Chinese Hostages

China calls for restarting Iran nuclear talks

The Iranian nation, not the Islamic cult with guns, has been held hostage by China's business practices.

Obama has been black mailed in not taking tough actions on companies that deal with the Islamic regime and US that are based in China.

China is provider of labour and buys US bonds. So the US is in collusion with the Chinese. The left wing in US does not look at the peace dividend if there were military cut backs if there was a non violent regime in Iran.

For our part I say, find another enemy and leave Iran to develop peacefully. Let us have regime change by recognising the true Iranians who put Iran first. Iranians that love Iranian culture that is the oldest in the world and is part of the human heritage.

Published with Blogger-droid v1.6.3

Is Ebadi morally superior to the Seyyeds in Iran?

"What we want is that the two sides should respect international law, and we warn them on this," she said. "The United States cannot have the right to deal with Iran outside the framework of international law, and Iran cannot build a wall around itself and say, 'I have nothing to do with international law' and pay no attention to [UN] Security Council resolutions."

http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=T&ct=us/8-0&fd=R&url=http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2007/11/75B38EE4-E855-4617-9ADC-083C341BFCB6.html&cid=0&ei=yBpHR_T6C5DgqwPe9LzqCw


She is a devout Moslem. Iran's Spirit is older than Islam. She talks about Human Rights. Human Rights was invented in the Zend Avesta, in Iran, at least 7000 years ago.

So what is she on about? How can she go on about Human Rights, without the slightest reference to the roots of Human Rights. At least the UN has put a copy of Cyrus's Cylinder, as a sign of respect.

Many doubt her intentions. She has a Nobel Prize. Out of the blue we have an important person in Iran, but what does that person do with that respect? Is she any better than the Seyyeds? Is Cyrus or Zoroaster more meaningful to her than Halabi Qureshi (aka Mohammad)?

Acrimonious World

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called his French counterpart, Nicolas Sarkozy, "young and inexperienced" in an acrimonious and threatening letter, the daily newspaper Le Monde reported Friday.

Report: Iran president sends "acrimonious" letter to France's Sarkozy - International Herald Tribune

I came across this comment first, and then thought, "ah well, yet another quip, from that madman".  But as I was reading the newswires, I came across the word acrimonious again.

In a statement following the vote on the resolution on moratorium on the use of the death penalty, the representative of Singapore congratulated the co-sponsors of the resolution on their “pyrrhic victory”. He said the vote had proved that there was no international consensus on the resolution, as almost half of the delegations had not voted in its favour. That should be an indication that many delegations were uncomfortable with the text. Co-sponsors had brought the resolution forward fully aware of how acrimonious and divisive the issue was.

TWO-DAY DELIBERATIONS END WITH CONTENTIOUS RESOLUTION CALLING FOR MORATORIUM ON USE OF DEATH PENALTY APPROVED BY THIRD COMMITTEE AFTER VOTE

There is something weird, and yet wonderful about coincidence, and with the internet, it happens a lot.  It defies logic, because how often is it, that one comes across such a word as acrimonious.

Now maybe there is a hidden meaning to all this?  One can talk about the split world we live in.  That all those for capital punishment are with the likes of the Seyyeds.  Is this the great divide in the world?

I know that on a personal note, when I first meet someone, I don't ask about their religion or their politics.  What I do ask is their position on Capital Punishment.  And I ask you, dear reader,  where do you stand?

Let me tell you where I stand and why.  I believe in Life.  I do not think there is such a thing as death.  But my definition of Life is different.  I believe that there is a greater existence, and that we are always part of that.  So nothing just disappears and is gone.  The energy of the person remains.  Astrologers and many non Astrologers connect to these energies.  So with that attitude, it is ridiculous to believe in death.

Now look at the all the political, nationalistic, religious and other movements or motives, that have been based on death, and have not done Good.  The world that we live in now, is only where it is, because on balance, more people on Earth are learning, that death is a divisive issue, and at best helps the person who kills the most.

As for Iran, it will be only a free society, as and when Capital Punishment is outlawed.  That will take care of the Seyyeds' dogma, and any other awkward political movement.  The Iranian Opposition needs to be fully united on this, and non-violent regime change.  This can be done by having peaceful General Strikes, whereby the Seyyeds' authority will be undermined, with no harm to anyone.

Mad comments from the Madman from Iran

"Our people are the freest in the world," he said. "The freest women in the world are the women in Iran." Those who make human rights charges against his government "are unaware of the situation in Iran," he added.

