Thursday, December 18, 2008

How to waste money the "Iranian Mullah" way

In this article it does not say how many, but each of these S300 missiles cost $USD 100 million.

Russia has confirmed the sale of a controversial weapons system to Iran, a move that could thwart Israeli or American plans to launch a military strike on Iran's nuclear facilities.

Russia is selling S-300 air-defense systems to Iran, the Russian RIA Novosti reported, quoting unnamed sources.


So they wouldn't buy one. They probably buy 100 of them. That means $USD 10 billion. Iran earns $USD 40 billion from its oil. So the prognosis, is that the threat of Israeli strike, forces Iran to waste all this money, and not build its infrastructure. That is exactly what the industrialized nations want from Iran.

Imagine a country whose geographical location makes it the best real-estate in the world, being sucked into a pariah state by a bunch of gun runners, drug dealers, and oil men. The Shahanshah went and wasted money on arms, and now these Mahdi worshippers are doing it for another reason.

The peace dividend for Iran and the whole area is too much for the western world to bear. The last thing they want is a Korea or Japan in West Asia.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Ehsas will make an Obama "Change" for Iran

When you read comments like this:

The future of US-Iran relations will become a hot topic in the run-up to Iran's own presidential elections in June 2009, in which Ahmadinejad is likely run against several conservative and reformist candidates. A victory for the incumbent -- who until recently was seen as the clear favorite but is fast losing support -- could undermine any attempts to improve relations. The election of a reformist candidate such as former President Mohammad Khatami could boost the chances of rapprochement.

You think, that we in Iran need what Obama called "Change". These cries of change need someone with guts to come out and say it. Obama had the culture and fabric of US democracy to be able to safely such things. We Iranians do not have such luxury in Iran. Our country has been invaded by an alien Seyyed Empire. They justify their existance with each one of them claiming to be a descendant of Halabi Qureshi (aka Mohammad) who in turn (thanks to Salman Parsi) was told to be descended from Abraham. But what has this to do with Iran's 15000 year ancient cultural heritage as recorded in the Vendidad chapter of The Zend Avesta.

The irony of all of this is that, if it were not for the Seyyed incursion into Iran, we Iranians would not get so interested in The Ancients of Iran. We would not have changed, and found a stronger feeling about Old Iran, or The Ancients of Iran. My quest into The Ancient of Iran, began as a spiritual journey not too dissimilar to what one sees when one looks at Stargate SG-5. These are feelings, and illuminations, with quite a lot of delusions. It is an escape the mind makes up for me, to accept that as a group of people our ancient ancestors were way way ahead of anything now. It is easy to pass it as illusion, and be cynical about it. But it comes back more and more.

Belief is growing in the people of Iran, that we were better, and more respectable than now. When you look at Cuneiform, or such magnificent works of the Persepolis, you are inspired to think, that something very powerful was at work. This civilization of Ancient Iran was not the same as the violence of the Seyyeds. The Ancients of Iran are running the hearts and minds of all real Iranians. That's "The Change" that has taken place.

So with all this inspiration, why is it that nothing gets done? Why as such magnificent people as we were, is it that we cannot get our acts together and change Iran's government. Why can't we engage in a dialogue with the Seyyeds and tell them how they can be ignored with a General Strike? Do we all have to make a "Big Show" somewhere so that the world media understands the stuff that I have just said? Do we really need to make a government in exile, and have a spokesperson. We need to go through all that formality with the press first to then remove the Seyyeds. Who cares what the world media says. We want to take care of our own land. We have done most of the work in our minds. It is now time to put it to practice. We have until now abstained from any silly Seyyed voting.

The people of Iran have an Iranian feeling (Ehasas), that no Seyyed or other foreign country has. We all feel that feeling and really get it in Persepolis or Damavand or anything else that is uniquely Iranian I call The Spirit of Nowrooz. The path to change this aliens force is to let it know that they are powerless against this feeling the Iranians have.

Friday, November 07, 2008

Finally the Seyyeds are blocked by the US

"As a result of today's action, U.S. financial institutions are no
longer allowed to process these U-turn transfers," the department
said. "This regulatory action will close the last general entry point
for Iran to the U.S. financial system."

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-11/07/content_10319407.htm

It has taken this long for the US to block the Seyyeds. Why did it
have to take this long?

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Greek Princess gives birth to Islam in Iran

I came across this statement:

"Ismā'il was the last in line of hereditary Grand Masters of the Safaviyeh Sufi order, prior to its ascent to a ruling dynasty. As a young boy only a year old, he had lost his father Haydar Safavi Sultan, Sufi Grand Master and belligerent leader of a swelling Shi'a Islam community in Azerbaijan region of Iran who was killed in battle. Ismā'il's mother was an Aq Qoyunlu noble, Martha, the daughter of Uzun Hasan by his Pontic Greek wife Theodora, better known as Despina Hatun"


And it made me think, how a son of a Greek Princess converts to Islam, thinks he is descended from Mohammed, and basically hands over Iran to Islam.

Had this man known about the Ancients of Iran, that wrote the Avesta, then maybe we would not be in the mess we are in now. Shah Ismail, you are responsible for all this mess!

Iran's unemployed power

Reading this article makes you think, why is it that the people of
Iran, who are mostly young, don't have general strikes against this
alien Seyyed regime?

http://www.arabianbusiness.com/pda/article.php?535780.0.1

Just threaten them with total shut down.

Sunday, October 12, 2008

From Bazaar to Mass General Strike in Iran

"All the shops near us are closed," he said by telephone, declining to be named. A Reuters witness said only a few shops seemed open for business.

http://www.reuters.com/article/economicNews/idUSDAH23166320081012?rpc=401&

This could spark the beginning of the Iranian resistance against the Seyyed regime. With the so called elections next year coming along, the strike will force the hand of different politicians running for the Seyyed Presidency.

What is important for all real Iranians, is that we should show peaceful dignity and unity, against Seyyed violent rule. What they would want is an excuse to enforce undue pressure on the people of Iran.

The people of Iran must show their solidarity with the Bazaar. We must not be enticed to physical confrontation. A national General Strike in alliance with the Bazaaris would present the greatest challenge.

The best solution is for the Seyyeds to face questions like; what would they do if real Iranians threatened to stop work? They couldn't exactly drag 40 million people out of their homes could they.

The beauty of non-violence is that no one is hurted in any way. The natural culture of Iran is against the Seyyeds and it is huge. It is after all the silent majority, and it needs to remind the violent alien, who really rules Iran.

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Catching arms dealers

It's really good to see that arms suppliers are getting caught.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/28/iran.armstrade

Saturday, September 20, 2008

The Persepective on Iraq

"They intend to target officials in the country and in Nasiriyah," he said adding that local authorities had put in place tight security measures, including banning the use of motorcycles.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gniKQVmkFo5eDYBptR0w_MqMX2IQ

For how long have the Seyyeds been infiltrating into Iraq? First of all we had the Brits let them in, when they were supposedly guarding the southern part of Iraq, commonly known as the Basra region. But no one was screaming and shouting about this more than the Iranian exiles. We warned the world of this, and we were, and are told, that we are neocons. How can we have anything in common with them? So they are starting to learn on their own. All Iranians have learnt that they have to see from the perspective of Iran First. No political ideology, religious ideology, has brought the Iranians together. Only the love of Iranian cultural heritage, that is at the heart of what it means to be Iranian First, can be the correct perspective. I call it The Persepective.

So what is The Persepective on Iraq. The answer is rooted in Babylonian perspective of Iraq. Iraq shares ancient common history with ancient Iran. Peace came to the area when the people on both side of the Zagros referred to their ancient roots and not the divisions caused by religions. But there are those that want to exploit the religious sides. We have no media power. No one reads these ideas.

Russians finally speak the truth

"Russia is opposed to any new United Nations measures against Iran over its disputed nuclear program for now, the Foreign Ministry said on Saturday."

Well, it is about time that they came clean. Moreover they are saying that the US are going to use Georgia to attack Iran. It really does not matter, as they have forces all around Iran. With the world markets in disarray, the banks that used to help these people are gone. More banks need to go under.

testing palm treo pro

testing

Well it finally happened. It is possible to blog with a mobile. I managed to open internet explorer 6.1 in the new plam treo as well as downloaded the opera mobile browser. The former allows copy paste from html, the latter has javascript. This new Palm Treo Pro is a great machine. You can do it all in ie if you send it as an email like I have been for a while. But in Opera you can have multi windows.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Six major countries to seek new sanctions against Iran

But they are all doing business with the Seyyeds in Iran. The Seyyeds have been effected a bit. The Seyyed sanctions on Iranians is far worse. The country is in ruins. The destruction of Iran's industrial base has benefited the modern world and stalled Iran. The Seyyeds have done a great job for them.

read more | digg story

Georgia a base for Iran attack

The number of provocative comments coming out of Russia and the Seyyeds are almost the same. And the US is very slow in responding. I suppose they are all caught up in the financial crisis. With all these banks gone under, who is going to pay for all this now. The root of all these problems were in those bad banks.

read more | digg story

Ahmadinejad ready to debate US presidential hopefuls - Yahoo

This guy is an utter nutter, who is ignored by all intelligent people in Iran, and now wants to go on world stage. Just ignore him.

read more | digg story

Hackers shut down Iranian clerics' Web sites

Good for the hackers. Well done.

