Newsweek insulting Iranians' intelligence

"He is still the elected president of my country," Amir says. "Insulting him in front of the world is insulting all Iranians."

More a:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21047612/site/newsweek/

What is more insulting? Reading an incorrect statement from an American media, or what Bollinger said? Let's look at the statement. AhMADinejad was not "elected" by the Iranian nation. In fact as the Iranians said, "delam khonak shod", or as we say in England, "I was right chuffed", to see AhMADinejad get cut up by Bollinger. And yes, he is a dictator, as the turnout was low, and the choice was awful.

But what is really insulting, is to see an Iranian reporter, report such a load of rubbish in AP and Newsweek. Our problem is not so much with the Seyyeds, but the incorrect reporting that is going on. And to the undeducated, they might think that the article was right, when it is outrageously wrong.

Seyyeds and the ticking clock

In view of the fact that Iran has not fulfilled the requirements of UN Security Council Resolutions 1737 and 1747, including the suspension of its enrichment and reprocessing activities, we agree to finalize a text for a third UN Security Council Sanctions Resolution under Article 41 of Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations with the intention of bringing it to a vote in the UN Security Council unless the November reports of Dr. Solana and Dr. El Baradei show a positive outcome of their efforts.

More

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i1dgxJCrq3yXejUwtmwy5QopFsZgD8RUJ8180

So it is good to see the world out smarting the IAEA. ElBaradei have even been suspected of collusion with the Seyyeds.

Seyyed's Poodle thinks he was a visiting professor at Columbia

Did you think that AhMADinejad was a teacher, that was invited to Columbia University? Well he thinks he was. Look at this clip

http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2007/09/26/amanpour.ahmadinejad.cnn?iref=videosearch

Then scroll to 1:58 into the interview, and you will hear him say something like, the students of Columbia came to see a teacher. But he knows that he is saying something really stupid, as he formulated his sentences in a very indirect way. He could have said, "I was invited by the students to teach them", but he did not say that.

The guy is worse than a megalomaniac, he is a dillusional megalomaniac. And this sort of dillusional illness has infested all these Seyyeds, who await some Mahdi to come to their rescue.

U.S. moving to implement new sanctions against Iran, and sell arms to Arabs

"We're going to keep going," Burns told reporters. "If Mr. Ahmadinejad thinks somehow that he has been given a pass, he is mistaken about that."Burns' talks over dinner with diplomats from Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany will set the stage for a second meeting on Thursday and then one between Rice and the group's other foreign ministers on Friday when the resolution is expected to be further defined.However, he said it is unlikely that the text of a new resolution will be agreed to this week.As Burns spoke, Rice was assuring Iran's wary neighbors in the Persian Gulf of U.S. backing to improve their defenses against a "hegemonistic Iran" through proposed multibillion dollar arms sales, a senior State Department official told reporters.

kare11.com :: KARE 11 TV - U.S. moving to implement new sanctions against Iran

Ah, you see how clear it all is.  The US wants that prat AhMADinejad to scare the pants off the Arabs so that they can sell even more arms to the Arabs.

Bollingers questions for President Ahmadinejad

Frankly, and in all candor, Mr. President, I doubt that you will have the intellectual courage to answer these questions. But your avoiding them will in itself be meaningful to us.

My questions for President Ahmadinejad | Salon.com

So Bollinger spoke his mind, and he wanted to tell AhMADinejad personally in public, and he did not care what the reply was.  See the 02:11 minute.

Mad comments from the Madman from Iran

"Our people are the freest in the world," he said. "The freest women in the world are the women in Iran." Those who make human rights charges against his government "are unaware of the situation in Iran," he added.

Iranian president answers Washington press corps | csmonitor.com

This is a sure sign of a madman.

