Payback time

Personal stories are common of how the financial sanctions are affecting those mostly well-off people who have foreign bank accounts or earn income from abroad.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071128/wl_nm/iran_sanctions_people_dc

Sanctions is probably the most widely debated topic around. But it is quite clear that two sets of people will get hit by it. The first are the Seyyeds themselves, and the second group are the wealthy secular Iranians, who have managed to survive with the Seyyeds. The rest are the silent majority poor down-trodden Iranians, who won't feel the difference. The Seyyeds and their wealthy crowd have been feeding off them for ages, and it is payback time. Anyone who did not want to deal with the Seyyeds, or did not have connections in the appropriate places struggled. Their stories are too horrific to mention, and it is all based on the fact that they had different political and religious views to the Seyyeds. But if you were poor and passed all the relgious hurdles then yes you could get into the Seyyed merchant class. But if your Spririt had given you Iranian ideas, then you really struggled to implement them in Iran. And of course if you had global ideas, you had to get out, and let the folks in US to benefit from it, as Iran was not the "land of opportunity". So the US has benefited quite a lot from this. Do you think the US wants all the Iranian brains and money to go back to Iran? No. So they love the Seyyeds. They can get rid of the Seyyeds in no time if they wanted to. But Iranians like Parisa who write about Iran should talk more about the how the power of General Strike can bring the Seyyeds down.

Guardian's or AP's Sally Buzbee is wrong on Iran

And Khamenei lacks the stern, spellbinding charisma that bound the first revolutionary leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, so strongly to his people.

But Iran's clerical regime ``has survived everything short of the plague'' in its 28 years, said Suzanne Maloney, a senior fellow at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy in Washington.

And no coherent, organized opposition has ever emerged.

Khalaji is blunt: Ahmadinejad may be unpopular and ``very fragile.'' But he says: ``The regime is not vulnerable at all.''

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-7100924,00.html

It is so easy to say it, and so The Guardian does. But The Guardian, like many other newspapers is wrong. I have found that the more liberal press like The Guardian, that does not like the nationalist opposition forces, and will not be seen to be supporting the Islamist ones, makes such crazy comments.

For crying out loud Sally Buzbee, ask any Iranian, and they will tell you, that these monsters are not Iranian. All the Blogs in the internet, that the Iranians are famous for, are there, because 65% of the Iranian population, that are young, all speak of Iranian values, that are opposed to the Seyyed ones. So why don't you do your work properly and read those blogs, and see the opposition.

And it is organised. Ok, maybe we don't all have one platform that we have one speaker to represent us. But we are all saying the same thing about the Seyyeds. So our Iranian culture has organized us. Our Iranian culture is beyond politics and religion. We do not have a religious or political opposition. We have a national opposition.

Iranians have recognised these Seyyeds as aliens.

Germany's price for Iranians' freedom

Der Spiegel reported that if Iranian Bank Melli, which handles most of Germany's trade with Iran, were placed on a European Union embargo list, it would cost the budget 700-800 million euros ($1-1.2 billion) next year because the government would be forced to pay damages to German firms.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071124/wl_nm/germany_iran_sanctions_dc

So what are we to make of EU? All these years, they and the Chinese, have turned a blind eye, to all the Seyyeds atrocities, on the secular people of Iran. To EU then, Iranians' freedom, is worth less than $2 billion. That is ludricous. The approach should be, to force the non-Iranian corporations, to make a choice, between Seyyeds and non Seyyeds. For example, in the United States, the banks like Deutsche Bank, were told to make a choice, between doing business with US or Iran. EU should do likewise. And in the long run, try to get the Chinese, Russians and Indians, to do the same. The Seyyeds, and their counter parties, cannot be allowed to use the very system they critisize. If they cannot be bothered, to be completely transparent over their nuclear activities; siphoning so much of secular Iranians' oil income for centrifuges, then they will be forced to be part of the pariah states of the world. Meanwhile the people of Iran, who are not benefiting under the Seyyeds, will know that at least something is being done to stop them. At this juncture, it is best for the Iranian Opposition, to be united as the alternative. The world needs to know, that if it supports the secular non violent movement regime change, then the intelligent Iranians, who reside in and outside Iran, will come to power, who will conform to international regulations, as opposed to some 1400 year old dogma, designed to resurrect an new Seyyed Empire. The world at the moment uses concepts like Human Rights, that were born in the Zend Avesta. It is high time, the world respected that, more than anything else that came later, in Iran's histroy. Respect Iran for what it really is, and not for what the Seyyeds say Iran is. We are the sons and daughters of Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great. Support the true Iranians, and build a better world for all.

