Seyyed nukes almost ready

It is really interesting how almost joyously the Chinese press reports this:

Deputy head of Iran's Supreme National Security Council Javad Vaeedi said on Sunday that his country has so far produced 300 tons of uranium hexafluoride (UF6)gas used for uranium enrichment in the Isfahan nuclear facility.

Addressing a congregation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), Vaeedi said "The Isfahan uranium conversion facilityis active and it has produced more than 300 tons of UF6," local Fars news agency reported.

He said that despite pressures by Western countries which once stressed that Iran should not have even 20 centrifuges, there are now 3,000 centrifuges operative in Iran.

Now some of you, I am sure, are pretty confused about all this tech talk. But just read this:

Hence, to produce one kilogram of HEU requires processing 176 kilograms of UF6 gas.

So the Seyyed bomb is not that far away. And the IRGC are very proud of it. Is the rest of Iran concerned that this bomb will put Iran in harms way, especially with the IRGC screaming "wipe-out" comments about Israel. Yes So will the Iranian nation do anything about it by themselves, or are they going to wait for the Israelis to bomb Natanz?

Whatever happened to Peace Rallies. Or why not have a General Strike because the Seyyeds are putting Iran in harms way.

Forget sanctions give Seyyeds the bomb and call his bluff.

The circulated excerpts outlined voluntary and mandatory travel restrictions and assets freezes. They also name two Iranian banks - Melli and Saderat - warning states to exercise vigilance when dealing with them. Iran Air Cargo and Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Line were singled out for cargo inspections in cases of "reasonable grounds to believe that the aircraft/vessel is transporting goods prohibited under this resolution or (earlier) resolutions," according to the proposal excerpts. The document notes Iran's refusal to fully suspend enrichment, reprocessing and heavy water-related projects and to cooperate fully with the. International Atomic Energy Agency. It requests the IAEA file a report on whether Iran has suspended these activities within 90 days.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/948243.html

And the key word in all this is 90 days. By the time any of this ever happens it will be another six months. A big Yawn eh. So I propose the following. Give the Seyyeds the bomb. And make sure it can hit Washington DC. At that point we will really call the Seyyeds' bluff. And if they so much as even try, see how the Iranian nation will rise and kick them out. Fact is that the world does not want Iran to develop at all into anything good. It wants Iranians to be stuck with these madmen and remain a pariah state. The last thing the industrialised nations of the world want is for the wealthiest nation in Western Asia to get connected properly and regain its title as the Cross Roads of Civilization. Look at the world map. What is in the centre of the world? It is Iran. Now think about all the energy resources in the world and ask yourself where is it? It is around Iran. Imagine gas pipelines going all over the world from Iran. Now ask yourdelf an even easier question. Why don't the world powers not help the Iranian Opposition form a government in exile and then deal with them, instead of the Seyyeds? Because they don't want to. Remember how easily they removed the Shahanshah, well then they can repeat it again. All they need to do is to ask Iranians to call for General Strikes and create a non violent regime change. It is that easy. But don't hold your breath.

No they want Iran to be the only viable threat to the world peace now that the Soviet Union has gone. This will allow the energy companies to make loads of money by keeping the oil price nice and high. And of course to keep the armed forces fully paid and employed with tax payers' money.

And ultimately it is our fault. We Iranians should be ashamed of ourselves for not being able to take care of our own problems ourselves.

------------------

A big if

"The resolution clearly states that if Iran agrees with the six powers' proposals, direct negotiations will start to settle all issues related to the Iranian nuclear program, and all the six powers, including the United States, will be involved in these direct talks," Lavrov told Russian journalists following six-power talks in Berlin on Wednesday.

http://www.interfax.ru/e/B/politics/28.html?id_issue=11950837

That's a big if. But it would be the first time that the Seyyeds will be given the kind of respect they want. How arrogant and uncomprimising will become apparrent. The Foreign Ministry has always been the most accomodative of all the various camps. But the IRGC is running the show, and they know that if they give in, then they have to answer to their Mahdi, as and when he pops around.

