Barack Obama loves Iran's Seyyeds now

The US State Department says from now on it will be represented when the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany meet with Iranian officials to discuss the nuclear issue.

There is absolutely nothing new that the US and the Seyyeds can say, that they have not said to each other before hand.

The good news is that for the first time, the US can ignore its intermediaries, such as Russia and EU. Now ask yourself, what have these intermediaries done all these years. Absolutely nothing for Iran or US, but plenty for themselves to get aid, financial or otherwise, for various projects not related to Iran, that they wouldn't have, if they had not had such a "closer than US" relationship with the Seyyeds.

It seems the US is fed up, or cannot afford to pay for go betweens or power brokers. It is saying, "hey I am all for disarmament, and what have you got to say" and it is calling the Seyyeds and their web of contacts bluff.

Good. But that still brings me to the question, "what are they going to say?" I mean they deal with the North Koreans directly, and they have the bomb. Heck they deal with Pakistanis, and many of them hate the US. So what's the big deal?

The big deal is this. The people of Pakistan can trade and come and go as they like. Their government does not create barriers on their people like the Seyyeds do. There is more freedom there. But in Iran the Seyyeds are ruthless and paranoid about their power base. They are there precisely for being anti-US. Take that away, and there is no so called "moral high ground" for the Seyyeds.

That all means that the people of Iran actually have the power, as they are the people who have ignored the Seyyed so called elections en-masse, and will abstain in totality. They made sure that the Seyyeds dig themselves into their own Mahdi bunkers and pushed them all to the top, so they can be seen clearly in the public eye. No true sane Iranian, that puts Iran First holds a public office.

So think of the situation the US has. It kept the mullahs in power to justify its military in the area now that its proxy the Shahanshah is no longer there. It knows that the mullahs in Iran have no foundation, and they will be thrown out soon, as soon as a massive non-violent general strike is carried nationwide in Iran. So it has to make them look good. And that's why it is showing them respect.

How about showing the people of Iran respect instead? The US never has. It knows that the economic might of the people of Iran, as resourceful business people, with a country rich in mineral resources, slap bang in the middle of the world, with such enormous pride, will be too much for them. The US industries cannot afford to see the likes of the East Asian industries coming out of West Asia. The US industries have to keep Iranian people down, and if it is not the mullahs, then they will find some other monster.

Yah Ahura we won't let them

Giuliani should address the non-violent movement of Iran

'You have one chance to talk to the people of Iran. They are watching. You want to create a reformist element in Iran and you don't speak to that? ... This is why terrorist will say, we can take advantage of the guy.'

Here he is picking on Obama, like I did, but he could use his position to address the Seyyeds directly. Why doesn't he ask them point black, "what could you do, if the people of Iran went on a general strike?".

But that would be too easy. Fact is, that the US does not want to remove the Seyyeds. Otherwise what else would "morally justify" their gun-boat diplomacy.

Message to Hillary: It's not Iran funding terrorism, it's the Seyyeds

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters that Iran intended to “interfere with the internal affairs” in the region by funding terrorism, “whether it’s Hizbollah, Hamas or other proxies”.

She has always been fond of gun-boat diplomacy hasn't she? Why doesn't she think out of the box. Think about and address the plight of the Iranians', who are peacefully resisting this regime. Help them in their non-violent approach.

Obama was wrong on Iran's Saadi

What Saadi said was this:

The Children of Adam are limbs of each other 
Having been created of one essence. 
When the calamity of time afflicts one limb 
The other limbs cannot remain at rest. 
If thou hast no sympathy for the troubles of others 
Thou art unworthy to be called by the name of a man.

Saadi wrote this to say that when someone suffers, others feel their suffering.  The whole purpose of this poem is to talk about suffering, and the sympathy we all should have for each other, wherever we are, and from whatever origin.

That brings up the question, "Does Mr Obama realise the calamity on Iranians that have tried to celebrate Nowruz for 1400 years?".  How dare he talk to the Seyyed/Theocrats about this truely Iranian occasion, when the Seyyeds/Theocrats' sole task is to destroy what is Iranian.

Mr Obama, you should be addressing the Iranians that put Nowruz over and above everything else.  You should not be trying to cut a deal with these people who hate Iran and its culture so symbolised by Nowruz.

Iran has The Best Calendar in the World

The Ancients of Iran chose to celebrate the beginning of each season, as it related to the inteplay of light and darkness, and the position of the Earth in the larger scheme of things in the Universe. This year Spring Equinox or Nowrooz will be celebrated at exactly 11:43:39 GMT today all over the world.

