Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Quack Hitchens expects Earthquake for Iranian rapproachment

Iran is scheduled to suffer from a devastating earthquake in the very near future. Its capital, Tehran, is built on a cobweb of fault-lines: a predicament not improved by the astonishing amount of illegal and uninspected construction that takes place, thanks to corruption and incompetence, within its perimeter

http://mobile2.wsj.com/beta2/htmlsite/html_article.php?id=1&CALL_URL=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120338314589475783.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Here we go again with this quack Hitchens. Suddenly he is a Geologist and knows that there will definitely be an Earthquake, that will destroy Tehran.

Every Iranian feels a tremor nearly everyday all over Iran. And the homes are built to standards to withstand 5 or 6 on Richter scale. We Iranians built the Persopolis in such a way that it can stand even a 7.

Hitchens, paints Iran as if it is a backward nation only capable of selling rugs and pistachios. He has to admit that the monsters the right wing Brits like him put into power to raise the oil price to make the North Sea oil economical, have not managed to influence your average Iranian. He has had to realise that Iranians want to be modern and their music is so.

So what can the Brits and the Seyyeds do now. Iranians are ignoring them and he has to admit that they love the US culture and modern ways of the world. Iranians are not as Islamic as the Pakistan the Brits created. We reach to the Iran before Islam. The Pakistanis don't and that's where the likes of Hitchens got it badly wrong.

Everyone listened to the Islamic scholars in their Universities who have little or no regard for the Iranian Spirit that existed before Islam and is in the hearts and minds of all Iranians more than ever. That Iranian Spirit keeps the peace and binds us all so that we do not have civil war and ethnic divisions. Iran cannot become Balkanized. Iran cannot become Islamic Federations as the Seyyeds want. Iranians will have peaceful non violent change.

Mr Hitchens should realise the US could tell the world that the Iranian population could easily topple the Seyyeds with a General Strike. But the like of Hithcens and the US administration do not want to tell the world of such easy ways to get rid of the regime. They in fact want to keep the regime there to keep their military afloat in the area.

Saturday, February 16, 2008

US and Seyyeds vs Iranians

Since then, Washington has boasted that the U.S. and existing U.N. sanctions, along with the task force warning, have taken a significant toll on Iran's economy, particularly on its unemployment and inflation rates, and raised pressure on the government.

"Both unemployment and inflation rates in Iran are on the rise, with independent experts estimating the unemployment rate to be roughly twice the 11 percent claimed by the regime," Deputy Treasury Secretary Robert Kimmitt said last week.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080216/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_iran

So the Seyyeds are running amok with money; both inside and outside Iran. Why don't the US sit down with their proxies in China, and tell them off for dealing with the Seyyeds?

Oh they are happy about the high inflation and the high unemplyment. So that does not neccessarily mean regime change. Heck the people of Iran have gotten used to this slow slide into pariah state.

And that is what the US wants. It even gets in touch with the Seyyeds' representatives and makes sure that they are ok as the rest of Iran grinds to a halt. But the people are not really doing anything, that would contest the Seyyeds.

All kinds of perscriptions exist to get Iran out of this quandry. But none will work if the Iranian Peace is not achieved. Iranian Peace needs people in Iran thinking about how they can coalesce. There is no need for political parties when the nation has been lost to the Seyyeds who are siphoning the money to conquer Israel in the name of Mahdi.

No real Iranian wants any of that. Real Iranians want Iranian Peace. It means confronting the Seyyeds with the superior moral attitude of Iranian Peace. Iranian Peace needs to built on Iranian attitudes of Peace and Love that bind all Iranians together. The most important use of these values is to create a Peaceful Resistance to the Seyyeds.

Peaceful Resistance uses non violence but its is mighty in numbers. Its argument is to show to the Seyyeds that they do not have the 70 million Iranian Peace support. No one wants blood or war in Iran. The Real Iranians want Peaceful Resistance en-masse against the Seyyeds.

If anyone has the chance to oppose the Seyyeds they need to tell them that they can do nothing in a massive General Strike for Iranian Peace.

Ya Ahura we will do it. And you Seyyeds will learn from us and will live with us once we have moved Iran into a higher moral order.

