Tell U.N. Atomic Energy Chief to not mix Iranians' nuke policy with the Seyyeds'

“It is my gut feeling that Iran would like to have the technology to enable it to have nuclear weapons,” Dr. ElBaradei, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency said in the interview at the organization’s headquarters in Vienna. ... “They want to send a message to their neighbors, to the rest of the world, ‘don’t mess with us,’” he said, urging outside powers to engage with Iran to remove the incentive for making a bomb. ... He said he believed Iran’s “ultimate aim” was to be “recognized as a major power in the Middle East.”

What do you do with ElBaradei. First of all he refers to Iran, when it is the Doomsday Khomeinists or Seyyeds, that are followers of their 12th Imam, who are hell bent in creating Armageddon, not the Iranians.

Secondly, who in Iran wants to be so powerful, to then allow the US government to reason with its people, to use US tax payer money, to build permanent bases in the area. The best solution anyone with an ounce of brain, is for Iranians, real Iranians, to come across as decent civilized people, as they were when Iran was the cross-roads of civilization.

What ElBaradei wants is to use the Seyyeds to suck the oil revenue of Iran and teach the Americans a lesson, that the fanatic Arabs like him can't. If he is saying this stuff now, imagine what he can say later when he retires.

Iran's Seyyeds siphoning oil for stealth nuke development fails

Iran said the allegations were either fabricated or related to conventional weapons designs. Saeed Jalili, Iran’s top security official, said the IAEA report was “a success and victory” and “the fruit of [the] Iranian nation’s resistance and insistence on their rights”.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/36c7f1b0-e15e-11dc-a302-0000779fd2ac.html

What he really means is that the Seyyeds have successfully siphoned the resources of Iran to meet what their Mahdi wants them to do. And what in the world has that to do with Iranians who have deeper more authentic roots than any Seyyed. We have our own peaceful moral philosophy which is non violent and respects human rights. We love Life and that is why the Seyyeds have survived. If it was not for the Iranians' respect for Life, we would have lost our temper and created a Seyyed Massacre. We want to live with all, starting with anyone who has changed his religion from what was called Zoroastrianism to Judaism then Chrisitanity and then Islam. We respect that. Do they? So we will change Iran the right way. We will not play their game. We will not obey their dogma. We will stay at home as and when and show our strength with a massive 70 million General Strike.

Russia and China fall in line, just before the "flexibility" comment

Russia and China did not comment, and the agreement seemed at odds with weeks of public opposition, primarily by the Kremlin, to new sanctions against Iran.

Russia and China fall in line on Iran | Jerusalem Post

Why have the Russians and Chinese suddenly complied?  Or is it, that in two weeks time, Ayatollah ElBaradei will say that there has been some "flexibility", as was just expressed in the Chinese press below:

Wen said peaceful negotiation would be the best way to resolve the nuclear issue and he hoped that Iran could further demonstrate its flexibility, according to a press release from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

China urges Iran to cooperate with IAEA

And then the Seyyeds would just carry on as normal.

ElBaradei buys more time for Iran's Seyyeds' nuke bomb program

“Resolving all outstanding verification issues in the next two to three months, after a long deadlock, would go a long way towards building the confidence of the international community in the peaceful nature of Iran’s past nuclear programme,”

Despite progress, important issues of Iran’s nuclear programme still remain – UN


And what will ElBaradei do next January when nothing had happened, and the Seyyeds had not come completely clean?

Incentives apply to human beings not Islamist Fascists in Iran

It is quite remarkable to see a Nobel Prize winner, ElBaradei, apply secular logic to Islamist Fascists in Iran. He states:

"The same applies to the situation in Iran," he said. "You can use sanctions but sanctions alone as we know by experience will not resolve issues. You need to use incentives and disincentives."

The folks who live in Qom and face Mecca, pay no attention to anyone else. As such, the people of Iran are solely responsible for their disposal; in a clean peaceful non violent manner; leaving no excuse for retaliation against future generations of Iranians. Once a higher global body, such as the UN, officially recognises the struggle of the secular Iranians, against Islamist angry attitude to the world, then the IAEA will realise not to take the Islamist Fascists in Iran seriously.

It would be nice of course if Mr ElBaradei did this attitude now, but he has a bone of contention with the all nuclear powers; and wants to use the Islamists in Iran's nuclear ambitions, as a threatening tool against the old nuclear powers. But why should the people of Iran suffer, and become guinea pigs for a much larger world problem. Mr ElBaradei must realise, that to give so much respect to Islamist Fascists in Iran, makes them feel as if they have legitimate rule in Iran.