Iranian president answers Washington press corps | csmonitor.com

This is a sure sign of a madman.

Incentives apply to human beings not Islamist Fascists in Iran

It is quite remarkable to see a Nobel Prize winner, ElBaradei, apply secular logic to Islamist Fascists in Iran. He states:

"The same applies to the situation in Iran," he said. "You can use sanctions but sanctions alone as we know by experience will not resolve issues. You need to use incentives and disincentives."

The folks who live in Qom and face Mecca, pay no attention to anyone else. As such, the people of Iran are solely responsible for their disposal; in a clean peaceful non violent manner; leaving no excuse for retaliation against future generations of Iranians. Once a higher global body, such as the UN, officially recognises the struggle of the secular Iranians, against Islamist angry attitude to the world, then the IAEA will realise not to take the Islamist Fascists in Iran seriously.

It would be nice of course if Mr ElBaradei did this attitude now, but he has a bone of contention with the all nuclear powers; and wants to use the Islamists in Iran's nuclear ambitions, as a threatening tool against the old nuclear powers. But why should the people of Iran suffer, and become guinea pigs for a much larger world problem. Mr ElBaradei must realise, that to give so much respect to Islamist Fascists in Iran, makes them feel as if they have legitimate rule in Iran.

Mr ElBaradei, the people of Iran will take note of your appeasement attitude towards the Islamist Fascists, as and when the Islamist Fascists of Iran, and brought against the a new Iranian court, just like Saddam Hossein is being tried in Iraq today by his own people. The people of Iran are the sons of Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great. We are the founders of Human Rights, and know very well how aggression cannot be overcome with more aggression.

Mr ElBaradei, you have been given the authority to judge the Islamist Fascists in Iran, and you attract a lot of attention and revel in it. You enjoy dragging the issue as long as you can, because when diplomacy ends war begins. But you are not helping the Iranian people, by discussing these issue solely with the Islamist Fascists in Iran. There are plenty of Iranians, both in Iran and outside Iran, who are better qualified to discuss, and represent the feeling of Iranian people all over the world.

We Iranians in opposition are more capable, and more intelligent than the Islamist Fascists in Iran. We therefore ask you in the name of Peace, not to deal with the Islamist Fascists seriously. When you speak to the Islamist Fascists in Iran, tell them that you know that the people of Iran, do not want Iran to be put in harms way. Cite example of other countries that threatened world peace and how world wars began.

You are an important person, and must represent the secular views of all Human Beings, especially those that live in Iran. Please do the right thing, and speak to the Islamist Fascists in Iran, as if you were a secular peace loving Iranian, and did not want the oil money to be used to make dangerous weapons of mass destruction.

One Islamist versus another in Iran

Nearly everyday one hears one character say one thing, and the next day, the die-hard bigoted Ahmadinejad, say something else. Here is a clear example:

Teheran considers a proposal to enrich uranium for Iranian use on Russian soil ‘attractive,’ Iranian Ambassador to Russia Gholamreza Ansari said Wednesday, the news agency Interfax reported.

The guys in the Foreign Ministry were swiftly changed when Ahmadinejad took over. This fella be might up for the chop soon. I bet anyone, that we will soon get an announcement from Ahmadinejad, that they will not agree to any enrichment outside Iran, and moreover, they will want to proliferate it.

Russia change in tune against the Islamist Fascists in Iran

Yup just as I said before, the Russians have suddenly changed their view on the Islamist Fascists in Iran. And it is interesting to see how the Indian press is one of the first to report this change in attitude.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov today expressed Moscow's "alarm" at Iran's plans to expand nuclear research and its refusal to accept proposals tabled by five permanent UNSC members and Germany to restart dialogue.

"We are alarmed, of course, by Iran's refusal to accept the sextet's proposals, which aim to create conditions for restarting the talks," Lavrov said in an interview published by the government-run Rossiiskaya Gazeta daily.

The Indians and their friends in the Non Aligned Movement (NAM) have always supported the Islamist Fascists in Iran. But they are more anti-US than the Russians, especially with the Communists Party in India being so big. I have always been very wary of the Indians, ever since the early days of the Islamist Inquisition of Iran in 1979, when I found out that Ayatollah Khomeini was educated at Lucknow. The Islamists there are very die hard, and recently were the first to criticize the new Pope. So the root of the problem is in Lucknow.