Is Ebadi morally superior to the Seyyeds in Iran?

"What we want is that the two sides should respect international law, and we warn them on this," she said. "The United States cannot have the right to deal with Iran outside the framework of international law, and Iran cannot build a wall around itself and say, 'I have nothing to do with international law' and pay no attention to [UN] Security Council resolutions."

http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=T&ct=us/8-0&fd=R&url=http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2007/11/75B38EE4-E855-4617-9ADC-083C341BFCB6.html&cid=0&ei=yBpHR_T6C5DgqwPe9LzqCw


She is a devout Moslem. Iran's Spirit is older than Islam. She talks about Human Rights. Human Rights was invented in the Zend Avesta, in Iran, at least 7000 years ago.

So what is she on about? How can she go on about Human Rights, without the slightest reference to the roots of Human Rights. At least the UN has put a copy of Cyrus's Cylinder, as a sign of respect.

Many doubt her intentions. She has a Nobel Prize. Out of the blue we have an important person in Iran, but what does that person do with that respect? Is she any better than the Seyyeds? Is Cyrus or Zoroaster more meaningful to her than Halabi Qureshi (aka Mohammad)?

Cordesman's dark vision for Iran

So in clear, concise and chillingly forensic style, Cordesman spells out that the real stakes in the crisis that is building over Iran's nuclear ambitions would certainly include the end of Persian civilization, quite probably the end of Egyptian civilization, and the end of the Oil Age. This would also mean the end of globalization and the extraordinary accretions in world trade and growth and prosperity that are hauling hundreds of millions of Chinese and Indians and others out of poverty.

http://www.metimes.com/Opinion/2007/11/22/analysis_a_mideast_nuclear_war/4411/

So there you have it. All the numbers, that lead to little less than Armageddon. But Armageddon is what the Seyyeds want. And it is very hard for the West to believe that weirdos like these, can be in charge of a whole country. But they are.

We do not worship Iran

We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Neocon_accused_of_misquoting_Irans_leader_1119.html

Oh I remember AKh making this comment. In fact SB should know better. We were both at Princeton at the time. We all know, how AKh did not want to even have Iran, included in the name of the Islamic Republic. Fact is, he did not even want to leave Iraq. He is famous for being so unmoved returning to Iran. He was quite happy to have a Seyyed Empire from Baghdad as and when. But we must give credit to Iranians from the first day. The Seyyeds began losing against the nation of Iran, right from the word go. Akh could not persue all his radical thoughts and had to shut up. But that did not mean that there was a political alternative to him. The Shah died and we all know the rest. So what are we to do? Quite simple really, carry on as we are modernizing Iran, in spite of what these Seyyeds are doing. They need their own land. Let them go to southern Iraq, and have a seat right next to the Holy See in the UN. But leave Iran, that is thousands of years older alone. Heck if it was not for people like Mani, you would not have the likes of Salman Parsi and Islam. The people who come from Babylon have a distinctively different outlook to Life than Iranians. We look at the God within. Akh and his lot, are idealists. One book and that's it. Fine go and run your country with that one booK. Don't come and burn all ours. The Earth is big enough for all of us. If you are going to stay in Iran, put Iran and its history, above everything else. You will have your peaceful departure, and we Iranians will not harm you. We are too civilized for that. Look out for the shut down.

Cruise site hit in Iran

A series of explosions rocked the Parchin Military Site (where missiles, including "cruise" type missiles, are manufactured) at Varamin south of Tehran.

http://noiri.blogspot.com/2007/11/breaking-news-explosions-in-iran.html

How much money, yes money that could have been used to make hospitals and schools, was wasted by the Seyyeds, to build these sites. And now we have to get rid of them. The arms companies are having a laugh. What suckers we Iranians are. We let the Seyyeds in, and they suck our oil to build rubbish like this that is no good to anyone.