Seyyed and Israeli clash like children

The exchange came after Iran's chief delegate Ail Asghar Soltanieh — like Arab delegates before him — said that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had acknowledged last year that his country possessed nuclear weapons — something Olmert says he never did.Soltanieh also criticized "the continuous silence of the U.S. ... vis a vis the atrocities, aggression, bloodshed and violations of over 30 resolutions of the United Nations."That, he said, is "shameful and (a) dark point in the history of the United Nations, and the IAEA and the modern century at large."In turn, Israeli delegate Israel Michaeli, alluding to claims that Olmert acknowledged Israel's nuclear weapons, said some previous speakers "continued to lie.""Those who call for the elimination of Israel" have no right to criticize "Israeli policies aimed at defending Israel's very existence," Michaeli said.

The Associated Press: Iran, Israel Clash at IAEA Conference

So now these two goons get to face each other face to face, and swear at each other.  It is really sad how childish these so called grown up men behave.  And the toys they are arguing over can take the world to Armaggedon.

Atomic Iran vs Nowrooz Spirit

"There are ways to live with a nuclear Iran," Abizaid said in remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank. "Let's face it, we lived with a nuclear Soviet Union, we've lived with a nuclear China, and we're living with (other) nuclear powers as well."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070918/ap_on_go_ot/abizaid_iran

It is not the case of becoming a nuclear power, it is the case of morality. The Iranian Nowrooz Spirit does not allow a threatening posture.

Russians coming to their senses

"We do not need a nuclear Iran or an Iran with the potential to create them," a Russian official whose name was not disclosed told Russian news agencies Monday. "We will not play any anti-U.S. games with it, should [Iran] decide against giving any answers to the IAEA's questions. Let them answer for themselves."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/12/AR2007031201296.html

Well with comments like that it seems that the Russians are not too keen in being an anti-US propaganda tool for the Seyyeds.

Iran's Seyyeds and the right to invade Iraq

"US forces will be targeted if they stay," Larijani has also told the press

Asia Times Online :: Middle East News - US and Europe drain Iran's half-full glass

This Seyyed, and the writer of the article, are talking through their Turban and hat respectively.  There is a proxy war going on in Iraq.  The Seyyeds are using Iran's wealth, to build a bomb and get back the old caliphate with its capital in Baghdad.  I bet you that in the Seyyeds' mind, he wants to build a new state stretching from Islamabad to Baghdad and to the Levant with Baghdad at it centre.

Trouble with that idea is that Ur in Iraq (which is why Iraq is called what it is in the first place) is where Abraham was born.  That brings in the two other religious fanatics from the Jewish and Christian side.  So Iraq does mean more than just oil to the US, with its Evangelists.

As far as Iranians are concerned, all three "religious" reasons, are just that, "religious".  The capital of Iran was called in the time of the Sassanians Cteisphon (and we Iranians pronounce it Teezfoon).  The Sassanians had plenty of tolerance and all the younger faiths than Iranian philosophy could live.  In fact in the light of Zoroastrian tolerance, other faith were encouraged.

Ironically the younger faith did not reciprocate did they, and apostates like Salman Parsi were encouraged to burn all of Iran's books.  So the younger faiths have lost their right to anything.  They broke the peace, and that is why they are where they are.  You cannot ignore history.

How Matt Lauer got it completely wrong on Iran

Watch this video

http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?g=923e4bfd-11ba-421f-9958-ab1308cc8ef2&f=00&fg=

First of all I like that ad with the dog chasing the owner. It just about sums up what you will see. The US at the moment is trying so hard to connect to the Seyyeds. The liberal news of US like MSNBC, which knows so pitifully little about the history of Iran, got Matt Lauer to state that Mossadegh was a President in 1953.

We all know how Mossadegh abused democracy for the first time, with rent-crowds, that later Khomeini used as well. And to this day the Seyyeds use rent-a-crowds in front of the TV. The US Democrats fell for all this in 1979, and it is happening again.

What is even funnier is amongst all the intellectuals of Iran, Matt Lauer goes and finds some Seyyed Professor who defends the nuke plans the Seyyeds have. It is all a laugh really. But you watched it on TV, so it must be true. You will see what I mean at the end, that the only clips worth were the ads.

