No Gas

"Turkmenistan reduced its exports to Iran by half two days ago but since Sunday afternoon, the exports have completely ceased," said a spokesman for the National Iranian Gas Company, quoted by the state broadcaster.

Turkmenistan normally exports between 20 to 23 million cubic metres (706 to 812 million cubic feet) of gas daily to Iran, the spokesman said.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g8kprmWTGdlprL...


Total madness, that we have proven reserves second to Russia, and the only thing the Seyyeds are interested in, is siphoning the Oil income to make centrifuges.

And what are the Iranian people's reaction to all this? A lot. But is it being reported by anyone in the West? Does AFP go further than this? No. After all they don't want the French interests to be influenced in any way do they.

Gossip without water

The authorities insist the drive against water pipes is on grounds of health alone, but it comes amid one of the toughest moral crackdowns in years, which has seen thousands of women warned for attire or behaviour deemed un-Islamic.

The clampdown has also targeted trendy coffeeshops, book-cafes and Internet cafes, which are among the few places where young men and women can hang out together in the Islamic republic, which frowns upon the mixing of the sexes.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071230/wl_mideast_afp/iransocialsmokingprotest

This just another excuse for the Seyyeds, to poke around Iranian culture, which alien to them. But more importantly this their pathetic attempt to stop the chattering crowds. They can't influence the spread of The Good Truth which stems from the Iranian Spirit. Their alien thoughts no longer attract Iranians' attention.

Iranian Business in Dubai

"There are 48 European banks based here that have started imposing restrictions on companies that do business with Iran, even though they know the merchants very well and have a history with them," says Hadi Motameni, president of the Iranian Business Council. "When businesses don't get loans from banks, they can't function."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071229/ap_on_re_mi_ea/gulf_iran_s_boomtown

It is about time that Iranians were a little more responsible about their dealings with the Seyyeds.

UN is with the Iranian Opposition

The UN General Assembly approved a Canadian draft resolution Tuesday expressing "deep concern" at alleged systematic human rights violations in Iran, including torture, flogging, amputations, stoning and public executions.

The 192-member world body adopted the resolution by a vote of 73-53 with 55 abstentions.

The resolution is not legally binding but carries moral weight and reflects the majority view of world opinion.

http://www.thecanadianpress.com/english/online/OnlineFullStory.aspx?filename=w121896A&newsitemid=19460015&languageid=1

Thank goodness most of the world is with the Iranian Opposition. But the Seyyeds think that they are over and above the UN don't they.

Include Iranians, but Seyyeds will exclude

It's now time to pursue an inclusive strategy that attempts to bring both the Arab center and Iranian periphery into a comprehensive peace arrangement and a framework for regional security.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1198517212331&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

What is utterly amazing is how no matter what strategy the Israelis, neocons, or whoever else has, they do not see the real problem. The real problem is that the Seyyeds, especially the likes of Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi and his echelon, will never be seen with the Israelis or American, agreeing about anything.

Now the Israelis and the US neocons know this. So all this rapproachment, is a precursor to the next and perhaps ultimate phase. They want to make sure that they cannot be critisized for not trying to be reasonable with the Seyyeds.

But we all know that they all could remove the Seyyeds in a week if they wanted to. So all this is political theatre. Why don't they recognise the true Iranians in opposition, and help the non violent regime change.

The reason is very clear. The last thing they want is for Iran to be run by an intelligence that would compete in all spheres of human activity. The brain and monetary drain must continue, and Iran must become a pariah state.

But the people of Iran are fighting this inhibition internally. Every Seyyed has been ear marked and is avoided. People will deal only with those who are not part of the ruling oligarchy. The change is already taking place and the so called coming Seyyed election will be totally ignored by all.

Unless of course the US President says something like the Iranians do not know how to vote, and gets everyone's back up. That would help the Seyyeds just like it did the last time. But the people of Iran will see through this.

Seyyeds buying friends with oil

Iran and Malaysia signed a $16 billion agreement to develop two Iranian gas fields, state-run television reported Wednesday, describing the deal as the largest energy contract in Iran.

http://www.iii.co.uk/news/?type=afxnews&articleid=6464495&action=article

And the US has threatened the Malaysians with withrawing the preferred trading status, and Malaysians didn't twitch. It is amazing how the Chinese and Malaysians have absolutely no regard for Human Rights. How can they be so materialistic?

Stop that Chinaman

“We were very concerned to see the announcement and we have followed up and communicated that concern to the Chinese government . . . at multiple levels,” said a senior US official, who added the US was still waiting for “further details” from China about the transaction.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9b1abb3e-af22-11dc-880f-0000779fd2ac.html

That's right, the root of the problem are the Chinese. Force them to choose between trading with the US or the Seyyeds. But of course we all know, for China you must read US companies in China like Wal-Mart. They use prisoners, together will cheap oil from Iran, to export to the West. Do you buy "Made in China"? Think before you buy.

Perverse Double Negative

U.S. intelligence agencies are reporting that Iran is not currently building nukes. I am by no means advocating for war as a solution, nor do I intend for it to be an element of this question. But would these be the same "intelligence" agencies that reported that Iraq DID have weapons of mass destruction?

http://www.stevenspointjournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071215/SPJ06/712150388/1713/SPJopinion

Truly we live in a perverse world. So the US agencies are betting, that once the next media campaign to the pre-emptive strikes gets going, they are off the hook. The world would rather not blame them for getting involved in politics. But that's the whole point. If the US "intelligence" agencies gave credit to Iranian patriots, that are not involved with the Seyyeds, then maybe we Iranians could change our country in our own sweet peaceful way. But they would rather try to get themselves in that llittle spot where the newspapers write about Iran. Not one word is written about how, a public dialogue on the ways and means of non violent resistance, in itself would show up the Seyyeds weaknesses, and show the strength of non violent general strike.

Re-write that speech ElBaradei

"They scattered the weaponization program to other locations and restarted in 2004," Mohammad Mohaddessin, the NCRI's foreign affairs chief, told the Journal.

"Their strategy was that if the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) found any one piece of this research program, it would be possible to justify it as civilian. But so long as it was all together, they wouldn't be able to."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/933444.html

For the past many years it used to be the case, that every time the IAEA came around to give an "A OK" to the Seyyed stealth nuke program, someone - either a "defector" or the NCRI would release some new piece of information, and poor old Ayatollah ElBaradei would get pissed off that he had to rewrite his anti-US speech.

Why did Iran's Seyyeds pull out of Manama Dialogue?

THE credibility of a major security conference talking place in Bahrain has been thrown in doubt after Iranian officials pulled out at the last minute.

http://www.gulf-daily-news.com/Story.asp?Article=202283&Sn=BNEW&IssueID=30263

One of the more interesting twists to this whole nuclear saga with the Seyyeds is what The Economist stated in its last paragraph when it states:

But to keep the world on side, America may have to show new flexibility. For example, while tightening sanctions, it could offer to talk to Iran about all aspects of their troubled relations, even before work at Natanz stopped. Iran might refuse. But that would at least make it clear which side was the spoiler.

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10251997

Now here is the first time, since the US decided to declare a slightly softer tone towards the Seyyeds, with the publication of the NIE report. AhMADinejad has welcomed the US's more positive outlook. So why don't the Seyyeds show up at the Manama Dialogue?

The reason I think is that they have no excuse to blame the US for anything now. The Seyyeds have had to rewrite the speech for Manama. All that anti-US stuff cannot work anymore.

Weaponization vs Enrichment

For that very reason, however, relieved doves who think the spectre of a nuclear Iran or of an American attack has now disappeared had better read the report again. Its final sentence says ("high confidence") that Iran has the scientific, technical and industrial capacity eventually to produce nuclear weapons if it chooses. As to what "eventually" means, the assessment has not changed: it was always late 2009 at the earliest but more probably the middle of the next decade.

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10251997

We know that the so called "spies" of United States, had seen some notes of some whisperings from some Seyyed thugs. That led them to deduce that the weaponization program, which is not that hard, has been halted. The world press, of course, the ones inside United States to begin with, and then the ones outside United States, used this as ammunition to beat neocons like Dick Cheney. What a shame that none of these correspondents actually know much about the nuclear cycle. As you can see from the article above, the crucial part of the nuclear cycle is the enrichment process. That bit has not stopped, and those centrifuges in Natanz have cost Iran so much both financially and internationally. We have let the Seyyeds ruin our reputation as the Birth Land of Human Rights. The fact that the enriched Uranium has no use for any power station in Iran, means that the Seyyeds want to use it for their own global Armaggeddon in respect of their Mahdi. They will press the button. The MAD (Multually Assured Destruction) principle does not apply for the Seyyeds. They see themselves as over and above UN or any international body that exists, has existed, or will exist. So what is the solution? The solution is that the world press should spend more time praising the Iranian diaspora, that has managed to create a new understanding of Iran for the future. We have people of incredibly high intellectual calibre who are keeping the dignity and respect of Iranians. These professionals are the future of Iran. We all want peaceful regime change. The one power we do not have is a world press that understands and appreciates the simplest way to get rid of the Seyyeds without bloodshed. We need the world press to not ask about the nuclear programs, but to ask what the Seyyeds could do in light of a non violent general strike. Once the Seyyeds are faced with questions centred on General Strikes, then they will realise that their bandits, can do nothing against a population of 65 million, if it decided to shut down Iran for even a couple of days. Our problem is not the Seyyeds, but the world press's blackout on forces of peaceful regime change in Iran.