Shah vs Musharraf

"When the challenge to the Shah arose we procrastinated too long", he told me late last month, "I think we should have fished or cut bait more quickly, either making a clear choice to support the Shah in some effort to repress the opposition or to prevent Khomeini from coming back.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C11%5C19%5Cstory_19-11-2007_pg3_3

The radical chic of both present day Pakistan, and the then Iran, both sided with the Islamists. The radical chic in Iran was not anti-nationalistic, but when the Shahanshah died, and the military sided with the Seyyeds, Iran was lost. The flag changed, the national anthem changed. Iran became an Islamic Republic. At the time I said, Iran has now become another Pakistan. These two Islamic Republics both put Islam above nationalistic values. Now if you ask any Iranian then and now, you will find that they put the Spirit of Nowrooz over and above Islam. Khomeini tried to ban Nowrooz. Iran as a nation and Empire consisted of Pakistan. As Iranians we go back at least 7000 years. The Pakistani people should do the same as the Afghanis, and trace their ancient roots, and seek the secular nationalistic foundation, and not act as an upstart young nation with no heritage and just revolutionary fervour. This revolutionary fervour has been used by the US military and peak oil advocates, to find a reason to be in West Asia. If the Shahanshah was not poisoned, and had recovered, the Seyyeds would not have been able to hijack Iran and run amok. As it is, the people of Iran have now learnt what the Shahanshah meant by the alliance of Red and Black. The Seyyeds have had to resort to Iranian nationalistic virtues in order to attract the public interest, by playing the nuclear card. But the people know that the Seyyeds put Islam above Iran, and they want to siphon the oil to prepare for the return of the 12th Shiite Emperor. Ironically the Spirit of Iran is more in Iranians' minds than ever. People gather and celebrate Iranian festivals much more than any Islamic ones. Iran will become a new Iran and the whole area will find its proper roots. Maybe then ZB and his ilk will realise what the history of the area is.

Why Iran's Seyyeds would never block the Straits of Hormuz

'We would never look to use oil as a weapon', Ahmadinejad said in response to a Thomson Financial News question.

OPEC SUMMIT ROUNDUP Ahmadinejad attacks US dollar, says won't use oil as weapon - Forbes.com

You know, if he did use it as a weapon, that would certainly end things for all the peak oil and Seyyed supporters.  Think of this scenario.   The US and its allies have enough power in the Persian Gulf to stop and monitor any traffic through the Straits of Hormuz.  It would not take that long for the world to realize that the oil is better used if it is all piped across to the Mediterranean, Arabian Sea or Red Sea.  The price would jump, but it would fall even more, as the contingency plans would kick in, and the whole world would be in the Persian Gulf.  Heck they would seal off Iran.  Moreover there would be a huge embargo on everything Iran did, Seyyed or otherwise.  Yes the monkey knows this.  Anyway with this comment of his, he is sure to drop the insurance rates, and so the price of oil will collapse.  And he wanted the price to go up.  What a nutter.  What a laugh.

Iran's Seyyeds ruling over China, helping slavery

China now gets at least 14 percent of its imported oil from Iran, making it China's largest supplier and the source of as much as $7 billion worth of oil this year, according to David Kirsch, a manager at PFC Energy.

Deepening China-Iran Ties Weaken Bid to Isolate Iran - washingtonpost.com

This is a clear case of the tail wagging the "Chinese" dog.  And of course it is the Seyyeds that are ultimately controlling the cost of cheap energy to China's industrial zones.  And ironically it is the big western firms that are taking advantage of this situation.  For example Wal-Mart is making $USD 1 billion a day in revenue. And the weak dollar helps them sell their stuff.  The next time you go to Wal-Mart, and you see something without a name or location where it is made, you know that is was made by a prisoner, using Iranian Oil.  Don't buy it.  Buy a product made in your own country.  Don't help 21st Century slavery.

How many Opecs for a peanut?

The Iranian president called for drawing up of a comprehensive plan for OPEC and establishment of an specialized bank called "OPEC Bank" to safeguard the hard currencies of OPEC member states.

http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-234/0711181674163039.htm

First the madman said that Iran will not trade in US dollars. But did that mean that the Chinese bought crude oil in Euros? No. Next he went on about creating a new oil bourse in Kish. Did that change anything? No. The world still looks at the WTI and Brent in US dollars. Finally he learnt how feable and pathetic he is, when the major banks of Iran were thrown out of the world's financial system. So the poor chap and his brigade of zombies are so arrogant, that they want the world to trade in what presumably would be called Opecs. Can you imagine going to a bar in London, and asking "how many Opecs is it for a beer?" You know that is why we call him Anatarinejad (Anatar means monkey). This monkey is full of tricks and he thinks he is so clever. Any peanuts anyone for the monkey?

Acrimonious World

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called his French counterpart, Nicolas Sarkozy, "young and inexperienced" in an acrimonious and threatening letter, the daily newspaper Le Monde reported Friday.