But the Iranian Opposition has not formed a provisional government in exile, and will not be able to represent Iran - the true Iranians. And the silent majority of Iranians who are humble and non violent, have to suffer, as our oil income is used for making the bomb for Seyyed's Mahdi. But the real Iranians are able to still ignore the Seyyeds and any fake rapproachment will get the nations interest. And that has been the only area where the people had paid some attention to the Seyyeds. But as soon as they put it all in the Islamic context and the Iranians will switch off. The Seyyeds lost the hearts and minds of the Iranian nation a long time ago. People look at them as strangers - unwelcomed strangers at that.

So the best scenario for Seyyeds would be the scenario that buys time. In the mean time there will the Seyyeds' bogus elections. But the IRGC fanatics will give a quick rebuff, and their rubber boat tactics will be of course just what the UNSC would expect. At that point there will be no chance for a more complacent President to replace Ahmadinejad. So if the Seyyeds can hold back the maddest elements of their people, then they will be able to get some new person elected; that would not be so foul mouthed and be able smooth talk the UNSC and buy time. And the people of Iran are having to cope with the devils they know than the devils they do not know.
------------------

Seyyeds buying votes and cooperation from Iranians

Can the Iranian nation be bribed?

We all know how inefficient government and quasi-government organizations are in the best democracies. Countless books have been written comparing government services with private enterprises.

The religious domains that the Seyyeds have created, and use to channel funds to the poor, remains highly suspect. Dare one criticize a religious domain, or point the finger of suspicion to it? Will the poor and depraved have benefited from these handouts, when the inflation in Iran is so rampant.

Are Iranians truly going to get "ripped off" even more and do nothing, or have they been enlightened by the greater secular force, and will not vote. Can the Iranian nation discuss mass boycott and non cooperation via blogs? Can a public debate occur where the strength on nil participation be discussed? The Seyyeds know that if a public debate does arise, they will be out. Will the world have this debate?

Or will GWB say something to piss the people of Iran off, and make them vote, just to prove him wrong? It is funny how GWB can actually help the Seyyeds stay in power if he says the wrong things. Why don't the vociferous left wing that brought the Seyyeds to power, and hate GWB, not talk about the non violent regime change that can be made in Iran, via the media.

Why doesn't the world media make it, its responsibility to question the power of the Seyyeds against a mass boycott of all Iranians, and non cooperation in all areas of the Iranian economy that serve the Seyyeds. Why don't the left wing of the world not use Iran as a tool to critisize the US. Why doesn't the world media not show the Iranian people how easy it is to topple the Seyyeds by just talking about it in public.

Think of the lead article in the London Times, or the New York Times, addressing the people of Iran, and presenting a non violent solution to regime change in Iran. What is wrong with that? All it would do is to force the Seyyeds' own newspapers and government spokesmen to react. And their reaction against a mass general strike, where people do not leave their homes is hopeless. The Seyyeds cannot drag 70 millions out of their homes to keep the economy running.

Fact is that the world media does not want to remove the Seyyeds. Fact is that the US and China do not want to remove the Seyyeds. The people of Iran in the satellite TVs do not even talk along these lines. Why doesn't VOA bring this topic up?

It seems I am the only one. Nuts.

Obama and Seyyeds

"Iranian nuclear weapons would destabilize the region and could set off a new arms race."

http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4886

So says Mr Obama. He likes to negotiate with the Seyyeds, but does not trust them with nukes.

Clash between Seyyed sailors and US

A radio transmission from one of the Iranian ships said, "I am coming at you. You will explode in a couple of minutes," CNN reported, citing a U.S. official.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080107/ts_nm/usa_iran_ship_dc

Making such provocative jestures to a force that could sqwash you is really dumb. It is just as well the US did not take these Seyyed sympathizers seriously. Of course there will be great stories like these to come to get the oil price up.

Good Deed Reminder for Israel

"Iran is a big, strong rich country, and that competition in leading the Muslim world is well-known to all Arab and Muslim countries," he said.

"Once you can reach with your missile double the distance between Iran and Israel, it means there is some farther target. Is it Egypt? Libya? Saudi Arabia? A European country?"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=DTF3PKHLPZ3Q3QFIQMGCFF4AVCBQUIV0?xml=/news/2008/01/06/wisrael106.xml

Iran is a strong and rich country, but not because of its oil or money, that the Seyyed rulers abuse. We actually do not need to have any of these very expensive weapons at all, if we had people representatives not believing in non violence and human rights or above all capital punishment.

