Thursday, November 08, 2007

The other Islamic Republic

When a large group of eminent U.S. foreign policy experts was asked this summer to name the country most likely to transfer nuclear technology to terrorists in the next three to five years, Pakistan was the top choice.
COLUMN-Pakistan,Iran show U.S.influence's limits:Bernd Debusmann | Reuters

Connect the dots.  US used to support Taliban & Co, when the Soviets were a threat in Afghanistan.  The US helped them to be this new force in Waziristan.  Musharraf's (or should I call him Mozakhraf) military pretends to fight them.  AQ Khan and the Seyyeds get the nuke plans from the Chinese.  Their narc friends get all that snuff from Afghanistan.  Smells very familiar to the trade going on, as in the film Apocalypse Now.  So everyone is in the oldest trade.  Meanwhile the Israelis want to hit Natanz, when it should be Khost.  And can the AQ Khan's nukes hit Israel?  Sure can.  So why hit Iran, when all the trouble is in the other Islamic Republic, namely the Islamic Republic of Pakistan?  Now you see why the US wants to give them all more aid.

Mini Nuke attack on Natanz

Under the plans, conventional laser-guided bombs would open “tunnels” into the targets. “Mini-nukes” would then immediately be fired into a plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce the risk of radioactive fallout.“As soon as the green light is given, it will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be demolished,” said one of the sources.
Revealed: Israel plans nuclear strike on Iran - Times Online

Oh they make it look so clean and simple don't they.  It reminds me of those ads for new kitchen and bathroom cleaning agents.  So suddenly we are led to believe that it will be a clean efficient surgical strike.  But the long term effects, the political and religious ramifications are excellent for the arms and oil industries.  Is there an exodus of people from Natanz?  Of course not.  Will the Seyyeds be even more prepared to siphon secular Iranians oil income and send it to Hamas or Hezbollah one day to drop a mini-nuke over Israel, because of this rumour? Yes.  The world media is nuts.  They will not talk about the natural forces that can get rid of the Seyyeds from within Iran, like a General Strike.  Oh no, that would be far too boring.

BBC losing propaGANDa war

This is one of the strongest indications yet of the new Atlanticist accent to French foreign policy under the new President Nicolas Sarkozy.
BBC NEWS | World | Middle East | New France gets tough with Iran

It seems that BBC is now the only pro-Seyyed media force out there.  It used to count on the French wire services to help it in the pro-Seyyed propaGANDa, or more appropriately, anti-US propaGANDa news.

Sunday, November 04, 2007

Obama, go and see the Ayatollahs now

Clinton last summer condemned Obama for declaring that, as president, he would personally negotiate with Iranian leaders without preconditions. But in October, she said that, if elected, she would direct her subordinates to begin unconditional negotiations. The difference, Clinton argued, is that she would withhold the prestige of a presidential-level meeting until progress warranted it.
Brownstein: The great Iran divide - National Journal - MSNBC.com

Why doesn't Mr Obama go right now to Qom, and see Mesbah Yazdi face to face, and then Khamenei, and then AhMADinejad, with the certainty that he will come back as a hero, and be elected with a huge majority?

For crying out loud, how many times have we had the US elections, and the Seyyed elections, use each other to get the people scared, and come out to vote for the war lobby, and the peak oil advocates?  Can the people of United States and Iran see through this?  Yes of course they can.  But can the press and its commentators realise this.

Fact is, that if the people of Iran, were given the dignity and respect, and were told that they can get rid of the Seyyeds with just talking about a national strike, instead of a US strike, then maybe things will change in Iran more peacefully.  But nobody wants that boring solution do they.

Shahnameh vs Avesta

“Every nation has a book that represents the personality of that nation. For example: the British people have the works of Shakespeare, the Greeks have the Iliad and the Odyssey, the Italians have The Divine Comedy by Dante, and we have the Shahnameh,” he told the Mehr News Agency on Saturday.
tehran times : Shahnameh embodies Iranian identity: scholar

Some scholar really.  How dare he not mention the Zend-Avesta.  After all, Shahnameh is a poor reprint of Khodayeh-Namak, which itself relates to Zend-Avesta.

