Iran civil rights movement

Saw this site and put out all this there (don't know why, it just happened):

I do not agree with a lot that has been said. The Iranians, like myself began as conscientious objectors to this illegal regime from 12th Feb 1979.

I had relatives employed in the oil and petrochemicals, and they, like me, objected to the new directives being sent out by the mullahs.

Every place, every important meeting had an IRGC or mullah sniffing around. But the non-violent movement in Iran was born to stop them from the progress of Iran. Iranians defeated their wishes from the 12th February 1979.

But the problem was that the world refused to note the mullahs being defeated. The world focused on the warmongering of Khomeini and let the war with Iraq start. That killed Iranians. It was then very difficult to stop that. But we managed at the end. But a lot of Iranians became Basij and that sustained the mullahs.

Oh they managed to change the flag, the anthem, and many names. They even wanted to bulldoze Persepolis. But the ancient ruins remain, and more have been found as new roads had to be built. The people of Iran do not use Islamic names to name their children anymore. The backlash has been a blessing in disguise. A new Iran has been born in stealth out of this tragedy.

Iranians must unite along a non-violent approach

The video above sums up very well the scenes of the bloody struggles against the alien Seyyed regime. This is exactly what I did not want.

What we can do, is to agree along a peaceful non-violent unity. That we can all agree on. Anyone who does not agree is with them. They are violent. The Iranian Spirit will only live in a non-violent person.

Simple.

Ganji is wrong on Iran

The mullahs' strategy is simple. To retain power, they need an enemy. They thus seek to keep their country on a perpetual war footing by playing up the notion that the Bush administration is conspiring to overthrow them, destroy the Islamic republic and undermine Islam itself. Nonviolent activists, human-rights defenders and intellectuals are labeled enemy agents. And Iran's deteriorating economic conditions are attributed to U.S. sanctions rather than to Tehran's chronic mismanagement.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/109548

Are we Iranians that weak and unorganized outside the religious circles, that we can let people say such stupid things. We Iranians cannot, like any other human beings stand up for peace. That we cannot organise a unity based on love and peace that can organize a national non violent strike? How can we sit there and take such rubbish from such writers. For how long should we Iranians just not say "enough is enough, we want peace, and anyone that distrubs the peace, is wrong".

The Economist and me

Last week I got an email from The Economist to review an article the had published. I noticed that, what they wrote was the usual boring synopsis of the recent events, with no solutions. Wiki was better reading. I gave the author my blunt remarks and never got a reply.

Well guess what? In this week's Economist they are going on about non violent resistance. But still they managed to put a cynical comment like this.

Indeed some Iran-watchers believe the president's efforts to promote change have helped the regime to quash even those reformers who have no foreign links. “It puts a target on the back of every dissident,” says Afshin Molavi, a writer on Iran.

Non-violent protest | They shall overcome—but perhaps not always | Economist.com

When will they ever learn. Iran, like all other nations, has to non violently change. It has to start with peace, so that it never turns into violence. And even if it did, the people who turned it to violence will be mistrusted.

The people of Iran will go on General Strike, and no one can taint it, be they the liberals that defend the Seyyeds, by stating on their behalf that the US is behind the strikers. Fact is that the US wants the Seyyeds to be enemy number one, and to keep the people of Iran under pressure, and more importantly under developed.

What would the US, EU and Far Eastern companies do with new competition from new products from a new modern Iran? It has the best location, the best mineral resources, and a young population that can build it, and bring it to the glory of ancient Iran that it had, before the Seyyed ancestors ever came around again in 13th Century AD.

Iranians have already wiped out the Seyyeds from their minds. The rest is just a matter of time, and the Nowrooz Spirit will keep the peace as we all march on.

General Strike spreads in Iran's Kurdistan province

In Persian at the above link.

C'mon Iran. Time to switch off the country.

Seyyeds need US Democrats against Real Iranians

Ask any Iranian, "why did the mullahs manage to kick out the Shah?,' and they will give you one word, 'Carter'. Below is a link, to a very right wing summary, of the current state of affairs surrounding Iran.

For many years, the US right wing supported Iran, as a bastion against the Soviet Union. But once the US left wing got elected, the world changed big time. Even when the Seyyeds went mad, the exodus of Iranians pleased the world no end. USA and Canada, got millions of top notch Iranians and their wealth. Proxy trading with Seyyeds became widespread.

