US gives 'major' boost to covert ops in Iran - who are they kidding?

Although such covert activities in Iran are not new on the part of the United States, the magazine said the "scale and the scope of the operations in Iran, which involve the Central Intelligence Agency and the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), have now been significantly expanded.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iViYLxNjCmWra6oWDVoLzoJ7-CJQ

Oh for crying out loud, are people such suckers, to believe that, the "US" is carrying out "covert operations" on their own Seyyed buddies. There are so many agencies in the US; all competing for money, and bickering amongst themselves, that you wonder, where the real battles are. If the US could be more centralised, then yeah ok, maybe "a" policy would apply. All that can be said is those US, Chinese, Russian, and EU groups, that are benefiting from this Seyyed Empire are winning big time. They have the oil, wmds, and the media.

Obviously there is a really easy way to get rid of the Seyyeds. The Seyyeds are not the problem. The problem is the people's network in Iran. There isn't one spot people look at. Make one spot and it will kick ass. There are loads of intelligent people, but they and their ideas are clouds. If I had the attention of all Iran, the country would have got rid of the Seyyeds non-violently a long time ago.

(I am not writing much due to my injury)

House targets pension assets tied to Iran's Seyyeds, Sudan.

The measure would give the teachers' pension fund and state government employee pension fund 16 months to sell those holdings.

http://www.examiner.com/a-1456951~House_targets_pension_assets_tied_to_Iran__Sudan.html

I am in hospital at the moment.

Live updates at http://twitter.com/ahuramazda

However, most articles are along the same boring ones, so they appear on the clippings on the right hand column. Thanks to Google Reader, it is just a one click solution to news collecting.

But this article got enough excitement in me, to type all this with my left thumb on this fine piece of kit called the Blackberry Curve.

Anyway, the irony we Iranians face, is that it is the US people themselves who invest indirectly in companies like GE, and Samsung, which invest with the Seyyeds. A choice has to be forced on these companies. In simple terms it is either US or the Seyyeds?

US applauds new EU sanctions against Seyyeds interests in Iran

Washington has been waiting for Europe to take such measures for months, and the matter became a theme of US President George W. Bush's recent European tour.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080623/pl_afp/irannucleareusanctionsus

Hip hip hooray! All this does, is to make the Seyyeds feel important, whilst they are actually seen as aliens in by the real Iranians. Nevertheless it should be done. The Seyyeds dogma and economic mismanagement, has prevented over the years, secular modern Iranians, from doing anything easily. The Seyyeds have used pretty much the ideologies of a socialist military regime, not too different from present day North Korea. Over centralisation, and far too much government interference, has ruined the economy for all but a few who are at the top of the food chain.

As usual I will make my case; that the very best way for a new Iran is for a peaceful regime change. : The UN has to appoint a world body; to select a provisional "Iran First" (IF) body of Iranian who the best in the world in the world and are in exile. They will have more respect than the Seyyed State (SS). The SS cannot do much; if the IF body of people use their greater respect to ask the people to react non-violently to the SS. A dialogue must be attempted with SS, but if it is ignored, then the IF body, which has established its respect from the IF groups and people within Iran, will then ask the Iranian people to go on a general strike. This solution requires people to stay at home. More importantly this non-violent weapon, is the most powerful weapon, as it is based on peace first. There is no need for "win the war and then win the peace".

UN gives theocracy the right to kill

UN's Explotation Of Human Rights

read more | digg story

GE trades with Iran's Seyyeds

And a lot of other US companies. Why can't Bush start there?

read more | digg story

Misplaced Iran/WMD files found

They were said to include details of how trade and banking systems could be manipulated to finance weapons of mass destruction in Iran.

read more | digg story

Unreported protests in Iran (video)

The people are not religious rent-a-crowds.

read more | digg story

Seyyed Neocon of Iran who would press the button.

His moral order is on a different plane that anybody else.

read more | digg story

"Accept our nuclear package", Iran's Seyyeds tell world powers.