Anyway, it shows one thing for sure. The Iranian Opposition has not managed to do anything in the past 30 years. Why is it the reporters like Matt Lauer do not know about the Iranian Opposition. Or maybe they do know, and they just want to use Iran to criticize the Republicans, instead of dealing with the Iranians' suffering under the Seyyeds. US reporter are again dragged into Iran because of the growing influence of the Seyyeds in Iraq, and the don't even know the geography of the area.

Why is the Seyyed Poodle sucking up to the West saying "sorry" to UK?

He also told the programme that "if the American government, and British government, corrects themselves, problems will be solved."

Channel 4 - News - Iranian president says "sorry" to UK

Up to this point, this Seyyed poodle was painted as some unyielding demon, and now he comes across as Mr Nice Guy.  Has all this got to do with a deal with the Brits getting out of the would be Seyyed Area in Iraq or present day Shiite dominated provinces in southern Iraq?

N.B. British Oil has invested a lot of money in these areas with a number of other Oil companies.

ElBaradei buys more time for Iran's Seyyeds' nuke bomb program

“Resolving all outstanding verification issues in the next two to three months, after a long deadlock, would go a long way towards building the confidence of the international community in the peaceful nature of Iran’s past nuclear programme,”

Despite progress, important issues of Iran’s nuclear programme still remain – UN


And what will ElBaradei do next January when nothing had happened, and the Seyyeds had not come completely clean?

True Iranians will never fight for Seyyeds

"Based on discussions at the Organization of the Islamic Conference, an attack against any Muslim country amount to an attack against all Muslim countries … That's a legitimate right," said Gholam Hussein Elham when asked whether Iran will defend Syria if it were attacked by Israel.

More at

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3447223,00.html

Sad as it seems, the present highly dellusional theocratic regime in Iran, thinks it has the support of all Iranians. Or maybe the above statement is just another pathetic sound bite as more and more Sunnis are becoming anti Seyyed. The people of Iran hardly participated in the so called elections last time. People spit on mullahs in Iran. And Iranians carry on doing things their way in Iran, ignoring the Seyyeds. The Seyyeds are losing the war against the non believers. The Iranian puts Iran's peace first for Iranian reasons, as opposed to any other reason that is not part of the Nowrooz Spirit of Free Will and Peace for all.

Thank you Australia from all Free Iranians

Australia will not approve the sale of its uranium to Russia until it is assured that the nuclear fuel would not be sold to hostile countries like Iran and Syria for production of bomb, Prime Minister John Howard said today.

Central Chronicle--World


Good on ya Aussies.  Well done to the Australians.  Free Iranians will remember you.  Why don't the NAM do this?

Russia's man who loves Seyyeds

Vice Chairman of Russia's Parliament Duma, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, has urged the fast delivery of the sophisticated S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran to enable the Middle Eastern country to defend its air space, the Press TV reported. Zhirinovsky was addressing the open session of Duma on Wednesday.

Company News Story


There are so many factions in Russia.  Mr Z is obviously the man to watch for any cooperation with the Seyyeds.

Brits vs Seyyeds in Iraq

British forces were engaged in a "proxy war with Iran" in the south of Iraq, the officer who planned this week's withdrawal from Basra Palace said today.

More at:

http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/politics/international_politics/british+troops+proxy+war+with+iran/771452

For so long the conspiracy was that the Brits were in it with the Seyyeds, shielding them from the US.

Does it really matter. I still think the Seyyeds and their kind, should go from Iran and rule southern Iraq, Yeah, leave Iran to the true Iranians, that put Iran over and above any belief system, unless of course the belief system is believing in Iran, like Zoroastrianism is.

Tone of the press on Iran's horrible regime

With the Islamist regime in Tehran making clear that it has no intention of complying with U.N. Security Council

Options on Iran -- The Washington Times, America's Newspaper


One look at the above tone, and you can see how the world is now clearly separating the Islamist regime from the people of Iran.  That was not the case not so long ago.

The more the Seyyeds are seggragated in the media as distinct from the rest of Iranians, the better and easier the regime change will be.

Iraq crisis is Iran's Seyyeds' trap

Iran may well provide the glue that keeps that from happening - all the more reason for the US and its allies not to view every Iranian involvement in Iraq negatively, or as an act of subversion.

