The Generals that sold Iran to the Ayatollahs

I have reprinted an extract from a book that is free on Google, that tells you of the exact events that led to the loss of Iran to the Moslems.  The Generals effectively took charge at around 10 am on Februrary 11 1979.  It was coordinated by a man called Fardust, because he stopped the loyalty to The Crown.

Fardust was the Shah's closest man, and he let Iran down.  Nowadays his friend is a man called AA Dareini and he works for AP.  For years I have been seeing his articles all over the world, as an AP correspondent.  Did he write fairly on Iran?  Did he write about how Iranians resisted the Islamification of Iran with the Nowruz Pagan culture and won.  Our ancient farm festivals in praise of nature and life have given Iranians the will to live and resist the death worship of Islam.

As you all know, I go to sites and take on anyone, but this guy Dareini was always hidding.  The other day I found his page in Newsvine, and I put the above questions there.  Recently I followed another link to his page and found I could not log in. Wow, my first ever.  Never has anyone blocked my non-violent approach, and that includes the pro-regime sites and forums.  So it goes to show where the problem is.  The problem is media, and it is a problem because people do not know how much influence these writers have.  People think they know everything, but they don't.

Oh it sickens me how educated Iranians, did not dwell into more philosophical, more Earthly, how does one say, more natural way of approaching life.  Iranians at the time of the Shah, were either the structured modern sort, you know Scientists, Doctors, Military people, or they were more common sense traders.  All of them blindly accepted Islam, because it did not interfere.  This is what caught us all by surprise.  But if we had respected our own pagan philosophy written in The Zend Avesta and followed Astrology then we would not be tempted by violence.

I am pleased to say that we are now finally beginning to see the non-violent approach and we are getting there.  Many of those born with Saturn in Libra are finally old enough to be involved in the new Iran.


The rise and fall of the Pahlavi ... - Google Books

Why Iranians Jump over Fire - Chaharshanbehsoori

The real reasoning behind this act of jumping through fire, is related to Astrology of the Twelfth House. The Twelfth House is related to the non-self, humility and selflessness of a person. The activities relate to facing all issues that are pending for a person so that the person may be able to start the new year properly. The last five days are called Hamspatmediamgah or as Parsi call it Hamaspathmaedaya.

Iran civil rights movement

Saw this site and put out all this there (don't know why, it just happened):

I do not agree with a lot that has been said. The Iranians, like myself began as conscientious objectors to this illegal regime from 12th Feb 1979.

I had relatives employed in the oil and petrochemicals, and they, like me, objected to the new directives being sent out by the mullahs.

Every place, every important meeting had an IRGC or mullah sniffing around. But the non-violent movement in Iran was born to stop them from the progress of Iran. Iranians defeated their wishes from the 12th February 1979.

But the problem was that the world refused to note the mullahs being defeated. The world focused on the warmongering of Khomeini and let the war with Iraq start. That killed Iranians. It was then very difficult to stop that. But we managed at the end. But a lot of Iranians became Basij and that sustained the mullahs.

Oh they managed to change the flag, the anthem, and many names. They even wanted to bulldoze Persepolis. But the ancient ruins remain, and more have been found as new roads had to be built. The people of Iran do not use Islamic names to name their children anymore. The backlash has been a blessing in disguise. A new Iran has been born in stealth out of this tragedy.

Clinton, Gibbs on Iran Nukes -- Out of the Mouths of Babes

@Caru



There is a level of doubt that has risen purely from the foreign policy of the mullahs, and their sense of world order. In the time of the Shah, the US did not mind even if Iran had the bomb. So it is the type of people that are running the country that matters. We have a lot of intelligent people in Iran and outside, who can represent Iran, and do not have wacko 7th Century ideas.



The question you need to be asking is, why did a modern state in 1979 get derailed by Carter. What was he worried about when he said Iran is an Island of Stability. Obviously that is exactly what he did not want. Just think what Iran would be now. Quo Bene?



It is very simple.
About Nuclear Weapons
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Poll on Freedom of Speech in Iran

The same WPO poll asked respondents to assess actual freedom of speech in Iran: “In Iran, how free do you think people are to express controversial political views, without fear of being harassed or punished?” Only 27% of Iranians said they were completely free in this regard, but another 44% said they were somewhat free; 23% said they were “not very free” (12%) or “not at all free” (11%).

IranElection_Feb10_rpt.pdf (application/pdf Object)

The interesting part of this whole report is that it makes Ahmadinejad look popular, whilst it knows too well that the people in Iran cannot answer any questions, just in case they get killed by the mullahs.

David Frum is quite right on Iran's mullahs

They are all falling apart and they know that the people are not with them. This is all show.

in reference to:

"The Iranian nuclear program is not going very well. Lacking an actual completed weapon, the Iranian mullahs may seek to gain some of the political benefits of weaponizing by boasting and bragging. Watch out for us! We’re coming! Any minute now! Getting closer!"
- David Frum: Don't start bombing Iran just yet - Full Comment (view on Google Sidewiki)

A message for Japan Today on Iran

I thought it necessary to enlighten the Japanese of who the real opposition are, and what our purpose is. Clashing is not the non-violent way. One day maybe they will see how the Iranians have resisted in every area of culture and industry against the mullahs and have won.

in reference to:

"The non-violent movement of Iran does not approve of clashes. We have stopped the mullahs to wipe out Iran successfully since 12th Feb 1979. They changed the name of Iran and our flag, but have failed in most other area. Our strategy like any other non-violent movement has been to create a massive unity of peace."
- Clashes erupt in Iran on 31st anniversary of revolution › Japan Today: Japan News and Discussion (view on Google Sidewiki)

Boston Herald needed updating on Iran

It is so sad that the world press just does not understand how long the non-violent movement has been fighting the mullahs in Iran.

in reference to:

"Iranians have been non-violently protesting, fighting, and winning against the mullah ever since 12th Feb 1979. It is just that the western press refuses to accept how we have stopped the mullahs from completely wiping out our Iranian culture. They have changed the flag, our national anthem. But go inside every Iranians' home and you will see that they put Iranian culture above anything else, especially Islam."
- The two Irans collide - BostonHerald.com (view on Google Sidewiki)

Iran's nukes: Calling the mullah's bluff once again.

It was obvious from the start. Now they admit that they are a bunch of clowns.

in reference to:

"The foreign ministry shunned the US offer as “not logical,” after US State Department spokesman Philip Crowley floated the idea on Tuesday when Iran said it had begun enriching uranium to 20% for a Tehran research reactor.“Shutting down the reactor or stopping the production of medicine is not the solution,” said foreign ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast. “This proposal is not logical.”"
- Gulf Times – Qatar’s top-selling English daily newspaper - Gulf/Arab World (view on Google Sidewiki)

Obama is trying to teach the mullah of Iran

Is Obama naive or what? How can he teach the mullahs anything, especially about isolation.

in reference to:

""What we are going to be working on over the next several weeks is developing a significant regime of sanctions that will indicate to them how isolated they are from the international community as a whole," Obama said."
- U.S. ready to offer Iran alternative to nuclear plan - CNN.com (view on Google Sidewiki)