Guardian's or AP's Sally Buzbee is wrong on Iran

And Khamenei lacks the stern, spellbinding charisma that bound the first revolutionary leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, so strongly to his people.

But Iran's clerical regime ``has survived everything short of the plague'' in its 28 years, said Suzanne Maloney, a senior fellow at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy in Washington.

And no coherent, organized opposition has ever emerged.

Khalaji is blunt: Ahmadinejad may be unpopular and ``very fragile.'' But he says: ``The regime is not vulnerable at all.''

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-7100924,00.html

It is so easy to say it, and so The Guardian does. But The Guardian, like many other newspapers is wrong. I have found that the more liberal press like The Guardian, that does not like the nationalist opposition forces, and will not be seen to be supporting the Islamist ones, makes such crazy comments.

For crying out loud Sally Buzbee, ask any Iranian, and they will tell you, that these monsters are not Iranian. All the Blogs in the internet, that the Iranians are famous for, are there, because 65% of the Iranian population, that are young, all speak of Iranian values, that are opposed to the Seyyed ones. So why don't you do your work properly and read those blogs, and see the opposition.

And it is organised. Ok, maybe we don't all have one platform that we have one speaker to represent us. But we are all saying the same thing about the Seyyeds. So our Iranian culture has organized us. Our Iranian culture is beyond politics and religion. We do not have a religious or political opposition. We have a national opposition.

Iranians have recognised these Seyyeds as aliens.

Germany's price for Iranians' freedom

Der Spiegel reported that if Iranian Bank Melli, which handles most of Germany's trade with Iran, were placed on a European Union embargo list, it would cost the budget 700-800 million euros ($1-1.2 billion) next year because the government would be forced to pay damages to German firms.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071124/wl_nm/germany_iran_sanctions_dc

So what are we to make of EU? All these years, they and the Chinese, have turned a blind eye, to all the Seyyeds atrocities, on the secular people of Iran. To EU then, Iranians' freedom, is worth less than $2 billion. That is ludricous. The approach should be, to force the non-Iranian corporations, to make a choice, between Seyyeds and non Seyyeds. For example, in the United States, the banks like Deutsche Bank, were told to make a choice, between doing business with US or Iran. EU should do likewise. And in the long run, try to get the Chinese, Russians and Indians, to do the same. The Seyyeds, and their counter parties, cannot be allowed to use the very system they critisize. If they cannot be bothered, to be completely transparent over their nuclear activities; siphoning so much of secular Iranians' oil income for centrifuges, then they will be forced to be part of the pariah states of the world. Meanwhile the people of Iran, who are not benefiting under the Seyyeds, will know that at least something is being done to stop them. At this juncture, it is best for the Iranian Opposition, to be united as the alternative. The world needs to know, that if it supports the secular non violent movement regime change, then the intelligent Iranians, who reside in and outside Iran, will come to power, who will conform to international regulations, as opposed to some 1400 year old dogma, designed to resurrect an new Seyyed Empire. The world at the moment uses concepts like Human Rights, that were born in the Zend Avesta. It is high time, the world respected that, more than anything else that came later, in Iran's histroy. Respect Iran for what it really is, and not for what the Seyyeds say Iran is. We are the sons and daughters of Zoroaster and Cyrus the Great. Support the true Iranians, and build a better world for all.

Is Ebadi morally superior to the Seyyeds in Iran?

"What we want is that the two sides should respect international law, and we warn them on this," she said. "The United States cannot have the right to deal with Iran outside the framework of international law, and Iran cannot build a wall around itself and say, 'I have nothing to do with international law' and pay no attention to [UN] Security Council resolutions."

http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=T&ct=us/8-0&fd=R&url=http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2007/11/75B38EE4-E855-4617-9ADC-083C341BFCB6.html&cid=0&ei=yBpHR_T6C5DgqwPe9LzqCw


She is a devout Moslem. Iran's Spirit is older than Islam. She talks about Human Rights. Human Rights was invented in the Zend Avesta, in Iran, at least 7000 years ago.