The people representatives in the Seyyed rule follow rules that are alien to everyday Iranians. But what is most annoying in reading these Israeli reports, is that they do not point to the alternative peaceful regime change solutions that can happen. Iranians now are all inspired from the Good Deeds of Cyrus the Great for the Jews.

Seyyed calls Norway inhuman

"We are sorry to hear that some state officials in Norway have ignored adopting a policy based on facts and respect for the governing laws and regulations in other countries through exerting their views which help promote and courage crimes and wrongdoing in other societies," he said.

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=160753

It absolute madness for anyone looking at the freedom of the Norwegians, to think that their laws are worse than Seyyeds' laws for Iranians.

It is also rediculous to assume that whatever happens between Israelis and Palestinians, should determine how the Seyyeds rule over Iranians.

These Seyyed sympathizers in Iran, have to say such things to satisfy the Seyyeds. The whole of Iran is ignoring the Seyyeds, with the women wearing makeup and as fashionable as ever, if not more. And the Seyyeds will never ever win the hearts and minds of Iranians.

Who feeds the Seyyeds?

Iran produces 40 lakh barrels of oil per day and has a reserve of 112 billion barrels, 11 percent of the world's total reserve. Iran exports 25 lakh barrels of oil every day of which Greece is the largest importer, 24 percent. Turkey imports 22 pc, Belgium 14 pc, Italy 11 pc, Japan 10 pc, France 7 pc and China 4 pc. One estimate claims that China is going to be the largest oil consumer in the world very shortly and it may gear up the present price level.

http://nation.ittefaq.com/issues/2008/01/06/news0440.htm

Did anyone suspected that Greece would be the greatest importer of Iranian oil. Now it is not just because the Greeks have the largest oil shipping network, and they just follow instructions. But Greek tycoons are the most philosophical in the world. Greece is supposed to be the most freedom loving culture in the world. So why are they blinded by greed to not look at what the Seyyeds are doing in Iran. And the same is true for all the others.

Getting money from the frozen assets

Attorney Zohreh Mizrahi, who represented the family, said Thursday that she is confident the plaintiffs will be able to collect by seeking Iranian assets frozen in the United States, which has an economic embargo with Iran.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080104/ap_on_re_us/iran_lawsuit

Can someone give us more info on getting money from the frozen assets.

Ironically it's Pakistan not Iran

Nuclear material is ripe for the picking. More than 15 years after the end of the Cold War, nuclear stockpiles remain unguarded and unsecured.

http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4866

I am all for non violent regime change. I don't like saying this, but the passing away of Benazhir Bhutto, has frightened the Israelis. She was going to try to establish relations with Israel. Now that makes the nuclear threat more from Pakistan.

I and a lot of others have been saying this about Pakistan for such a long time. They supplied the stuff to the Seyyeds. All you need are some Sunni extremists to gain politically, and more importantly the Israelis to fret more and more over Pakistan's threat, then Iran will be out of the picture. Now if the PPP can establish itself again, then the Seyyeds will be enemy number one again. If not then expect a US attack on Pakistan to safeguard the nukes, and the Republicans to stay.

The Seyyeds and the Sunni extremists have their own "good" reasons for using nukes righteously. They believe they have to sort the world out don't they. Right now Iran is a proxy for all the major terrorist groups. The Chinese supply the cash without any concern. The US companies in the Chinese industrial zones, love it with slave labour and almost free rent and energy. We have seen the US clamp down on some of the Chinese arms suppliers.

But I hope that the focus does move to Pakistan and away from Iran. That way the Seyyeds cannot look so important to all of Iran. And that is the only reason they are ruling. It is all based on false fear. The people of Iran do not need nukes to get the world's ear. We have our own non Seyyed culture and morality, which will confront any form of violence internally and externally non violently. Less talk about a strike at Iran, and more talk about the power of non violent general strike please.

Divestment from Iran

The employee fund will further consider divestment — probably focused on Iran — at its Feb. 26 meeting.

http://www.statesman.com/business/content/business/stories/other/01/03/0103sudan.html

With the overwhemling majority vote in the UN against Capital Punishment and condemnation of the state of Human Rights in Seyyed Iran, many of the US investment funds are having to sell shares in companies that do business in Iran. The Chinese companies are getting hit most. The Chinese have tried to delay the UN Security Council, but the real course of action, is within the US itself. So ironically the US's problem with the Seyyeds can be solved right from the US.