read more | digg story

Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Iranian suicide speedboats

These Seyyed poodles think they are going to go to heaven. The Seyyeds have taken a segment of Iranian society and brainwashed them, and bribed them with the oil fund of secular hard working Iranians. Who benefits? The peak oil advocates, and arms traders. Just look at the amount of weapons sold to the Arabs by the US.

read more | digg story

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Iran Positions Islamist Revolutionary Guard in Persian Gulf

Good. It used to be the regular navy. Now we have the real Seyyeds' boys out there. They will not be gentlemen, as the old Navy were. These people are mad. So expect a lot of crazy things, to get the oil traders really scared. But it won't scare anyone. The oil price will keep reacting to economic fundamentals as opposed to fundamentalism.

read more | digg story

China: No New Sanctions Against Iran

The Chinese are crazy. All they want is the resources of various countries, without any care for human rights. All of yesterday and today we have been getting news from them, to the effect that they do not want the Seyyeds to be sanctioned. That is because they know that it will their companies that are next on the list.

read more | digg story

Israel Waging 'Secret War With Iran'

As if it was not "intensive" before. What a load of rubbish. The only thing they can do is to engage with the forces of peaceful regime change that have the people's support. But they won't, they just want to isolate Iran, or destroy it either with the help of Seyyeds, or bomb it themselves.

read more | digg story

Saturday, August 16, 2008

Military draft needed for war with Iran's Seyyeds

American Chronicle | Military draft needed for war with Iran and Syria?:
"Will the U.S. soon need to activate Selective Service System plans for a military draft if open hostilities break out with Iran and Syria?"
People who ask these questions must be seriously thinking of war as a good thing. What happened to non-violence? The guy goes on as says:
Military service can include many positive experiences: Fellowship, honor, respect, courage, new skills, teamwork, duty to country, learning about people from other backgrounds, sacrifice and many other very valuable aspects of military service are important. Many veterans can attest to this.
Madness, total madness. So the US wants to sort its own social problems by creating a war in Iran.

Balkinazation of Iran vs Russia and US

A catastrophe in the making - Times Online: "
Moscow has used apocalyptic language before, and no one is seriously suggesting that Warsaw or Crakow will become smoking ruins any time soon. But the Polish move, and the Russian threat, provide the clearest evidence yet that the six-day Georgian war has spread to Eastern Europe’s ancient fault-lines."
I suppose the only good thing out of all this, is that we can safely say, that the Russians are just as bad as the Americans. Until last week it was US this and US that, and poor old Russia has no force, and they are the "good guys". Go to any blog or forum in the web, and you see it filled up with how US did this to Iran, and how it removed Mossadegh, brought back the Shah. And normally you get an answer, from the more educated types, that in the 70's we had the Soviet threat to worry about. Jimmy Carter came around and called Iran something to the effect of "Iran was the bastion of stability". And then he did nothing when Khomeini came around. The Shah called it the alliance of Red and Black.

Now it has gone full circle, the Russians, are the bad boys again. They are no longer given the benefit of doubt. The right wing in the Western world breathes a sigh of relief. The nationalists who are above relgion and politics, also feel that they can finally tell the politicians, to forget their "democratization" ideologies, and think about national soverignity, which is more important. So hopefully in Iran, the nationalist sentiment will rise above political and relgious differences. We Iranians will put Iran above politics, religion and commerce.

What we can now say, is that the US will feel vindicated, that its campaign into Iraq is not unique. Or is it, that the US's actions in Iraq, led the Russians to believe that they can send their tanks and aircraft anywhere as well. And what are we to think, that the next escalation will be Iran, when one little skirmish between the IRGC and US forces erupts into a full scale war? As we can see, it does not take much to light up fireworks. Will Russia and the US want to cut up Northern Iran from Southern Iran. Will we become balkanized? These questions are old questions that we never thought would come around, but they have.

World history is full of scenarios like these, and for a moment I thought the 21st Century was going to be different. History repeats itself, but not exactly. We do not have a strong nationalist in Iran. We have a Royal Institution and Cyrus Reza Phalavi has been chosen to run it. We need to have the identity of Iran be asserted so that it does not become second to religion as it is now, or to democracy as a Federation of states. Iranian culture is winning against the Seyyeds and their religious dogma. People ignore them. But is the Royal Institution really doing enough. It has not really created an alternative council to uphold real Iran as opposed to this theocracy. And if it has, the media of the world have shut it out. More needs to be done on both the media side, and the Royal Institution side. Not even an alternative Council of Guardians that put nationalism above everything else, has been created. All the other little organizations are purely political.

Ironically the Iranian identity and self-concept is now very strong. We have all had to make big choices. The youth in Iran clearly know what they don't like. They do not like the Seyyeds. They do not like politics, religion, or big business. People want to have freedom to express and build what they want to do. That freedom to express and build comes from the Spirit of the Avesta, that has written some 15000 years ago, that "Gozineshi" is the only way to "Khorsandi". An Iranian wrote this, and it has remained in our hearts all this time. It is at the root of Free Will. The Iranian Free Will is there to save and unite us and it is winning against the Seyyeds and any future alien wherever it may come from; be it from the US side or the Russian side.

Saturday, August 09, 2008

Politics and Olympics - Iran's Seyyeds vs Israel

I was really eager to see it happen. The heat came, and suddenly lane number 1 was empty. How embarrassing can it get? Iran get a DNS (did not show). Why don't they just send the whole team back. Or will the Olympic team make sure that just these two countries are not together. This is stupid.

read more | digg story

Secret message in Chinese Olympics picture for Iranians

Look at the the small picture, and see how in French the "i" in the word islamic is in lower case, but the "R" in the word Republic is capitalized.



Personally I think both the words "republic" and "islamic" are not necessary. We are just Iranians, or to be absolutely correct, were are called Empire of Iran, that consists of many national entities from one ancient cultural heritage as written in the Zend Avesta.

The colours are wrong. The flag is wrong. The women should not be covered. That is all what the Seyyeds have done. more

One day we will have the Seyyeds all trotting down with their Seyyed flag and black colours all over the place, but from a different land, not from what we call the Iranian plateau.

I like this picture, when the American got turned upside down.

Saturday, August 02, 2008

BBC delivers rubbish pro Seyyeds opinion on Iran's women rowers

BBC NEWS | Middle East | High hopes of Iran's women rowers:
"But this is rowing with a distinctly Islamic touch. As the rowers begin to arrive at six in the morning, it is already 28C. Soon the temperature will be up in the high 30s (over 100F). But Homa Hosseini is wearing the obligatory Islamic uniform - a cap secures a headscarf in place."
This is just the sort of BBC reporting, we Iranians have always objected to. It seems that, they turn a blind eye to all the suffering the women get, under the Seyyeds. They make it all look so "normal", and that the women are really enjoying themselves. There are so many sports the women, are not allow to view, let alone perform in.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Oil drops 2 percent after weak US jobs data and no Seyyed warmongering

Oil drops 2 percent after weak US jobs data - Forbes.com:
"Oil fell more than 2 percent Thursday as weak U.S. economic data reinforced worries about shrinking fuel demand in the world's top energy consumer."
It is good to see the economic news is moving markets, and not warmongerings.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Israelis like Seyyeds not true Iranians

AxisofLogic/ Palestine:
"Why then does Israel occupy so central a place in the hostile pronouncements of Ahmadinejad and other Iranians? The reason has to do with Iran`s internal difficulties: underdevelopment, poverty, unemployment, oppression and religious compulsion. In order to channel the frustration of the masses away from these problems, Iran uses the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The latter has also served it in southern Lebanon, where it has built an advance front with Hezbollah. The development of nuclear capability is aimed, therefore, toward domestic concerns. Iran has adopted nuclear power, like Pakistan before it, as a means of boosting national pride."
With all this analysis which is quite correct, why do the Israelis concern themselves with the Seyyeds. Why don't they impress the Chinese and Russians not to support the Seyyeds. Why is it, that the Israelis want to associate the whole of the Iranian population as being in tone with these Seyyeds. Sometimes the people of Iran think, that the Israelis themselves love to have the Seyyeds, because their threat means that they get handouts from the US. The solution is simple. Recognize Iranians not Seyyeds. Next, help us to form a government in exile to instruct a General Strike, to bring the Seyyeds to the negotiation table with Iranians, who want to change Iran for the better. We are the people who can change our country, and not US or Israelis with their air-strikes.

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Joe Klein on Neoconservatives and Iran

Jeffrey Goldberg (July 29, 2008) - Joe Klein on Neoconservatives and Iran:
'Given the level of threats that they've been getting from the United States, and from Israel, it's a logical thing for Iran to want nuclear weapons as a deterrent.'
Wow, talking about getting things completely the wrong way round. The Seyyeds would have created the bomb even if the US was not there. They have their own agenda.

Iran's Seyyeds' Secret N-plant discovered at Al-Zarqan area

This is just the sort of news you get, whenever the nuclear debate looks as if it is coming to an equitable conclusion.

read more | digg story

Monday, July 28, 2008

Diplomat close to IAEA says Iran's Seyyeds inflates atom progress

Diplomat close to IAEA says Iran inflates atom progress | World | Reuters:
"Iran appears to have overstated the expansion of its uranium enrichment programme at a sensitive juncture in talks with world powers, a diplomat close to the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency said on Monday."
It is obvious that the Seyyed Neocons, like their US Neocons, are blowing the flame of oil prices, as much as they can, but it just keeps going out.