So do you wonder why things are not changing in present day Iran? Well most of our top notch people are not in Iran, and are doing business outside. But do you ever wonder what really keeps fueling the Seyyeds paranoia? It is the US right wing, and UN sanctions. This paranoia will force Iran into a pariah state.

So the argument goes, that if the US left wing got elected in 2008, kissed and hugged the Seyyeds, then the clandestine nuclear activities would end, and the 12th Imam would have to wait a bit longer. Ah, but wait a minute, the 12th Imam's return, is non negotiable to the Seyyeds. So it is false to think, that either the left or the right wing, could stop the Seyyeds' minds. The Seyyeds are siphoning the oil fund of the secular Iranians, and there is nothing any outside force can do about it.

But the secular Iranians can remove the Seyyeds, and stop it from becoming the North Korea of Middle East. Like so many articles written on Iran, the author refuses to think that we Iranians, like the Indians, are able to remove the Seyyeds, non violently and moreover nationalistically. Iranians are not Seyyeds. Seyyeds believe they are descended from Halabi Qureshi (aka Mohammad), whilst we Iranians are descended from Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great.

There is of course a massive difference, between the attitude of various Iranians and non Iranians; that celebrates Nowrooz everyday; that celebrates it once a year; that does not know what it is; and finally the Seyyed sort, who has blatantly resisted the Nowrooz philosophy for 1400 years. Again many who write on Iran, refuse to look at the Iranian Spirit that is embodied in Nowrooz. They then cannot see the peaceful life loving Spirit that is part and parcel of 7000 years of Iranian culture. More and more Iranians are celebrating Nowrooz everyday, and of course all Iranians celebrate Nowrooz once a year.

Every Iranian is opposing the Seyyeds right now in Iran. They do not need the US. The last thing they want is for some US politician to use Iran as a scapegoat to get votes. But the Seyyeds would love an American as a sparring partner. Iranians need the world press to acknowledge the difference between them and the Seyyeds. The peaceful non violent intellectual movement in Iran, is the only way to prove the illegitimacy of the Seyyeds. So the non violent resistance of Iran has to convince world press of the success of the true secular Iranian.

The people of Iran are winning the fight against the alien attitudes towards Iran. The US politicians now have millions of Iranians there to correct them. Internally the people of Iran are winning with their apathy towards the Seyyed rule. It has annoyed them so much that they have had to clamp down on petty things as men's haircuts.

The Seyyeds have a limited number of thugs that can go around taking down satellite dishes, and forcing the youth to admit guilt. The Seyyeds cannot stop the train of thought along the lines of Free Will in 65 million Iranians. The only reason Iran has not changed, is because the people are not openly stating in public, that the Seyyeds will get destroyed if there is a General Strike. But the Iranian Blogsphere is very active.

But we need a more practical solution. We need the bakers in Iran to say,'What if we did not bake bread for you Seyyed?'. We need the oil workers to say, 'What if we stopped the flow of oil?' Once every major industry in Iran, talked about not providing for the Seyyeds, then the real power centres of Iran will be seen. A consensus needs to be reached, to show how much stronger real secular Iranians are against the guns of the Seyyeds.

The soldiers of the Seyyeds, need Iranian energy and food to survive. So all we need to do, is to deprive the Seyyeds of that. But it needs to be put across non violently, because at the end of the day, we all have to live with each other, without Seyyeds' guns.

http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55625

More Kidnapping vs Soft Power

So that's it, take a breather this week-end folks, as we sit with our barbecues, rejoicing the end of one hostage drama. But little do we know, that the Seyyeds are famous for one thing, if nothing else. They retained power against the US with their hostage crisis, and now are on the verge to more of it.

But the world knows better this time. The yellow bellied drug runners, arms for oil traders, and the like, are no longer going to get away with it. Why? Well, Mr Steyn is of the belief, that "soft power" is going to persuade. An immense campaign, to surround and strangle the Seyyeds, is under way. And the first good results of it was shown just recently, with the release of the 15 sailors.

Yup, the Seyyeds can no longer get way with nicking people willy nilly. It was always really amusing for me, to see how little Arafat and Co, managed to get up Goliaths' like US's noses, and to really distract him so much, as to completely throw him off balance. But they did just that. And so with that success, like Arafat's boys who hijacked planes in the 70's, the Seyyeds prey at chic well dressed UK marines, get all the mums and dad glued to SKY TV (who loves that), and the whole pathetic drama manages to mesmerize the public. No nuclear power with all that strength can get in the way.

