The tail wagging the dog

Ahmadinejad and his ilk are not interested in any negotiation, any compromise or any live-and-let-live final solution. They are determined to be the soldiers of Mahdi come-what-may. They have no problem with the total destruction of the world. They are headed for a life of eternal bliss in Allah's paradise. They hardly care, even rejoice, if the rest of humanity is subjected to a tragic death in the nuclear, biological and chemical wasteland of planet earth.

More at:

http://www.amilimani.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=79&Itemid=2

And the world, especially the Russians and Chinese deal with him. Why? Because he is giving the oil away. Are the Chinese happy to deal with such types? Do the Chinese want to responsible for paying him so much money? If the answer is yes, then China's role in the UNSC has to be debated. The Chinese are basically bank rolling many many horrible regimes, and the West, especially GWB never mention it. And the reason for that is that the Chinese are the biggest buyers of US debt. So if you knock out the Seyyeds, you will also put the US economy at risk. A case of the tail wagging the dog. So how do stop that from happening? We Iranians in the Opposition need to have a Iran Government in Exile (IGIE). It needs to have the support of all the major corporations in the world, including the Chinese. These corporations need to swear an oath of allegiance to IGIE, that they would not deal with Seyyed Inquisition Nation (SIN). At the moment the nearest thing to that are the two lists the UNSC has made of people and organizations, which are still able to travel and do business with SIN. So we have to have the UN clear the mess SIN has got Iran into, instead of doing it ourselves. That is why there is no IGIE. We think that once the UN has banned enough people and organizations, then everything will be honky dory. Wow how naïve is that? We need to be practical, clear and above board. The world needs to see an open clear government in exile. The internet can be a great tool for this, and we can have this IGIE represented there. People with contacts in the major corporations need to be represented at the IGIE website and be accounted for their activities in getting the support for a new Iran.

Seyyeds' Emperor's Disapproval

"I have supported (previous) governments. I support this government too. This also does not mean that I approve of every detail of the work that is being done," Khameini said.

More at:

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hUY2jT63mwB2Q1CHHJ5x6WXohozQ

We had recently two events, that are rather odd, in light of the almost thirty years of Seyyed Inquisition of Nations (SIN). SIN has managed to completely erradicate all kinds of descent, even before they started sometimes. But SIN seemed defeated, when some students raised their voice in the streets, against the Seyyed Poodle pretending to run Iran. No nation, including Iraq, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and many further afield have not managed to stop SIN. The Russian President is coming to beg them to adhere to NPT transparency rules, and Chinese whispers of flexibilty are not working. SIN is literally giving the secular Iranians birthright away from our soil, for the sake of their dogma. So could these voices of descent and opposition be pure fabrications from within to make SIN look good? Is this all theatre? Even if it is, it is good. For as we know in all despotic regimes, it is like a rice cooker, even the slightest loosening of the valve, and you get quite a lot of steam puffing out. SIN cannot control the 7000 year Iranians' Spirit Of Nowrooz (SON).

From the Horses Mouth

Turning to Iran's economic struggles, Rowhani said that despite high prices for Iran's oil, "we don't see a healthy and dynamic economy."

"If we had an accurate and comprehensive plan, most of the country's problems could have been resolvable," he said

More at:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071010/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_ahmadinejad

It is good to see that some bickering is beginning to take place. The silence of the Seyyeds is breaking, and people are jockeying for positions in the Seyyed elections in the Spring. More and more Seyyeds will voice their displeasure as the economic noose is tightened. Money talks. The people of Iran will have to build reserves for the day when national strikes will praralyse the country, and people power will reign over the Seyyeds.

US$1000 for you Iranian

Iran's export revenues from crude oil, oil derivatives, and distilled natural gas have exceeded $20 billion during March 21-August 23 period, according to the Central Bank of Iran (CBI).

More:

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=154415

Well, if you do the maths you get to a figure of a million toman for each Iranian. Let me explain. $20bn divided by 20 weeks is $1bn per week. There are 70 million Iranians or 20 million three and a half member families. A billion is a thousand million. So each Iranian family should get $1000 per week.

I remember, Khomeini said something along these lines in 1978, and caught the imagination of everyone in Iran. He promised that he would deliver that amount to everyone. So what happened? Oh people criticized the Shahanshah for using the money for weapons, and misusing the funds for this and that etc etc. And you know the rest, and the mess it got us into now.

But now look at this pathetic lot. What can they do, now that they are at the helm of Iran? Just like every government in history, they will use the excuse of war or potential threat, to keep money from the poor. Ironically they create a moral duty for the poor, to enlist and fight for that ficticious threat. In the time of the Shah it was USSR, this time it is USA. Ah, but it never really happens. Something worse than war happens.

"Quo Bene?" as Machiavelli asked. And the reply sits squarely with the multinationals, and wheeler dealers who have no scruples. The wheeler dealers of the world should be careful who they give this money to.

I personally believe that there should be a fund outside Iran, that the UN should supervise, that makes sure that the Seyyeds do not use it for nukes. UN should be involved with the distribution of Iran's oil wealth, until these madmen are non violently removed. A similar concept was set up in times of Saddam for Iraq, and it was abused.

