"Violence is dead end" says Obama to the Muslims

In his speech to the Moslem world, he refers to Algebra as Islamic, when it is Iranian. He says Islam is part of USA, when the Seyyeds see US as part of Islam. He does not name the Seyyeds, but refers to their anti-Israeli, and violent views.

This indirect criticism helps the Seyyeds. He either tackles them head on, or just cites moral philosophy like so many preachers. After all what is the difference between a politician and a preacher? A time goes by, Obama sounds like a preacher, with no concrete actions. He reminds me of typical Sunday sermons.

On Iran from 34 mins. Recongises Mossadegh vs CIA. Supports human rights, but did not condemn the lack of it in Iran. Talks of concensus vs coercion. He talks about tolerance in Islam when in Iran people are being killed for reverting back to Zoroastrianism. Then he critisizes liberals picking on Women's rights, when they are stoned in Iran. No mention of any country. He just talks in broad terms, and subtley hits at Islam, when he knows that Islam is strictly intolerant to women's right to liberal thoughts.

Giuliani should address the non-violent movement of Iran

'You have one chance to talk to the people of Iran. They are watching. You want to create a reformist element in Iran and you don't speak to that? ... This is why terrorist will say, we can take advantage of the guy.'

Here he is picking on Obama, like I did, but he could use his position to address the Seyyeds directly. Why doesn't he ask them point black, "what could you do, if the people of Iran went on a general strike?".

But that would be too easy. Fact is, that the US does not want to remove the Seyyeds. Otherwise what else would "morally justify" their gun-boat diplomacy.

Obama was wrong on Iran's Saadi

What Saadi said was this:

The Children of Adam are limbs of each other 
Having been created of one essence. 
When the calamity of time afflicts one limb 
The other limbs cannot remain at rest. 
If thou hast no sympathy for the troubles of others 
Thou art unworthy to be called by the name of a man.

Saadi wrote this to say that when someone suffers, others feel their suffering.  The whole purpose of this poem is to talk about suffering, and the sympathy we all should have for each other, wherever we are, and from whatever origin.

That brings up the question, "Does Mr Obama realise the calamity on Iranians that have tried to celebrate Nowruz for 1400 years?".  How dare he talk to the Seyyed/Theocrats about this truely Iranian occasion, when the Seyyeds/Theocrats' sole task is to destroy what is Iranian.

Mr Obama, you should be addressing the Iranians that put Nowruz over and above everything else.  You should not be trying to cut a deal with these people who hate Iran and its culture so symbolised by Nowruz.

Ehsas will make an Obama "Change" for Iran

When you read comments like this:

The future of US-Iran relations will become a hot topic in the run-up to Iran's own presidential elections in June 2009, in which Ahmadinejad is likely run against several conservative and reformist candidates. A victory for the incumbent -- who until recently was seen as the clear favorite but is fast losing support -- could undermine any attempts to improve relations. The election of a reformist candidate such as former President Mohammad Khatami could boost the chances of rapprochement.

You think, that we in Iran need what Obama called "Change". These cries of change need someone with guts to come out and say it. Obama had the culture and fabric of US democracy to be able to safely such things. We Iranians do not have such luxury in Iran. Our country has been invaded by an alien Seyyed Empire. They justify their existance with each one of them claiming to be a descendant of Halabi Qureshi (aka Mohammad) who in turn (thanks to Salman Parsi) was told to be descended from Abraham. But what has this to do with Iran's 15000 year ancient cultural heritage as recorded in the Vendidad chapter of The Zend Avesta.

The irony of all of this is that, if it were not for the Seyyed incursion into Iran, we Iranians would not get so interested in The Ancients of Iran. We would not have changed, and found a stronger feeling about Old Iran, or The Ancients of Iran. My quest into The Ancient of Iran, began as a spiritual journey not too dissimilar to what one sees when one looks at Stargate SG-5. These are feelings, and illuminations, with quite a lot of delusions. It is an escape the mind makes up for me, to accept that as a group of people our ancient ancestors were way way ahead of anything now. It is easy to pass it as illusion, and be cynical about it. But it comes back more and more.

Belief is growing in the people of Iran, that we were better, and more respectable than now. When you look at Cuneiform, or such magnificent works of the Persepolis, you are inspired to think, that something very powerful was at work. This civilization of Ancient Iran was not the same as the violence of the Seyyeds. The Ancients of Iran are running the hearts and minds of all real Iranians. That's "The Change" that has taken place.

So with all this inspiration, why is it that nothing gets done? Why as such magnificent people as we were, is it that we cannot get our acts together and change Iran's government. Why can't we engage in a dialogue with the Seyyeds and tell them how they can be ignored with a General Strike? Do we all have to make a "Big Show" somewhere so that the world media understands the stuff that I have just said? Do we really need to make a government in exile, and have a spokesperson. We need to go through all that formality with the press first to then remove the Seyyeds. Who cares what the world media says. We want to take care of our own land. We have done most of the work in our minds. It is now time to put it to practice. We have until now abstained from any silly Seyyed voting.