So what is she on about? How can she go on about Human Rights, without the slightest reference to the roots of Human Rights. At least the UN has put a copy of Cyrus's Cylinder, as a sign of respect.

Many doubt her intentions. She has a Nobel Prize. Out of the blue we have an important person in Iran, but what does that person do with that respect? Is she any better than the Seyyeds? Is Cyrus or Zoroaster more meaningful to her than Halabi Qureshi (aka Mohammad)?

Cordesman's dark vision for Iran

So in clear, concise and chillingly forensic style, Cordesman spells out that the real stakes in the crisis that is building over Iran's nuclear ambitions would certainly include the end of Persian civilization, quite probably the end of Egyptian civilization, and the end of the Oil Age. This would also mean the end of globalization and the extraordinary accretions in world trade and growth and prosperity that are hauling hundreds of millions of Chinese and Indians and others out of poverty.

http://www.metimes.com/Opinion/2007/11/22/analysis_a_mideast_nuclear_war/4411/

So there you have it. All the numbers, that lead to little less than Armageddon. But Armageddon is what the Seyyeds want. And it is very hard for the West to believe that weirdos like these, can be in charge of a whole country. But they are.

We do not worship Iran

We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Neocon_accused_of_misquoting_Irans_leader_1119.html

Oh I remember AKh making this comment. In fact SB should know better. We were both at Princeton at the time. We all know, how AKh did not want to even have Iran, included in the name of the Islamic Republic. Fact is, he did not even want to leave Iraq. He is famous for being so unmoved returning to Iran. He was quite happy to have a Seyyed Empire from Baghdad as and when. But we must give credit to Iranians from the first day. The Seyyeds began losing against the nation of Iran, right from the word go. Akh could not persue all his radical thoughts and had to shut up. But that did not mean that there was a political alternative to him. The Shah died and we all know the rest. So what are we to do? Quite simple really, carry on as we are modernizing Iran, in spite of what these Seyyeds are doing. They need their own land. Let them go to southern Iraq, and have a seat right next to the Holy See in the UN. But leave Iran, that is thousands of years older alone. Heck if it was not for people like Mani, you would not have the likes of Salman Parsi and Islam. The people who come from Babylon have a distinctively different outlook to Life than Iranians. We look at the God within. Akh and his lot, are idealists. One book and that's it. Fine go and run your country with that one booK. Don't come and burn all ours. The Earth is big enough for all of us. If you are going to stay in Iran, put Iran and its history, above everything else. You will have your peaceful departure, and we Iranians will not harm you. We are too civilized for that. Look out for the shut down.

Cruise site hit in Iran

A series of explosions rocked the Parchin Military Site (where missiles, including "cruise" type missiles, are manufactured) at Varamin south of Tehran.

http://noiri.blogspot.com/2007/11/breaking-news-explosions-in-iran.html

How much money, yes money that could have been used to make hospitals and schools, was wasted by the Seyyeds, to build these sites. And now we have to get rid of them. The arms companies are having a laugh. What suckers we Iranians are. We let the Seyyeds in, and they suck our oil to build rubbish like this that is no good to anyone.

Shah vs Musharraf

"When the challenge to the Shah arose we procrastinated too long", he told me late last month, "I think we should have fished or cut bait more quickly, either making a clear choice to support the Shah in some effort to repress the opposition or to prevent Khomeini from coming back.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C11%5C19%5Cstory_19-11-2007_pg3_3

