Disinformation for US attack on Iran

The immediate purpose of this disinformation campaign is apparently to help justify the planned US attack on a wide range of Iranian industrial and military targets.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8880

One the cleverest form of disinformation is to talk about disinformation.

Ultimately any nation can do whatever it likes to do. Media can write whatever. But people have the knowledge more than ever in human history to judge and share via internet. The world media is crumbling with the power of bloggers.

Politicians and their petty media supporters are playing a losing game. I am glad to say that we Iranians are the largest community of bloggers in the world. We know how the BBC put Khomeini in power.

It won't happen again. We are winning every day against the Seyyeds in Iran. The people of Iran have discovered a new Iran, after a lot of soul searching. Our new deeper roots have had to go to the realms of Vendidad in Zend Avesta to reignite the old Iranian flame that is 20000 years old which will inspire us forth. We happily ignore the Seyyeds.

No media mogul can pull the wool over our eyes anymore.

US warns China without mentioning the Seyyeds

"If Beijing begins to accept greater responsibility for the health of the international system -- as all global powers should -- we will remain on a constructive, even if competitive, path. If not, the rise of China begins to look more adversarial," he said.

http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/national_world/stories/2008/05/01/CIA_director_0501.ART_ART_05-01-08_A6_D8A33T3.html?sid=101

Why doesn't Hayden not mention the Seyyeds' collusion with China? Fact is that it is not the Chinese, but the US corporations and other western companies, that are using China's cheap industrial zones, that are to blame.

Warmonerging US vs Non Violent Regime Change

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Tuesday that sending a second U.S. aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf could serve as a "reminder" to Iran, but he said it's not an escalation of force.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080430/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/gates_iran

I suppose the best way to change the regime officially and respectively, is to first contain it, and then threaten it with gun boat diplomacy.

Normally that pisses off the liberals all over the world; starting from India, who are naturally anti-US, indirectly benefits the Seyyeds.

And that's been the story all along since the Seyyed take over. And that is why the oil price has gone through the roof and Exxon makes 1 billion a day.

Put all that together and you can see why they would rather not have a peaceful non violent regime change.

Mass Abstention of Seyyed selection in Iran will happen

Some 21 million Iranians are eligible to vote in the Friday run-offs.

http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/000200804250921.htm

No one but the Seyyeds and Basij will vote.

Wipe out vs Obliterated

"While it is reasonable to warn Iran of the consequence of it continuing to develop nuclear weapons and what those real consequences bring to its security, it is not probably prudent... in today's world to threaten to obliterate any other country and in many cases civilians resident in such a country," he said.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jEp2ukq1nzsx5Q...

Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, should really have pointed this out sooner. It is so embarrassing to see a seasoned politican, such as Hilary Clinton, who raves on about being so much more experienced, making a comment like this, just to get conservative votes from would be McCain supporters.

We Iranians have now gotten used to politicians throwing the name of Iran, and misrepresenting Iran. Obviously one is lead to believe that both the "Obliterated" comment will be seen along side the "Wipe Out" comment from now on. But would you think that Clinton is as irresponsible a person as that Seyyed poodle in Iran?

UN rules remove Seyyed missiles

Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak said Iranian companies were ordered out of the Defense Services Asia show Tuesday because their exhibition was deemed "offensive."

"Unfortunately, when we came around to inspecting their stand, they displayed equipment that clearly contravened the UN resolution - equipment such as missiles and missile systems and others," Najib told reporters.

Najib said the exhibit was in defiance of UN resolutions that ban Iranian arms exports and forbid countries from providing Iran with technical and financial assistance that could contribute to its alleged nuclear weapons program.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1208870479864&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

It is with great thanks to UN and the Malaysians that we Iranians that have a peaceful nature have to look up to. We cannot fight these monsters in any other way but through the application of International Law, until decent ancient laws of Iran come back.

Does Anxiety Lead People to Religion?

An intriguing new vein of psychological research, however, does show that religion can act as a buffer against existential anxieties. Mike Friedman and W. Steven Rholes at Texas A&M University have shown that when Christian fundamentalists are shown inconsistencies in the Bible, those who acknowledge them become more anxious, compared with fundamentalists who maintain the inerrancy of the Bible.When asked to complete a number of word stems such as D E _ _, for example, fundamentalists who acknowledged the contradictions in their faith were more likely to reach for the word DEAD, as opposed to DEER, DEBT or DEED.The connection between faith and anxiety seems to run in both directions, in that increased religiosity predicts lower anxiety, while higher anxiety causes people to cling ever more tightly to their faith. Thomas Pyszczynski at the University of Colorado once found that when Islamic students in Iran were made to feel anxious, they were more likely to gravitate toward fundamentalist religious claims -- and endorse religiously motivated suicide attacks against the United States

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/20/AR2008042001893.html

It seems to make a lot of sense to me.

Seyyeds' minister in parting shot at Ahmadinejad

"Mr Ahmadinejad and I did not have common views on some issues," he told the Shahrvand Emrouz weekly in an interview."I was critical of the policies which caused money supply growth," Danesh Jaafari said

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g6cUcvHJClkUg5OIZIGCkMNNB8sg

Some people are coming to their senses at least. Seyyed economics is a load of rubbish.

China keeps Seyyeds alive

In 2004, Iran agreed to sell a Chinese corporation $20 billion worth of natural gas per year for 25 years - representing the world's largest natural gas purchase. By 2007, China had become the largest trading partner of rogue states Iran, North Korea and Sudan, and the second-largest of Burma and Zimbabwe.

http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20080420/focus/focus4.html

This is a quite well written article on what a monster China has become.

Moaning Iranian Professor

The reality is that 70% of Iranians are less than 30 years of age, many are Internet-savvy, glued to satellite television and have very little toleration for the Islamic utopia promised by their leaders when the evidence of national decline is apparent everywhere.

http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/story.html?id=456102

And yet another Iranian Professor complains about Iranian misrepresentation in the Press. That is exactly why one should call these despots Seyyeds. They put their allegaince to Islam first. And so the west recognises them as Iranains.

So the best thing to do is to kick out the Seyyeds from the UN until they have their own country, somewhere in southern Iraq.