The people of Iran have an Iranian feeling (Ehasas), that no Seyyed or other foreign country has. We all feel that feeling and really get it in Persepolis or Damavand or anything else that is uniquely Iranian I call The Spirit of Nowrooz. The path to change this aliens force is to let it know that they are powerless against this feeling the Iranians have.

Obama charges Iranian-Americans, but would pay Seyyeds

"The Obama campaign has promised to have a private meeting with Iranian Americans if we as a group can raise $250,000 for this coming Sunday's event," Manouch Moshayedi, a prominent Iranian-American...Wow that is disgusting. I bet Obama would pay a lot more than that to see Ahmadinejad, and guarrantee his election.

read more | digg story

Obama's "Big Idea" on Iran's Seyyeds

RapidCityJournal.com - Rapid City, South Dakota's News Leader » Ap » Headlines:

"'My whole goal in terms of having tough, serious direct diplomacy is not because I'm naive about the nature of any of these regimes. I'm not,' Obama said at a press conference. 'It is because if we show ourselves willing to talk and to offer carrots and sticks in order to deal with these pressing problems, and if Iran then rejects any overtures of that sort, it puts us in a stronger position to mobilize the international community to ratchet up the pressure on Iran.'"

Suddenly Obama thinks that he can be morally correct if he goes to the Seyyeds and make overtures, that the EU and many others have failed to do. And you know what, the Seyyeds will make him look special. They will lie to him to get him elected, and then carry on doing what they are doing. Obama will get elected, and he will find out that the Seyyeds have lied to him, and he will turn very nasty. There is, in this young President of USA to be, a very angry side, which the US military needs, in order to defeat the Seyyeds. With all due respect, McCain has no got what it takes. He legacy is far too polluted by GWB. The US military needs a young blood, who realises what the real truth is. At that point the people of United States will believe the new President, as he really did try his best to negotiate.

But all of this is political posturing by the US politicians to get the hearts and minds of their voters is very pathetic. As I have said a hundred times before, it is really easy to get rid of the Seyyeds. We do not need Mr Obama to trot off to Iran. Just get the world media to ask the Seyyeds, how would they cope, if the people of Iran decided not to work for them. The discussion threads will be a lot more powerful than the threats of sanctions. A general strike is a lot better than an air strike. But then that is far too easy, and it would remove the need for US military in the area, and allow the real Iranians to build the new economic force in west Asia. And you know what, it is us Iranians' own fault for not organizing ourselves well enough from abroad to regain our land. The country has been hijacked by a bunch of nutters and no one can get into the cockpit to stop the plane from a crash landing or to be blown up in the sky.

Obama's next 9/11 or section 311 for Iran

But that also means voters have no problem envisioning disaster should we pull out our troops too soon - the possible slaughter of pro-American Iraqis, plus police and government officials; perhaps a takeover by Iran; a comeback by al Qaeda and other terrorist operatives.

http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/dmorris/2008/dm_0604.shtml

"..perhaps a takeover by Iran" is a scenario, that the vote hungry Obama, has not really looked into. He had to say something to get the Jewish vote. That essentially put Clinton out of the race. And he hopes that it will help the Democrats to defeat the GOP come november.

As far as the Seyyeds are concerned, they just need to react to this subtle change in tone of Obama, and he is finished. They need to say, that he is just like McCain, and he would lose in november. But if the Seyyeds and their Iraqi, Lebanese, and Palestinian proxies, say nothing, then "their man" will become the next President of United States. This man is Jimmy Carter all over again. And the Seyyeds love JC.

Obama, right now, is a man driven by a Cause with a big C, which is far deeper than meets the eye, and is above and beyond his Country. I am of course referring to the famous Kissinger, "Cause and Country" principle. These ideals are exactly what got Khomeini into Iran when Carter was around. Carter was an idealist. This is not the practical Clinton camp that was privy to US national security issues. Obama the President will not be able to sit with all those people who have protected US, and more importantly were put in place by the Republicans.

This is what the Seyyeds want. The would love to see the most liberal side of Democratic Party get into office on idealistic grounds. In reality what would happen, is that the US would pull out of Iraq, and the area at large, Israel and Arabs would increase their arms, and the US would have more money to spend on all the Democrat's social programs. That means that the Israelis will go it alone against the Seyyeds' nukes. US forces will be trimmed down, and we will end up just like we were before 9/11.