The radical chic of both present day Pakistan, and the then Iran, both sided with the Islamists. The radical chic in Iran was not anti-nationalistic, but when the Shahanshah died, and the military sided with the Seyyeds, Iran was lost. The flag changed, the national anthem changed. Iran became an Islamic Republic. At the time I said, Iran has now become another Pakistan. These two Islamic Republics both put Islam above nationalistic values. Now if you ask any Iranian then and now, you will find that they put the Spirit of Nowrooz over and above Islam. Khomeini tried to ban Nowrooz. Iran as a nation and Empire consisted of Pakistan. As Iranians we go back at least 7000 years. The Pakistani people should do the same as the Afghanis, and trace their ancient roots, and seek the secular nationalistic foundation, and not act as an upstart young nation with no heritage and just revolutionary fervour. This revolutionary fervour has been used by the US military and peak oil advocates, to find a reason to be in West Asia. If the Shahanshah was not poisoned, and had recovered, the Seyyeds would not have been able to hijack Iran and run amok. As it is, the people of Iran have now learnt what the Shahanshah meant by the alliance of Red and Black. The Seyyeds have had to resort to Iranian nationalistic virtues in order to attract the public interest, by playing the nuclear card. But the people know that the Seyyeds put Islam above Iran, and they want to siphon the oil to prepare for the return of the 12th Shiite Emperor. Ironically the Spirit of Iran is more in Iranians' minds than ever. People gather and celebrate Iranian festivals much more than any Islamic ones. Iran will become a new Iran and the whole area will find its proper roots. Maybe then ZB and his ilk will realise what the history of the area is.

Why Iran's Seyyeds would never block the Straits of Hormuz

'We would never look to use oil as a weapon', Ahmadinejad said in response to a Thomson Financial News question.

OPEC SUMMIT ROUNDUP Ahmadinejad attacks US dollar, says won't use oil as weapon - Forbes.com

You know, if he did use it as a weapon, that would certainly end things for all the peak oil and Seyyed supporters.  Think of this scenario.   The US and its allies have enough power in the Persian Gulf to stop and monitor any traffic through the Straits of Hormuz.  It would not take that long for the world to realize that the oil is better used if it is all piped across to the Mediterranean, Arabian Sea or Red Sea.  The price would jump, but it would fall even more, as the contingency plans would kick in, and the whole world would be in the Persian Gulf.  Heck they would seal off Iran.  Moreover there would be a huge embargo on everything Iran did, Seyyed or otherwise.  Yes the monkey knows this.  Anyway with this comment of his, he is sure to drop the insurance rates, and so the price of oil will collapse.  And he wanted the price to go up.  What a nutter.  What a laugh.

Iran's Seyyeds ruling over China, helping slavery

China now gets at least 14 percent of its imported oil from Iran, making it China's largest supplier and the source of as much as $7 billion worth of oil this year, according to David Kirsch, a manager at PFC Energy.

Deepening China-Iran Ties Weaken Bid to Isolate Iran - washingtonpost.com

This is a clear case of the tail wagging the "Chinese" dog.  And of course it is the Seyyeds that are ultimately controlling the cost of cheap energy to China's industrial zones.  And ironically it is the big western firms that are taking advantage of this situation.  For example Wal-Mart is making $USD 1 billion a day in revenue. And the weak dollar helps them sell their stuff.  The next time you go to Wal-Mart, and you see something without a name or location where it is made, you know that is was made by a prisoner, using Iranian Oil.  Don't buy it.  Buy a product made in your own country.  Don't help 21st Century slavery.

How many Opecs for a peanut?

The Iranian president called for drawing up of a comprehensive plan for OPEC and establishment of an specialized bank called "OPEC Bank" to safeguard the hard currencies of OPEC member states.

http://www2.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-234/0711181674163039.htm

First the madman said that Iran will not trade in US dollars. But did that mean that the Chinese bought crude oil in Euros? No. Next he went on about creating a new oil bourse in Kish. Did that change anything? No. The world still looks at the WTI and Brent in US dollars. Finally he learnt how feable and pathetic he is, when the major banks of Iran were thrown out of the world's financial system. So the poor chap and his brigade of zombies are so arrogant, that they want the world to trade in what presumably would be called Opecs. Can you imagine going to a bar in London, and asking "how many Opecs is it for a beer?" You know that is why we call him Anatarinejad (Anatar means monkey). This monkey is full of tricks and he thinks he is so clever. Any peanuts anyone for the monkey?