The package also proposes that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) step up its supervision of nuclear sites around the world and asserts that more should be done to ensure nuclear programmes are not diverted to military ends

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5h5Cg2j6fnd0UGB7nJNCva3amFeFw

How hypocritical can you get? These criminals now suddenly want to be accepted as the bastions of morality. It only goes to show, that they have little regard for world institutions, that are there to protect proliferation. They think they represent a new world order. In fact, they just represent an anti-US ideology - nothing more than that. And the US uses them in that regard. This "Goodguy-Badguy" syndrome is what keeps the warmongering necons alive on both sides with all its useless economic and trade ramifications.

Bombing Iran? It's Not So Bad, Really - How stupid.

Would Iranians "rally 'round the flag" if Iran is attacked? Maybe, maybe not, they say. "One cannot assume that a preventive strike against Iran's nuclear infrastructure would necessarily prompt a nationalist backlash.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20080613/cm_thenation/1096329613

The flag of the Seyyeds is not Iranian. Why would any Iranian, rally around that flag. Go inside every home in Iran, and you would see the proper Iranian flag.

A major point, that this paper completely misses, is that within Iran, there is an "us and them" situation. The Seyyeds enticed Saddam to attack Iran, and so obtained some kind of moral support, from Iranians, who felt that the enemy within, is not as bad as the enemy on the border. What should have happened then of course, was that if Iranians then, could have objected to all those theocratic warmongerings from Khomeini: -to rise against Saddam and cleanse the world in preparation for their Mahdi etc etc, and shut him up, the Saddam army would not have marched into Khuzestan. At the time, all Iranian nationalists said to me, that you are too silly and naïve with your non-violence talk, and I should look at such mad acts of Saddam.

So here we are with one of Khomeini's staunchest believers, beating his drums of war and enticing the world with the threat of nukes. This time we don't have Saddam to get worried about a divided Iraq, but we have the Israelis worried about Seyyeds' proxies dropping mini nukes across from their borders, once Natanz has concentrated enough of the wretched stuff.

Peace comes from having your cause for your own home. False ideologies whose cause is just a cause, fuel fanaticism that becomes war. So back to this article, it seems the authors have forgotten, that if Iranians really were that fanatic then they would have risen up against the Seyyeds a long time ago with a lot of blood on the streets. But Iranians believe in Life and Peace, as enshrined in our Zend Avesta, and books derived from it like the Shahnameh. We all know where our hearts and minds are; and they are now certainly not with the Seyyeds' ideologies.
A lot has happened in the past thirty years. Iranians have realised how their very culture has been threatened from within. There is a war already going on in Iran, and if the recent Seyyed selection (SS) is anything to go by, then the fact that the people abstained en-masse, shows how weak the Seyyed support is. In fact the Seyyeds' loved Saddam for the war, and would love the Israelis to attack. The Seyyed ideology thrives on war. If attacked the Seyyeds will have reason to exist as defenders of Islamic Iran, even though the peace movement in Iran is much more popular amongst pure Iranians.

So how can we Iranians convince the Israelis that we are not the same as the Seyyeds, and that they should be dealing with us? I have said it before, and I will say it again. The UN must pass a resolution to create a provisional government in exile that will represent Iran. The unions and other corporations will show their allegiance as proof. This new body of Iranians who put Iran first, will sit at the negotiating tables with the UN, and not those that went through the SS. A call for general strike will be stronger than any Israeli or US air strike.
But the world corporations just do not want to think along such lines of thought. A new modern Iran, with its energy based on gas, is a huge competitive concern. Iran has in the past benefited from being at the cross-roads of civilizations; with its real estate located in the centre of three continents. Just imagine how easily any company can produce and distribute their products from Iran. The competition is far too threatening. And so it is best to trip Iran into another war and wound it for a couple of generations.

Ya Ahuramazda in the Spirit of Nowrooz we will not let that happen.