How crazy can the Israeli media get?

We only get one strike | Op-Ed Contributors | Jerusalem Post

Iran has the same virus inherent in every totalitarian power - to gain imperial dominion. Totalitarian Iran wants to recreate its empire east of the Mediterranean. The leaders of modern Iran, long before the present Islamic regime, toyed with the idea of reviving the empire of Cyrus and Darius.

You sometimes think these Israelis are mad. After all if it was not for Cyrus, where would they be now?

False Jitters Over Iran, and Israel

Jim Hoagland - Jitters Over Iran - washingtonpost.com:

"So you might want to consider battening down the hatches and getting the bomb shelters ready, just in case."

Actually Jim, look around this week-end, and you will notice that it is really quiet. No warmongering at all.

Why? Well they got the price of oil back up. So none of the Seyyed or Republican Peak Oil advocates is worried. But wait, once the price drops again, and their war of words will begin. We will have the Israelis firing missiles over the Mediterranean, and the Seyyed's IRGC firing more across the Straits of Hormuz, for target practice.

That will get the Arabs to go ape shit and start buying the futures contracts, and hey presto the price of oil will be well and truly near $200.

Israel imports oil from Iran's Seyyeds

Israel imports Iranian oil on a large scale even though contacts with Iran and purchasing of its products are officially boycotted by Israel. Israel gets around the boycott by having the oil delivered via Europe.

Fact is, that the Seyyeds use Israel in their moral arguments, and yet they let the oil they control to get to them. Normal Iranians, have no qwalm with the Israelis, but these aliens, who are stealing our oil wealth, are being hypocrites, and no one in Iran writes about it. It seems the Seyyeds are not really good at imposing sanctions, and do not care. Why is it, that not one member of the Seyyed oligarchy is not picking up on this? There is no internal dissent. Very strange.

The other Islamic Republic

When a large group of eminent U.S. foreign policy experts was asked this summer to name the country most likely to transfer nuclear technology to terrorists in the next three to five years, Pakistan was the top choice.

COLUMN-Pakistan,Iran show U.S.influence's limits:Bernd Debusmann | Reuters

Connect the dots.  US used to support Taliban & Co, when the Soviets were a threat in Afghanistan.  The US helped them to be this new force in Waziristan.  Musharraf's (or should I call him Mozakhraf) military pretends to fight them.  AQ Khan and the Seyyeds get the nuke plans from the Chinese.  Their narc friends get all that snuff from Afghanistan.  Smells very familiar to the trade going on, as in the film Apocalypse Now.  So everyone is in the oldest trade.  Meanwhile the Israelis want to hit Natanz, when it should be Khost.  And can the AQ Khan's nukes hit Israel?  Sure can.  So why hit Iran, when all the trouble is in the other Islamic Republic, namely the Islamic Republic of Pakistan?  Now you see why the US wants to give them all more aid.

Mini Nuke attack on Natanz

Under the plans, conventional laser-guided bombs would open “tunnels” into the targets. “Mini-nukes” would then immediately be fired into a plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce the risk of radioactive fallout.“As soon as the green light is given, it will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be demolished,” said one of the sources.

Revealed: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran - Times Online

Oh they make it look so clean and simple don't they.  It reminds me of those ads for new kitchen and bathroom cleaning agents.  So suddenly we are led to believe that it will be a clean efficient surgical strike.  But the long term effects, the political and religious ramifications are excellent for the arms and oil industries.  Is there an exodus of people from Natanz?  Of course not.  Will the Seyyeds be even more prepared to siphon secular Iranians oil income and send it to Hamas or Hezbollah one day to drop a mini-nuke over Israel, because of this rumour? Yes.  The world media is nuts.  They will not talk about the natural forces that can get rid of the Seyyeds from within Iran, like a General Strike.  Oh no, that would be far too boring.

Practice what you preach Israel

However, there is little evidence that the Israeli government is doing much to apply the same pressure to Israel's own companies involved with the hundreds of international companies doing business with Iran.

Dilip Hiro makes another stupid comment on Iran's Seyyeds - cheghadr khareh in mard?

One of the more startling comments I have just come across is this one from Dilip. You know he got his fame from supporting AK. He has been on my radar for so long. Well read this:

Specifically, if Iran were to target Israel, it would find itself annihilated since - equipped with submarine-borne nuclear weapons - Israel possesses the second-strike capability that Tehran does not.

It is as if the alien Seyyeds in Iran care. They know that once they have "wiped Israel off the map", their Mahdi will come and save them against anything. That includes an Israeli submarine nuclear attack.

No one won in Lebanon

It is so funny, you read the Islamist press in Iran, and they go on about how their Hezbollah friends won the war in Lebanon. And then you read the Israeli press, and you hear the same thing.

Ironically, the opportunity stems from the defeat that all camps suffered this summer: In the end nobody won anything.

I think as Zedillo says, neither won.

Sino-Islamist relations and Iran

Maybe China is coming around.

China reluctantly has backed Security Council efforts to call Iran to account, but its commitment to meaningful economic penalties is not assured. Acknowledging it needs China and a similarly skeptical Russia to make any punishment stick, the U.S. is crossing its fingers for a Chinese 'yes' vote but would settle for an abstention.

Again it comes down to the various corporations that are dealing with the Islamist Fascists, not the whole of China per se. The Islamists need the funds more to finance their "wipe out Israel" plan. So the Chinese need to talk to Israelis. Olmert go to China please.

Can the Islamists in Iran create trouble for the Chinese in their western provinces? And then you have the likes of Wal-Mart that have a lot of clout in China. Imagine them pulling out of China. That will give the Chinese something to think about.

Addressing Iran incorrectly

One of the main problems is how world leaders give undue credit to the false regime in Iran. For example the Israeli President states:

'The Iranians should be afraid -- they must understand if they object to every compromise there will be a price to pay'

Olmert should be addressing the Islamist Fascists in power directly, not the nation of Iran. That way the Islamist Fascists will know that they are not being regarded as representatives of Iran.