Diplomacy with false teeth

"We will now press for a further sanctions resolution,'' the British minister wrote in the opinion piece published today. ``We cannot be afraid of diplomacy with teeth. The alternatives are all worse.''

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601102&sid=aQKIB92PC240&refer=uk

What is the point of diplomacy with teeth that does not include oil trading? The Chinese have clearly stated, that they will not be party to any aggreement, that would stop the flow of oil. And then you have the UK being the centre of military precurement. Unlike the US, the UK is not forcing companies to choose between the Seyyeds and UK.

Putin is naive towards the Seyyeds

President Vladimir Putin has urged Iran to freeze its controversial uranium enrichment programme, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Wednesday, Interfax reported.

In a meeting Tuesday with Iranian nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, Putin repeated his "call for freezing work on uranium enrichment," Interfax quoted Lavrov as saying.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071205/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpoliticsrussiaenrich

How strange that the Russians are toeing the US line. After China stopping a lot of credit lines to the Seyyeds, everyone was thinking that the Russians were going stump the coalition. Obviously the world values its trade relations with the US more than the Seyyeds. The US has made it quite clear that it will not allow companies that trade with the Seyyeds to trade with the US as well.

China falls into line

Asadollah Asgaroladi, head of the Iran-China chamber of commerce, was quoted as saying that Chinese banks "did not open letters of credit for Iranian traders during the past week."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/feedarticle?id=7122871

When we look back in years to come, we will realise this to be a very important event.

It has been quite difficult to get the Chinese to fall in with the rest of the world.

Obviously Russia does not want Iran out of the NPT, because of all the investments it has made in Bushehr NPP. But there are quite a few people there, that are not too pleased with Lavrov.

Annapolis, policing and US policy

This shift comes after Iran's "anger" at Syria because it attended the Annapolis Conference, while leaders of Palestinian organizations in Damascus did not accept an official Iranian invitation to meet with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Tehran, to coincide with the Annapolis Conference, and announce a counter-declaration, with the attendance of 10 Palestinian organizations. According to what sources told al-Hayat's correspondent in Damascus, the positions by the Palestinian organizations, came despite "considerable pressure exerted on and temptations offered to the leaders of the organizations," before the Iranian Embassy in Damascus was informed of the invitees' desire to "postpone" the visit to another time.

http://english.daralhayat.com/opinion/OPED/12-2007/Article-20071201-9518769f-c0a8-10ed-00c1-a41e440fe9ff/story.html

It is good to see, that the Seyyed foreign policy, has well and truly failed. It is however so sad, to see so much of secular Iranians' oil income, to be have been illegally siphoned for Seyyeds' bribes to other people outside Iran, rather than for poor secular Iranians.

Saudi Arabia has realised, that it must snub the Seyyeds, no matter how many times AhMADinejad, goes begging to them. Even the Syrians, Hamas and Hezbollah, have turned down the recent anti-Annapolis conference. But as you can see, the Annapolis Conference, is leading to a situation that would help put Iran before Lebanon.

For so long "the Middle East", was what was going on in the Levant, as the Seyyeds were busy trying to change Iran. The Seyyeds have failed, and no Moslem is with them. And the Iranians' 7000 old culture has been resurrected, ironically without a Shahanshah. Good. But why? Because the Shahanshahs used the principles of Human Right as written in the Zend Avesta. The Shahanshahs of Iran were the first believers of Human Rights. And the Iranians, out of necessity have had to do the same. Slowly the moral vacuum is filling up. Iran is reinventing itself - en masse, without a 2500 year old celebration.

But what did the Iranian Opposition do, when the Annapolis Conference took place? There was no one from the new Iranians there, who could tell the world of the clear non violent regime change in mind, that we all want. And does the world really know about us? Fact is we have no money or organization. Is there a need for it? Maybe not. Is the Spirit of Iran finding its own quiet way into our hearts? Yah Ahura it is.

All Iranians, like all decent human beings want peaceful change. Consciously resisting to anything Seyyed, is definitely there. It was not so obvious in The White Revolution we had. Ironically it has become obvious in a Black Revolution. So the non violent opposition is intuitively in all Iranians. It is part of our ancient 7000 year culture. But we need the world to know it, so that it is referred to as the new Iranian model, in lieu of the Seyyed Empire.

Ask any Iranian do you want change, and they will say yes. But they want it peacefully. It is not a case of the end justfying the means. It does not mean, that because the end will be peace, then we should attain it by any means. That's the trap the Iraqi people fell into.

And many multinationals corporations, like Exxon did not suffer one bit from the demise of what happened in Iraq. In fact they loved the fact that, everything apart from the flow of oil, has been destroyed. And the US government benefited too. The brain and financial drain to US, has been immmense. Can you imagine the equivalent effect to Iran, if it gets bombed? Quo Bene, again? US.

This rush to America was going on in the 70's, and then in 80's, after Akh's Tsunami hit our shores. And all the Iranians who fled to the "land of opportunity", just forgot the past and got on with the present and future. They had to. Now that is what I call a coup for the US.

But Iran struggled on. The poor secular Iranian people that remained, somehow conscientiously built their country, but this time with a Seyyed in the way. But they managed to get around the Seyyeds. They do not want politics, or religion. They love Iran. They see the immense opportunities there, and much to the surprise of the US, they have done very well. Hmm ... What can the Americans conjure up this time?

The world powers, that do not want secular Iran to be "the Japan of West Asia", have allowed the violent forces to be heard more, than the non violent forces of change in and out of Iran, with the nuclear fiasco stories, which help peak oil advocates. But ask any Iranian in Iran, and they will tell you that the Seyyeds' Chimp is powerless. The world press does not really like to report this, even though we have Iranian journalists now working for all the major newswires. That's criminal.

The last thing the media want, is for Iran to be able to manage change peacefully, with its own 7000 year old Free Will, as embodied in the oldest philosophical work known as Zend Avesta. That would be too boring, and would not sell at the newstands. War stories sell news, and effect commodity prices, and that's the bottom line.

Payback time

Personal stories are common of how the financial sanctions are affecting those mostly well-off people who have foreign bank accounts or earn income from abroad.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071128/wl_nm/iran_sanctions_people_dc

Sanctions is probably the most widely debated topic around. But it is quite clear that two sets of people will get hit by it. The first are the Seyyeds themselves, and the second group are the wealthy secular Iranians, who have managed to survive with the Seyyeds. The rest are the silent majority poor down-trodden Iranians, who won't feel the difference. The Seyyeds and their wealthy crowd have been feeding off them for ages, and it is payback time. Anyone who did not want to deal with the Seyyeds, or did not have connections in the appropriate places struggled. Their stories are too horrific to mention, and it is all based on the fact that they had different political and religious views to the Seyyeds. But if you were poor and passed all the relgious hurdles then yes you could get into the Seyyed merchant class. But if your Spririt had given you Iranian ideas, then you really struggled to implement them in Iran. And of course if you had global ideas, you had to get out, and let the folks in US to benefit from it, as Iran was not the "land of opportunity". So the US has benefited quite a lot from this. Do you think the US wants all the Iranian brains and money to go back to Iran? No. So they love the Seyyeds. They can get rid of the Seyyeds in no time if they wanted to. But Iranians like Parisa who write about Iran should talk more about the how the power of General Strike can bring the Seyyeds down.

Guardian's or AP's Sally Buzbee is wrong on Iran

And Khamenei lacks the stern, spellbinding charisma that bound the first revolutionary leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, so strongly to his people.

But Iran's clerical regime ``has survived everything short of the plague'' in its 28 years, said Suzanne Maloney, a senior fellow at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy in Washington.

And no coherent, organized opposition has ever emerged.

Khalaji is blunt: Ahmadinejad may be unpopular and ``very fragile.'' But he says: ``The regime is not vulnerable at all.''