And that's how Big Brother (TV), international politics and war get all connected beautifully. Selling news is big business, and crackpots like Seyyeds and all their sound bites, are great fodder for the press, oil prices, the flotilla off the Persian Gulf. So what of it? Even if my imagination is running wild with all those dots, you all know that the wall of ammunition that is pointing up the Seyyeds' noses, is enough to scare them big time.

Expect more hostage taking. In my other site I figured out that it will be around the late week of April. So we should see some more people being involved with the IRGC, or someone pretending to be IRGC. They will more than likely be holding the Seyyeds as well as the new hostages for ransom. It will be a new crowd, who will surprise the existing Seyyeds' as they all jockey for power. Expect that to happen just when the oil price really starts to dive. That is just about the time when it all happens. And then bingo the chain reactions begin.

This time more US and UK and many other countries will be in the Persian Gulf. The Straits of Hormuz will have to have traffic lights to coordinate the flow above and below the sea level. Either way, some prat will probably throw a cocktail over the side of a US or UK navy vessel, and hey we will be all into a lovely mess. Watch the oil price go up and up. Will the TV commentators see through all this? Why should they? They have to whip up anxiety. Keep people glued to the TV man, and watch those ads eh.

But it will now be the end of the Seyyeds were are told. The grand plan is to play their game, and win. So the UK and US will nick the Seyyeds in Iraq, and will force their hand to take western hostages. And with madmen in Qom giving their blessing to anything as they face Mecca, expect more and more Chlorine trucks, and more Seyyed IRGC arrests in Iraq. So both the allies in Iraq and the freaks in Qom will increase the stakes in this useless game of bluff.

We are told that "soft power" will win. The mere fact that the Seyyeds will face a Tsunami of munitions, will force them not to dare. But Seyyeds are driven by their own illusion of power. They think that their religion will win. All that will allow more poor helpless Iranians to volunteer and convert to Seyyed brainwashing. Wouldn't it be easier if the Allies concentrated more on working with the non violent forces already winning in Iran? Look at the way we all ignored the Seyyeds in Iran during the Spring New Year festivities we have been celebrating for 7000 years. Not one Iranian cared for the Western or Seyyed TV.

Western TV's will not focus on this aspect of Iranian culture. They will not show how 60 million Iranians celebrated Nowrooz and Sizdehbedar. They will not see the beautiful Life loving Iranians. Why? It does not effect oil prices, and if allowed to prosper, it will allow the foundation of a new modern industrial state on par with those in East Asia, which will surpass anything they ever did because of both geography,demography and natural resources.

Anti Neocons using Iran as a scapegoat

There are people in the world that do not want to give one iota of credit to Iran's own resistance movement. They will then go so far as to declare war against the Seyyeds, as if there are no intelligent Iranians.

Former UN weapons inspector, turned peace activist, Scott Ritter isn’t swallowing Gates’ assurances either. Here’s what he said on the subject during a recent lecture: “Ladies and gentlemen, we’re going to war with Iran. It’s going to happen. There’s nothing we can do to stop it.”

So I wrote to the author of that article. Below is a copy of that letter:

I was just reading your article about your car and the wagon when you compared Iran to US.

What you failed to realise is that the only way stop the Seyyed Empire is for the world to accept the Non Violent Resistance (NVR) movement in Iran.

The people of Iran openly declared a non violent war against the Seyyeds and are winning. The problem is that the media in the world that is against the neocons will use any country that is anti US as fodder against the neocons.

So these anti US commentators are not that much for secular Iranians as they are against neocons. If they really cared for the real Iranians who see themselves as sons of Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great, then they would ask them how they would like to remove the alien Seyyeds.

NVR is not interested in physical confrontation, and its principles are not too different from other NVR movements in human history. NVR movements created regime changes that lasted, because it was based on winning the peace first without war.

But don't you dare think that we are that passive. NVR will provoke the Seyyeds with questions that they will fail to answer. Questions that will show their weak foundations amongst all the Iranians whose labour provides the fuel for your car and that wagon.