Ancient dualism or what they call Mithraic is part of the precession of Equinoxes as explained in this video.

The Economist tries to reason with the illegal Seyyed/Theocrat regime in Iran

This leads to speculation that the supreme leader may yet quietly promote a rival, but less controversial, principlist figure, such as Mohamed Qalibaf, who has proved himself a skilled administrator as mayor of Tehran, rather than Mr Ahmadinejad. Some leading principlists have also proposed a coalition conservative government that would dilute Mr Ahmadinejad’s role. Such quiet manoeuvring inside the principlist camp suggests a fear that either they, too, could find themselves split, or that the reformists will, despite Mr Khatami’s absence, actually succeed in galvanising new voters.

Quite amazing that a magazine like The Economist, takes these monsters in Iran seriously, when the people of Iran don't. The Economist even speculates about outcomes.

A Seyyed/Theocrat reading such articles, thinks he is being taken seriously by the Western press. It is a sad day when the decent Iranians living abroad have to witness such errors in Western press. No wonder these illegal monsters are still in Iran.

Iran's Seyyeds'/Theocrats' man advises Obama

Brzezinski bears more responsibility for the fact that the Iranian people are subjected to — and everyone else in the world is threatened by — an authoritarian Islamist regime than any single Westerner besides, perhaps, ex-President Carter. Eleven years ago, Brzezinski revealed the gaping breach in his brain through which the mullahs poured in 1979.

I suppose he thought that a Shah Abbas type of Iran was better, with Shiite doctrines being able to fend of USSR.

Obama team is no different than Bush on Iran

'The key issue is now to find a channel to Khamenei,' said a senior Western diplomat briefed on the Obama administration's policy review in recent days. 'If the supreme leader moves, he's going to do it in a very prudent and incremental way.'

The discussions are part of a larger Iran-policy review that the Obama administration is aiming to complete this month, according to U.S. officials."

You read commentaries like this, and it makes you think, "wow, this Obama guy is really up to something good". We all like him. And I know you are thinking here comes his sentence starting with the word "But ....".

Let's look at it objectively. Fact is that the Obama team has just renewed the Clinton 1995 sanctions on Iran on Thursday. So all the hoo haa about the new guy at White House, is different from the others is wrong. Moreover he is going to go for the top Seyyed in Iran. Maybe that makes him different.

Fact is, that this non-Iranian bunch of bandits that control some of the instruments of power in Iran, are standing on shaky ground. In fact their only legitimacy is the slogan "Death to America". Take that away, and they have nothing. Obama just needs to utter the words, "non violent general strike", and the people of Iran will shut down Iran. But he does not do that. Why?

Oh actually the Seyyed/Theocrats have done something no power has ever managed to do since Cambyses II. The Arabs and Israelis and US, have now agreed to fear the Seyyeds nuclear endeavours, developed of course with stolen money of secular Iranian people, via their illegitimate representatives in their so called parliament. That Israeli, Arab and US unity, is costing innocent Iranians far too much. But the world does not want true and proper Iranians to be in charge. That would propose a formidable challenge.

World media supports Iran's Seyyeds/Theocrats

Oh it is madness.

It is the same old rubbish every day. Elbaradei this, Nuclear that, US says this, UN says that, the Chinese uming and erring, the Russians delivering missiles or not delivering missiles, and finally Israelis attack or not attack.

All of this helps the Seyyeds/Theocrats to be up there in the world news, for no reason at all. We all know that the people of Iran do not support them, and given half a chance to express their view, will let the pro-Seyyed/Theocrat world press know, that they could topple them in a general strike.

So why isn't it happening? Why is it that the people of Iran just get their act together, and start to write about a general strike. Truth is, that they have, but it does not get mass media publicity. If the mass media really wanted, it could bombard the Seyyed/Theocrats with questions about their inability to survive a general strike.


But the mass media does not do this. That is why we Iranian Bloggers are the third largest community of Bloggers in the world. No one expresses our views for us. Why you may ask? Conspiracy theorists would say, that the Seyyed/Theocrats need to be there to replace the threat of USSR.

Even now with Obama, we are told, that the US forces and all the military industries in the US, will die out, if Iran suddenly was not enemy number one. Or Pax Americana would be finished without the Seyyeds/Theocrats making ugly comments from Iran.

But still, we Iranians should be able to sort out our own mess. Why don't we? Yeah why don't we? Well look, even the TV stations that are anti-Seyyed/Theocrats, like the VOA or the new BBC Persian TV dare not mention anything to do with general strike. And the very little anti-Seyyed/Theocrat news that is mentioned, is deemed to be of Israeli origin. Or if there is an Iranian that is a true secular Iranian, he or she is labelled as pro-Israeli, or someone who believes in dictatorship.