Report: Iran president sends "acrimonious" letter to France's Sarkozy - International Herald Tribune

I came across this comment first, and then thought, "ah well, yet another quip, from that madman".  But as I was reading the newswires, I came across the word acrimonious again.

In a statement following the vote on the resolution on moratorium on the use of the death penalty, the representative of Singapore congratulated the co-sponsors of the resolution on their “pyrrhic victory”. He said the vote had proved that there was no international consensus on the resolution, as almost half of the delegations had not voted in its favour. That should be an indication that many delegations were uncomfortable with the text. Co-sponsors had brought the resolution forward fully aware of how acrimonious and divisive the issue was.

TWO-DAY DELIBERATIONS END WITH CONTENTIOUS RESOLUTION CALLING FOR MORATORIUM ON USE OF DEATH PENALTY APPROVED BY THIRD COMMITTEE AFTER VOTE

There is something weird, and yet wonderful about coincidence, and with the internet, it happens a lot.  It defies logic, because how often is it, that one comes across such a word as acrimonious.

Now maybe there is a hidden meaning to all this?  One can talk about the split world we live in.  That all those for capital punishment are with the likes of the Seyyeds.  Is this the great divide in the world?

I know that on a personal note, when I first meet someone, I don't ask about their religion or their politics.  What I do ask is their position on Capital Punishment.  And I ask you, dear reader,  where do you stand?

Let me tell you where I stand and why.  I believe in Life.  I do not think there is such a thing as death.  But my definition of Life is different.  I believe that there is a greater existence, and that we are always part of that.  So nothing just disappears and is gone.  The energy of the person remains.  Astrologers and many non Astrologers connect to these energies.  So with that attitude, it is ridiculous to believe in death.

Now look at the all the political, nationalistic, religious and other movements or motives, that have been based on death, and have not done Good.  The world that we live in now, is only where it is, because on balance, more people on Earth are learning, that death is a divisive issue, and at best helps the person who kills the most.

As for Iran, it will be only a free society, as and when Capital Punishment is outlawed.  That will take care of the Seyyeds' dogma, and any other awkward political movement.  The Iranian Opposition needs to be fully united on this, and non-violent regime change.  This can be done by having peaceful General Strikes, whereby the Seyyeds' authority will be undermined, with no harm to anyone.

Why did the Chinese walk out and help Iran's Seyyeds?

A meeting of Western powers scheduled for next week to discuss tougher sanctions on Iran has been cancelled because China has pulled out, European diplomatic sources said on Friday.

European diplomats say Iran sanctions meeting cancelled | Markets | Reuters

What did I say?  It is the Chinese behind all this mess.  And it is not really the Chinese Generals in China, but the US multinational Generals eg: GE, GM, etc and of course Wal-Mart.

We have in China, the modern equivalent of slave trade.  Strong accusations?  Yup.  Follow this line of thought.  The US and EU companies, such as Wal-Mart, and many others, are making stuff in China.  And they are doing it with prisoners.  Almost every week, 100,000 people get arrested in the whole of China, and become slave labour in the specially selected "industrial" zones.

But to me, what is most important, is the energy supply.  Where does that come from?  Iran.  But the world press does not report it.  If anything, they will blame the Chinese human rights record.  And they, that is the US press, does a fine job of not disclosing the slave trade that Wal-Mart gets up to with the cheap land and energy.

So the last thing these "US Generals in China" can do, is to let Iranians become free, and part of the civilized world.  No, Iran has to remain a pariah state, and just give oil to US slave drivers in China.  If any civilized Iranian was in charge, no oil would go to them, especially with the view that they burn it badly and pollute the Earth aswell.

So the US will apply selective unilateral sanctions on some companies.  Will it include HSBC, or Standard Chartered Bank?  No way.  Will it include all those proxy companies working for the Seyyeds and the US?  No way.  They will just make a  token jesture.

The only answer to all this, is when the Iranian population decide, that enough is enough, and they decide to threaten the Seyyeds with General Strikes.

Seyyeds sucking up to the Chinese big time

China, which can veto further U.N. sanctions, gets about 12 percent of its oil imports from Iran and wants more.

Iran and China vow to boost ties - Yahoo! News

At the time of Shahanshah, the liberals used to criticize; saying "the US owns Iran", or "the Shah is US's puppet".  Where are the liberals, or the anti-US "radical chic" now?  Why don't they cry against the Chinese in the same way?