Brian Williams and Iran's Monkey face sit under a tree.

"They submitted a package and we responded by submitting our own package," Ahmadinejad said, referring to a July 19 meeting in Switzerland involving the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, plus Germany."We are going to negotiate over the common ground as it exists inside the two packages," he said. "If the two parties succeed...that will help us to work on our differences as well to reach an agreement."
Ahmadinejad cites `common ground' with West - Yahoo! News

Obviously the Seyyeds do not like the West's package, and vice-versa.  These are two completely different packages with nothing in common.

Mr Brian Williams acts as if he is running for President of United States, stating, " that there is a new stance".  The only new stance, is the fact the NBC news went into that garden for the first time.  Big deal.  What a waste of time.

Sunday, July 27, 2008

Iran's Seyyeds try to raise the Rial vs US dollar

Samsami made the remark in response to a question about recent reports
on a possible government decision to more than halve the value of the
US dollar against the Iranian currency and set it at 4500 rials. The
green back is currently valued at 9300 rials.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=64912&sectionid=3510213

First the Seyyeds decided, to sell the petty 2.5 mln b/d (when the
world's demand is 85 mln b/d), in Euros. As the threats of war raised
commodities, so Gold and notably oil went up in US Dollar terms. But
the world media, for some absurd reason, made this assertion; that the
commodities are being bought, because the US dollar is down, and they
are cheaper.

But normally, when there is a crisis, like in the 70's, safe havens
benefit. The Gold went up and so did the US dollar high security
assets, like US Treasuries. In those days there was no Euro, and there
were no counter trades for the Yen to benefit from. But this time
round, the Euro, and those people borrowing in Yen (which is making it
extraordinarily highs, as the debt mountain has mushroomed), have gone
up against the US dollar.

Now within this background, this Seyyed utter nutter, wants to
overnight change the value of the rial. With all the sanctions on any
financing outside HSBC, Standard Chartered Bank, and all those Hawala
traders in the Persian Gulf, it is going to be almost impossible for
this bozo to implement his task.

Who cares what he says, the markets decide, and at the moment,
everyone is dumping Rial, as no one wants it, with these animals in
charge.

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Obama charges Iranian-Americans, but would pay Seyyeds

"The Obama campaign has promised to have a private meeting with Iranian Americans if we as a group can raise $250,000 for this coming Sunday's event," Manouch Moshayedi, a prominent Iranian-American...Wow that is disgusting. I bet Obama would pay a lot more than that to see Ahmadinejad, and guarrantee his election.

read more | digg story

Spiegel says Cyrus Cylinder and myth are fake

Matthias Schulz needs to realise that Cyrus was brought up as a Zoroastrian, and read books like Zend-Avesta which would have educated him in the high morals he had. As for the doubts, then he needs to read Cyropaedia, and the Bible, which were not written by the Shah.

read more | digg story

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Obama's "Big Idea" on Iran's Seyyeds

RapidCityJournal.com - Rapid City, South Dakota's News Leader » Ap » Headlines:
"'My whole goal in terms of having tough, serious direct diplomacy is not because I'm naive about the nature of any of these regimes. I'm not,' Obama said at a press conference. 'It is because if we show ourselves willing to talk and to offer carrots and sticks in order to deal with these pressing problems, and if Iran then rejects any overtures of that sort, it puts us in a stronger position to mobilize the international community to ratchet up the pressure on Iran.'"
Suddenly Obama thinks that he can be morally correct if he goes to the Seyyeds and make overtures, that the EU and many others have failed to do. And you know what, the Seyyeds will make him look special. They will lie to him to get him elected, and then carry on doing what they are doing. Obama will get elected, and he will find out that the Seyyeds have lied to him, and he will turn very nasty. There is, in this young President of USA to be, a very angry side, which the US military needs, in order to defeat the Seyyeds. With all due respect, McCain has no got what it takes. He legacy is far too polluted by GWB. The US military needs a young blood, who realises what the real truth is. At that point the people of United States will believe the new President, as he really did try his best to negotiate.

But all of this is political posturing by the US politicians to get the hearts and minds of their voters is very pathetic. As I have said a hundred times before, it is really easy to get rid of the Seyyeds. We do not need Mr Obama to trot off to Iran. Just get the world media to ask the Seyyeds, how would they cope, if the people of Iran decided not to work for them. The discussion threads will be a lot more powerful than the threats of sanctions. A general strike is a lot better than an air strike. But then that is far too easy, and it would remove the need for US military in the area, and allow the real Iranians to build the new economic force in west Asia. And you know what, it is us Iranians' own fault for not organizing ourselves well enough from abroad to regain our land. The country has been hijacked by a bunch of nutters and no one can get into the cockpit to stop the plane from a crash landing or to be blown up in the sky.

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Iran's Seyyeds have a "Black Night"

reportonbusiness.com: Iran's gasoline imports prime target for sanctions:
"Thirdly, target countries often get help from so-called 'black knight' allies, who undermine the effectiveness of sanctions and grow rich in the process. And finally, sanctions may drive wedges between the economic interests of allies who share the same policy goals."
China is the Seyyeds' "Black Night". So will the US government, or can the US government actually influence US and other world corporations to stop trading with China? Stupid question really.

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Do you believe Ahmadinejad's deputy?

Ahmadinejad's deputy: Iran is a friend of Israel - Haaretz - Israel News: "
'Iran wants no war with any country, and today Iran is friend of the United States and even Israel.... Our achievements belong to the whole world and should be used for expanding love and peace,' said Iranian Vice President Esfandiar Rahim-Mashaei, who is also head of the Cultural Heritage Organization.
Have you noticed that all kinds of people are getting involved in this saga, trying to appease the media. These people have never passed opinions before.

Saturday, July 19, 2008

Simple solution for getting Iran back

Iran won't discuss enrichment freeze in next talks - Yahoo! News:
"Iran's top nuclear negotiator ruled out on Saturday discussion of freezing uranium enrichment at any subsequent round of talks with major powers."
So why do the world powers bother. Why don't they think of helping the Iranians around the world to select a new set of Iranians, that are leaders in their industry. We have Iranians who run the JPL and sent the Mars lander on Mars. We have Iranians that are number two in Google. We have Iranians that founded Ebay. For crying out loud, what is it with the UN, US and the Iranian diaspora. Let's create an Iranian government in exile, that puts Iran first. That means it is answerable to the people's law of Iran, and then to politics, religion, and commerce. The UN has to ask for these people to be nominated.

Once we have 20 people, then they can decide for Iran what is right. The Seyyed regime can do what it likes, but the people of Iran, and the UN will not listen to them. The people will then threaten a General Strike, and the Seyyeds can go to Najaf, and stay there. We do not need air strikes or blood on the streets.

Civil disobedience by 300 truck drivers in Iran

Truckers blocked team-mate highway in protest to police corruptions. The participating drivers explained to vehicles stopping that the police was allowed only to intervene when a crime was in the making or to issue tickets for traffic violations. However, they [police] stop us on the road and demand bribes for something they made up as traffic violations.

http://www.ncr-iran.org/content/view/5396/1/

Truck drivers in Iran, are slowly becoming a force to be reckoned with. Strategically what they and other groups are building up to, will build up to a general strike one day. The threat of a general strike will save Iran from any alien, be they external, or internal like the Seyyeds.

Friday, July 18, 2008

Talks with Iran's Seyyeds will save US economy

Iran calls nuclear talks positive - Yahoo! News:
"Iran's Foreign Minister said Friday that forthcoming nuclear talks in Geneva and the participation of a U.S. diplomat for the first time look positive and he expects progress."
Which means that the price of oil is not going to go up soon. So maybe the US has to participate, in order that its economy does not suffer anymore.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

How John Bolton has helped Iran's fanatic Seyyeds

John Bolton is making sense | FP Passport
Over the past two or three years, we have been treated to one sensational threat after another about the likelihood of imminent war with Iran. All of these alarms and predictions have one thing in common: they never happened. Perhaps it is time for us to join Bolton in looking at the real indicators. When Bolton quits writing his jeremiads or when he begins to express satisfaction with the direction of U.S. policy, that is when we should start to get worried.
So are we seriously seening a shift in US policy, or is it that the US knows, that the Seyyeds are never going to change. We know that this flavour of Seyyeds, namely the IRGC, is very bitter, compared to the ones who run the foreign ministry. Ironically these Seyyed neocons are not too different from their US counterparts. But it took the likes of Bolton and of Cheney, to get the poodles of Jannati and Mesbah-Yazdi to come to power. Once these titans of the Seyyed Empire were in, and failed to move from their policy enrichment for the sake of their Mahdi cause, then the Seyyeds reform minded foreign ministry, gave up any form of sweeteners to the US. The die-hards had won the battle, and spear-headed a huge propaganda campaign to move towards China and Russia even more, as the US and UN sanctions forced EU corporations to quit. Just look at how the Russian Gasprom is so eager to pick up where Total of France leaves behind. So it is becoming quite clear, that the Seyyeds are going to be labelled as Chinese/Russian poodles. So it is up to the new US administration to deal with the Chinese and Russians with the appropriate threats to sort out the Seyyeds.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

How crazy can the Israeli media get?