The other way, is to approach China directly over their wheeling and dealing with the Seyyeds. Tell them straight, "be careful who you give this money to". They will then say something like, "we are dealing with the government of Iran". At that point one can say, that the IRGC has been seen to support inhuman acts, such as suicide bombings and giving funds to activities in the Levant.

But then the Chinese would says, "hey it is your companies in the Chinese industrial zones that use the cheap energy, land and labour, that sell it to the Seyyeds via Dubai and such places." And then the ball is in the US court, and there is nothing that this Bush admin wants to do about it, as long as the oil price is up for the benefit of Texas. "Yup, yes sir'ee", as they say in Texas, "as long as we get the money, who cares about those ayrabs, those yankees or whateva...."

So what actually happens that is worse than war, is that we can see clearly the money going right back to the US, and the Iranian brains going there as well, as they give up on the Iranian economy. It is happening every day and is worse than war. Why, because we can do something about it. We can all address these issues clearly to the world. We can all not put up with the Seyyeds and their wheeler dealers via General Strikes.

I have written countless articles on non violent regime change, and we need the people of Iran to think and talk along such lines as General Strikes, so that the wealth and resources of Iran, be they natural or human are not siphoned away for the benefit of aliens.

Newsweek insulting Iranians' intelligence

"He is still the elected president of my country," Amir says. "Insulting him in front of the world is insulting all Iranians."

More a:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21047612/site/newsweek/

What is more insulting? Reading an incorrect statement from an American media, or what Bollinger said? Let's look at the statement. AhMADinejad was not "elected" by the Iranian nation. In fact as the Iranians said, "delam khonak shod", or as we say in England, "I was right chuffed", to see AhMADinejad get cut up by Bollinger. And yes, he is a dictator, as the turnout was low, and the choice was awful.

But what is really insulting, is to see an Iranian reporter, report such a load of rubbish in AP and Newsweek. Our problem is not so much with the Seyyeds, but the incorrect reporting that is going on. And to the undeducated, they might think that the article was right, when it is outrageously wrong.

Seyyeds and the ticking clock

In view of the fact that Iran has not fulfilled the requirements of UN Security Council Resolutions 1737 and 1747, including the suspension of its enrichment and reprocessing activities, we agree to finalize a text for a third UN Security Council Sanctions Resolution under Article 41 of Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations with the intention of bringing it to a vote in the UN Security Council unless the November reports of Dr. Solana and Dr. El Baradei show a positive outcome of their efforts.

More

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i1dgxJCrq3yXejUwtmwy5QopFsZgD8RUJ8180

So it is good to see the world out smarting the IAEA. ElBaradei have even been suspected of collusion with the Seyyeds.

Seyyed's Poodle thinks he was a visiting professor at Columbia

Did you think that AhMADinejad was a teacher, that was invited to Columbia University? Well he thinks he was. Look at this clip

http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2007/09/26/amanpour.ahmadinejad.cnn?iref=videosearch

Then scroll to 1:58 into the interview, and you will hear him say something like, the students of Columbia came to see a teacher. But he knows that he is saying something really stupid, as he formulated his sentences in a very indirect way. He could have said, "I was invited by the students to teach them", but he did not say that.

The guy is worse than a megalomaniac, he is a dillusional megalomaniac. And this sort of dillusional illness has infested all these Seyyeds, who await some Mahdi to come to their rescue.

U.S. moving to implement new sanctions against Iran, and sell arms to Arabs

"We're going to keep going," Burns told reporters. "If Mr. Ahmadinejad thinks somehow that he has been given a pass, he is mistaken about that."Burns' talks over dinner with diplomats from Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany will set the stage for a second meeting on Thursday and then one between Rice and the group's other foreign ministers on Friday when the resolution is expected to be further defined.However, he said it is unlikely that the text of a new resolution will be agreed to this week.As Burns spoke, Rice was assuring Iran's wary neighbors in the Persian Gulf of U.S. backing to improve their defenses against a "hegemonistic Iran" through proposed multibillion dollar arms sales, a senior State Department official told reporters.

kare11.com :: KARE 11 TV - U.S. moving to implement new sanctions against Iran

Ah, you see how clear it all is.  The US wants that prat AhMADinejad to scare the pants off the Arabs so that they can sell even more arms to the Arabs.

Bollingers questions for President Ahmadinejad

Frankly, and in all candor, Mr. President, I doubt that you will have the intellectual courage to answer these questions. But your avoiding them will in itself be meaningful to us.

My questions for President Ahmadinejad | Salon.com

So Bollinger spoke his mind, and he wanted to tell AhMADinejad personally in public, and he did not care what the reply was.  See the 02:11 minute.

Mad comments from the Madman from Iran

"Our people are the freest in the world," he said. "The freest women in the world are the women in Iran." Those who make human rights charges against his government "are unaware of the situation in Iran," he added.

Iranian president answers Washington press corps | csmonitor.com

This is a sure sign of a madman.