The other Islamic Republic

When a large group of eminent U.S. foreign policy experts was asked this summer to name the country most likely to transfer nuclear technology to terrorists in the next three to five years, Pakistan was the top choice.

COLUMN-Pakistan,Iran show U.S.influence's limits:Bernd Debusmann | Reuters

Connect the dots.  US used to support Taliban & Co, when the Soviets were a threat in Afghanistan.  The US helped them to be this new force in Waziristan.  Musharraf's (or should I call him Mozakhraf) military pretends to fight them.  AQ Khan and the Seyyeds get the nuke plans from the Chinese.  Their narc friends get all that snuff from Afghanistan.  Smells very familiar to the trade going on, as in the film Apocalypse Now.  So everyone is in the oldest trade.  Meanwhile the Israelis want to hit Natanz, when it should be Khost.  And can the AQ Khan's nukes hit Israel?  Sure can.  So why hit Iran, when all the trouble is in the other Islamic Republic, namely the Islamic Republic of Pakistan?  Now you see why the US wants to give them all more aid.

Mini Nuke attack on Natanz

Under the plans, conventional laser-guided bombs would open “tunnels” into the targets. “Mini-nukes” would then immediately be fired into a plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce the risk of radioactive fallout.“As soon as the green light is given, it will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be demolished,” said one of the sources.

Revealed: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran - Times Online

Oh they make it look so clean and simple don't they.  It reminds me of those ads for new kitchen and bathroom cleaning agents.  So suddenly we are led to believe that it will be a clean efficient surgical strike.  But the long term effects, the political and religious ramifications are excellent for the arms and oil industries.  Is there an exodus of people from Natanz?  Of course not.  Will the Seyyeds be even more prepared to siphon secular Iranians oil income and send it to Hamas or Hezbollah one day to drop a mini-nuke over Israel, because of this rumour? Yes.  The world media is nuts.  They will not talk about the natural forces that can get rid of the Seyyeds from within Iran, like a General Strike.  Oh no, that would be far too boring.

BBC losing propaGANDa war

This is one of the strongest indications yet of the new Atlanticist accent to French foreign policy under the new President Nicolas Sarkozy.

BBC NEWS | World | Middle East | New France gets tough with Iran

It seems that BBC is now the only pro-Seyyed media force out there.  It used to count on the French wire services to help it in the pro-Seyyed propaGANDa, or more appropriately, anti-US propaGANDa news.

Obama, go and see the Ayatollahs now

Clinton last summer condemned Obama for declaring that, as president, he would personally negotiate with Iranian leaders without preconditions. But in October, she said that, if elected, she would direct her subordinates to begin unconditional negotiations. The difference, Clinton argued, is that she would withhold the prestige of a presidential-level meeting until progress warranted it.

Brownstein: The great Iran divide - National Journal - MSNBC.com

Why doesn't Mr Obama go right now to Qom, and see Mesbah Yazdi face to face, and then Khamenei, and then AhMADinejad, with the certainty that he will come back as a hero, and be elected with a huge majority?

For crying out loud, how many times have we had the US elections, and the Seyyed elections, use each other to get the people scared, and come out to vote for the war lobby, and the peak oil advocates?  Can the people of United States and Iran see through this?  Yes of course they can.  But can the press and its commentators realise this.

Fact is, that if the people of Iran, were given the dignity and respect, and were told that they can get rid of the Seyyeds with just talking about a national strike, instead of a US strike, then maybe things will change in Iran more peacefully.  But nobody wants that boring solution do they.

Shahnameh vs Avesta

“Every nation has a book that represents the personality of that nation. For example: the British people have the works of Shakespeare, the Greeks have the Iliad and the Odyssey, the Italians have The Divine Comedy by Dante, and we have the Shahnameh,” he told the Mehr News Agency on Saturday.

tehran times : Shahnameh embodies Iranian identity: scholar

Some scholar really.  How dare he not mention the Zend-Avesta.  After all, Shahnameh is a poor reprint of Khodayeh-Namak, which itself relates to Zend-Avesta.

From Nuclear bluff to Regime change to Peak Oil

At a time when majority of states have understood the present realities and have the intention of publicly acknowledging the realities, certain groups of states raise hue and cry to seek concessions from the Iranian nation, added the president.

President: Everyone will be aware of closure of Tehran's N-case soon - Irna

Seyyeds' Poodle could actually do well, if he played the nuclear bluff game.  But being a devout fanatic and true to his dogma , he will not budge.  He will press the button, once the Mahdi button is made.