We only get one strike | Op-Ed Contributors | Jerusalem Post
Iran has the same virus inherent in every totalitarian power - to gain imperial dominion. Totalitarian Iran wants to recreate its empire east of the Mediterranean. The leaders of modern Iran, long before the present Islamic regime, toyed with the idea of reviving the empire of Cyrus and Darius.
You sometimes think these Israelis are mad. After all if it was not for Cyrus, where would they be now?

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Oil vultures over Iran

Arab Monitor - Sito di informazione dal mondo arabo:
"The Iranian-Russian joint venture, if implemented, would help Gazprom to boost its supplies in order to meet its delivery obligations, whereas it would effectively undermine Western powers' and Israel's concerted efforts to isolate Iran. Therefore, Kommersant reports, analysts are still cautious about the prospects of cooperating with Iran. On the other hand, Kommersant argues, if Russia renounces cooperation with Iran alligning itself with Western powers and Israel, it will cede the rich Iranian oil and gas market to Japan, India and China."
Like vultures swirling over a rotten corpse, the industrialised countries (the West and Japan), are bickering over what is under the land of Iran, with the up and coming nations (India, Russia, China). They don't give a damn about the people of Iran, who are trying to make a living on the land of Iran.

Monday, July 14, 2008

Iran's Seyyeds seek closer ties with China, support for nuclear programme

Iran seeks closer ties with China, support for nuclear programme:
"Tehran expects China, as well as all its friendly countries, to express support for the country's nuclear programme and its close cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, Hosseini said."
This guy is basically begging the Chinese not to switch sides. Now it is up to the US and EU to sort out China and to a lesser extent Russia. Chinese should be brought to the UN security council for its ambivalence towards any regime's human rights. It is not just in Iran, it is in Sudan, Zimbabwe, Venezuela; which are all the trouble spots. Fact is that Wal-Mart is big in China and no one asks Wal-Mart "what are you doing there, using cheap labour, and energy that is actually from Iran. Maybe the Saudis could threaten to cut off the energy supplies, to get the Chinese away from the Seyyeds.

Navy stops Iran's Seyyeds sending drugs into Britain

A secret mission by the Royal Navy has seized drugs worth £26m which were being smuggled to Britain from Iran.

read more | digg story

Saturday, July 12, 2008

False Jitters Over Iran, and Israel

Jim Hoagland - Jitters Over Iran - washingtonpost.com:
"So you might want to consider battening down the hatches and getting the bomb shelters ready, just in case."
Actually Jim, look around this week-end, and you will notice that it is really quiet. No warmongering at all.

Why? Well they got the price of oil back up. So none of the Seyyed or Republican Peak Oil advocates is worried. But wait, once the price drops again, and their war of words will begin. We will have the Israelis firing missiles over the Mediterranean, and the Seyyed's IRGC firing more across the Straits of Hormuz, for target practice.

That will get the Arabs to go ape shit and start buying the futures contracts, and hey presto the price of oil will be well and truly near $200.

Congressman wants to stop US exports to Iran's madmen

Lawmaker wants review of US exports to Iran - Yahoo! News:
"Rep. David Scott, vice chairman of the House subcommittee on terrorism, nonproliferation and trade, said Friday that he will press for a congressional review of sanctions enforcement following an Associated Press investigation that found U.S. exports to Iran rose from about $8 million in 2001, Bush's first year in office, to nearly $150 million last year."
Well, it is about time, wakey wakey US.

Friday, July 11, 2008

No war with Iran's Seyyeds during Olympics?

Newshoggers.com: More Iranian Rumors:
"Once the six week negotiation period passes, and the real negotiations begin, the clock is ticking. This time period is not an accident, there is a reason why the six week time period was insisted upon by several nations of the six party talks, including China. The six week period insures that war will not break out during the Olympics, and with this condition established heads of state will be in attendance..."
That's the power of China, and Japan. But I think that would be the best time to raise the temperature. At that point the Chinese will push their Seyyed proxies to forget their dogmatic attitude.

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Iran's Seyyed isolation grows leads to become China's proxy in Middle East

Iran isolation grows as France's Total cancels $10bn South Pars gas field project - Times Online:
"Efforts to isolate Tehran have scored a political and economic hit with a decision by France's Total group, the last big western energy company in Iran, to halt plans to develop huge natural gas reserves in the Gulf."
Does this mean that the Chinese are going to do this project as well. Why doesn't someone say something to the Chinese?

But Norway is still dealing with Iran's Seyyeds

Bloomberg.com: Europe: Total Postpones Plan to Invest in Iranian Gas Project:
"StatoilHydro ASA, Norway's biggest oil and gas producer, said today it will remain in Iran and complete a project to develop phases six to eight of South Pars."
Why? What's with the Scandinavians? They were all for banning the cartoons, and now this. What is the relationship between the Seyyeds and Norway? I know, Dynamite. Seyyeds love bombs. Where was it invented?

Iran's Seyyeds buying gold perhaps?

Bloomberg.com Commodities: Gold Gains on Mounting Iranian Tensions, Equity Market Slump :
"Crude-oil futures rose after Iran, the second-largest petroleum producer in the Middle East, tested more missiles in the Persian Gulf."
But what this report does not refer to, is that we had so much money being returned to Iran from EU after the closure of banks.

Wednesday, July 09, 2008

Why the U.S. (Probably) Won't attack Iran

Tom Engelhardt, talks as if the Iranians are a bunch of zombies, who cannot take care of the Seyyeds themselves, and like the Iraqis need the US to interfere.

read more | digg story

On Iran: Obama's "direct diplomacy" is a bad excuse

What is it that direct diplomacy would do? The Seyyed would tell him that he is an apostate.How much clearer can the UN get after all these years?

read more | digg story

War for Iran's Oil - an illusion.

The problem is purely based on speculative trading on the oil contracts. In fact if there was a war, the price would crash, as the Seyyeds would be defeated, and the Straits of Hormuz would be safe. False fear pricing is a lot worse, than the actual reality.

read more | digg story

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

A look at state exports to Iran's terrorist regime

Simple question. Why?Or to put it elaborately, why does the US not stop this, before attacking Iran?

read more | digg story

Monday, July 07, 2008

Putin didn't talk about enrichment with Iran's madman

The madman Ahmadinejad sits in front of Putin, and gets no grief. Why does the US do business with Russians?

read more | digg story

Seyyeds of Iran love Obama

Asked specifically about Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama, Mottaki declined to comment, saying Obama had run into trouble in the past for expressing a willingness to negotiate with Iran."So by commenting on this we do not want to create further problems for the U.S. presidential candidates," Mottaki said

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080706/wl_nm/iran_mottaki_dc

The foreign ministry of the Seyyed Empire is the more reformed part. They lost power a long time ago. They would love to negotiate, and not put Iranians in harms way.

The foreign ministry buys time for the Seyyed cause. Their cause or ideology, is what drives them to be over and above all other human causes. That is why they are interested in siphoning the secular Iranians oil fund to build nukes.

Of all the international violations, the world has picked on the nukes issue. Why you may ask? It is because it helps Peak Oil advocates.

Sunday, July 06, 2008

BBC chooses to report stark choices for Iran

Later, he appeared to clarify his position, when he told Iranian state television: "In my interview, I talked about accepting negotiations, and not accepting the proposed package. I said to accept negotiations based on Iran's usual policies."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7489430.stm

Two things come to mind right away from that comment in that article. First of all, what is BBC doing condoning, so naively, people who care more for their Seated Empire, than Iran? Secondly, the article is written in such a definitive fatalistic tone.

We are told, "That's it. There are no other options, and it is a stark choice". Total rubbish I say. It really shows how "stark" the BBC is. Lucid Wittiest said, "uttering a word is like striking a note on the keyboard of imagination." And there is no imagination in that article.

The most appropriate word I say is "strike". We Iranians, like any nation, have ignored the Seated rituals, no matter how much the US and Israelis, have given them an excuse; to put the fear of their views of "God" in the Norris believers of Iran. Our imagination says that we can all go on a General Strike, and do not need air strikes, to get Iran back. It would really be nice if the BBC had the same imagination.

All the years that the BBC has involved with Iran, it is a shame, or a sham, that they just do not express the Norris culture of Iran, which has for so long fostered civilisation for mankind. It is morally superior to any religion, being based on Free Will and imagination of a person's own right to live. It is in fact a threat to the existing Abrasive dogmatic religions.

If Carter was around, he would point to the likes of Carter; and how he allowed dogma, to poison and mesmerism Iranians, to change the flag and name of Iran. The democratic process was abused, to try to uproot all the essential elements of Iranian nation hood in the name of dogma.

People now know better, and enemas abstained in that process, and the result is that, the silent majority know that the Seated Selection process should be used to dis till them from the Iranian nation hood.

We Iranians stand united on own carpets. Each carpet is uniquely different and second to nothing else in the world. The Spirit that is woven through all Iranians, is so deep, strong, and distinct; that it has shone brilliantly in all the palaces of the world, from the beginning of culture itself, reminding all what it means to be Persian.

So there is so much of Iranian culture, that is flowering and blossoming in front of those "stark" choices BBC loves to emphasise. The BBC chooses to turn a blind eye to all what is Iran now, just like they did in 1978, when there was no internet, and it was pretty much only radio station we all listened to. They relayed the communists' orders, as and when people should go on strike. But will they relay what the Iranian opposition says? No.