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-7100924,00.html

It is so easy to say it, and so The Guardian does. But The Guardian, like many other newspapers is wrong. I have found that the more liberal press like The Guardian, that does not like the nationalist opposition forces, and will not be seen to be supporting the Islamist ones, makes such crazy comments.

For crying out loud Sally Buzbee, ask any Iranian, and they will tell you, that these monsters are not Iranian. All the Blogs in the internet, that the Iranians are famous for, are there, because 65% of the Iranian population, that are young, all speak of Iranian values, that are opposed to the Seyyed ones. So why don't you do your work properly and read those blogs, and see the opposition.

And it is organised. Ok, maybe we don't all have one platform that we have one speaker to represent us. But we are all saying the same thing about the Seyyeds. So our Iranian culture has organized us. Our Iranian culture is beyond politics and religion. We do not have a religious or political opposition. We have a national opposition.

Iranians have recognised these Seyyeds as aliens.

Germany's price for Iranians' freedom

Der Spiegel reported that if Iranian Bank Melli, which handles most of Germany's trade with Iran, were placed on a European Union embargo list, it would cost the budget 700-800 million euros ($1-1.2 billion) next year because the government would be forced to pay damages to German firms.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071124/wl_nm/germany_iran_sanctions_dc

So what are we to make of EU? All these years, they and the Chinese, have turned a blind eye, to all the Seyyeds atrocities, on the secular people of Iran. To EU then, Iranians' freedom, is worth less than $2 billion. That is ludricous. The approach should be, to force the non-Iranian corporations, to make a choice, between Seyyeds and non Seyyeds. For example, in the United States, the banks like Deutsche Bank, were told to make a choice, between doing business with US or Iran. EU should do likewise. And in the long run, try to get the Chinese, Russians and Indians, to do the same. The Seyyeds, and their counter parties, cannot be allowed to use the very system they critisize. If they cannot be bothered, to be completely transparent over their nuclear activities; siphoning so much of secular Iranians' oil income for centrifuges, then they will be forced to be part of the pariah states of the world. Meanwhile the people of Iran, who are not benefiting under the Seyyeds, will know that at least something is being done to stop them. At this juncture, it is best for the Iranian Opposition, to be united as the alternative. The world needs to know, that if it supports the secular non violent movement regime change, then the intelligent Iranians, who reside in and outside Iran, will come to power, who will conform to international regulations, as opposed to some 1400 year old dogma, designed to resurrect an new Seyyed Empire. The world at the moment uses concepts like Human Rights, that were born in the Zend Avesta. It is high time, the world respected that, more than anything else that came later, in Iran's histroy. Respect Iran for what it really is, and not for what the Seyyeds say Iran is. We are the sons and daughters of Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great. Support the true Iranians, and build a better world for all.

Is Ebadi morally superior to the Seyyeds in Iran?

"What we want is that the two sides should respect international law, and we warn them on this," she said. "The United States cannot have the right to deal with Iran outside the framework of international law, and Iran cannot build a wall around itself and say, 'I have nothing to do with international law' and pay no attention to [UN] Security Council resolutions."

http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=T&ct=us/8-0&fd=R&url=http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2007/11/75B38EE4-E855-4617-9ADC-083C341BFCB6.html&cid=0&ei=yBpHR_T6C5DgqwPe9LzqCw


She is a devout Moslem. Iran's Spirit is older than Islam. She talks about Human Rights. Human Rights was invented in the Zend Avesta, in Iran, at least 7000 years ago.

So what is she on about? How can she go on about Human Rights, without the slightest reference to the roots of Human Rights. At least the UN has put a copy of Cyrus's Cylinder, as a sign of respect.

Many doubt her intentions. She has a Nobel Prize. Out of the blue we have an important person in Iran, but what does that person do with that respect? Is she any better than the Seyyeds? Is Cyrus or Zoroaster more meaningful to her than Halabi Qureshi (aka Mohammad)?

Cordesman's dark vision for Iran

So in clear, concise and chillingly forensic style, Cordesman spells out that the real stakes in the crisis that is building over Iran's nuclear ambitions would certainly include the end of Persian civilization, quite probably the end of Egyptian civilization, and the end of the Oil Age. This would also mean the end of globalization and the extraordinary accretions in world trade and growth and prosperity that are hauling hundreds of millions of Chinese and Indians and others out of poverty.

http://www.metimes.com/Opinion/2007/11/22/analysis_a_mideast_nuclear_war/4411/

So there you have it. All the numbers, that lead to little less than Armageddon. But Armageddon is what the Seyyeds want. And it is very hard for the West to believe that weirdos like these, can be in charge of a whole country. But they are.

We do not worship Iran

We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Neocon_accused_of_misquoting_Irans_leader_1119.html

Oh I remember AKh making this comment. In fact SB should know better. We were both at Princeton at the time. We all know, how AKh did not want to even have Iran, included in the name of the Islamic Republic. Fact is, he did not even want to leave Iraq. He is famous for being so unmoved returning to Iran. He was quite happy to have a Seyyed Empire from Baghdad as and when. But we must give credit to Iranians from the first day. The Seyyeds began losing against the nation of Iran, right from the word go. Akh could not persue all his radical thoughts and had to shut up. But that did not mean that there was a political alternative to him. The Shah died and we all know the rest. So what are we to do? Quite simple really, carry on as we are modernizing Iran, in spite of what these Seyyeds are doing. They need their own land. Let them go to southern Iraq, and have a seat right next to the Holy See in the UN. But leave Iran, that is thousands of years older alone. Heck if it was not for people like Mani, you would not have the likes of Salman Parsi and Islam. The people who come from Babylon have a distinctively different outlook to Life than Iranians. We look at the God within. Akh and his lot, are idealists. One book and that's it. Fine go and run your country with that one booK. Don't come and burn all ours. The Earth is big enough for all of us. If you are going to stay in Iran, put Iran and its history, above everything else. You will have your peaceful departure, and we Iranians will not harm you. We are too civilized for that. Look out for the shut down.

Cruise site hit in Iran

A series of explosions rocked the Parchin Military Site (where missiles, including "cruise" type missiles, are manufactured) at Varamin south of Tehran.

http://noiri.blogspot.com/2007/11/breaking-news-explosions-in-iran.html

How much money, yes money that could have been used to make hospitals and schools, was wasted by the Seyyeds, to build these sites. And now we have to get rid of them. The arms companies are having a laugh. What suckers we Iranians are. We let the Seyyeds in, and they suck our oil to build rubbish like this that is no good to anyone.

Shah vs Musharraf

"When the challenge to the Shah arose we procrastinated too long", he told me late last month, "I think we should have fished or cut bait more quickly, either making a clear choice to support the Shah in some effort to repress the opposition or to prevent Khomeini from coming back.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C11%5C19%5Cstory_19-11-2007_pg3_3

The radical chic of both present day Pakistan, and the then Iran, both sided with the Islamists. The radical chic in Iran was not anti-nationalistic, but when the Shahanshah died, and the military sided with the Seyyeds, Iran was lost. The flag changed, the national anthem changed. Iran became an Islamic Republic. At the time I said, Iran has now become another Pakistan. These two Islamic Republics both put Islam above nationalistic values. Now if you ask any Iranian then and now, you will find that they put the Spirit of Nowrooz over and above Islam. Khomeini tried to ban Nowrooz. Iran as a nation and Empire consisted of Pakistan. As Iranians we go back at least 7000 years. The Pakistani people should do the same as the Afghanis, and trace their ancient roots, and seek the secular nationalistic foundation, and not act as an upstart young nation with no heritage and just revolutionary fervour. This revolutionary fervour has been used by the US military and peak oil advocates, to find a reason to be in West Asia. If the Shahanshah was not poisoned, and had recovered, the Seyyeds would not have been able to hijack Iran and run amok. As it is, the people of Iran have now learnt what the Shahanshah meant by the alliance of Red and Black. The Seyyeds have had to resort to Iranian nationalistic virtues in order to attract the public interest, by playing the nuclear card. But the people know that the Seyyeds put Islam above Iran, and they want to siphon the oil to prepare for the return of the 12th Shiite Emperor. Ironically the Spirit of Iran is more in Iranians' minds than ever. People gather and celebrate Iranian festivals much more than any Islamic ones. Iran will become a new Iran and the whole area will find its proper roots. Maybe then ZB and his ilk will realise what the history of the area is.

Why Iran's Seyyeds would never block the Straits of Hormuz

'We would never look to use oil as a weapon', Ahmadinejad said in response to a Thomson Financial News question.