Sunday, February 10, 2008

Ganji is wrong on Iran

The mullahs' strategy is simple. To retain power, they need an enemy. They thus seek to keep their country on a perpetual war footing by playing up the notion that the Bush administration is conspiring to overthrow them, destroy the Islamic republic and undermine Islam itself. Nonviolent activists, human-rights defenders and intellectuals are labeled enemy agents. And Iran's deteriorating economic conditions are attributed to U.S. sanctions rather than to Tehran's chronic mismanagement.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/109548

Are we Iranians that weak and unorganized outside the religious circles, that we can let people say such stupid things. We Iranians cannot, like any other human beings stand up for peace. That we cannot organise a unity based on love and peace that can organize a national non violent strike? How can we sit there and take such rubbish from such writers. For how long should we Iranians just not say "enough is enough, we want peace, and anyone that distrubs the peace, is wrong".

Saturday, February 02, 2008

Chinese banks cut business with Iranian banks

Chinese banks have stopped working with Iranian banks due to U.S. pressure over Tehran's disputed nuclear programme, a senior Iranian Foreign Ministry official was quoted as saying in comments published on Saturday.The United States, which is spearheading efforts to isolate the Islamic Republic over activities which Washington fears are ultimately aimed at making bombs, has urged international banks and companies to stop doing business with Tehran

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/International_Business/Chinese_banks_cut_business_with_Iranian_banks/articleshow/2750702.cms

Well it is about time. Now who can the Seyyeds go to?

Friday, February 01, 2008

Singapore resident to be arraigned on illegal aircraft sales to Iran's Seyyeds.

Monarch Aviation Pte Ltd exported military aircraft parts from US suppliers to Singapore without proper licenses, falsely identifying them as civilian components, the letter alleged. It also illegally resold commercial aircraft parts to a company in Tehran, in violation of the International Emergency Powers Act, a US law barring transactions to protect against national security threats.

http://www.straitstimes.com/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/STIStory_202399.html

It has taken a long time to catch these unscruplous traders; with no care in the world about the plight of the Iranians, under the Seyyeds.
------------------

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Seyyed nukes almost ready

It is really interesting how almost joyously the Chinese press reports this:

Deputy head of Iran's Supreme National Security Council Javad Vaeedi said on Sunday that his country has so far produced 300 tons of uranium hexafluoride (UF6)gas used for uranium enrichment in the Isfahan nuclear facility.

Addressing a congregation of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), Vaeedi said "The Isfahan uranium conversion facilityis active and it has produced more than 300 tons of UF6," local Fars news agency reported.

He said that despite pressures by Western countries which once stressed that Iran should not have even 20 centrifuges, there are now 3,000 centrifuges operative in Iran.


Now some of you, I am sure, are pretty confused about all this tech talk. But just read this:

Hence, to produce one kilogram of HEU requires processing 176 kilograms of UF6 gas.


So the Seyyed bomb is not that far away. And the IRGC are very proud of it. Is the rest of Iran concerned that this bomb will put Iran in harms way, especially with the IRGC screaming "wipe-out" comments about Israel. Yes So will the Iranian nation do anything about it by themselves, or are they going to wait for the Israelis to bomb Natanz?

Whatever happened to Peace Rallies. Or why not have a General Strike because the Seyyeds are putting Iran in harms way.

Saturday, January 26, 2008

Forget sanctions give Seyyeds the bomb and call his bluff.

The circulated excerpts outlined voluntary and mandatory travel restrictions and assets freezes. They also name two Iranian banks - Melli and Saderat - warning states to exercise vigilance when dealing with them. Iran Air Cargo and Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Line were singled out for cargo inspections in cases of "reasonable grounds to believe that the aircraft/vessel is transporting goods prohibited under this resolution or (earlier) resolutions," according to the proposal excerpts. The document notes Iran's refusal to fully suspend enrichment, reprocessing and heavy water-related projects and to cooperate fully with the. International Atomic Energy Agency. It requests the IAEA file a report on whether Iran has suspended these activities within 90 days.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/948243.html

And the key word in all this is 90 days. By the time any of this ever happens it will be another six months. A big Yawn eh. So I propose the following. Give the Seyyeds the bomb. And make sure it can hit Washington DC. At that point we will really call the Seyyeds' bluff. And if they so much as even try, see how the Iranian nation will rise and kick them out. Fact is that the world does not want Iran to develop at all into anything good. It wants Iranians to be stuck with these madmen and remain a pariah state. The last thing the industrialised nations of the world want is for the wealthiest nation in Western Asia to get connected properly and regain its title as the Cross Roads of Civilization. Look at the world map. What is in the centre of the world? It is Iran. Now think about all the energy resources in the world and ask yourself where is it? It is around Iran. Imagine gas pipelines going all over the world from Iran. Now ask yourdelf an even easier question. Why don't the world powers not help the Iranian Opposition form a government in exile and then deal with them, instead of the Seyyeds? Because they don't want to. Remember how easily they removed the Shahanshah, well then they can repeat it again. All they need to do is to ask Iranians to call for General Strikes and create a non violent regime change. It is that easy. But don't hold your breath.