The BBC led the revolution against Iranian nation hood, and brought dogma under the guise of democracy. That is why so many Iranians are now correspondents in their Blogs. The world is flabbergasted, to see the avalanche of Persian Blogs second only to English. And the BBC ignores them. Thank goodness that Iranians that put Iran first, are there, and we are in control of our own destiny.

Iran should use thorium for its nuclear power.

Thorium is an alternative to Uranium in nuclear reactors, albeit with notable differences. You can't make weapons with it.

read more | digg story

Who is in charge in Iraq?

You can't have the US and Seyyeds together in one place.

read more | digg story

Saturday, July 05, 2008

Seyyeds destroy Iran's economy

Do they care? No, but this time they are going to sink with it.

read more | digg story

Real Iranians want peace.

Seyyeds want Israelis to kill Iranians. World must speak to real Iranians. It is rediculous to think who else would benefit, but Peak Oil advocates, and the economic threat Iranians pose. Bring back real Iranians, and a lot of money will go to Iran from US and Dubai. You will see the equivalents to Sony and GE in Iran. Iranians are smart and hard working. Connect the dots. The potential for West Asia is enormous.

read more | digg story

Sunday, June 29, 2008

US gives 'major' boost to covert ops in Iran - who are they kidding?

Although such covert activities in Iran are not new on the part of the United States, the magazine said the "scale and the scope of the operations in Iran, which involve the Central Intelligence Agency and the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), have now been significantly expanded.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iViYLxNjCmWra6oWDVoLzoJ7-CJQ


Oh for crying out loud, are people such suckers, to believe that, the "US" is carrying out "covert operations" on their own Seyyed buddies. There are so many agencies in the US; all competing for money, and bickering amongst themselves, that you wonder, where the real battles are. If the US could be more centralised, then yeah ok, maybe "a" policy would apply. All that can be said is those US, Chinese, Russian, and EU groups, that are benefiting from this Seyyed Empire are winning big time. They have the oil, wmds, and the media.

Obviously there is a really easy way to get rid of the Seyyeds. The Seyyeds are not the problem. The problem is the people's network in Iran. There isn't one spot people look at. Make one spot and it will kick ass. There are loads of intelligent people, but they and their ideas are clouds. If I had the attention of all Iran, the country would have got rid of the Seyyeds non-violently a long time ago.

(I am not writing much due to my injury)

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

House targets pension assets tied to Iran's Seyyeds, Sudan.

The measure would give the teachers' pension fund and state government employee pension fund 16 months to sell those holdings.

http://www.examiner.com/a-1456951~House_targets_pension_assets_tied_to_Iran__Sudan.html

I am in hospital at the moment.

Live updates at http://twitter.com/ahuramazda

However, most articles are along the same boring ones, so they appear on the clippings on the right hand column. Thanks to Google Reader, it is just a one click solution to news collecting.

But this article got enough excitement in me, to type all this with my left thumb on this fine piece of kit called the Blackberry Curve.

Anyway, the irony we Iranians face, is that it is the US people themselves who invest indirectly in companies like GE, and Samsung, which invest with the Seyyeds. A choice has to be forced on these companies. In simple terms it is either US or the Seyyeds?

Monday, June 23, 2008

US applauds new EU sanctions against Seyyeds interests in Iran

Washington has been waiting for Europe to take such measures for months, and the matter became a theme of US President George W. Bush's recent European tour.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080623/pl_afp/irannucleareusanctionsus


Hip hip hooray! All this does, is to make the Seyyeds feel important, whilst they are actually seen as aliens in by the real Iranians. Nevertheless it should be done. The Seyyeds dogma and economic mismanagement, has prevented over the years, secular modern Iranians, from doing anything easily. The Seyyeds have used pretty much the ideologies of a socialist military regime, not too different from present day North Korea. Over centralisation, and far too much government interference, has ruined the economy for all but a few who are at the top of the food chain.

As usual I will make my case; that the very best way for a new Iran is for a peaceful regime change. : The UN has to appoint a world body; to select a provisional "Iran First" (IF) body of Iranian who the best in the world in the world and are in exile. They will have more respect than the Seyyed State (SS). The SS cannot do much; if the IF body of people use their greater respect to ask the people to react non-violently to the SS. A dialogue must be attempted with SS, but if it is ignored, then the IF body, which has established its respect from the IF groups and people within Iran, will then ask the Iranian people to go on a general strike. This solution requires people to stay at home. More importantly this non-violent weapon, is the most powerful weapon, as it is based on peace first. There is no need for "win the war and then win the peace".

Friday, June 20, 2008

UN gives theocracy the right to kill

UN's Explotation Of Human Rights

read more | digg story

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

GE trades with Iran's Seyyeds

And a lot of other US companies. Why can't Bush start there?

read more | digg story

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Misplaced Iran/WMD files found

They were said to include details of how trade and banking systems could be manipulated to finance weapons of mass destruction in Iran.

read more | digg story

Unreported protests in Iran (video)

The people are not religious rent-a-crowds.

read more | digg story

Seyyed Neocon of Iran who would press the button.

His moral order is on a different plane that anybody else.

read more | digg story

Saturday, June 14, 2008

"Accept our nuclear package", Iran's Seyyeds tell world powers.

The package also proposes that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) step up its supervision of nuclear sites around the world and asserts that more should be done to ensure nuclear programmes are not diverted to military ends

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5h5Cg2j6fnd0UGB7nJNCva3amFeFw

How hypocritical can you get? These criminals now suddenly want to be accepted as the bastions of morality. It only goes to show, that they have little regard for world institutions, that are there to protect proliferation. They think they represent a new world order. In fact, they just represent an anti-US ideology - nothing more than that. And the US uses them in that regard. This "Goodguy-Badguy" syndrome is what keeps the warmongering necons alive on both sides with all its useless economic and trade ramifications.

Bombing Iran? It's Not So Bad, Really - How stupid.

Would Iranians "rally 'round the flag" if Iran is attacked? Maybe, maybe not, they say. "One cannot assume that a preventive strike against Iran's nuclear infrastructure would necessarily prompt a nationalist backlash.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20080613/cm_thenation/1096329613

The flag of the Seyyeds is not Iranian. Why would any Iranian, rally around that flag. Go inside every home in Iran, and you would see the proper Iranian flag.

A major point, that this paper completely misses, is that within Iran, there is an "us and them" situation. The Seyyeds enticed Saddam to attack Iran, and so obtained some kind of moral support, from Iranians, who felt that the enemy within, is not as bad as the enemy on the border. What should have happened then of course, was that if Iranians then, could have objected to all those theocratic warmongerings from Khomeini: -to rise against Saddam and cleanse the world in preparation for their Mahdi etc etc, and shut him up, the Saddam army would not have marched into Khuzestan. At the time, all Iranian nationalists said to me, that you are too silly and naïve with your non-violence talk, and I should look at such mad acts of Saddam.

So here we are with one of Khomeini's staunchest believers, beating his drums of war and enticing the world with the threat of nukes. This time we don't have Saddam to get worried about a divided Iraq, but we have the Israelis worried about Seyyeds' proxies dropping mini nukes across from their borders, once Natanz has concentrated enough of the wretched stuff.

Peace comes from having your cause for your own home. False ideologies whose cause is just a cause, fuel fanaticism that becomes war. So back to this article, it seems the authors have forgotten, that if Iranians really were that fanatic then they would have risen up against the Seyyeds a long time ago with a lot of blood on the streets. But Iranians believe in Life and Peace, as enshrined in our Zend Avesta, and books derived from it like the Shahnameh. We all know where our hearts and minds are; and they are now certainly not with the Seyyeds' ideologies.
A lot has happened in the past thirty years. Iranians have realised how their very culture has been threatened from within. There is a war already going on in Iran, and if the recent Seyyed selection (SS) is anything to go by, then the fact that the people abstained en-masse, shows how weak the Seyyed support is. In fact the Seyyeds' loved Saddam for the war, and would love the Israelis to attack. The Seyyed ideology thrives on war. If attacked the Seyyeds will have reason to exist as defenders of Islamic Iran, even though the peace movement in Iran is much more popular amongst pure Iranians.

So how can we Iranians convince the Israelis that we are not the same as the Seyyeds, and that they should be dealing with us? I have said it before, and I will say it again. The UN must pass a resolution to create a provisional government in exile that will represent Iran. The unions and other corporations will show their allegiance as proof. This new body of Iranians who put Iran first, will sit at the negotiating tables with the UN, and not those that went through the SS. A call for general strike will be stronger than any Israeli or US air strike.
But the world corporations just do not want to think along such lines of thought. A new modern Iran, with its energy based on gas, is a huge competitive concern. Iran has in the past benefited from being at the cross-roads of civilizations; with its real estate located in the centre of three continents. Just imagine how easily any company can produce and distribute their products from Iran. The competition is far too threatening. And so it is best to trip Iran into another war and wound it for a couple of generations.

Ya Ahuramazda in the Spirit of Nowrooz we will not let that happen.

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Calling MIT Iran's plan bluff

The US neocons don't want that. The neocons actually prefer the status quo with the option of attacking Iran.

read more | digg story

Monday, June 09, 2008

Iraq will not be used against Iran, PM vows

But Iraq will be used by the Seyyeds against the US forces. The peaceful way will come from media writing more about the ancient cultural freedoms.

read more | digg story

Seyyed Empire in Iraq and Iran vs USA

A week ago we have Sistani rejecting the US and Iraqi government draft, and just now Khamenei has rejected it.  So the modern Shiites like Al-Maliki have do not have anyone's "Blessings" really.