That's how crazy it is. All the Iran loving people are excluded from the powerful world press. They can only be found in Blogs and Forums. None of the main newswires care about them. Even the newswires own Iran correspondents refuse to rise above politics, religion and commerce, and look at Iran's culture coming first. They refuse to understand that the culture of Iran is more important than politics, religion, and commerce.

Ask any Iranian what he will agree with another Iranian on, and it is on cultural matters. Things like the flag should not have changed, the national anthem should not have changed. The names of the streets should not have changed. But the world press refuses to comment on this, and does not help us regain our culture with peaceful non-violent general strikes.

Defending vs Defining Iran

Every year, we Iranians abroad, get sickened to the teeth, as we see images of the madness that overwhelmed our country in 1979. People cannot believe, how a cunning fanatic pushed on a soft nerve in the Iranian psyche, and propelled Iranians towards a fake salvation.We are given a carefully manicured list of all the things the Shahanshah of Iran did that was wrong. We are told that that was the cause for the need for change then. Like Obama's mesmerising speeches for Americans, the people of Iran then thought that money will be better distributed, and it is payback time for the super rich in Iran.I was not born in a super rich family, but even in our own family, the ones who were not there like my dad was, very close to the instruments of power, told us, "you had it real good, now it is our turn". No matter what we told them; that we should be united against this Tsunami that is about to hit us, our own cousins ignored us.So a moral high ground was lost. The very culture of being an Iranian was being threatened, and ultimately was removed from the public face. The name of Iran was changed. The flag was changed. The military who were supposed to be above politics had switched sides. The Shah had left and the Royal Institution was in disarray.Rudderless and left to float on this turbulent oceans of delusion, The Royal Institution of Iran, that for thousands and thousands of years had been the sacred cultural bastion against known external enemies, had been abandoned.I would hear from the military and all those Iran lovers "abandon ship". The captain was down with Cancer and no one knew. All the ones with vision had been mesmerised by the Seyyeds/Theocrats. We Astrologers knew what was happening, and even predicted it. All you needed to read was what Jamasp and Nostrodamus had written.But what could be done. Iran was an economic danger to the world. The military toys that the Shah had bought were too dangerous, just like they are thought to be so now for the Seyyeds/Theocrats.Iran whose main contribution to world culture was the triad method of self-righteousness for the sake of righteousness as written in the Zend-Avesta, and later Declaration of Human Rights, was being ridiculed by all the illiterate media in the world. Even professors were lauding the aliens within. No one trusted us. Most were jealous.Some of us who were sent amongst aliens from the moment we could walk, were prepared, and to this day, keep the kernel of what it meant to be Iranian. We have had to withstand the British righteousness and be better than that, by being a Righteous Iranian. We rose above anger and became refined and very much defined than those in Iran.We always wished that one day we wouldn't have to sit down and define rather than defend what it meant to be Iranian. But a lot of us Iranians still defend what it means to be Iranian, instead of defining clearly what it means to be Iranian and moving forward. We understood the dangers of pure democracy for the sake of democracy, or change for the sake of change.In these defining moments of Iranian history we are all filtering what we don't like and upon reflection, it clear that we should not have abandoned ship for the sake of democracy. We know that Iranian democracy is different from democracy for its own sake.We all now know that Iran is sacred, and it has to be above everything else. We can see, and the Seyyeds/Theocrats like so many previous aliens that have been melted by the Iranian culture slowly and subliminally, have had to use nationalistic propaganda to whip up popular support, by wasting money on capital intensive military projects.We in the non-violent movement know that resistance to weapons is futile, but our peaceful spirit grows everyday when we resist anger and not bear arms against the violent alien morality. We know that we must not stoop so low to their level. We have defined our new Iran, and clear path to change and preserve a new Iran has been set.To that end we have thousands of young hearts pumping out Blogs that are all Iranian First. The more the popular media repeats the same interpretations it has for the past thirty years, the more the people of Iran will look elsewhere for the truth.The boat's sail is new and its being driven by young Iranian hearts who are above politics, religion, and culture. The waves are calm, and the wind is in our sails. We have established our own network inside the boat non-violently.But no where do you see the old media speak of peaceful non-violent regime change through threats of general strikes. You just read about military strikes. Our war is already afoot, and the enemy is the old media that ruined Iran. Ya Ahura never again