BBC chooses to report stark choices for Iran

Later, he appeared to clarify his position, when he told Iranian state television: "In my interview, I talked about accepting negotiations, and not accepting the proposed package. I said to accept negotiations based on Iran's usual policies."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/7489430.stm

Two things come to mind right away from that comment in that article. First of all, what is BBC doing condoning, so naively, people who care more for their Seated Empire, than Iran? Secondly, the article is written in such a definitive fatalistic tone.

We are told, "That's it. There are no other options, and it is a stark choice". Total rubbish I say. It really shows how "stark" the BBC is. Lucid Wittiest said, "uttering a word is like striking a note on the keyboard of imagination." And there is no imagination in that article.

The most appropriate word I say is "strike". We Iranians, like any nation, have ignored the Seated rituals, no matter how much the US and Israelis, have given them an excuse; to put the fear of their views of "God" in the Norris believers of Iran. Our imagination says that we can all go on a General Strike, and do not need air strikes, to get Iran back. It would really be nice if the BBC had the same imagination.

All the years that the BBC has involved with Iran, it is a shame, or a sham, that they just do not express the Norris culture of Iran, which has for so long fostered civilisation for mankind. It is morally superior to any religion, being based on Free Will and imagination of a person's own right to live. It is in fact a threat to the existing Abrasive dogmatic religions.

If Carter was around, he would point to the likes of Carter; and how he allowed dogma, to poison and mesmerism Iranians, to change the flag and name of Iran. The democratic process was abused, to try to uproot all the essential elements of Iranian nation hood in the name of dogma.

People now know better, and enemas abstained in that process, and the result is that, the silent majority know that the Seated Selection process should be used to dis till them from the Iranian nation hood.

We Iranians stand united on own carpets. Each carpet is uniquely different and second to nothing else in the world. The Spirit that is woven through all Iranians, is so deep, strong, and distinct; that it has shone brilliantly in all the palaces of the world, from the beginning of culture itself, reminding all what it means to be Persian.

So there is so much of Iranian culture, that is flowering and blossoming in front of those "stark" choices BBC loves to emphasise. The BBC chooses to turn a blind eye to all what is Iran now, just like they did in 1978, when there was no internet, and it was pretty much only radio station we all listened to. They relayed the communists' orders, as and when people should go on strike. But will they relay what the Iranian opposition says? No.

The BBC led the revolution against Iranian nation hood, and brought dogma under the guise of democracy. That is why so many Iranians are now correspondents in their Blogs. The world is flabbergasted, to see the avalanche of Persian Blogs second only to English. And the BBC ignores them. Thank goodness that Iranians that put Iran first, are there, and we are in control of our own destiny.

Iran should use thorium for its nuclear power.

Thorium is an alternative to Uranium in nuclear reactors, albeit with notable differences. You can't make weapons with it.

read more | digg story

Who is in charge in Iraq?

You can't have the US and Seyyeds together in one place.

read more | digg story

Seyyeds destroy Iran's economy

Do they care? No, but this time they are going to sink with it.

read more | digg story

Real Iranians want peace.

Seyyeds want Israelis to kill Iranians. World must speak to real Iranians. It is rediculous to think who else would benefit, but Peak Oil advocates, and the economic threat Iranians pose. Bring back real Iranians, and a lot of money will go to Iran from US and Dubai. You will see the equivalents to Sony and GE in Iran. Iranians are smart and hard working. Connect the dots. The potential for West Asia is enormous.

read more | digg story

US gives 'major' boost to covert ops in Iran - who are they kidding?

Although such covert activities in Iran are not new on the part of the United States, the magazine said the "scale and the scope of the operations in Iran, which involve the Central Intelligence Agency and the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), have now been significantly expanded.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iViYLxNjCmWra6oWDVoLzoJ7-CJQ

Oh for crying out loud, are people such suckers, to believe that, the "US" is carrying out "covert operations" on their own Seyyed buddies. There are so many agencies in the US; all competing for money, and bickering amongst themselves, that you wonder, where the real battles are. If the US could be more centralised, then yeah ok, maybe "a" policy would apply. All that can be said is those US, Chinese, Russian, and EU groups, that are benefiting from this Seyyed Empire are winning big time. They have the oil, wmds, and the media.

Obviously there is a really easy way to get rid of the Seyyeds. The Seyyeds are not the problem. The problem is the people's network in Iran. There isn't one spot people look at. Make one spot and it will kick ass. There are loads of intelligent people, but they and their ideas are clouds. If I had the attention of all Iran, the country would have got rid of the Seyyeds non-violently a long time ago.

(I am not writing much due to my injury)

House targets pension assets tied to Iran's Seyyeds, Sudan.

The measure would give the teachers' pension fund and state government employee pension fund 16 months to sell those holdings.

http://www.examiner.com/a-1456951~House_targets_pension_assets_tied_to_Iran__Sudan.html

I am in hospital at the moment.

Live updates at http://twitter.com/ahuramazda

However, most articles are along the same boring ones, so they appear on the clippings on the right hand column. Thanks to Google Reader, it is just a one click solution to news collecting.

But this article got enough excitement in me, to type all this with my left thumb on this fine piece of kit called the Blackberry Curve.

Anyway, the irony we Iranians face, is that it is the US people themselves who invest indirectly in companies like GE, and Samsung, which invest with the Seyyeds. A choice has to be forced on these companies. In simple terms it is either US or the Seyyeds?

US applauds new EU sanctions against Seyyeds interests in Iran

Washington has been waiting for Europe to take such measures for months, and the matter became a theme of US President George W. Bush's recent European tour.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080623/pl_afp/irannucleareusanctionsus

Hip hip hooray! All this does, is to make the Seyyeds feel important, whilst they are actually seen as aliens in by the real Iranians. Nevertheless it should be done. The Seyyeds dogma and economic mismanagement, has prevented over the years, secular modern Iranians, from doing anything easily. The Seyyeds have used pretty much the ideologies of a socialist military regime, not too different from present day North Korea. Over centralisation, and far too much government interference, has ruined the economy for all but a few who are at the top of the food chain.

As usual I will make my case; that the very best way for a new Iran is for a peaceful regime change. : The UN has to appoint a world body; to select a provisional "Iran First" (IF) body of Iranian who the best in the world in the world and are in exile. They will have more respect than the Seyyed State (SS). The SS cannot do much; if the IF body of people use their greater respect to ask the people to react non-violently to the SS. A dialogue must be attempted with SS, but if it is ignored, then the IF body, which has established its respect from the IF groups and people within Iran, will then ask the Iranian people to go on a general strike. This solution requires people to stay at home. More importantly this non-violent weapon, is the most powerful weapon, as it is based on peace first. There is no need for "win the war and then win the peace".

UN gives theocracy the right to kill

UN's Explotation Of Human Rights

read more | digg story

GE trades with Iran's Seyyeds

And a lot of other US companies. Why can't Bush start there?

read more | digg story