Religion in Iraq is beginning to interfere big time in the politics, and the neck-tie wearers in Iraq, are just as dispised by the Seyyed there, as the Seyyeds are in Iran.  Basically the Seyyed Empire is trying to do a coup, just like they did in Iran, in Iraq.

These Imperialists, are no different from any other authoritarian non-cultural dogma.  It does not matter whether it is a religious, or political utopia, when the intrinsic culture of the country is secondary to politics or religion.

Imposition of any sort is wrong, and these relgious warriors are doing just that.  They put Iran and Iraq second to their Koranic belief.  Ancient Babylon, and Iran are not what they respect.  But does the world press put it this way?  No.  They will look at it purely from pro-US and anti-US perspective.

Thursday, June 05, 2008

Obama's next 9/11 or section 311 for Iran

But that also means voters have no problem envisioning disaster should we pull out our troops too soon - the possible slaughter of pro-American Iraqis, plus police and government officials; perhaps a takeover by Iran; a comeback by al Qaeda and other terrorist operatives.

http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/dmorris/2008/dm_0604.shtml

"..perhaps a takeover by Iran" is a scenario, that the vote hungry Obama, has not really looked into. He had to say something to get the Jewish vote. That essentially put Clinton out of the race. And he hopes that it will help the Democrats to defeat the GOP come november.

As far as the Seyyeds are concerned, they just need to react to this subtle change in tone of Obama, and he is finished. They need to say, that he is just like McCain, and he would lose in november. But if the Seyyeds and their Iraqi, Lebanese, and Palestinian proxies, say nothing, then "their man" will become the next President of United States. This man is Jimmy Carter all over again. And the Seyyeds love JC.

Obama, right now, is a man driven by a Cause with a big C, which is far deeper than meets the eye, and is above and beyond his Country. I am of course referring to the famous Kissinger, "Cause and Country" principle. These ideals are exactly what got Khomeini into Iran when Carter was around. Carter was an idealist. This is not the practical Clinton camp that was privy to US national security issues. Obama the President will not be able to sit with all those people who have protected US, and more importantly were put in place by the Republicans.

This is what the Seyyeds want. The would love to see the most liberal side of Democratic Party get into office on idealistic grounds. In reality what would happen, is that the US would pull out of Iraq, and the area at large, Israel and Arabs would increase their arms, and the US would have more money to spend on all the Democrat's social programs. That means that the Israelis will go it alone against the Seyyeds' nukes. US forces will be trimmed down, and we will end up just like we were before 9/11.

Some would argue that the whole 9/11 was a set up; that the military in the US needed funding; that whole military industrial complex of United States, that is a core economic engine as well, needs to keep going. So will we get another major global crisis to tame even Obama, or will he, like clever Bill Clinton not fall into those traps. I hope it is the later, as he is not so sensitive to oil industry as Bush is. But reality is that the US military will get up to its tricks and create another new 9/11. Obama will then have to leave his Cause and think about his Country. It is then that you will see the real Lion in this man roar.

So are the Democrats a better alternative for secular progressive Iranians that want to put Iran first. Sadly no. What happens when you get the Democrats, is that many more people will leave Iran to work in US. The mass migration of Iranians caused huge financial and intellectual drain on the homeland after Carter let Khomeini into Iran. So many Iranians left Iran and took their wealth and intelligence to US. That damage is a lot worse than any damage the Seyyeds have done. Iran is then left with even less people to stay in Iran and develop it.

So what is the most ideal scenario. As a person who believes in non-violence, the path I would choose would be for the US government, whatever kind, to block all transactions from all the banks and companies that deal with the Seyyeds in the US with evoking section 311 of the Patriots Act, which NRO alludes to. The Seyyeds have taken over the machinery of state of Iran and believe that their dogma is non-negotiable. No carrot or stick will stop them from their agenda. Creating another new Iranian government in exile that has the support of unions in Iran, will be the first step for a non-violent General Strike to freeze Iran. Any talk of military strikes will bolster the Seyyeds.

So to sum up, it is not as if once the US changes its attitude, then the Seyyeds will change. They won't. They are in their own mindset; and it drives them to have a "Mahdi" and do whatever it is they believe in, as and when. The US must not think that with their new "Political Brand", suddenly the world will change. It won't. Once the "Seyyed Cause" becomes a Country of their own outside Iran, then Iran will be freed, and become country again. US will need to balkanize Iraq, with a region or two for the Shiites, just like the Clintons did with Yugoslavia. A world of nation states is the most peacefull world, and the next President of United States will by hook or by crook realise that.

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

US Giants in Iran

GE is the largest U.S. company currently operating in Iran. Haliburton and ConocoPhillips, which were in Iran, have pulled up stakes and moved on. Others still in Iran (or who have recently conducted business in that country) according to the American Enterprise Institute, include: Chicago Bridge & Iron, Foster Wheeler, Coca Cola, and PepsiCo.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26767

The funny part of all this, is that the Seyyeds themselves who would be the first to object to doing business with the US, don't know.

In fact the story is quite simple. The giant companies in the world are running this world, and no government can stand in their way, starting with the US government itself. If GE wanted to remove the Seyyeds they could. It is very simple for them.

So think, what is it that they want to prevent from happening in Iran? The answer is another massive giant like GE but made in Iran. The last thing these companies want is for another dozen equivalents of those in Japan and Korea popping out of Western Asia. Western Asia is next door to Europe and the business opportunities and advantages are immense.

So they love having a bunch of weirdos turning Iran into a pariah state that just sells the raw materials and buys stuff from them only.

US giants in Iran

GE is the largest U.S. company currently operating in Iran. Haliburton and ConocoPhillips, which were in Iran, have pulled up stakes and moved on. Others still in Iran (or who have recently conducted business in that country) according to the American Enterprise Institute, include: Chicago Bridge & Iron, Foster Wheeler, Coca Cola, and PepsiCo.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26767

The funny part of all this, is that the Seyyeds themselves who would be the first to object to doing business with the US, don't know.

In fact the story is quite simple. The giant companies in the world are running this world, and no government can stand in their way, starting with the US government itself. If GE wanted to remove the Seyyeds they could. It is very simple for them.

So think, what is it that they want to prevent from happening in Iran? The answer is another massive giant like GE but made in Iran. The last thing these companies want is for another dozen equivalents of those in Japan and Korea popping out of Western Asia. Western Asia is next door to Europe and the business opportunities and advantages are immense.

So they love having a bunch of weirdos turning Iran into a pariah state that just sells the raw materials and buys stuff from them only.

Monday, June 02, 2008

McCain and Obama sound bites vs Torquemadas in Iran

Wikipedia says this about sound bites, "Not everyone enjoys hearing sound bites. They tend to sound best when delivered unplanned, and the logical inverse is often true -- the planned sound bite can easily ring forced and cast doubt as to the speaker's integrity."

And so McCain's recent statement, "As more people, businesses, pension funds and financial institutions across the world divest from companies doing business with Iran, the radical elite who run that country will become even more unpopular than they are already. Years ago, the moral clarity and conviction of civilized nations came together in a divestment campaign against South Africa, helping to rid that nation of the evil of apartheid. In our day, we must use that same power and moral conviction against the regime in Iran, and help to safeguard the people of Israel and the peace of the world.", sound so much like a poitical sound bite. It is almost as bad as Obama's one of wanting to meet the Seyyeds in Qom.

These political sound bites have done nothing for The Iranian. The Iranian is beyond politics, religion, or commerce. Like any human being, he or she has Free Will, but unlike most advanced democracies, has fallen for the typical politician's and theocrat's cheap trick to vote. I must say that even though Iran is one of the oldest countries in the world, it was democratically quite naive way back in 1979; when with one vote, it threw out the baby and the bath water. Why did we in Iran get rid of the whole essence of what it meant to be Iranian, with what was just a political gesture.

That vote on Iran, changed the name and the flag of Iran. That is how potent politics can get, if it allowed to go too far, or should I say, if it is allowed to be abused - and it was abused by the Seyyeds. But one could say that it was more a case of there not being any organization to stop politics and democracy from interfering in the cultural affairs in Iran, than anything else. That is why the Seyyeds have such safeguards in place, to keep democracy more of a self-selection fiasco, than anything else. As such they are quite correct in defending their mantle. But whether this mantle is Iranian is another question. What is more interesting is how the world treats them as representatives of The Iranian. These are the real questions I am dealing with below.