From Nuclear bluff to Regime change to Peak Oil

At a time when majority of states have understood the present realities and have the intention of publicly acknowledging the realities, certain groups of states raise hue and cry to seek concessions from the Iranian nation, added the president.
President: Everyone will be aware of closure of Tehran's N-case soon - Irna

Seyyeds' Poodle could actually do well, if he played the nuclear bluff game.  But being a devout fanatic and true to his dogma , he will not budge.  He will press the button, once the Mahdi button is made.

As far as secular Iranians are concerned, he is a "has been", and well past the "sell by date".

So the only thing this poodle, and all the other trolls can do, is to hope for the US President, and those in the future, to make a big thing about the nuclear story.  But world media has figured that out, and knows that everybody yawns at it all.

That means that the world oil media industry, that wants peak oil, needs to talk more about the blocking of Straits of Hormuz, bombing of Arab refineries etc etc.  Same old boring stuff eh.  That's why I believe that the only way, is for major changes in Iran, that would then move prices really higher for the peak oil advocates.  And that will be done.  That way everyone that matters will benefit.  As a hint, think what the effects would be, if the Chinese could economically get their own oil by themselves from the very deep wells in South China Sea?  That would change their relationship with the Seyyeds.  This is dreamland territory.

Seyyeds and US block aid to secular Iranians

So far, $5.4 million in payments has been suspended for four projects, the officials said, and they do not expect the suspensions to be permanent.
The Columbus Dispatch : World Bank forced to halt some aid to Iran

But the article fails to mention the fact that the Seyyeds do not deal in US dollars anymore.  The Seyyeds love the fact that the secular Iranians do not get money.  This all helps them.  They have access to all the Euros they need.  The people of Iran can no longer deal in the most common currency.  Most of the wealthiest Iranians have US dollars in California and they would be the source of all the trouble against the Seyyeds, as and when.  Connecting the dots means that the US and Seyyeds are on the same side, against the secular true Iranians.  So this means that the funds to true secular Iranians needs to go via HSBC or Standard Chartered Bank or some other bank in Indonesia or Malaysia or parts of EU, that are not trading in US dollars and are trading in tranches less than $ US 20 million.  Hopefully no IRGC thug is involved, and the funds can reach the proper Iranians.  Ya Ahuramazda!

Saturday, November 03, 2007

Seyyed terms uranium enrichment abroad "unacceptable"

'Any proposal to pursue the enrichment process outside Iran is meaningless and if such proposals were aimed at stopping enrichment on Iranian soil, then they would be totally unacceptable,' deputy chief nuclear negotiator Javad Vaeidi was quoted by Fars news agency as saying.Vaeidi was referring to an interview by Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal with the Middle East Economic Digest (MEED) in which he said that the Persian Gulf states would be ready to form a consortium for providing enriched uranium to Iran and hence avoiding escalation of the international crisis over Iran's nuclear programme.
Tehran terms uranium enrichment abroad "unacceptable" (Roundup) - Middle East

Fact is that the Seyyeds want to escalate the situation.  That is their Holy manadate for the return of their Mahdi.  I mean, can you imagine Mahdi turning up and asking, "Why have you got that Saudi stuff here?"

Russia and China fall in line, just before the "flexibility" comment

Russia and China did not comment, and the agreement seemed at odds with weeks of public opposition, primarily by the Kremlin, to new sanctions against Iran.
Russia and China fall in line on Iran | Jerusalem Post

Why have the Russians and Chinese suddenly complied?  Or is it, that in two weeks time, Ayatollah ElBaradei will say that there has been some "flexibility", as was just expressed in the Chinese press below:

Wen said peaceful negotiation would be the best way to resolve the nuclear issue and he hoped that Iran could further demonstrate its flexibility, according to a press release from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

China urges Iran to cooperate with IAEA


And then the Seyyeds would just carry on as normal.

Friday, November 02, 2007

US hits at Beijing over Iran stance

“We are disappointed by the lack of co-operation by China on a third Security Council resolution,” said Nicholas Burns, US under-secretary of state, representing Washington at the meeting. “We don’t think that China is moving with us.”
FT.com / World - US hits at Beijing over Iran stance

And folks with that statement, the real culprit in this whole saga, is cornered.  If China washes its hand from the Seyyeds, then the Seyyeds are well and truly on their way out.  Somehow the Chinese need to be pursuaded.