OPEC SUMMIT ROUNDUP Ahmadinejad attacks US dollar, says won't use oil as weapon - Forbes.com

You know, if he did use it as a weapon, that would certainly end things for all the peak oil and Seyyed supporters.  Think of this scenario.   The US and its allies have enough power in the Persian Gulf to stop and monitor any traffic through the Straits of Hormuz.  It would not take that long for the world to realize that the oil is better used if it is all piped across to the Mediterranean, Arabian Sea or Red Sea.  The price would jump, but it would fall even more, as the contingency plans would kick in, and the whole world would be in the Persian Gulf.  Heck they would seal off Iran.  Moreover there would be a huge embargo on everything Iran did, Seyyed or otherwise.  Yes the monkey knows this.  Anyway with this comment of his, he is sure to drop the insurance rates, and so the price of oil will collapse.  And he wanted the price to go up.  What a nutter.  What a laugh.

Iran's Seyyeds ruling over China, helping slavery

China now gets at least 14 percent of its imported oil from Iran, making it China's largest supplier and the source of as much as $7 billion worth of oil this year, according to David Kirsch, a manager at PFC Energy.

Deepening China-Iran Ties Weaken Bid to Isolate Iran - washingtonpost.com

This is a clear case of the tail wagging the "Chinese" dog.  And of course it is the Seyyeds that are ultimately controlling the cost of cheap energy to China's industrial zones.  And ironically it is the big western firms that are taking advantage of this situation.  For example Wal-Mart is making $USD 1 billion a day in revenue. And the weak dollar helps them sell their stuff.  The next time you go to Wal-Mart, and you see something without a name or location where it is made, you know that is was made by a prisoner, using Iranian Oil.  Don't buy it.  Buy a product made in your own country.  Don't help 21st Century slavery.

How many Opecs for a peanut?

The Iranian president called for drawing up of a comprehensive plan for OPEC and establishment of an specialized bank called "OPEC Bank" to safeguard the hard currencies of OPEC member states.

http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-234/0711181674163039.htm

First the madman said that Iran will not trade in US dollars. But did that mean that the Chinese bought crude oil in Euros? No. Next he went on about creating a new oil bourse in Kish. Did that change anything? No. The world still looks at the WTI and Brent in US dollars. Finally he learnt how feable and pathetic he is, when the major banks of Iran were thrown out of the world's financial system. So the poor chap and his brigade of zombies are so arrogant, that they want the world to trade in what presumably would be called Opecs. Can you imagine going to a bar in London, and asking "how many Opecs is it for a beer?" You know that is why we call him Anatarinejad (Anatar means monkey). This monkey is full of tricks and he thinks he is so clever. Any peanuts anyone for the monkey?

Acrimonious World

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called his French counterpart, Nicolas Sarkozy, "young and inexperienced" in an acrimonious and threatening letter, the daily newspaper Le Monde reported Friday.

Report: Iran president sends "acrimonious" letter to France's Sarkozy - International Herald Tribune

I came across this comment first, and then thought, "ah well, yet another quip, from that madman".  But as I was reading the newswires, I came across the word acrimonious again.

In a statement following the vote on the resolution on moratorium on the use of the death penalty, the representative of Singapore congratulated the co-sponsors of the resolution on their “pyrrhic victory”. He said the vote had proved that there was no international consensus on the resolution, as almost half of the delegations had not voted in its favour. That should be an indication that many delegations were uncomfortable with the text. Co-sponsors had brought the resolution forward fully aware of how acrimonious and divisive the issue was.

TWO-DAY DELIBERATIONS END WITH CONTENTIOUS RESOLUTION CALLING FOR MORATORIUM ON USE OF DEATH PENALTY APPROVED BY THIRD COMMITTEE AFTER VOTE

There is something weird, and yet wonderful about coincidence, and with the internet, it happens a lot.  It defies logic, because how often is it, that one comes across such a word as acrimonious.

Now maybe there is a hidden meaning to all this?  One can talk about the split world we live in.  That all those for capital punishment are with the likes of the Seyyeds.  Is this the great divide in the world?

I know that on a personal note, when I first meet someone, I don't ask about their religion or their politics.  What I do ask is their position on Capital Punishment.  And I ask you, dear reader,  where do you stand?

Let me tell you where I stand and why.  I believe in Life.  I do not think there is such a thing as death.  But my definition of Life is different.  I believe that there is a greater existence, and that we are always part of that.  So nothing just disappears and is gone.  The energy of the person remains.  Astrologers and many non Astrologers connect to these energies.  So with that attitude, it is ridiculous to believe in death.

Now look at the all the political, nationalistic, religious and other movements or motives, that have been based on death, and have not done Good.  The world that we live in now, is only where it is, because on balance, more people on Earth are learning, that death is a divisive issue, and at best helps the person who kills the most.

As for Iran, it will be only a free society, as and when Capital Punishment is outlawed.  That will take care of the Seyyeds' dogma, and any other awkward political movement.  The Iranian Opposition needs to be fully united on this, and non-violent regime change.  This can be done by having peaceful General Strikes, whereby the Seyyeds' authority will be undermined, with no harm to anyone.

Why did the Chinese walk out and help Iran's Seyyeds?

A meeting of Western powers scheduled for next week to discuss tougher sanctions on Iran has been cancelled because China has pulled out, European diplomatic sources said on Friday.

European diplomats say Iran sanctions meeting cancelled | Markets | Reuters

What did I say?  It is the Chinese behind all this mess.  And it is not really the Chinese Generals in China, but the US multinational Generals eg: GE, GM, etc and of course Wal-Mart.

We have in China, the modern equivalent of slave trade.  Strong accusations?  Yup.  Follow this line of thought.  The US and EU companies, such as Wal-Mart, and many others, are making stuff in China.  And they are doing it with prisoners.  Almost every week, 100,000 people get arrested in the whole of China, and become slave labour in the specially selected "industrial" zones.

But to me, what is most important, is the energy supply.  Where does that come from?  Iran.  But the world press does not report it.  If anything, they will blame the Chinese human rights record.  And they, that is the US press, does a fine job of not disclosing the slave trade that Wal-Mart gets up to with the cheap land and energy.

So the last thing these "US Generals in China" can do, is to let Iranians become free, and part of the civilized world.  No, Iran has to remain a pariah state, and just give oil to US slave drivers in China.  If any civilized Iranian was in charge, no oil would go to them, especially with the view that they burn it badly and pollute the Earth aswell.

So the US will apply selective unilateral sanctions on some companies.  Will it include HSBC, or Standard Chartered Bank?  No way.  Will it include all those proxy companies working for the Seyyeds and the US?  No way.  They will just make a  token jesture.

The only answer to all this, is when the Iranian population decide, that enough is enough, and they decide to threaten the Seyyeds with General Strikes.

Seyyeds sucking up to the Chinese big time

China, which can veto further U.N. sanctions, gets about 12 percent of its oil imports from Iran and wants more.

Iran and China vow to boost ties - Yahoo! News

At the time of Shahanshah, the liberals used to criticize; saying "the US owns Iran", or "the Shah is US's puppet".  Where are the liberals, or the anti-US "radical chic" now?  Why don't they cry against the Chinese in the same way?

The other Islamic Republic

When a large group of eminent U.S. foreign policy experts was asked this summer to name the country most likely to transfer nuclear technology to terrorists in the next three to five years, Pakistan was the top choice.

COLUMN-Pakistan,Iran show U.S.influence's limits:Bernd Debusmann | Reuters

Connect the dots.  US used to support Taliban & Co, when the Soviets were a threat in Afghanistan.  The US helped them to be this new force in Waziristan.  Musharraf's (or should I call him Mozakhraf) military pretends to fight them.  AQ Khan and the Seyyeds get the nuke plans from the Chinese.  Their narc friends get all that snuff from Afghanistan.  Smells very familiar to the trade going on, as in the film Apocalypse Now.  So everyone is in the oldest trade.  Meanwhile the Israelis want to hit Natanz, when it should be Khost.  And can the AQ Khan's nukes hit Israel?  Sure can.  So why hit Iran, when all the trouble is in the other Islamic Republic, namely the Islamic Republic of Pakistan?  Now you see why the US wants to give them all more aid.

Mini Nuke attack on Natanz

Under the plans, conventional laser-guided bombs would open “tunnels” into the targets. “Mini-nukes” would then immediately be fired into a plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce the risk of radioactive fallout.“As soon as the green light is given, it will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be demolished,” said one of the sources.

Revealed: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran - Times Online

Oh they make it look so clean and simple don't they.  It reminds me of those ads for new kitchen and bathroom cleaning agents.  So suddenly we are led to believe that it will be a clean efficient surgical strike.  But the long term effects, the political and religious ramifications are excellent for the arms and oil industries.  Is there an exodus of people from Natanz?  Of course not.  Will the Seyyeds be even more prepared to siphon secular Iranians oil income and send it to Hamas or Hezbollah one day to drop a mini-nuke over Israel, because of this rumour? Yes.  The world media is nuts.  They will not talk about the natural forces that can get rid of the Seyyeds from within Iran, like a General Strike.  Oh no, that would be far too boring.