If you had kept your big mouth shut

One really does feel very sorry for this idiot pretending to run Iran. At first one thought, "well he has a PHD", maybe, just maybe he has more sense than the old folk in Qom. After all one cannot blame the old folk saying their old songs over and over again. For years the world just put up with it. But last year everyone thought, "hey this kid, seems to have a lot of energy, has a modern education, maybe, just maybe, he is going to bring a breath of fresh air. But this is what we hear:

"It is most embarrassing that the U.N Security Council, which should be the defender of nations' security and rights, threatens countries pursuing nuclear fuel under the law to provide fuel for peaceful purposes," Ahmadinejad said.

And that just about sums it up for me. He refuses to accept the world order. Why? Because he has his own utopia that he thinks is over and above UN. The Russians have tried and tried to educate him, but as I said earlier, they are using him for getting into WTO. So this new kid on the block is crying out loud like a cry baby. That has moved Iran closer and closer into a pariah state, which does not help him at all. He is cornered and all he can do is moan and groan and shout out loud, whilst we all laugh at him.

Russian and Chinese waste more time on Iran

Future historians will judge this episode of Iranian history with great humour. The Chinese and the Russians have been playing a game of charade, with the rest of the world when it comes to Iran.

The sanctions impose limits on a Russian project to build Iran's first nuclear power station in the southwestern city of Bushehr.

The people of Iran in opposition need to take charge, and let the world know that the new Iran is in the oppositions' hand, not in the hands of Russians, Chinese, and their proxies in Iran.

Khan nuke gear for the Islamist Fascists in Iran

Here we go, it was just a matter of time. The Pakistanis and North Koreans in collusion with the Islamist Fascists.

The P2 nuclear centrifuges were also sent to North Korea, said the official, who did not want to be identified.

Reports in Pakistan yesterday quoted the official, who was speaking in Washington, as saying: "If you ask for an educated and intelligent guess, I would say, yes, they might have been sent to Iran too, but we have no evidence to prove it."

It does not really take a lot of imagination to figure that one out does it. Why is it that the people of Iran allow such proliferation. The people should bring this government to a halt, by threatening a General Strike. Better the people to go on strike, than to have the world strike Iran.

UN sanctions including Russians and Chinese on the way for Islamist Fascists in Iran

It is good to see that no matter how hard the Russians like Lavrov try, they cannot disrupt the unity of the UN against the Islamist Fascists in Iran.

One of the diplomats, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the draft was not yet public, described all three measures as moderate and narrowly focused in an attempt to win Russian and Chinese backing to punish Iran's refusal to suspend uranium enrichment. The diplomat added that Moscow and Beijing could be formally presented with the draft as early as later this week.

This then represents a very agreeable first stage, that will ruffle the mullahs feathers.

ElBaradei is Neville Chamberlain reincarnated when it comes to Iran's Islamist nukes

I cannot but look back at the similarities. Wiki describes:

The repeated failures of the Baldwin government to deal with rising Nazi power are often laid, historically, on the doorstep of Chamberlain, since he presided over the final collapse of European affairs, resisted acting on military information, lied to the House of Commons about Nazi military strength, shunted out opposition which, correctly, warned of the need to prepare – and above all, failed to use the months profitably to ready for the oncoming conflict.

And now I read:

Unlike American officials, ElBaradei says that he is not convinced that Iran's ultimate goal is to build a weapon, though IAEA officials believe that Iran wants to have all of the major components of a weapon in hand so that it is clear that it could build one in weeks or months.

History repeats itself, but not exactly.

Sino-Islamist relations and Iran

Maybe China is coming around.

China reluctantly has backed Security Council efforts to call Iran to account, but its commitment to meaningful economic penalties is not assured. Acknowledging it needs China and a similarly skeptical Russia to make any punishment stick, the U.S. is crossing its fingers for a Chinese 'yes' vote but would settle for an abstention.

Again it comes down to the various corporations that are dealing with the Islamist Fascists, not the whole of China per se. The Islamists need the funds more to finance their "wipe out Israel" plan. So the Chinese need to talk to Israelis. Olmert go to China please.

Can the Islamists in Iran create trouble for the Chinese in their western provinces? And then you have the likes of Wal-Mart that have a lot of clout in China. Imagine them pulling out of China. That will give the Chinese something to think about.

Russia kisses Iranian mullah's ass

'We won't be able to support and will oppose any attempts to use the Security Council to punish Iran or use Iran's program in order to promote the ideas of regime change there'