Asia Times Online :: Middle East News - Iraq crisis is Iran's opportunity


Sometimes you read comments, and you think, "well that goon is not aware of Iranian history", and you let it go.  But we Iranians have some real weirdos.  Above is a perfect example.  In wanting to be different, this character always says the wrong things.  He highlights the fact that the Seyyeds are over the moon because the Brits are out of the Basra area.

In fact what will happen, is that the Seyyeds will rush in, and be spotted very clearly, and held accountable for what they are doing, as the Sunnis and Kurds will start to complain.  Up to this point, the Seyyeds where pretty much camoflaged by the Brits, who were silent, too silent about the Seyyed involvement in Iraq.  So it is just as well that the apologists for the Seyyeds are out of the area, and we can all see the real interferrence taking place right on TV.

Personally I think that the sooner the Seyyeds have their own country in southern Iraq the better.

New Seyyed Commander Takes Over Revolutionary Guards in Iran

So we hear that a new Seyyed Commander has been appointed.  Big deal.  Fact is that the true Iranian Army is held together, and is not polutted by these aliens.  So many correspondents miss this point as shown below:

But the Iranian military is not -- in the manner of some Latin American states in the past or Turkey -- prominently involved in domestic politics. Those officers who go on to fill political or administrative positions do so as civilians and are seen as elements with an assured loyalty to the political system more than to the IRGC as a corps.

Iran: New Commander Takes Over Revolutionary Guards - RADIO FREE EUROPE / RADIO LIBERTY

Culture vs Religion in Iranians

"His family had been only culturally Islamic, not devout Muslims, but the conversion still upset his father."

More:

http://www.al.com/living/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/living/1188981799316130.xml&coll=2&thispage=2

There is an amazingly strong culture in Iran. Actually it is more akin to a Spirit. But as the above article shows, even educated military in Iran, did not know enough. They ran away.

One of the strange situations we have in Iran, is that unlike other societies, where they had to opt for knowledge of secular politics, to fend off the interference of religion in the society, Iran has its own ancient morality far far older than any of the religions. This Spirit of Nowrooz preserves the idenity of an Iranian, no matter whatever else he or she likes in Life.

It must be said that only under the blatant vulgarity of the Seyyed rulers, has the Nowrooz Spirit become very cherished and dear to all true Iranians. How many Iranians put any younger "holy book" on the haftseen instead of the oldest book of truth, namely the Zend Avesta?

Christians and many other religions, lump everything philosophical or spiritual, under the wings of Zoroastrianism. In fact Iran, just like China or Greece, had plenty, if not more philosophers, but only one remains very distinct above all else, namely Zoroaster or Zarathushtra. Diversity of thought and choice is at the heart of what is called "Gozinesh" in the Zend Avesta. The concept of choice and Free Will existed in the Zend Avesta before anywhere else.

So why are we in this mess? Iran lost all its art and literature because its high priest converted to Christianity, and then created what is now called Islam to prevent proselytizing. Salman Parsi then burnt all of Iran's art and demolished all art meticulously, and said one needed just the Koran. As Cyrus the Great demonstrated, we Iranians tolerate, and do not like proselytizing.

Going back to the article, you can see how people are still proselytizing. They have no idea of the Spiritual roots of Iranian culture. To them old Iran had just a bunch of kings and tough men. Whilst most of the modern attitudes nowadays are to be found in Good Old Iranian culture. Iranians need not to run away, and go to younger religions, that Old Iran had created in the first place.

Perhaps people are converting to Christianity because at least it has some resemblance to our very much more ancient celebrations that it copied, or should I say, plagiarised incorrectly. You need to look at the roots of Christmas, and the Easter, and Thanks Giving, and see that the mimic Yalda, Nowrooz, and Mehregan.

ElBaradei hits the Seyyeds on nukes

"There are concrete elements of suspicion against Iran - so I am of the opinion that Iran has temporarily forfeited this right and must first win it back through confidence-building measures toward the international community," ElBaradei said.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/I/IRAN_NUCLEAR?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

This time he is trying to buy time and critisize the Seyyeds.