BBC losing propaGANDa war

This is one of the strongest indications yet of the new Atlanticist accent to French foreign policy under the new President Nicolas Sarkozy.

BBC NEWS | World | Middle East | New France gets tough with Iran

It seems that BBC is now the only pro-Seyyed media force out there.  It used to count on the French wire services to help it in the pro-Seyyed propaGANDa, or more appropriately, anti-US propaGANDa news.

Obama, go and see the Ayatollahs now

Clinton last summer condemned Obama for declaring that, as president, he would personally negotiate with Iranian leaders without preconditions. But in October, she said that, if elected, she would direct her subordinates to begin unconditional negotiations. The difference, Clinton argued, is that she would withhold the prestige of a presidential-level meeting until progress warranted it.

Brownstein: The great Iran divide - National Journal - MSNBC.com

Why doesn't Mr Obama go right now to Qom, and see Mesbah Yazdi face to face, and then Khamenei, and then AhMADinejad, with the certainty that he will come back as a hero, and be elected with a huge majority?

For crying out loud, how many times have we had the US elections, and the Seyyed elections, use each other to get the people scared, and come out to vote for the war lobby, and the peak oil advocates?  Can the people of United States and Iran see through this?  Yes of course they can.  But can the press and its commentators realise this.

Fact is, that if the people of Iran, were given the dignity and respect, and were told that they can get rid of the Seyyeds with just talking about a national strike, instead of a US strike, then maybe things will change in Iran more peacefully.  But nobody wants that boring solution do they.

Shahnameh vs Avesta

“Every nation has a book that represents the personality of that nation. For example: the British people have the works of Shakespeare, the Greeks have the Iliad and the Odyssey, the Italians have The Divine Comedy by Dante, and we have the Shahnameh,” he told the Mehr News Agency on Saturday.

tehran times : Shahnameh embodies Iranian identity: scholar

Some scholar really.  How dare he not mention the Zend-Avesta.  After all, Shahnameh is a poor reprint of Khodayeh-Namak, which itself relates to Zend-Avesta.

From Nuclear bluff to Regime change to Peak Oil

At a time when majority of states have understood the present realities and have the intention of publicly acknowledging the realities, certain groups of states raise hue and cry to seek concessions from the Iranian nation, added the president.

President: Everyone will be aware of closure of Tehran's N-case soon - Irna

Seyyeds' Poodle could actually do well, if he played the nuclear bluff game.  But being a devout fanatic and true to his dogma , he will not budge.  He will press the button, once the Mahdi button is made.

As far as secular Iranians are concerned, he is a "has been", and well past the "sell by date".

So the only thing this poodle, and all the other trolls can do, is to hope for the US President, and those in the future, to make a big thing about the nuclear story.  But world media has figured that out, and knows that everybody yawns at it all.

That means that the world oil media industry, that wants peak oil, needs to talk more about the blocking of Straits of Hormuz, bombing of Arab refineries etc etc.  Same old boring stuff eh.  That's why I believe that the only way, is for major changes in Iran, that would then move prices really higher for the peak oil advocates.  And that will be done.  That way everyone that matters will benefit.  As a hint, think what the effects would be, if the Chinese could economically get their own oil by themselves from the very deep wells in South China Sea?  That would change their relationship with the Seyyeds.  This is dreamland territory.

Seyyeds and US block aid to secular Iranians

So far, $5.4 million in payments has been suspended for four projects, the officials said, and they do not expect the suspensions to be permanent.

The Columbus Dispatch : World Bank forced to halt some aid to Iran

But the article fails to mention the fact that the Seyyeds do not deal in US dollars anymore.  The Seyyeds love the fact that the secular Iranians do not get money.  This all helps them.  They have access to all the Euros they need.  The people of Iran can no longer deal in the most common currency.  Most of the wealthiest Iranians have US dollars in California and they would be the source of all the trouble against the Seyyeds, as and when.  Connecting the dots means that the US and Seyyeds are on the same side, against the secular true Iranians.  So this means that the funds to true secular Iranians needs to go via HSBC or Standard Chartered Bank or some other bank in Indonesia or Malaysia or parts of EU, that are not trading in US dollars and are trading in tranches less than $ US 20 million.  Hopefully no IRGC thug is involved, and the funds can reach the proper Iranians.  Ya Ahuramazda!

Seyyed terms uranium enrichment abroad "unacceptable"

'Any proposal to pursue the enrichment process outside Iran is meaningless and if such proposals were aimed at stopping enrichment on Iranian soil, then they would be totally unacceptable,' deputy chief nuclear negotiator Javad Vaeidi was quoted by Fars news agency as saying.Vaeidi was referring to an interview by Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal with the Middle East Economic Digest (MEED) in which he said that the Persian Gulf states would be ready to form a consortium for providing enriched uranium to Iran and hence avoiding escalation of the international crisis over Iran's nuclear programme.

Tehran terms uranium enrichment abroad "unacceptable" (Roundup) - Middle East

Fact is that the Seyyeds want to escalate the situation.  That is their Holy manadate for the return of their Mahdi.  I mean, can you imagine Mahdi turning up and asking, "Why have you got that Saudi stuff here?"

Russia and China fall in line, just before the "flexibility" comment

Russia and China did not comment, and the agreement seemed at odds with weeks of public opposition, primarily by the Kremlin, to new sanctions against Iran.

Russia and China fall in line on Iran | Jerusalem Post

Why have the Russians and Chinese suddenly complied?  Or is it, that in two weeks time, Ayatollah ElBaradei will say that there has been some "flexibility", as was just expressed in the Chinese press below:

Wen said peaceful negotiation would be the best way to resolve the nuclear issue and he hoped that Iran could further demonstrate its flexibility, according to a press release from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

China urges Iran to cooperate with IAEA

And then the Seyyeds would just carry on as normal.

US hits at Beijing over Iran stance

“We are disappointed by the lack of co-operation by China on a third Security Council resolution,” said Nicholas Burns, US under-secretary of state, representing Washington at the meeting. “We don’t think that China is moving with us.”

FT.com / World - US hits at Beijing over Iran stance

And folks with that statement, the real culprit in this whole saga, is cornered.  If China washes its hand from the Seyyeds, then the Seyyeds are well and truly on their way out.  Somehow the Chinese need to be pursuaded.

Saudis enriching Seyyeds

Saudi Arabia today revealed details of an ambitious offer to Tehran, aimed at defusing the growing crisis over Iran's controversial nuclear program, reported the Times of London.

More at :

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,307497,00.html?sPage=fnc.world/iran

It seems that, like others before, the Saudis are trying to avert public criticism, by pretending to help Seyyeds. Now don't forget, that he is offering it to the same insane people, who wanted to make a joint Islamic force for the area. So this is what the visit to London was about. So much fot the Brits.

Lavrov's Black Mail

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov is to go to Iran on Tuesday for a previously unannounced visit.

Mr Lavrov is due to hold talks with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at 1930 local time (1600 GMT).

More at:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7068675.stm

No country has so much power over the Seyyeds, so much so that, at a drop of a hat the Russians, can pop over for a chat. And what has Mr Lavrov done for "World Peace"? Absolutely nothing. Actually he has done a lot. He has used the Seyyeds, to negotiate some great concessions from the West. He did the same from the Europeans when he switched the gas off. And that leads me to the opposition forces of Iran. Thirty years ago Shahanshah Aryamehr talked about the mighty pipeline to Europe, just in case of the Soviets threat did show its ugly head.

Financial situation of the Seyyeds in Iran

Below is a link, to a very good summary on the economic situation on Iran, with all the numbers you need.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21520466/

West Asia vs East Asia

Many Arabs argue that the Iranians actually want America to attack. Politically, that would help the hard-liners rally support. And militarily, it would lure the United States onto a battlefield where its immense firepower wouldn't do much good.

David Ignatius - Walking Into Iran's Trap - washingtonpost.com

Actually the argument is that, the US would like to get stuck in another protracted war, so that West Asia is totally destroyed.  It knows, like Vietnam and Cambodia, the out flow of cheap good labour, which it needs.  It will still carry getting the oil, just like it still does in Iraq.  The US oil companies and their Seyyed poodles, have no love for Iran or true Iranians.  The last thing they want is, for Iranians to have multinational oil companies, and multinational corporations, like those in East Asia.  The Chinese or the East Asians do not want that competition.  That is why China supports the Seyyeds.  Iranians and other Caspian people are young and extremely intelligent, with a culture that predates all of Asia.  We ruled Asia for centuries, and the last thing the rest of Asia, and their US backers want, is another Persian Empire, with it own splendour of multinational corporations, becoming The Bridge of Turquoise between Europe and Africa and the East, again.