The people of Iran do not need the United States of America

Some people think that the people of Iran, or the society of Iran is weak against the Seyyeds. So they state:

Paradoxically, to liberalize the theocratic state, the United States would do better to shelve its containment strategy and embark on a policy of unconditional dialogue and sanctions relief. A reduced American threat would deprive the hard-liners of the conflict they need to justify their concentration of power. In the meantime, as Iran became assimilated into the global economy, the regime's influence would inevitably yield to the private sector, with its demands for accountability and reform.

It is important to appreciate that Iran has a political system without precedent or parallel in modern history. The struggle there is not just between reactionaries and reformers, conservatives and liberals, but fundamentally between the state and society. A subtle means of diminishing the state and empowering the society is, in the end, the best manner of promoting not only democracy but also nuclear disarmament.

Where have these astute people been? Don't they realise that the young people of Iran have built a new internet network that has bypassed the Seyyed rulers. We do not need United States. It is non violent, and is a lot more subtle.

Iranian students disrupt Pres. Ahmadinejad's speech, burning his picture

I am just a bit curious. Could this be a set up? I mean, these guys could just be actors. Usually this sort of action never gets going, and the protesters are arrested. Could this be the Islamist Fascists' fake way of showing tolerance? I hate to say this, but only if they are arrested will it be regarded as genuine.

Now if these students, do not meet any angry Islamist Fascists, then the movement will grow. But the Islamist Fascists have 6 million chomagdars; all very eager to bash secular Iranians on the head. I do not want to see people get hurt. Bravery is not required.

Withstanding the Islamists' hate, and rising above it, is important. The Islamist Fascists are driven by anger and hate, and they do not tolerate. So the best way to fight them, is to do as I said. Talk about the failure of the Islamist Fascists, to answer a total National Strike, in what I call a Non Violent National Strike (NVNS).

Once the people talk about NVNS, and the whole country speaks this Good Thought, then we get to Good Words. Once Good Words dominate, then Good Deeds will paralyse them, without one drop of blood on the sacred soil of Iran.

We need to talk and teach the whole of Iran to believe in NVNS.

Incentives apply to human beings not Islamist Fascists in Iran

It is quite remarkable to see a Nobel Prize winner, ElBaradei, apply secular logic to Islamist Fascists in Iran. He states:

"The same applies to the situation in Iran," he said. "You can use sanctions but sanctions alone as we know by experience will not resolve issues. You need to use incentives and disincentives."

The folks who live in Qom and face Mecca, pay no attention to anyone else. As such, the people of Iran are solely responsible for their disposal; in a clean peaceful non violent manner; leaving no excuse for retaliation against future generations of Iranians. Once a higher global body, such as the UN, officially recognises the struggle of the secular Iranians, against Islamist angry attitude to the world, then the IAEA will realise not to take the Islamist Fascists in Iran seriously.

It would be nice of course if Mr ElBaradei did this attitude now, but he has a bone of contention with the all nuclear powers; and wants to use the Islamists in Iran's nuclear ambitions, as a threatening tool against the old nuclear powers. But why should the people of Iran suffer, and become guinea pigs for a much larger world problem. Mr ElBaradei must realise, that to give so much respect to Islamist Fascists in Iran, makes them feel as if they have legitimate rule in Iran.

Mr ElBaradei, the people of Iran will take note of your appeasement attitude towards the Islamist Fascists, as and when the Islamist Fascists of Iran, and brought against the a new Iranian court, just like Saddam Hossein is being tried in Iraq today by his own people. The people of Iran are the sons of Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great. We are the founders of Human Rights, and know very well how aggression cannot be overcome with more aggression.

Mr ElBaradei, you have been given the authority to judge the Islamist Fascists in Iran, and you attract a lot of attention and revel in it. You enjoy dragging the issue as long as you can, because when diplomacy ends war begins. But you are not helping the Iranian people, by discussing these issue solely with the Islamist Fascists in Iran. There are plenty of Iranians, both in Iran and outside Iran, who are better qualified to discuss, and represent the feeling of Iranian people all over the world.

We Iranians in opposition are more capable, and more intelligent than the Islamist Fascists in Iran. We therefore ask you in the name of Peace, not to deal with the Islamist Fascists seriously. When you speak to the Islamist Fascists in Iran, tell them that you know that the people of Iran, do not want Iran to be put in harms way. Cite example of other countries that threatened world peace and how world wars began.

You are an important person, and must represent the secular views of all Human Beings, especially those that live in Iran. Please do the right thing, and speak to the Islamist Fascists in Iran, as if you were a secular peace loving Iranian, and did not want the oil money to be used to make dangerous weapons of mass destruction.

