hIhJ6Mj6JCdZoAjLEuJ_rKCISugg

So we can hold the Russians completely responsible for any Seyyed beligerance. Will all the spent fuel go back to Russia for sure? Or will the Russians be building a monster out of the Seyyeds to fight the US with later. Remember what happened when they supported Saddam. We all know that Bush is doing all this to please internal dissent in US. But since when have we had the US ever agreeing with Russia. In the 70's Iran was supposed to be with the US against the menace to the North. Oil brings everyone together.

Putin is so naïve about the Seyyeds

"No one can seriously think that Iran would dare attack the United States," a source in the Russian delegation at the NATO-Russia summit in Bucharest quoted Putin as telling leaders.

http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=25222

How naïve can Putin be, when there is a proxy war going on between US and the Seyyeds' men in Iraq. Why doesn't he realise that, if the Seyyeds do finally make the warheads, they will point it to any nation, including Russia. Imagine the Chenchnya getting help from the Seyyeds.

Israel imports oil from Iran's Seyyeds

Israel imports Iranian oil on a large scale even though contacts with Iran and purchasing of its products are officially boycotted by Israel. Israel gets around the boycott by having the oil delivered via Europe.

Fact is, that the Seyyeds use Israel in their moral arguments, and yet they let the oil they control to get to them. Normal Iranians, have no qwalm with the Israelis, but these aliens, who are stealing our oil wealth, are being hypocrites, and no one in Iran writes about it. It seems the Seyyeds are not really good at imposing sanctions, and do not care. Why is it, that not one member of the Seyyed oligarchy is not picking up on this? There is no internal dissent. Very strange.

Iranians went to America first

From this article we can see that the pre-ice age Iranians went to the Americas. This fits with what is written Vendidad of the Zend Avesta.

read more | digg story

Babylon vs violent Iraq

"Petraeus is going to go very hard on Iran as the source of attacks on the American effort in Iraq," a British official said. "Iran is waging a war in Iraq. The idea that America can't fight a war on two fronts is wrong, there can be airstrikes and other moves," he said.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/05/wiran105.xml

Why is it that a British official making such a big deal of this? Fact is that the Brits have known about the Seyyed poodles' involvement in Basra, and have kept very quiet. That ensured that the Seyyeds could trickle in. Now they have become strong enough to cause havoc in the Green Zone.

But this war is just a money making fiasco. You have Seyyeds paying their poodles, and the Cheney people paying their toy soldiers. Their is very little control from Baghdad. Qom now controls Iraq. The Seyyeds have always wanted to rule Iraq and their orders stopped Badr.

But Badr is on the war path again and it wants to provoke the US again. It is powered by a 1400 year cult with no consideration of a much older heritage of that area. Ancient history is not being respected. The true spirit of Babylon was found by Cyrus the Great, not by Seyyeds. It produced a long lasting peace.

Seyyeds lose China card

Beijing is believed to have decided to assist the inspectors after documents seized from Iranian officials included blueprints for "shaping" uranium metal into warheads, the testing of high explosives used to detonate radioactive material and the procurement of dual-use technology.Much of the new material was presented to the governors of the Vienna-based IAEA last February. That meeting is said to have triggered China's change of heart, the paper added

http://www.kuna.net.kw/NewsAgenciesPublicSite/ArticleDetails.aspx?id=1896580&Language=en

So finally the world managed to convince the Chinese, who pretended that they did not no anything, that they did know what their Seyyed trading partners were doing, with all the money they have been giving to them via oil purchases.

Now they have no reason to do all that trading with the Seyyeds, who are not spending it on Iranian welfare, but on their own dogmatic agenda.