FT's Philip Stephens miscalculation

Last month, at a conference hosted by the Konrad Adenauer Foundation’s Washington office, one of those present recalled being taught by Henry Kissinger at Harvard. China had just tested the bomb and a fellow student suggested that the answer was a pre-emptive strike against its nuclear installations. And just how frequently should the US repeat the exercise? Mr Kissinger asked in response. Mr Bush might ask himself the same question.

FT.com / Columnists / Philip Stephens - Bush heads for a dreadful miscalculation over Iran

Philip Stephens thinks he is really smart with this article, drawing correlation of pre nuclear China to Iran.  What he does not realise, is that present day China would not be where it is, if the US decided to isolate the Chinese banking system, as it has with the Iranian banks.

Sanctions after 20 million, why?

"The US sanctions can affect third parties, such as Russia or one of its companies, if their investment in Iran is more than 20 million dollars.

More at:

http://www.energy-daily.com/reports/Lukoil_to_continue_in_Iran_despite_sanctions_problems_999.html

What sort of sanctions is that? My argument for sanctions on the Seyyeds, is that they are sanctioning the ordinary real secular modern Iranians, who do not like the Seyyed dogma. So the Seyyeds who control the government sector, should be fully sanctioned, and not limited to any sum over US $20 million. The US is not doing enough. It's a cop out.

Media isolating Seyyeds' Forces

There have been at least half a dozen intense firefights between the SAS and arms smugglers, a mixture of Iranians and Shi'ite militiamen.

More at:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2691726.ece

It is becoming quite clear, that the world press wants to make sure, that there are distinctively different elements in Iran. It is good to see that Seyyeds' armed poodles are not being confused with Iran's traditional armed forces.

One nuke man idiot replaces another in Iran

“The resignation of Mr Larijani has been accepted and Saeed Jalili will be replacing him,” government spokesman Gholam Hossein Elham was quoted as saying by several Iranian news agencies.

Jalali was born in 1965 in Iran’s holy second city of Mashhad. He started his diplomatic career in 1989 and has worked in the office of the country’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Khaleej Times Online - Larijani successor Jalili is Ahmadinejad ally


One idiot replaces another.  Obviously Putin must have known what mess there was, and so he decided to hear it right from the horse's mouth, when he went straight to the top man Seyyed Khamenei.

Two faced Blair

"This ideology now has a state, Iran, that is prepared to back and finance terror in the pursuit of destabilising countries whose people wish to live in peace."

Blair accuses Iran of fuelling 'deadly ideology' of militant Islam | Iran | Guardian Unlimited

So why wasn't Tony Blair making such punchy statements last year?  Blair dared not say such things, when we had the boat hostage situation did we.  We now have the UK government openly critisizing the US in Iraq.  But more importantly, they let the Seyyeds' men creep into Basra, and inflitrate the forces.  Ask any modern Iranian, and they will tell you that the Brits are behind the Seyyeds.  So what in the world is he going on about?

Putin's real friends are not the Seyyeds in Iran

Russia may not be with Iran, but it is not with America and Europe either.

Russia's foreign policy | Last tango in Tehran | Economist.com

So where is Russia?  Is it everything to everyone, or nothing to no one.  The funny part is that everyone thinks that the Russians are with them.  The Seyyeds will rejoice that the Russians have not disagreed about anything, and of course we all know that they have not agreed to anything either.  The US will also go on about how their relationship is fine, and yet the Russians will cut them down.  Finally look at the number of deals that the multinationals are doing in Iran, Russia and China.  So it has nothing to do with governments.  It is all about the various companies.   And the US has got it right by limiting the transaction with the Seyyeds.  It does not matter whether corporations or nations are dealing with the Seyyeds, they will get a warning and eventually forced to make a choice like the German banks had to a couple of months ago.  The Russians and Chinese, need to make a choice between the Seyyeds and the US.  And that is the bottom line.  It is strictly business, and the US Treasury is quite right to put the world corporations on the spot.  Mr Putin can come and go as much as he likes.  But if the US Treasury does not allow some of those US corporation to trade with Russia, then who is Mr Putin going to go to?

Iran Seyyeds Face Warning Over Money Laundering

The task force, known by its initials FATF, decided to make a statement about its concerns during a Wednesday-Friday plenary meeting."The FATF has repeatedly attempted to engage with Iran," McDonell said. "To date this has proved impossible, although this is still our aim."In these circumstances, and given the risks, the FATF has no option but to express its concerns publicly," he said.

FOXNews.com - Iran Faces Warning Over Money Laundering - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News


So amazing that it has taken the world to realise now that the Seyyeds have been laundering money for so long.  Why is it that they are starting to talk about it just now.  Anything to do with ignoring the US dollar perhaps.

Seyyeds vs Peace

``Efforts are being made to once again make an imposition on the Palestinian people in the name of peace. ... The result of all conferences held in the name of peace so far have been to the detriment of the Palestinian nation,'' Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said in a speech marking the end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

More at:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6993760,00.html

Peace is never an imposition. But because Seyyeds are selective (or should I say racist), only their concept of peace is correct. What if the conference was organized by Eskimos. What would they have to say then? Fact is that peace is a universal language, and we all embrace it, no matter what your belief is.

US hits Seyyeds' Friends

"The fact that Iran continues to challenge the international community means that ... those who do business with Iran represent a threat," Rice added.

More at:

http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/theworld/2007/October/theworld_October405.xml&section=theworld&col=

Well it is about time. However, the irony is that most of the trading is done via US proxies from Dubai. And then you've the oil that goes to China. So Dr Rice is going to go to the Chinese and tell them to stop trading with the Seyyeds. Now that would be a miracle. For crying out loud, why doesn't someone tell the Americans, to help the Iranians take care of their own business themselves. You know, talk about the other Iranians; that are cleverer and more intelligent and better than the Seyyeds. Fact is that if all the professional Iranians came and ran Iran, the Western companies would have a new Japan to deal with, and that is the last thing they want. No, these guys want Iran to become a pariah state. Only Iranians can help themselves, and we will. The last thing you want is for the Seyyeds to tell us (once they have been rejected), that the Americans changed Iran for the better.

The tail wagging the dog

Ahmadinejad and his ilk are not interested in any negotiation, any compromise or any live-and-let-live final solution. They are determined to be the soldiers of Mahdi come-what-may. They have no problem with the total destruction of the world. They are headed for a life of eternal bliss in Allah's paradise. They hardly care, even rejoice, if the rest of humanity is subjected to a tragic death in the nuclear, biological and chemical wasteland of planet earth.

More at:

http://www.amilimani.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=79&Itemid=2

And the world, especially the Russians and Chinese deal with him. Why? Because he is giving the oil away. Are the Chinese happy to deal with such types? Do the Chinese want to responsible for paying him so much money? If the answer is yes, then China's role in the UNSC has to be debated. The Chinese are basically bank rolling many many horrible regimes, and the West, especially GWB never mention it. And the reason for that is that the Chinese are the biggest buyers of US debt. So if you knock out the Seyyeds, you will also put the US economy at risk. A case of the tail wagging the dog. So how do stop that from happening? We Iranians in the Opposition need to have a Iran Government in Exile (IGIE). It needs to have the support of all the major corporations in the world, including the Chinese. These corporations need to swear an oath of allegiance to IGIE, that they would not deal with Seyyed Inquisition Nation (SIN). At the moment the nearest thing to that are the two lists the UNSC has made of people and organizations, which are still able to travel and do business with SIN. So we have to have the UN clear the mess SIN has got Iran into, instead of doing it ourselves. That is why there is no IGIE. We think that once the UN has banned enough people and organizations, then everything will be honky dory. Wow how naïve is that? We need to be practical, clear and above board. The world needs to see an open clear government in exile. The internet can be a great tool for this, and we can have this IGIE represented there. People with contacts in the major corporations need to be represented at the IGIE website and be accounted for their activities in getting the support for a new Iran.

Seyyeds' Emperor's Disapproval

"I have supported (previous) governments. I support this government too. This also does not mean that I approve of every detail of the work that is being done," Khameini said.

More at:

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hUY2jT63mwB2Q1CHHJ5x6WXohozQ

We had recently two events, that are rather odd, in light of the almost thirty years of Seyyed Inquisition of Nations (SIN). SIN has managed to completely erradicate all kinds of descent, even before they started sometimes. But SIN seemed defeated, when some students raised their voice in the streets, against the Seyyed Poodle pretending to run Iran. No nation, including Iraq, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and many further afield have not managed to stop SIN. The Russian President is coming to beg them to adhere to NPT transparency rules, and Chinese whispers of flexibilty are not working. SIN is literally giving the secular Iranians birthright away from our soil, for the sake of their dogma. So could these voices of descent and opposition be pure fabrications from within to make SIN look good? Is this all theatre? Even if it is, it is good. For as we know in all despotic regimes, it is like a rice cooker, even the slightest loosening of the valve, and you get quite a lot of steam puffing out. SIN cannot control the 7000 year Iranians' Spirit Of Nowrooz (SON).