As far as secular Iranians are concerned, he is a "has been", and well past the "sell by date".

So the only thing this poodle, and all the other trolls can do, is to hope for the US President, and those in the future, to make a big thing about the nuclear story.  But world media has figured that out, and knows that everybody yawns at it all.

That means that the world oil media industry, that wants peak oil, needs to talk more about the blocking of Straits of Hormuz, bombing of Arab refineries etc etc.  Same old boring stuff eh.  That's why I believe that the only way, is for major changes in Iran, that would then move prices really higher for the peak oil advocates.  And that will be done.  That way everyone that matters will benefit.  As a hint, think what the effects would be, if the Chinese could economically get their own oil by themselves from the very deep wells in South China Sea?  That would change their relationship with the Seyyeds.  This is dreamland territory.

Seyyeds and US block aid to secular Iranians

So far, $5.4 million in payments has been suspended for four projects, the officials said, and they do not expect the suspensions to be permanent.

The Columbus Dispatch : World Bank forced to halt some aid to Iran

But the article fails to mention the fact that the Seyyeds do not deal in US dollars anymore.  The Seyyeds love the fact that the secular Iranians do not get money.  This all helps them.  They have access to all the Euros they need.  The people of Iran can no longer deal in the most common currency.  Most of the wealthiest Iranians have US dollars in California and they would be the source of all the trouble against the Seyyeds, as and when.  Connecting the dots means that the US and Seyyeds are on the same side, against the secular true Iranians.  So this means that the funds to true secular Iranians needs to go via HSBC or Standard Chartered Bank or some other bank in Indonesia or Malaysia or parts of EU, that are not trading in US dollars and are trading in tranches less than $ US 20 million.  Hopefully no IRGC thug is involved, and the funds can reach the proper Iranians.  Ya Ahuramazda!

Seyyed terms uranium enrichment abroad "unacceptable"

'Any proposal to pursue the enrichment process outside Iran is meaningless and if such proposals were aimed at stopping enrichment on Iranian soil, then they would be totally unacceptable,' deputy chief nuclear negotiator Javad Vaeidi was quoted by Fars news agency as saying.Vaeidi was referring to an interview by Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal with the Middle East Economic Digest (MEED) in which he said that the Persian Gulf states would be ready to form a consortium for providing enriched uranium to Iran and hence avoiding escalation of the international crisis over Iran's nuclear programme.

Tehran terms uranium enrichment abroad "unacceptable" (Roundup) - Middle East

Fact is that the Seyyeds want to escalate the situation.  That is their Holy manadate for the return of their Mahdi.  I mean, can you imagine Mahdi turning up and asking, "Why have you got that Saudi stuff here?"

Russia and China fall in line, just before the "flexibility" comment

Russia and China did not comment, and the agreement seemed at odds with weeks of public opposition, primarily by the Kremlin, to new sanctions against Iran.

Russia and China fall in line on Iran | Jerusalem Post

Why have the Russians and Chinese suddenly complied?  Or is it, that in two weeks time, Ayatollah ElBaradei will say that there has been some "flexibility", as was just expressed in the Chinese press below:

Wen said peaceful negotiation would be the best way to resolve the nuclear issue and he hoped that Iran could further demonstrate its flexibility, according to a press release from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

China urges Iran to cooperate with IAEA

And then the Seyyeds would just carry on as normal.

US hits at Beijing over Iran stance

“We are disappointed by the lack of co-operation by China on a third Security Council resolution,” said Nicholas Burns, US under-secretary of state, representing Washington at the meeting. “We don’t think that China is moving with us.”

FT.com / World - US hits at Beijing over Iran stance

And folks with that statement, the real culprit in this whole saga, is cornered.  If China washes its hand from the Seyyeds, then the Seyyeds are well and truly on their way out.  Somehow the Chinese need to be pursuaded.

Saudis enriching Seyyeds

Saudi Arabia today revealed details of an ambitious offer to Tehran, aimed at defusing the growing crisis over Iran's controversial nuclear program, reported the Times of London.

More at :

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,307497,00.html?sPage=fnc.world/iran

It seems that, like others before, the Saudis are trying to avert public criticism, by pretending to help Seyyeds. Now don't forget, that he is offering it to the same insane people, who wanted to make a joint Islamic force for the area. So this is what the visit to London was about. So much fot the Brits.