The Persepective on Iraq

"They intend to target officials in the country and in Nasiriyah," he said adding that local authorities had put in place tight security measures, including banning the use of motorcycles.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gniKQVmkFo5eDYBptR0w_MqMX2IQ

For how long have the Seyyeds been infiltrating into Iraq? First of all we had the Brits let them in, when they were supposedly guarding the southern part of Iraq, commonly known as the Basra region. But no one was screaming and shouting about this more than the Iranian exiles. We warned the world of this, and we were, and are told, that we are neocons. How can we have anything in common with them? So they are starting to learn on their own. All Iranians have learnt that they have to see from the perspective of Iran First. No political ideology, religious ideology, has brought the Iranians together. Only the love of Iranian cultural heritage, that is at the heart of what it means to be Iranian First, can be the correct perspective. I call it The Persepective.

So what is The Persepective on Iraq. The answer is rooted in Babylonian perspective of Iraq. Iraq shares ancient common history with ancient Iran. Peace came to the area when the people on both side of the Zagros referred to their ancient roots and not the divisions caused by religions. But there are those that want to exploit the religious sides. We have no media power. No one reads these ideas.

Seyyed Empire in Iraq and Iran vs USA

A week ago we have Sistani rejecting the US and Iraqi government draft, and just now Khamenei has rejected it.  So the modern Shiites like Al-Maliki have do not have anyone's "Blessings" really.

Religion in Iraq is beginning to interfere big time in the politics, and the neck-tie wearers in Iraq, are just as dispised by the Seyyed there, as the Seyyeds are in Iran.  Basically the Seyyed Empire is trying to do a coup, just like they did in Iran, in Iraq.

These Imperialists, are no different from any other authoritarian non-cultural dogma.  It does not matter whether it is a religious, or political utopia, when the intrinsic culture of the country is secondary to politics or religion.

Imposition of any sort is wrong, and these relgious warriors are doing just that.  They put Iran and Iraq second to their Koranic belief.  Ancient Babylon, and Iran are not what they respect.  But does the world press put it this way?  No.  They will look at it purely from pro-US and anti-US perspective.

Iran's Seyyeds captured Iraq, Palestine, and Lebanon

The Arab Passivity allowed Iran to capture Iraq, Palestine, and Lebanon through Mahdi Army and Al Maleki, Hamas and Hezbollah. This is the beginning.

Good Neighbours?

The Seyyeds in Iran have a religious agenda, that is dictated from the likes of Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, and not the Foreign Ministry. Ahmadinejad believes he is guided by some mystical force to establish the Caliphate state, and to ultimately reclaim Jerusalem for the return of the Shiite Mahdi. Iraq is the centre of the Shiite world and their holiest shrines are there. So to them everyone who is not Shiite is alien in that country. In that perspective "brotherly" comments from Ahmadinejad mean more than meets the eye. The US weakened the Sunnis who were the only force that stood up to the Shiites in Iraq. The US never managed to get any Shiite support in Iraq. So the US actually helped the Seyyeds' cause, even though their biggest foe are the Seyyeds in Iran. In conclusion the Seyyeds have enabled the neocons to rise to power, and vice-versa. They both need each other in this post Soviet era to keep energy prices up with pseudo threats to each other.

read more | digg story

Iran's Seyyeds and the right to invade Iraq

"US forces will be targeted if they stay," Larijani has also told the press

Asia Times Online :: Middle East News - US and Europe drain Iran's half-full glass

This Seyyed, and the writer of the article, are talking through their Turban and hat respectively.  There is a proxy war going on in Iraq.  The Seyyeds are using Iran's wealth, to build a bomb and get back the old caliphate with its capital in Baghdad.  I bet you that in the Seyyeds' mind, he wants to build a new state stretching from Islamabad to Baghdad and to the Levant with Baghdad at it centre.

Trouble with that idea is that Ur in Iraq (which is why Iraq is called what it is in the first place) is where Abraham was born.  That brings in the two other religious fanatics from the Jewish and Christian side.  So Iraq does mean more than just oil to the US, with its Evangelists.

As far as Iranians are concerned, all three "religious" reasons, are just that, "religious".  The capital of Iran was called in the time of the Sassanians Cteisphon (and we Iranians pronounce it Teezfoon).  The Sassanians had plenty of tolerance and all the younger faiths than Iranian philosophy could live.  In fact in the light of Zoroastrian tolerance, other faith were encouraged.

Ironically the younger faith did not reciprocate did they, and apostates like Salman Parsi were encouraged to burn all of Iran's books.  So the younger faiths have lost their right to anything.  They broke the peace, and that is why they are where they are.  You cannot ignore history.