From the Horses Mouth

Turning to Iran's economic struggles, Rowhani said that despite high prices for Iran's oil, "we don't see a healthy and dynamic economy."

"If we had an accurate and comprehensive plan, most of the country's problems could have been resolvable," he said

More at:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071010/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_ahmadinejad

It is good to see that some bickering is beginning to take place. The silence of the Seyyeds is breaking, and people are jockeying for positions in the Seyyed elections in the Spring. More and more Seyyeds will voice their displeasure as the economic noose is tightened. Money talks. The people of Iran will have to build reserves for the day when national strikes will praralyse the country, and people power will reign over the Seyyeds.

US$1000 for you Iranian

Iran's export revenues from crude oil, oil derivatives, and distilled natural gas have exceeded $20 billion during March 21-August 23 period, according to the Central Bank of Iran (CBI).

More:

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=154415

Well, if you do the maths you get to a figure of a million toman for each Iranian. Let me explain. $20bn divided by 20 weeks is $1bn per week. There are 70 million Iranians or 20 million three and a half member families. A billion is a thousand million. So each Iranian family should get $1000 per week.

I remember, Khomeini said something along these lines in 1978, and caught the imagination of everyone in Iran. He promised that he would deliver that amount to everyone. So what happened? Oh people criticized the Shahanshah for using the money for weapons, and misusing the funds for this and that etc etc. And you know the rest, and the mess it got us into now.

But now look at this pathetic lot. What can they do, now that they are at the helm of Iran? Just like every government in history, they will use the excuse of war or potential threat, to keep money from the poor. Ironically they create a moral duty for the poor, to enlist and fight for that ficticious threat. In the time of the Shah it was USSR, this time it is USA. Ah, but it never really happens. Something worse than war happens.

"Quo Bene?" as Machiavelli asked. And the reply sits squarely with the multinationals, and wheeler dealers who have no scruples. The wheeler dealers of the world should be careful who they give this money to.

I personally believe that there should be a fund outside Iran, that the UN should supervise, that makes sure that the Seyyeds do not use it for nukes. UN should be involved with the distribution of Iran's oil wealth, until these madmen are non violently removed. A similar concept was set up in times of Saddam for Iraq, and it was abused.

The other way, is to approach China directly over their wheeling and dealing with the Seyyeds. Tell them straight, "be careful who you give this money to". They will then say something like, "we are dealing with the government of Iran". At that point one can say, that the IRGC has been seen to support inhuman acts, such as suicide bombings and giving funds to activities in the Levant.

But then the Chinese would says, "hey it is your companies in the Chinese industrial zones that use the cheap energy, land and labour, that sell it to the Seyyeds via Dubai and such places." And then the ball is in the US court, and there is nothing that this Bush admin wants to do about it, as long as the oil price is up for the benefit of Texas. "Yup, yes sir'ee", as they say in Texas, "as long as we get the money, who cares about those ayrabs, those yankees or whateva...."

So what actually happens that is worse than war, is that we can see clearly the money going right back to the US, and the Iranian brains going there as well, as they give up on the Iranian economy. It is happening every day and is worse than war. Why, because we can do something about it. We can all address these issues clearly to the world. We can all not put up with the Seyyeds and their wheeler dealers via General Strikes.

I have written countless articles on non violent regime change, and we need the people of Iran to think and talk along such lines as General Strikes, so that the wealth and resources of Iran, be they natural or human are not siphoned away for the benefit of aliens.

Newsweek insulting Iranians' intelligence

"He is still the elected president of my country," Amir says. "Insulting him in front of the world is insulting all Iranians."

More a:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21047612/site/newsweek/

What is more insulting? Reading an incorrect statement from an American media, or what Bollinger said? Let's look at the statement. AhMADinejad was not "elected" by the Iranian nation. In fact as the Iranians said, "delam khonak shod", or as we say in England, "I was right chuffed", to see AhMADinejad get cut up by Bollinger. And yes, he is a dictator, as the turnout was low, and the choice was awful.

But what is really insulting, is to see an Iranian reporter, report such a load of rubbish in AP and Newsweek. Our problem is not so much with the Seyyeds, but the incorrect reporting that is going on. And to the undeducated, they might think that the article was right, when it is outrageously wrong.

Seyyeds and the ticking clock

In view of the fact that Iran has not fulfilled the requirements of UN Security Council Resolutions 1737 and 1747, including the suspension of its enrichment and reprocessing activities, we agree to finalize a text for a third UN Security Council Sanctions Resolution under Article 41 of Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations with the intention of bringing it to a vote in the UN Security Council unless the November reports of Dr. Solana and Dr. El Baradei show a positive outcome of their efforts.

More

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i1dgxJCrq3yXejUwtmwy5QopFsZgD8RUJ8180

So it is good to see the world out smarting the IAEA. ElBaradei have even been suspected of collusion with the Seyyeds.

Seyyed's Poodle thinks he was a visiting professor at Columbia

Did you think that AhMADinejad was a teacher, that was invited to Columbia University? Well he thinks he was. Look at this clip

http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2007/09/26/amanpour.ahmadinejad.cnn?iref=videosearch

Then scroll to 1:58 into the interview, and you will hear him say something like, the students of Columbia came to see a teacher. But he knows that he is saying something really stupid, as he formulated his sentences in a very indirect way. He could have said, "I was invited by the students to teach them", but he did not say that.

The guy is worse than a megalomaniac, he is a dillusional megalomaniac. And this sort of dillusional illness has infested all these Seyyeds, who await some Mahdi to come to their rescue.

U.S. moving to implement new sanctions against Iran, and sell arms to Arabs

"We're going to keep going," Burns told reporters. "If Mr. Ahmadinejad thinks somehow that he has been given a pass, he is mistaken about that."Burns' talks over dinner with diplomats from Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany will set the stage for a second meeting on Thursday and then one between Rice and the group's other foreign ministers on Friday when the resolution is expected to be further defined.However, he said it is unlikely that the text of a new resolution will be agreed to this week.As Burns spoke, Rice was assuring Iran's wary neighbors in the Persian Gulf of U.S. backing to improve their defenses against a "hegemonistic Iran" through proposed multibillion dollar arms sales, a senior State Department official told reporters.

kare11.com :: KARE 11 TV - U.S. moving to implement new sanctions against Iran

Ah, you see how clear it all is.  The US wants that prat AhMADinejad to scare the pants off the Arabs so that they can sell even more arms to the Arabs.

Bollingers questions for President Ahmadinejad

Frankly, and in all candor, Mr. President, I doubt that you will have the intellectual courage to answer these questions. But your avoiding them will in itself be meaningful to us.

My questions for President Ahmadinejad | Salon.com

So Bollinger spoke his mind, and he wanted to tell AhMADinejad personally in public, and he did not care what the reply was.  See the 02:11 minute.

Mad comments from the Madman from Iran

"Our people are the freest in the world," he said. "The freest women in the world are the women in Iran." Those who make human rights charges against his government "are unaware of the situation in Iran," he added.

Iranian president answers Washington press corps | csmonitor.com

This is a sure sign of a madman.

Seyyed and Israeli clash like children

The exchange came after Iran's chief delegate Ail Asghar Soltanieh — like Arab delegates before him — said that Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert had acknowledged last year that his country possessed nuclear weapons — something Olmert says he never did.Soltanieh also criticized "the continuous silence of the U.S. ... vis a vis the atrocities, aggression, bloodshed and violations of over 30 resolutions of the United Nations."That, he said, is "shameful and (a) dark point in the history of the United Nations, and the IAEA and the modern century at large."In turn, Israeli delegate Israel Michaeli, alluding to claims that Olmert acknowledged Israel's nuclear weapons, said some previous speakers "continued to lie.""Those who call for the elimination of Israel" have no right to criticize "Israeli policies aimed at defending Israel's very existence," Michaeli said.

The Associated Press: Iran, Israel Clash at IAEA Conference

So now these two goons get to face each other face to face, and swear at each other.  It is really sad how childish these so called grown up men behave.  And the toys they are arguing over can take the world to Armaggedon.