No they want Iran to be the only viable threat to the world peace now that the Soviet Union has gone. This will allow the energy companies to make loads of money by keeping the oil price nice and high. And of course to keep the armed forces fully paid and employed with tax payers' money.

And ultimately it is our fault. We Iranians should be ashamed of ourselves for not being able to take care of our own problems ourselves.

------------------

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

A big if

"The resolution clearly states that if Iran agrees with the six powers' proposals, direct negotiations will start to settle all issues related to the Iranian nuclear program, and all the six powers, including the United States, will be involved in these direct talks," Lavrov told Russian journalists following six-power talks in Berlin on Wednesday.

http://www.interfax.ru/e/B/politics/28.html?id_issue=11950837

That's a big if. But it would be the first time that the Seyyeds will be given the kind of respect they want. How arrogant and uncomprimising will become apparrent. The Foreign Ministry has always been the most accomodative of all the various camps. But the IRGC is running the show, and they know that if they give in, then they have to answer to their Mahdi, as and when he pops around.

But the Iranian Opposition has not formed a provisional government in exile, and will not be able to represent Iran - the true Iranians. And the silent majority of Iranians who are humble and non violent, have to suffer, as our oil income is used for making the bomb for Seyyed's Mahdi. But the real Iranians are able to still ignore the Seyyeds and any fake rapproachment will get the nations interest. And that has been the only area where the people had paid some attention to the Seyyeds. But as soon as they put it all in the Islamic context and the Iranians will switch off. The Seyyeds lost the hearts and minds of the Iranian nation a long time ago. People look at them as strangers - unwelcomed strangers at that.

So the best scenario for Seyyeds would be the scenario that buys time. In the mean time there will the Seyyeds' bogus elections. But the IRGC fanatics will give a quick rebuff, and their rubber boat tactics will be of course just what the UNSC would expect. At that point there will be no chance for a more complacent President to replace Ahmadinejad. So if the Seyyeds can hold back the maddest elements of their people, then they will be able to get some new person elected; that would not be so foul mouthed and be able smooth talk the UNSC and buy time. And the people of Iran are having to cope with the devils they know than the devils they do not know.
------------------

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Seyyeds buying votes and cooperation from Iranians

Can the Iranian nation be bribed?

We all know how inefficient government and quasi-government organizations are in the best democracies. Countless books have been written comparing government services with private enterprises.

The religious domains that the Seyyeds have created, and use to channel funds to the poor, remains highly suspect. Dare one criticize a religious domain, or point the finger of suspicion to it? Will the poor and depraved have benefited from these handouts, when the inflation in Iran is so rampant.

Are Iranians truly going to get "ripped off" even more and do nothing, or have they been enlightened by the greater secular force, and will not vote. Can the Iranian nation discuss mass boycott and non cooperation via blogs? Can a public debate occur where the strength on nil participation be discussed? The Seyyeds know that if a public debate does arise, they will be out. Will the world have this debate?

Or will GWB say something to piss the people of Iran off, and make them vote, just to prove him wrong? It is funny how GWB can actually help the Seyyeds stay in power if he says the wrong things. Why don't the vociferous left wing that brought the Seyyeds to power, and hate GWB, not talk about the non violent regime change that can be made in Iran, via the media.

Why doesn't the world media make it, its responsibility to question the power of the Seyyeds against a mass boycott of all Iranians, and non cooperation in all areas of the Iranian economy that serve the Seyyeds. Why don't the left wing of the world not use Iran as a tool to critisize the US. Why doesn't the world media not show the Iranian people how easy it is to topple the Seyyeds by just talking about it in public.

Think of the lead article in the London Times, or the New York Times, addressing the people of Iran, and presenting a non violent solution to regime change in Iran. What is wrong with that? All it would do is to force the Seyyeds' own newspapers and government spokesmen to react. And their reaction against a mass general strike, where people do not leave their homes is hopeless. The Seyyeds cannot drag 70 millions out of their homes to keep the economy running.

Fact is that the world media does not want to remove the Seyyeds. Fact is that the US and China do not want to remove the Seyyeds. The people of Iran in the satellite TVs do not even talk along these lines. Why doesn't VOA bring this topic up?

It seems I am the only one. Nuts.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Obama and Seyyeds

"Iranian nuclear weapons would destabilize the region and could set off a new arms race."

http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4886

So says Mr Obama. He likes to negotiate with the Seyyeds, but does not trust them with nukes.