Some would argue that the whole 9/11 was a set up; that the military in the US needed funding; that whole military industrial complex of United States, that is a core economic engine as well, needs to keep going. So will we get another major global crisis to tame even Obama, or will he, like clever Bill Clinton not fall into those traps. I hope it is the later, as he is not so sensitive to oil industry as Bush is. But reality is that the US military will get up to its tricks and create another new 9/11. Obama will then have to leave his Cause and think about his Country. It is then that you will see the real Lion in this man roar.

So are the Democrats a better alternative for secular progressive Iranians that want to put Iran first. Sadly no. What happens when you get the Democrats, is that many more people will leave Iran to work in US. The mass migration of Iranians caused huge financial and intellectual drain on the homeland after Carter let Khomeini into Iran. So many Iranians left Iran and took their wealth and intelligence to US. That damage is a lot worse than any damage the Seyyeds have done. Iran is then left with even less people to stay in Iran and develop it.

So what is the most ideal scenario. As a person who believes in non-violence, the path I would choose would be for the US government, whatever kind, to block all transactions from all the banks and companies that deal with the Seyyeds in the US with evoking section 311 of the Patriots Act, which NRO alludes to. The Seyyeds have taken over the machinery of state of Iran and believe that their dogma is non-negotiable. No carrot or stick will stop them from their agenda. Creating another new Iranian government in exile that has the support of unions in Iran, will be the first step for a non-violent General Strike to freeze Iran. Any talk of military strikes will bolster the Seyyeds.

So to sum up, it is not as if once the US changes its attitude, then the Seyyeds will change. They won't. They are in their own mindset; and it drives them to have a "Mahdi" and do whatever it is they believe in, as and when. The US must not think that with their new "Political Brand", suddenly the world will change. It won't. Once the "Seyyed Cause" becomes a Country of their own outside Iran, then Iran will be freed, and become country again. US will need to balkanize Iraq, with a region or two for the Shiites, just like the Clintons did with Yugoslavia. A world of nation states is the most peacefull world, and the next President of United States will by hook or by crook realise that.

McCain and Obama sound bites vs Torquemadas in Iran

Wikipedia says this about sound bites, "Not everyone enjoys hearing sound bites. They tend to sound best when delivered unplanned, and the logical inverse is often true -- the planned sound bite can easily ring forced and cast doubt as to the speaker's integrity."

And so McCain's recent statement, "As more people, businesses, pension funds and financial institutions across the world divest from companies doing business with Iran, the radical elite who run that country will become even more unpopular than they are already. Years ago, the moral clarity and conviction of civilized nations came together in a divestment campaign against South Africa, helping to rid that nation of the evil of apartheid. In our day, we must use that same power and moral conviction against the regime in Iran, and help to safeguard the people of Israel and the peace of the world.", sound so much like a poitical sound bite. It is almost as bad as Obama's one of wanting to meet the Seyyeds in Qom.

These political sound bites have done nothing for The Iranian. The Iranian is beyond politics, religion, or commerce. Like any human being, he or she has Free Will, but unlike most advanced democracies, has fallen for the typical politician's and theocrat's cheap trick to vote. I must say that even though Iran is one of the oldest countries in the world, it was democratically quite naive way back in 1979; when with one vote, it threw out the baby and the bath water. Why did we in Iran get rid of the whole essence of what it meant to be Iranian, with what was just a political gesture.

That vote on Iran, changed the name and the flag of Iran. That is how potent politics can get, if it allowed to go too far, or should I say, if it is allowed to be abused - and it was abused by the Seyyeds. But one could say that it was more a case of there not being any organization to stop politics and democracy from interfering in the cultural affairs in Iran, than anything else. That is why the Seyyeds have such safeguards in place, to keep democracy more of a self-selection fiasco, than anything else. As such they are quite correct in defending their mantle. But whether this mantle is Iranian is another question. What is more interesting is how the world treats them as representatives of The Iranian. These are the real questions I am dealing with below.

Of course the Seyyeds do not represent The Iranian. The Iranian has its roots from the Zend-Avesta and most Iranians have ironically found themselves even more now, than anytime before, as Iranian first, and something else second. The Shahanshah, who did not profess to know much about the Zend-Avesta, nevertheless found The Iranian in him, when he read The Shahnameh (which is a bad copy of the Khodayeh-Namak). Iranians did have a "Spiritual Renaissance" again in rather strange times of the Moguls, when Koran was no longer the one and only book allowed, and an amazing array of book were written. People nowadays learn Persian to read Hafez. No book in the world is so rich in its poetry. What is the Spirit so deep in the Iranian psyche, that is bursting to get out? It had a chance in Hafez, but there is a lot more. Why? Because The Iranian can be said to reach to before the last ice-age, if we are to believe what is written in the Vendidad. Yima speaks of the preparation of the coming ice-age and how we need to prepare for mass migrations. I need to bring all this in, so that the world realises why it is so easy for an average Iranian to ignore the Seyyeds and just carry on his life. The Iranian is at peace within, and his Spirit; it is for an Iranian a very personal existential belief. He thinks into realms that have little to do with the Seyyeds' dogma. But it does not really help in this mundane world of aggression. Iranians laugh at the Seyyed, and their spirit does not allow them to react angrily. Seyyeds want to die for a cause. The Iranian celebrated Life as in Nowrooz. But it does react. Just look at the mass abstention that took place in the Seyyed selection just a month or so ago. That shows the world how The Iranian does not care to use violence to ruin his future. We Iranians want to remove these upstarts, that do not respect the 20,000 year heritage of Iran. They and their US tennis partners insult the land of Iran with fearmongering and siphoning the oil fund to waste money on warfare instead of healthcare.