Atomic Iran vs Nowrooz Spirit

"There are ways to live with a nuclear Iran," Abizaid said in remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank. "Let's face it, we lived with a nuclear Soviet Union, we've lived with a nuclear China, and we're living with (other) nuclear powers as well."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070918/ap_on_go_ot/abizaid_iran

It is not the case of becoming a nuclear power, it is the case of morality. The Iranian Nowrooz Spirit does not allow a threatening posture.

Russians coming to their senses

"We do not need a nuclear Iran or an Iran with the potential to create them," a Russian official whose name was not disclosed told Russian news agencies Monday. "We will not play any anti-U.S. games with it, should [Iran] decide against giving any answers to the IAEA's questions. Let them answer for themselves."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/12/AR2007031201296.html

Well with comments like that it seems that the Russians are not too keen in being an anti-US propaganda tool for the Seyyeds.

Iran's Seyyeds and the right to invade Iraq

"US forces will be targeted if they stay," Larijani has also told the press

Asia Times Online :: Middle East News - US and Europe drain Iran's half-full glass

This Seyyed, and the writer of the article, are talking through their Turban and hat respectively.  There is a proxy war going on in Iraq.  The Seyyeds are using Iran's wealth, to build a bomb and get back the old caliphate with its capital in Baghdad.  I bet you that in the Seyyeds' mind, he wants to build a new state stretching from Islamabad to Baghdad and to the Levant with Baghdad at it centre.

Trouble with that idea is that Ur in Iraq (which is why Iraq is called what it is in the first place) is where Abraham was born.  That brings in the two other religious fanatics from the Jewish and Christian side.  So Iraq does mean more than just oil to the US, with its Evangelists.

As far as Iranians are concerned, all three "religious" reasons, are just that, "religious".  The capital of Iran was called in the time of the Sassanians Cteisphon (and we Iranians pronounce it Teezfoon).  The Sassanians had plenty of tolerance and all the younger faiths than Iranian philosophy could live.  In fact in the light of Zoroastrian tolerance, other faith were encouraged.

Ironically the younger faith did not reciprocate did they, and apostates like Salman Parsi were encouraged to burn all of Iran's books.  So the younger faiths have lost their right to anything.  They broke the peace, and that is why they are where they are.  You cannot ignore history.

How Matt Lauer got it completely wrong on Iran

Watch this video

http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?g=923e4bfd-11ba-421f-9958-ab1308cc8ef2&f=00&fg=

First of all I like that ad with the dog chasing the owner. It just about sums up what you will see. The US at the moment is trying so hard to connect to the Seyyeds. The liberal news of US like MSNBC, which knows so pitifully little about the history of Iran, got Matt Lauer to state that Mossadegh was a President in 1953.

We all know how Mossadegh abused democracy for the first time, with rent-crowds, that later Khomeini used as well. And to this day the Seyyeds use rent-a-crowds in front of the TV. The US Democrats fell for all this in 1979, and it is happening again.

What is even funnier is amongst all the intellectuals of Iran, Matt Lauer goes and finds some Seyyed Professor who defends the nuke plans the Seyyeds have. It is all a laugh really. But you watched it on TV, so it must be true. You will see what I mean at the end, that the only clips worth were the ads.

Anyway, it shows one thing for sure. The Iranian Opposition has not managed to do anything in the past 30 years. Why is it the reporters like Matt Lauer do not know about the Iranian Opposition. Or maybe they do know, and they just want to use Iran to criticize the Republicans, instead of dealing with the Iranians' suffering under the Seyyeds. US reporter are again dragged into Iran because of the growing influence of the Seyyeds in Iraq, and the don't even know the geography of the area.

Why is the Seyyed Poodle sucking up to the West saying "sorry" to UK?

He also told the programme that "if the American government, and British government, corrects themselves, problems will be solved."

Channel 4 - News - Iranian president says "sorry" to UK

Up to this point, this Seyyed poodle was painted as some unyielding demon, and now he comes across as Mr Nice Guy.  Has all this got to do with a deal with the Brits getting out of the would be Seyyed Area in Iraq or present day Shiite dominated provinces in southern Iraq?

N.B. British Oil has invested a lot of money in these areas with a number of other Oil companies.

ElBaradei buys more time for Iran's Seyyeds' nuke bomb program

“Resolving all outstanding verification issues in the next two to three months, after a long deadlock, would go a long way towards building the confidence of the international community in the peaceful nature of Iran’s past nuclear programme,”

Despite progress, important issues of Iran’s nuclear programme still remain – UN


And what will ElBaradei do next January when nothing had happened, and the Seyyeds had not come completely clean?

True Iranians will never fight for Seyyeds

"Based on discussions at the Organization of the Islamic Conference, an attack against any Muslim country amount to an attack against all Muslim countries … That's a legitimate right," said Gholam Hussein Elham when asked whether Iran will defend Syria if it were attacked by Israel.

More at

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3447223,00.html

Sad as it seems, the present highly dellusional theocratic regime in Iran, thinks it has the support of all Iranians. Or maybe the above statement is just another pathetic sound bite as more and more Sunnis are becoming anti Seyyed. The people of Iran hardly participated in the so called elections last time. People spit on mullahs in Iran. And Iranians carry on doing things their way in Iran, ignoring the Seyyeds. The Seyyeds are losing the war against the non believers. The Iranian puts Iran's peace first for Iranian reasons, as opposed to any other reason that is not part of the Nowrooz Spirit of Free Will and Peace for all.

Thank you Australia from all Free Iranians

Australia will not approve the sale of its uranium to Russia until it is assured that the nuclear fuel would not be sold to hostile countries like Iran and Syria for production of bomb, Prime Minister John Howard said today.

Central Chronicle--World


Good on ya Aussies.  Well done to the Australians.  Free Iranians will remember you.  Why don't the NAM do this?

Russia's man who loves Seyyeds

Vice Chairman of Russia's Parliament Duma, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, has urged the fast delivery of the sophisticated S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran to enable the Middle Eastern country to defend its air space, the Press TV reported. Zhirinovsky was addressing the open session of Duma on Wednesday.

Company News Story


There are so many factions in Russia.  Mr Z is obviously the man to watch for any cooperation with the Seyyeds.

Brits vs Seyyeds in Iraq

British forces were engaged in a "proxy war with Iran" in the south of Iraq, the officer who planned this week's withdrawal from Basra Palace said today.

More at:

http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/politics/international_politics/british+troops+proxy+war+with+iran/771452

For so long the conspiracy was that the Brits were in it with the Seyyeds, shielding them from the US.

Does it really matter. I still think the Seyyeds and their kind, should go from Iran and rule southern Iraq, Yeah, leave Iran to the true Iranians, that put Iran over and above any belief system, unless of course the belief system is believing in Iran, like Zoroastrianism is.

Tone of the press on Iran's horrible regime

With the Islamist regime in Tehran making clear that it has no intention of complying with U.N. Security Council

Options on Iran -- The Washington Times, America's Newspaper


One look at the above tone, and you can see how the world is now clearly separating the Islamist regime from the people of Iran.  That was not the case not so long ago.

The more the Seyyeds are seggragated in the media as distinct from the rest of Iranians, the better and easier the regime change will be.

Iraq crisis is Iran's Seyyeds' trap

Iran may well provide the glue that keeps that from happening - all the more reason for the US and its allies not to view every Iranian involvement in Iraq negatively, or as an act of subversion.

Asia Times Online :: Middle East News - Iraq crisis is Iran's opportunity


Sometimes you read comments, and you think, "well that goon is not aware of Iranian history", and you let it go.  But we Iranians have some real weirdos.  Above is a perfect example.  In wanting to be different, this character always says the wrong things.  He highlights the fact that the Seyyeds are over the moon because the Brits are out of the Basra area.

In fact what will happen, is that the Seyyeds will rush in, and be spotted very clearly, and held accountable for what they are doing, as the Sunnis and Kurds will start to complain.  Up to this point, the Seyyeds where pretty much camoflaged by the Brits, who were silent, too silent about the Seyyed involvement in Iraq.  So it is just as well that the apologists for the Seyyeds are out of the area, and we can all see the real interferrence taking place right on TV.

Personally I think that the sooner the Seyyeds have their own country in southern Iraq the better.

New Seyyed Commander Takes Over Revolutionary Guards in Iran

So we hear that a new Seyyed Commander has been appointed.  Big deal.  Fact is that the true Iranian Army is held together, and is not polutted by these aliens.  So many correspondents miss this point as shown below:

But the Iranian military is not -- in the manner of some Latin American states in the past or Turkey -- prominently involved in domestic politics. Those officers who go on to fill political or administrative positions do so as civilians and are seen as elements with an assured loyalty to the political system more than to the IRGC as a corps.

Iran: New Commander Takes Over Revolutionary Guards - RADIO FREE EUROPE / RADIO LIBERTY