Of course the Seyyeds do not represent The Iranian. The Iranian has its roots from the Zend-Avesta and most Iranians have ironically found themselves even more now, than anytime before, as Iranian first, and something else second. The Shahanshah, who did not profess to know much about the Zend-Avesta, nevertheless found The Iranian in him, when he read The Shahnameh (which is a bad copy of the Khodayeh-Namak). Iranians did have a "Spiritual Renaissance" again in rather strange times of the Moguls, when Koran was no longer the one and only book allowed, and an amazing array of book were written. People nowadays learn Persian to read Hafez. No book in the world is so rich in its poetry. What is the Spirit so deep in the Iranian psyche, that is bursting to get out? It had a chance in Hafez, but there is a lot more. Why? Because The Iranian can be said to reach to before the last ice-age, if we are to believe what is written in the Vendidad. Yima speaks of the preparation of the coming ice-age and how we need to prepare for mass migrations. I need to bring all this in, so that the world realises why it is so easy for an average Iranian to ignore the Seyyeds and just carry on his life. The Iranian is at peace within, and his Spirit; it is for an Iranian a very personal existential belief. He thinks into realms that have little to do with the Seyyeds' dogma. But it does not really help in this mundane world of aggression. Iranians laugh at the Seyyed, and their spirit does not allow them to react angrily. Seyyeds want to die for a cause. The Iranian celebrated Life as in Nowrooz. But it does react. Just look at the mass abstention that took place in the Seyyed selection just a month or so ago. That shows the world how The Iranian does not care to use violence to ruin his future. We Iranians want to remove these upstarts, that do not respect the 20,000 year heritage of Iran. They and their US tennis partners insult the land of Iran with fearmongering and siphoning the oil fund to waste money on warfare instead of healthcare.

So I say to Mr Obama, please answer these simple questions, before using Iran as another sound bite in your election trails. Your media is so powerful that whatever you say is blown so out of proportion that you need to be quite careful of what you say. You represent change, but what you propose is not change. First of all, why is it that you, Mr Obama think that for one minute the Seyyed, who wants to return the whole of Western Asia into a place for his Madhi to return to, listen to you. You have nothing new to say that he does not know already. In his eyes you are actually guilty, because you converted out of Islam. In Iran it is said the Seyyed will soon pass a law, that will allow anyone who converts out of Islam, to be killed. So we have an Islamic Inquisition going on in Iran, and you want to fly in and deal with the Torquemadas in Iran.

And now we have Mr McCain, who wants to use financial leverage on these Seyyed Torquemadas in Iran. So let's look at this logically. He wants anyone who is dealing with them, to stop that business. That means that the Chinese, who provide corporations like Wal-Mart; the land, the people, and the energy that comes from Iran, to stop dealing. So that means that Wal-Mart should stop operations in China. And it is not just Wal-Mart, it is most of the world's corporations. Next you have the corporations that deal with the US and the Seyyeds in Iran via proxy. How can this sound bite ever materialise to anything more than just that, a sound bite.

I just wish that the US candidates stop this immature postering and leave Iranians to deal with the Seyyeds. We need to win against the propaganda war that has misinformed the world about The Iranian. Help Iranians to have proper representation outside Iran at least. Start with the UN, and ask the illegal representative of the Seyyeds to be thrown out, because of their position on nukes. Ask the UN to create, just like they did in Afghanistan; a government in exile, made up of the most educated and professionally capable Iranians, wherever they are. They just need to put Iran above anything else. I can assure you that most advanced Iranians will gladly put some part of their life to serve their country, if the UN asked them to. Next we need this group of people to challenge the Seyyeds with giving instructions to the people of Iran that are following instructions at gun point, to get ready for a General Strike. We do not need a military strike Mr McCain; which only serves your need to keep your military a reason d'etre to be in the area, and get more funding from your US population. We do not need Mr Obama to engage with the Seyyeds. We need Iranians to deal with the Seyyeds. I believe that once the government in exile actually engages with the Seyyeds, with warnings of General Strike, and gets support from all the unions and workers inside Iran, then the Seyyeds aura of legitimacy will diminish. They do not actually have legitimacy, but have the air to appear legit to the world media. Once the media also get the confidence in the new government in exile, then the Seyyeds are ready to leave Iran. The world media needs to be told by the UN of not representing them in what they write.

But where will they go? As a person who believes in the tenets of non-violence as enshrined in our Holy Zend-Avesta, we need to give them a safe passage. And they want to go to their holy places in Iraq, so let them. It is really a matter of Iraqi government to deal with. The argument between the sons of Abraham is purely an Iraqi matter. Cyrus the Great brought peace to the area by rising above the religious issue and saw in the humanitarian ways of the Zend-Avesta. This is the way it will proceed. Think out of the Biblical box and see the more ancient roots of the area, that are part of Iran's rich ancient past.

Saturday, May 31, 2008

National Pride of Iran

"This has become an issue of national pride," he said during an hourlong interview at Iran's permanent mission in New York. Regardless of what Iran is offered in talks, he said, "the Iranian people will not accept suspension" of its enrichment program as the UN Security Council has demanded.Still, he said, Iran is seeking to resume negotiations over a wide range of topics, including some aspects of its nuclear program

http://www.boston.com/news/world/articles/2008/05/31/iran_cool_to_suspending_nuclear_agenda/

This idiot is the Seyyeds' representative not Iranians' representative.  Iranians would listen to the UN resolution more than any Seyyed resolution.

In fact, it is the Iranian nation that is helping the IAEA, to uncover what the Seyyeds are doing illegally with Iran's oil fund. The amount of money that is wasted on Mahdi projects that serve the Seyyeds' own agenda is immense. Iranians know that gas energy projects are a better solution, and they do not raise undue suspicion.

So what is the "National Pride of Iran"? Is it to become a Seyyed nation; that acts on its own and becomes labelled more and more as a rogue nation by all other nations? No it is not.  The Seyyed regime is that way, not Iran.  The Seyyeds say that the US has forced the UN.  But the US or other nations cannot force the UN. The Chinese have been bribed by the Seyyeds to stop the UN from taking tougher measures.

So Iranians are being misrepresented and the world has actually now finally realised that. There is a slow non-violent process of change afoot.  The non-violent regime change will be the main national pride of Iran for years to come.  Non-violence is key, and that is one of the main national prides of Iran.  It is the most revered and ancient pride that stems from our holy book, the Zend-Avesta.

It has taken thirty years now, and the Seyyeds have been identified, and in Iran it is an "us and them" situation. Clearly the self-selection process, that has just put the new set of Seyyeds in control of the machinery of state, know that the masses did not vote for them. Iranians are even more proud of what it means to be an Iranians, ironically thanks to the Seyyeds' self-selection process.

The people want the UN to throw out the Seyyed representative. They want a government in exile.  These last two steps are not that easy. There is a problem that we Iranians have; that is that we think that the world should ignore the Seyyeds, and listen to the people of Iran. But we do not have anyone to represent the real Iranians.  Iranians are divided in a political sense. We might be one of the oldest nations in the world, but politically we are very young. However most of the Iranians have had a crash course in politics now for the past thirty years. In fact we might have too many opinions about politics and have forgotten our "National Pride".

Most Iranians that have the intelligence to take over the machinery of state have put commerce over and above national pride, and have contributed to the brain drain. Even if you remove the political differences, many are still suspicious of the business interests behind any potential future leader in Iran.

National pride actually is the one thing we need right now over and above politics, religion, and commerce.  We need to have a selection of Iranians that the UN will approve that will put nationalism above everything else. They will be the people to handle what is Iranian first and regain Iran's national pride, whilst the Seyyeds are still in Iran. Slowly the Iranians that put Iran's interests above everything else, will be trusted by the world more than the Seyyeds.  At some point they will take over the machinery of the state non-violently.  National pride will then be restored in Iran and a new Iran will be born.  Once that is done, then politicians can be selected and so on and so forth.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Rice's Bush Policy On Iran 'Successful' statement, is wrong.

"I think this is called a successful multilateral coalition of states that have the same view" that Iran should be rewarded for dropping any nuclear weapons ambitions or isolated for pursuing them.

http://www.newsroomamerica.com/leadstory/story.php?id=419023

Rice is wrong. All that has happened is that the Russians and Chinese have become even more with the Seyyeds, than they were before. Financially there is nothing the US could do to make countries or companies not deal with the Seyyeds.

The US can't even stop the various US companies from trading with the Seyyeds. In fact the US needs the violent Seyyeds in power to justify its military buildup in the world.

There is a very simple way to remove the Seyyeds and that is to promote the idea of non-violent General Strike. But that requires media penetration. It would take a week. So the problem is US not the Seyyeds.

Reality check for Seyyeds

Ahmadinejad regards the talks as a "breach" of Iranian-Syrian commitments, the reports said, and Iranian authorities have instructed Iranian media not to report the news about Israel and Syria until Iran prepares a statement. Other media also have noted Iran's silence on the matter.

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/108721.html

Just when everyone thought, the Seyyeds had a lot of leverage over Iraqis and Syrians, it turns out they don't.

Friday, May 23, 2008

U.S. brands hang on in sanctions-hit Sudan, Iran

Pop into Paytakht shopping centre in Iran's capital and you can snap up a new Dell laptop, choose from a range of Motorola handsets and compare them with the latest Apple iPhone.

These products are among prominent U.S. brands that have stayed on shop shelves in Sudan and Iran in the face of some of the toughest trade restrictions ever imposed

http://us.mobile.reuters.com/mobile/m/AnyArticle/p.rdt?URL=http://www.reuters.com/article/reutersEdge/idUSL143118120080522

Seriously folks the Americans can't even control their own people, and they want to impose sanctions.

Another nuke diversion

"Our plan also provides that the multilateral partnership would take over all Iranian enrichment related facilities, not just the centrifuges," Thomson said. "In addition there would be international personnel on duty at every stage of the enrichment operation - on each shift in the plant, in personnel management ... in the guard rooms, etc."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/may/23/iran.nuclear

This is just another effort by the Seyyeds to waste time whilst they carry on making their Mahdi bomb.

