Saturday, February 24, 2007

Anti Neocons using Iran as a scapegoat

There are people in the world that do not want to give one iota of credit to Iran's own resistance movement. They will then go so far as to declare war against the Seyyeds, as if there are no intelligent Iranians.

Former UN weapons inspector, turned peace activist, Scott Ritter isn’t swallowing Gates’ assurances either. Here’s what he said on the subject during a recent lecture: “Ladies and gentlemen, we’re going to war with Iran. It’s going to happen. There’s nothing we can do to stop it.”


So I wrote to the author of that article. Below is a copy of that letter:

I was just reading your article about your car and the wagon when you compared Iran to US.

What you failed to realise is that the only way stop the Seyyed Empire is for the world to accept the Non Violent Resistance (NVR) movement in Iran.

The people of Iran openly declared a non violent war against the Seyyeds and are winning. The problem is that the media in the world that is against the neocons will use any country that is anti US as fodder against the neocons.

So these anti US commentators are not that much for secular Iranians as they are against neocons. If they really cared for the real Iranians who see themselves as sons of Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great, then they would ask them how they would like to remove the alien Seyyeds.

NVR is not interested in physical confrontation, and its principles are not too different from other NVR movements in human history. NVR movements created regime changes that lasted, because it was based on winning the peace first without war.

But don't you dare think that we are that passive. NVR will provoke the Seyyeds with questions that they will fail to answer. Questions that will show their weak foundations amongst all the Iranians whose labour provides the fuel for your car and that wagon.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007

Rageh Omaar BBC4 documentary on Iran



A recent program on BBC4 on censorship in Iran. We all had a good chat on it. Rageh Omaar shows how brave he is, and shows the clout of BBC, when he is invited to pray with Ahmadinejad.

Monday, February 12, 2007

Iran now is not the same as that of 1979 and would not support the Seyyeds if attacked

Many Iranians think that Iran now is the same as the Iran of 1979. They think that the Seyyeds can bring on the nationalism of Iran, and stay in power. Just read this pathetic dialogue, that everyone is huffing and puffing about.

At a farewell reception at Blair House for the retiring chief of protocol, Don Ensenat, who was President Bush's Yale roommate, the president shook hands with Washington Life Magazine's Soroush Shehabi. "I'm the grandson of one of the late Shah's ministers," said Soroush, "and I simply want to say one U.S. bomb on Iran and the regime we all despise will remain in power for another 20 or 30 years and 70 million Iranians will become radicalized."

"I know," President Bush answered.

"But does Vice President Cheney know?" asked Soroush.

President Bush chuckled and walked away.


What Shehabi does not realise, is that first of all the Seyyeds know jolly well that the people of Iran do not associate them as Iranians. Secondly that any call for arms is just a political ploy to keep themselves in power. The Seyyeds do not have the hearts and minds of the Iranian people. If anything any call for war will cause major peace marches in Iran, which will be a precursor to massive uprising against the Seyyeds. It is then to their benefit to come to a settlement with US and UN and their Oil trading partners.

Sunday, February 11, 2007

The people of Iran do not need the United States of America

Some people think that the people of Iran, or the society of Iran is weak against the Seyyeds. So they state:

Paradoxically, to liberalize the theocratic state, the United States would do better to shelve its containment strategy and embark on a policy of unconditional dialogue and sanctions relief. A reduced American threat would deprive the hard-liners of the conflict they need to justify their concentration of power. In the meantime, as Iran became assimilated into the global economy, the regime's influence would inevitably yield to the private sector, with its demands for accountability and reform.

It is important to appreciate that Iran has a political system without precedent or parallel in modern history. The struggle there is not just between reactionaries and reformers, conservatives and liberals, but fundamentally between the state and society. A subtle means of diminishing the state and empowering the society is, in the end, the best manner of promoting not only democracy but also nuclear disarmament.


Where have these astute people been? Don't they realise that the young people of Iran have built a new internet network that has bypassed the Seyyed rulers. We do not need United States. It is non violent, and is a lot more subtle.

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Dilip Hiro makes another stupid comment on Iran's Seyyeds - cheghadr khareh in mard?

One of the more startling comments I have just come across is this one from Dilip. You know he got his fame from supporting AK. He has been on my radar for so long. Well read this:

Specifically, if Iran were to target Israel, it would find itself annihilated since - equipped with submarine-borne nuclear weapons - Israel possesses the second-strike capability that Tehran does not.


It is as if the alien Seyyeds in Iran care. They know that once they have "wiped Israel off the map", their Mahdi will come and save them against anything. That includes an Israeli submarine nuclear attack.

Getting up Iran's Seyyeds' noses in Iraq

Someone is getting up the Seyyeds' noses badly. They are nicking their agents, and no one knows who it is that's doing it. That's funny.

"We've checked with our units and it was not an MNF-I (Multi-National Forces - Iraq) unit that participated in that event," military spokesman Lt. Col. Christopher Garver said, adding he could not confirm the diplomat was seized.

It is about time someone gave the Seyyeds a taste of their own medicine. After all, it was the likes of Ahmadinejad, who have taken so much, no too much credit, for the US Embassy hijacking.