Mr ElBaradei, the people of Iran will take note of your appeasement attitude towards the Islamist Fascists, as and when the Islamist Fascists of Iran, and brought against the a new Iranian court, just like Saddam Hossein is being tried in Iraq today by his own people. The people of Iran are the sons of Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great. We are the founders of Human Rights, and know very well how aggression cannot be overcome with more aggression.

Mr ElBaradei, you have been given the authority to judge the Islamist Fascists in Iran, and you attract a lot of attention and revel in it. You enjoy dragging the issue as long as you can, because when diplomacy ends war begins. But you are not helping the Iranian people, by discussing these issue solely with the Islamist Fascists in Iran. There are plenty of Iranians, both in Iran and outside Iran, who are better qualified to discuss, and represent the feeling of Iranian people all over the world.

We Iranians in opposition are more capable, and more intelligent than the Islamist Fascists in Iran. We therefore ask you in the name of Peace, not to deal with the Islamist Fascists seriously. When you speak to the Islamist Fascists in Iran, tell them that you know that the people of Iran, do not want Iran to be put in harms way. Cite example of other countries that threatened world peace and how world wars began.

You are an important person, and must represent the secular views of all Human Beings, especially those that live in Iran. Please do the right thing, and speak to the Islamist Fascists in Iran, as if you were a secular peace loving Iranian, and did not want the oil money to be used to make dangerous weapons of mass destruction.

Russia change in tune against the Islamist Fascists in Iran

Yup just as I said before, the Russians have suddenly changed their view on the Islamist Fascists in Iran. And it is interesting to see how the Indian press is one of the first to report this change in attitude.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov today expressed Moscow's "alarm" at Iran's plans to expand nuclear research and its refusal to accept proposals tabled by five permanent UNSC members and Germany to restart dialogue.

"We are alarmed, of course, by Iran's refusal to accept the sextet's proposals, which aim to create conditions for restarting the talks," Lavrov said in an interview published by the government-run Rossiiskaya Gazeta daily.

The Indians and their friends in the Non Aligned Movement (NAM) have always supported the Islamist Fascists in Iran. But they are more anti-US than the Russians, especially with the Communists Party in India being so big. I have always been very wary of the Indians, ever since the early days of the Islamist Inquisition of Iran in 1979, when I found out that Ayatollah Khomeini was educated at Lucknow. The Islamists there are very die hard, and recently were the first to criticize the new Pope. So the root of the problem is in Lucknow.

If you had kept your big mouth shut

One really does feel very sorry for this idiot pretending to run Iran. At first one thought, "well he has a PHD", maybe, just maybe he has more sense than the old folk in Qom. After all one cannot blame the old folk saying their old songs over and over again. For years the world just put up with it. But last year everyone thought, "hey this kid, seems to have a lot of energy, has a modern education, maybe, just maybe, he is going to bring a breath of fresh air. But this is what we hear:

"It is most embarrassing that the U.N Security Council, which should be the defender of nations' security and rights, threatens countries pursuing nuclear fuel under the law to provide fuel for peaceful purposes," Ahmadinejad said.

And that just about sums it up for me. He refuses to accept the world order. Why? Because he has his own utopia that he thinks is over and above UN. The Russians have tried and tried to educate him, but as I said earlier, they are using him for getting into WTO. So this new kid on the block is crying out loud like a cry baby. That has moved Iran closer and closer into a pariah state, which does not help him at all. He is cornered and all he can do is moan and groan and shout out loud, whilst we all laugh at him.

UN sanctions including Russians and Chinese on the way for Islamist Fascists in Iran

It is good to see that no matter how hard the Russians like Lavrov try, they cannot disrupt the unity of the UN against the Islamist Fascists in Iran.

One of the diplomats, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the draft was not yet public, described all three measures as moderate and narrowly focused in an attempt to win Russian and Chinese backing to punish Iran's refusal to suspend uranium enrichment. The diplomat added that Moscow and Beijing could be formally presented with the draft as early as later this week.

This then represents a very agreeable first stage, that will ruffle the mullahs feathers.

ElBaradei is Neville Chamberlain reincarnated when it comes to Iran's Islamist nukes

I cannot but look back at the similarities. Wiki describes:

The repeated failures of the Baldwin government to deal with rising Nazi power are often laid, historically, on the doorstep of Chamberlain, since he presided over the final collapse of European affairs, resisted acting on military information, lied to the House of Commons about Nazi military strength, shunted out opposition which, correctly, warned of the need to prepare – and above all, failed to use the months profitably to ready for the oncoming conflict.

And now I read:

Unlike American officials, ElBaradei says that he is not convinced that Iran's ultimate goal is to build a weapon, though IAEA officials believe that Iran wants to have all of the major components of a weapon in hand so that it is clear that it could build one in weeks or months.

History repeats itself, but not exactly.