So I say to Mr Obama, please answer these simple questions, before using Iran as another sound bite in your election trails. Your media is so powerful that whatever you say is blown so out of proportion that you need to be quite careful of what you say. You represent change, but what you propose is not change. First of all, why is it that you, Mr Obama think that for one minute the Seyyed, who wants to return the whole of Western Asia into a place for his Madhi to return to, listen to you. You have nothing new to say that he does not know already. In his eyes you are actually guilty, because you converted out of Islam. In Iran it is said the Seyyed will soon pass a law, that will allow anyone who converts out of Islam, to be killed. So we have an Islamic Inquisition going on in Iran, and you want to fly in and deal with the Torquemadas in Iran.

And now we have Mr McCain, who wants to use financial leverage on these Seyyed Torquemadas in Iran. So let's look at this logically. He wants anyone who is dealing with them, to stop that business. That means that the Chinese, who provide corporations like Wal-Mart; the land, the people, and the energy that comes from Iran, to stop dealing. So that means that Wal-Mart should stop operations in China. And it is not just Wal-Mart, it is most of the world's corporations. Next you have the corporations that deal with the US and the Seyyeds in Iran via proxy. How can this sound bite ever materialise to anything more than just that, a sound bite.

I just wish that the US candidates stop this immature postering and leave Iranians to deal with the Seyyeds. We need to win against the propaganda war that has misinformed the world about The Iranian. Help Iranians to have proper representation outside Iran at least. Start with the UN, and ask the illegal representative of the Seyyeds to be thrown out, because of their position on nukes. Ask the UN to create, just like they did in Afghanistan; a government in exile, made up of the most educated and professionally capable Iranians, wherever they are. They just need to put Iran above anything else. I can assure you that most advanced Iranians will gladly put some part of their life to serve their country, if the UN asked them to. Next we need this group of people to challenge the Seyyeds with giving instructions to the people of Iran that are following instructions at gun point, to get ready for a General Strike. We do not need a military strike Mr McCain; which only serves your need to keep your military a reason d'etre to be in the area, and get more funding from your US population. We do not need Mr Obama to engage with the Seyyeds. We need Iranians to deal with the Seyyeds. I believe that once the government in exile actually engages with the Seyyeds, with warnings of General Strike, and gets support from all the unions and workers inside Iran, then the Seyyeds aura of legitimacy will diminish. They do not actually have legitimacy, but have the air to appear legit to the world media. Once the media also get the confidence in the new government in exile, then the Seyyeds are ready to leave Iran. The world media needs to be told by the UN of not representing them in what they write.

But where will they go? As a person who believes in the tenets of non-violence as enshrined in our Holy Zend-Avesta, we need to give them a safe passage. And they want to go to their holy places in Iraq, so let them. It is really a matter of Iraqi government to deal with. The argument between the sons of Abraham is purely an Iraqi matter. Cyrus the Great brought peace to the area by rising above the religious issue and saw in the humanitarian ways of the Zend-Avesta. This is the way it will proceed. Think out of the Biblical box and see the more ancient roots of the area, that are part of Iran's rich ancient past.

Obama, go and see the Ayatollahs now

Clinton last summer condemned Obama for declaring that, as president, he would personally negotiate with Iranian leaders without preconditions. But in October, she said that, if elected, she would direct her subordinates to begin unconditional negotiations. The difference, Clinton argued, is that she would withhold the prestige of a presidential-level meeting until progress warranted it.

Brownstein: The great Iran divide - National Journal - MSNBC.com

Why doesn't Mr Obama go right now to Qom, and see Mesbah Yazdi face to face, and then Khamenei, and then AhMADinejad, with the certainty that he will come back as a hero, and be elected with a huge majority?

For crying out loud, how many times have we had the US elections, and the Seyyed elections, use each other to get the people scared, and come out to vote for the war lobby, and the peak oil advocates?  Can the people of United States and Iran see through this?  Yes of course they can.  But can the press and its commentators realise this.

Fact is, that if the people of Iran, were given the dignity and respect, and were told that they can get rid of the Seyyeds with just talking about a national strike, instead of a US strike, then maybe things will change in Iran more peacefully.  But nobody wants that boring solution do they.