Monday, May 19, 2008

Iran's Seyyeds captured Iraq, Palestine, and Lebanon

The Arab Passivity allowed Iran to capture Iraq, Palestine, and Lebanon through Mahdi Army and Al Maleki, Hamas and Hezbollah. This is the beginning.

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Oil and Brains of Iran

If rice at $1,000 per ton will add 100 million to the ranks of the very poor, how many people will be impoverished by a $200 oil?

Rice will probably climb to $2,000 per ton too because there seems to be a direct correlation now between the price of oil and the price of the cereal which is consumed by half of the world's population.

To speculators, rice and oil are one and the same thing--a commodity to be traded, hoarded, bartered and damn the consumers.

http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2008/may/17/yehey/opinion/20080517opi4.html

What Tony says is not difficult to imagine. This a very good summary of what might well happen. There is no mention of alternative energy and other efficiencies that will be more cost effective.

We had this situation in that last oil spike in the late 70's when the Seyyeds' Peak Oil men were at work. At that time the North Sea was going to be explored and once they came on stream, the price of oil hit $10. So the same sort of thing will happen.

Why will that happen? Well, companies like Exxon are not about to shift into solar or wind or any other energy. They stand to lose a lot of money, and the world is pretty much ruled by them. So they want the price to go up, so that they can find oil in more expensive areas, even though it literally comes out of the ground on its own in Iran.

One day the oil will not come from the Persian Gulf and that is what the West wants. When you factor all the head-aches associated with getting oil from such characters as the Seyyeds or Arabs, who make such a fuss about everything, then the West would rather dig deeper somewhere else.

But if Iran had its civilized citizens work for its own country; yes that means returning to Iran from Los Angeles and other megapopulated Iranian centres of the world, then Iran would become the most advanced nation in Western Asia. So the main problems is the oil and brain drain of Iran.

Sad to say it, but ask a poor man in Iran, what does he want to do, and he will tell you, that he wants to go to America. He has fallen for the life style he has seen on TV programmes. He knows he can have Ghormehsabzi in LA and he has more money in his pocket than staying in Iran.

This situation is nothing new. How many doctors I used to come across every holiday when I used to fly back to Iran in 70's when I was at a British boarding school. The doctors used to tell me, "oh you are from Shemiran", and your family is well connected. But I used to hit back saying,"but the people need your services" and they would say, how am I going to live to a high standard?

So we had a nightmare scenario in Iran in the 70's. Iran was not developing fast enough. The Shahanshah was told that he was aloser, and the money was going into his pocket, instead of basic infrastructure, so that doctors could serve and make money in Iran. I will not give you a boring history lesson of what happened next.

But look at the situation now. We have after a decade or so of relative calm, the country again being sqweezed big times for its intelligencia, and restricted even more by both the Seyyeds and their policies, which have had dire consequences for trade. People have had to set up shop in Dubai, and use all kinds of nifty ways to by-pass the American banks. In summary they ended up doing business with China. So Iran is dealing with China instead of US as it used in the times of Shahanshah.

So why is it that no one screams and shouts in the Western liberal press like they did then about this Chinese monopoly. The most we have heard was the leading article in the Economist about the new colonialist role of China. But that's it. There are no cartoons of Chinese rulers with the Seyyeds, like the ones we used to get of the Shah.

So the world has reduced Iran to an exclusive supplier of energy to western industries in China; the people will be siphoned off to America and Australia; and no one will be bothered to unite the intelligencia all over Iran in exile. The reason is simple. They do not want another Japan in Western Asia. Just suck our oil and brains.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Seyyeds think US is under threat.

Iran's ambassador to Russia said Tehran sees no reason to receive any sort of security guarantee.

Iran believes that this is the US which needs to be given such a guarantee; Interfax news agency quoted Gholam Reza Ansari as saying at a press conference.

http://www.isna.ir/Main/NewsView.aspx?ID=News-1132769&Lang=E

Can anyone understand what this guy means, by stating that the US needs to be given such a guarantee? It is implying that the US is under great threat and will suffer. Perhaps he thinks that the great Shiite Mahdi will hit the US. Is he nuts? But the fact that the Russians take them seriously is very funny.

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Iran's subprime crisis looming

However, now it has become clear to all that massive liquidity and constant rises in government expenditures are the driving forces behind inflation.

All this occurred because the billions of dollars that poured into Iran's coffers due to the unprecedented oil prices of the past few years were converted into rials and injected into the economy.

To create more jobs, the banks started providing easy loans, but the money was channeled into speculative real estate and commercial activities rather than production activities, which drove prices up.

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=168384

Wow doesn't this have similarities to what has just happened to the US?

Hizballah received 35 new Iranian speedboats shortly before current crisis

Hizballah received 35 new Iranian speedboats shortly before current crisisThe DEBKAfile's military sources report that three weeks before the recent Hizbullah takeover of western Beirut, the Shiite terrorist group recieved 35 speedboats from Iran. The speedboats have the capability to threaten international shipping in the region and could also be used to approach US and Israeli Navy ships near the Lebanese coast. The DEBKAfile reports that the speedboats were made for Hizbullah by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards shipyards at Bandar Abbas


http://www.infolive.tv/-/infolive.tv-22236-israelnews-debkafile-hizballah-received-35-new-iranian-speedboats-shortly-curren

Think of the money that went into making these. Then think of them being given to the Hezbollah in Lebanon for free.

How much better it would have been if the money was spent on the poor secular Iranians instead.

Saturday, May 10, 2008

China's proxy

At the meeting, Mahmoud Salahi noted that one of Iran's major policy is to attract foreign investments.

"Iran's free trade and special economic zones have proper potentials for foreign investors," he said, noting, "All foreign investors are welcome in the FEZs."

Salahi further noted that the anti-Iran resolutions by United Nations Security Council had no effect on deals with European countries.

http://www.mathaba.net/rss/?x=591828

Obviously Salahi is being seriously dellusional. Someone should remind him of the effect of the German banks pulling out of Iran, and the recent pull out of Shell gas deal.

Basicaly Iran has become part of the Chinese economy.

Thursday, May 08, 2008

The Poor in Iran

"We are staying here," said a protester who gave his name as Abu Rish. "We have money and support from Iran and Syria and we can go on like this for another 50 years."

http://mobile.nytimes.com/article;jsessionid=11E107F08E5E992C7A7D4BB922D2444E.w6?a=163297&f=20&p=1

Fact is that the oil fund is being siphoned, and used more in Lebanon than on the poor secular Iranians. The poor in Iran abstained en-masse from the recent Seyyed selection process in Iran.

The rest of Iran barely survive, and are bombarded by propaganda everyday; on how the Seyyeds are winning the Nuclear argument for secular Iranians on the world scene. It creates a false sense of success, when less and less funding is available, and the economic depression worsens.

Quo Bene? Peak Oil advocates, and all those corporations making use of the cheap oil contracts, that the Chinese have established for the world corporations in China with all those prisoners.

Monday, May 05, 2008

Obliteration a phone call away?

We could obliterate Iran’s infrastructure and architecture with a simple phone call.

If you are an Iranian, ask yourself this. Why should Iran be in such a situation, to have people say such things?

What have the Seyyeds done to bring on this kind of reaction from your average commentator?

Why don't we have a decent group of people representing Iran, outside Iran, to bestow the respect this ancient nation deserves?

Saturday, May 03, 2008

Who represents Iran?

Members of the United Iraqi Alliance had said the delegation was sent to Tehran to tell Iran to stop backing Shi'ite militias fighting U.S. and Iraqi security forces, underscoring Iraq's unease over the influence of its powerful neighbor.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080503/ts_nm/iraq_iran_dc

The Seyyeds oligarchy in Iran, are hardly in control of Iran, let alone some die-hards who have gone to Sadr City. But they are in control of the essential machinery of the state in Iran, to stop the regular army and the true Iranians to stop them.

I have already written at great length, about how Iranians can realise that they have the real power. Fact is that Iran has yet to have a social fabric on which it can create a instantaneous public outrage against the Seyyeds.

How do you create such a social fabric? Iranians are very good at making carpets, so why can't we weave one for all of us to stand on, and use to express our nationalistic sentiments? It is all part of being a primitive democracy. At the moment we have gone from voting to not voting.

Remember the first time the people of Iran went and voted; after Khomeini asked them to decide to trash Iran for an Islamic Republic. And they did, we are told. No one really knows. Nowadays people just abstain. So people do not participate socially any more.

Social participation will take time, but the new channels for it are being build along the modern networks such as internet blogging, and text messaging, which the Seyyeds are fighting. In this age of Aquarius the world will move forward via concensus. There really is no mouth piece such as a King anymore. So threads are started and concensus is sought.

Iranians have set up forums such as Iranian.com and the like, and are able to assimilate their thoughts. This process is fine for mutual understanding, but strategies to put into action any opposition for confrontation is difficult. It requires one of the Seyyeds to be part of the forum, and be defeated in a debate. That does not happen. And none of us can go on the Seyyed TV, to take them on and live.

So there needs to be as I have said, an appointment of a selected group of Iranians who are the best in the world at this time; who want to put Iran First and represent Iran in Exile. All forums will be linked in and concensus achieved. The UN needs to recognise this body, and kick out the Seyyed Rep.

It seems like a crazy idea, but there is no other non violent solution. Once the world listens and accepts this body, the Seyyeds, who are well known will be surrounded in their bunkers and faced with the threat of a General Strike. The rest is academic. No blood is spilled.