Iranians must ignore US elections

With most of the vote in, it seems that with the conservative Democrats taking charge of the House, ironically GWB will actually have agreement in certain areas like Immigration. The only real challenge to GWB will be San Fransiconian politics of Liberal Democrat Nancy Pelosi. Iranians will need her help to fight for women's rights in Iran. As the most Liberal Democrat she will have to keep the sanity of United States in the challenging times ahead. Go Nancy hit GWB hard! But alas, and ironically she has the most conservative bunch of Democrats she has had to deal with.

So Centre Politics is King, and the moderates are now in charge. Extremism is off the table, unless it is provoked by some incident like 9/11. And we don't really know what the oil companies and the military machine will cook up for the US. You all know the conspiracy theories; from US sinking their own ships to whateva, blaming it on Islamists etc etc, because the Islamists could not do it anyway. But with the US military machine facing cut backs and some Democrats talking about impeaching GWB, these theories can become reality.

And so I say, we Iranians have to ignore the Americans. We are a nation of our own, and we need to not get caught up, in the what if's. Remember how Iranians got suckered by the Republicans, thinking that they would have the US engage the Islamists very soon. And what happened? Nothing. Every day Iranians outside Iran get up and wish, "oh let's hope that the Russians or Chinese side with the EU and US, and everyone bashes the mad mullah in the head, and kicks them out." This is the classical posh Iranians' living abroad mentality. And because of that, the antithesis it produces, is the no frills Islamist Iranians in Iran, who fell for Ahmadinejad. So at one extreme you have the modern Iranians like the Crown Prince, and at the other end Mesbah Yazdi. But they both react to US politics. None try to motivate the silent majority of Iranians. And the key word is motivate. The Crown Prince has a duty to run the Royal Institution, but he is not doing anything in a focused practical way. The Iranian Opposition has not come together in a coordinated way as I have stated.

What have I stated? And is it new? Nothing is new in this game. Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great said it thousands and thousands of years ago. And do any of the so called "Leaders of Iran" say anything along the line of non violent regime change everyday? Not one of them does. How many articles have we Iranians written about non violent regime change? I have, but who else? Shame on all editors and all the Iranian Bloggers and anyone who is interested in the future of Iran if they do not talk about peaceful regime change. More people are interested in how Iran does in global politics, than taking direct action towards non violent regime change by themselves.

So I say to the people of Iran, especially those rich Iranians in sunny California. For the sake of Iran think about what I have said. Talk to all your relatives and friends about non violent regime change. Forget about what US politics is. We Iranians must handle our own affairs ourselves in our own civilized way. Take your first action. Argue about the how we are going to change Iran so that our children can live with the Islamists' children. Yes as Gandhi and all passive movement people have said, we have to win the peace. So start with a discussion about peace. Engage a conversation about how weak the Islamists are if the people of Iran go on a General Strike.

If you are an editor of an Iranian newspaper, I hope you really not sleep tonight if you do not think about how many people have not learnt from you, the benefits of General Strike and non violent regime change. The people of Iran must write as many articles about national peace for Iran. Iranian Love is stronger than Islam. Our culture is deeper than any other principle, and we can use it to show how civilized we really are. We have our own poets and philosophers, that bind us in our Iranian way. It is with these ideas that we can bind the people and show that we can resist working for the alien Islamist slave drivers, and be able to not feel guilty when we remove them in a civilized way without any harm to them.

Iranian apathy defeats the Islamist Fascists bogus elections

Ever since Khomeini was flown in from Paris, the Iranians have been mesmerised. But ever since Khomeini has died, the cover has been well and truly blown, and the people are seeing the guns that defend Islam. It is then no surprise to see the people heed the call to non violent regime change that I have been proposing. It is necessary for the Oppposition not to have any blood on its hand. Just like Gandhi used the same principles to get the aliens out of India, so the Iranian will do the same.

It is then with great pleasure to read:

Iranian election officials are battling to arouse the interest of candidates and voters in the country's December 15 municipal polls, state-run television reported yesterday.

Iranians do not need a leader like Gandhi. Each and every Iranian is well versed in what needs to be done. If you are an Iranian and you want to show that you care for a peaceful Iranian regime change, that is not manipulated by any alien, be it Islamic, Western or Eastern, then ignore these bogus elections.