Why the U.S. (Probably) Won't attack Iran

Tom Engelhardt, talks as if the Iranians are a bunch of zombies, who cannot take care of the Seyyeds themselves, and like the Iraqis need the US to interfere.

read more | digg story

On Iran: Obama's "direct diplomacy" is a bad excuse

What is it that direct diplomacy would do? The Seyyed would tell him that he is an apostate.How much clearer can the UN get after all these years?

read more | digg story

War for Iran's Oil - an illusion.

The problem is purely based on speculative trading on the oil contracts. In fact if there was a war, the price would crash, as the Seyyeds would be defeated, and the Straits of Hormuz would be safe. False fear pricing is a lot worse, than the actual reality.

read more | digg story

A look at state exports to Iran's terrorist regime

Simple question. Why?Or to put it elaborately, why does the US not stop this, before attacking Iran?

read more | digg story

Putin didn't talk about enrichment with Iran's madman

The madman Ahmadinejad sits in front of Putin, and gets no grief. Why does the US do business with Russians?

read more | digg story

Seyyeds of Iran love Obama

Asked specifically about Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama, Mottaki declined to comment, saying Obama had run into trouble in the past for expressing a willingness to negotiate with Iran."So by commenting on this we do not want to create further problems for the U.S. presidential candidates," Mottaki said

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080706/wl_nm/iran_mottaki_dc

The foreign ministry of the Seyyed Empire is the more reformed part. They lost power a long time ago. They would love to negotiate, and not put Iranians in harms way.

The foreign ministry buys time for the Seyyed cause. Their cause or ideology, is what drives them to be over and above all other human causes. That is why they are interested in siphoning the secular Iranians oil fund to build nukes.

Of all the international violations, the world has picked on the nukes issue. Why you may ask? It is because it helps Peak Oil advocates.

BBC chooses to report stark choices for Iran

Later, he appeared to clarify his position, when he told Iranian state television: "In my interview, I talked about accepting negotiations, and not accepting the proposed package. I said to accept negotiations based on Iran's usual policies."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7489430.stm

Two things come to mind right away from that comment in that article. First of all, what is BBC doing condoning, so naively, people who care more for their Seated Empire, than Iran? Secondly, the article is written in such a definitive fatalistic tone.

We are told, "That's it. There are no other options, and it is a stark choice". Total rubbish I say. It really shows how "stark" the BBC is. Lucid Wittiest said, "uttering a word is like striking a note on the keyboard of imagination." And there is no imagination in that article.

The most appropriate word I say is "strike". We Iranians, like any nation, have ignored the Seated rituals, no matter how much the US and Israelis, have given them an excuse; to put the fear of their views of "God" in the Norris believers of Iran. Our imagination says that we can all go on a General Strike, and do not need air strikes, to get Iran back. It would really be nice if the BBC had the same imagination.

All the years that the BBC has involved with Iran, it is a shame, or a sham, that they just do not express the Norris culture of Iran, which has for so long fostered civilisation for mankind. It is morally superior to any religion, being based on Free Will and imagination of a person's own right to live. It is in fact a threat to the existing Abrasive dogmatic religions.

If Carter was around, he would point to the likes of Carter; and how he allowed dogma, to poison and mesmerism Iranians, to change the flag and name of Iran. The democratic process was abused, to try to uproot all the essential elements of Iranian nation hood in the name of dogma.

People now know better, and enemas abstained in that process, and the result is that, the silent majority know that the Seated Selection process should be used to dis till them from the Iranian nation hood.

We Iranians stand united on own carpets. Each carpet is uniquely different and second to nothing else in the world. The Spirit that is woven through all Iranians, is so deep, strong, and distinct; that it has shone brilliantly in all the palaces of the world, from the beginning of culture itself, reminding all what it means to be Persian.

So there is so much of Iranian culture, that is flowering and blossoming in front of those "stark" choices BBC loves to emphasise. The BBC chooses to turn a blind eye to all what is Iran now, just like they did in 1978, when there was no internet, and it was pretty much only radio station we all listened to. They relayed the communists' orders, as and when people should go on strike. But will they relay what the Iranian opposition says? No.

The BBC led the revolution against Iranian nation hood, and brought dogma under the guise of democracy. That is why so many Iranians are now correspondents in their Blogs. The world is flabbergasted, to see the avalanche of Persian Blogs second only to English. And the BBC ignores them. Thank goodness that Iranians that put Iran first, are there, and we are in control of our own destiny.

Iran should use thorium for its nuclear power.

Thorium is an alternative to Uranium in nuclear reactors, albeit with notable differences. You can't make weapons with it.

read more | digg story

Who is in charge in Iraq?

You can't have the US and Seyyeds together in one place.

read more | digg story

Seyyeds destroy Iran's economy

Do they care? No, but this time they are going to sink with it.

read more | digg story