Russians coming to their senses

"We do not need a nuclear Iran or an Iran with the potential to create them," a Russian official whose name was not disclosed told Russian news agencies Monday. "We will not play any anti-U.S. games with it, should [Iran] decide against giving any answers to the IAEA's questions. Let them answer for themselves."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/12/AR2007031201296.html

Well with comments like that it seems that the Russians are not too keen in being an anti-US propaganda tool for the Seyyeds.

Iran's Seyyeds and the right to invade Iraq

"US forces will be targeted if they stay," Larijani has also told the press

Asia Times Online :: Middle East News - US and Europe drain Iran's half-full glass

This Seyyed, and the writer of the article, are talking through their Turban and hat respectively.  There is a proxy war going on in Iraq.  The Seyyeds are using Iran's wealth, to build a bomb and get back the old caliphate with its capital in Baghdad.  I bet you that in the Seyyeds' mind, he wants to build a new state stretching from Islamabad to Baghdad and to the Levant with Baghdad at it centre.

Trouble with that idea is that Ur in Iraq (which is why Iraq is called what it is in the first place) is where Abraham was born.  That brings in the two other religious fanatics from the Jewish and Christian side.  So Iraq does mean more than just oil to the US, with its Evangelists.

As far as Iranians are concerned, all three "religious" reasons, are just that, "religious".  The capital of Iran was called in the time of the Sassanians Cteisphon (and we Iranians pronounce it Teezfoon).  The Sassanians had plenty of tolerance and all the younger faiths than Iranian philosophy could live.  In fact in the light of Zoroastrian tolerance, other faith were encouraged.

Ironically the younger faith did not reciprocate did they, and apostates like Salman Parsi were encouraged to burn all of Iran's books.  So the younger faiths have lost their right to anything.  They broke the peace, and that is why they are where they are.  You cannot ignore history.

How Matt Lauer got it completely wrong on Iran

Watch this video

http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?g=923e4bfd-11ba-421f-9958-ab1308cc8ef2&f=00&fg=

First of all I like that ad with the dog chasing the owner. It just about sums up what you will see. The US at the moment is trying so hard to connect to the Seyyeds. The liberal news of US like MSNBC, which knows so pitifully little about the history of Iran, got Matt Lauer to state that Mossadegh was a President in 1953.

We all know how Mossadegh abused democracy for the first time, with rent-crowds, that later Khomeini used as well. And to this day the Seyyeds use rent-a-crowds in front of the TV. The US Democrats fell for all this in 1979, and it is happening again.

What is even funnier is amongst all the intellectuals of Iran, Matt Lauer goes and finds some Seyyed Professor who defends the nuke plans the Seyyeds have. It is all a laugh really. But you watched it on TV, so it must be true. You will see what I mean at the end, that the only clips worth were the ads.

Anyway, it shows one thing for sure. The Iranian Opposition has not managed to do anything in the past 30 years. Why is it the reporters like Matt Lauer do not know about the Iranian Opposition. Or maybe they do know, and they just want to use Iran to criticize the Republicans, instead of dealing with the Iranians' suffering under the Seyyeds. US reporter are again dragged into Iran because of the growing influence of the Seyyeds in Iraq, and the don't even know the geography of the area.

Why is the Seyyed Poodle sucking up to the West saying "sorry" to UK?

He also told the programme that "if the American government, and British government, corrects themselves, problems will be solved."

Channel 4 - News - Iranian president says "sorry" to UK

Up to this point, this Seyyed poodle was painted as some unyielding demon, and now he comes across as Mr Nice Guy.  Has all this got to do with a deal with the Brits getting out of the would be Seyyed Area in Iraq or present day Shiite dominated provinces in southern Iraq?

N.B. British Oil has invested a lot of money in these areas with a number of other Oil companies.

ElBaradei buys more time for Iran's Seyyeds' nuke bomb program

“Resolving all outstanding verification issues in the next two to three months, after a long deadlock, would go a long way towards building the confidence of the international community in the peaceful nature of Iran’s past nuclear programme,”

Despite progress, important issues of Iran’s nuclear programme still remain – UN


And what will ElBaradei do next January when nothing had happened, and the Seyyeds had not come completely clean?

True Iranians will never fight for Seyyeds

"Based on discussions at the Organization of the Islamic Conference, an attack against any Muslim country amount to an attack against all Muslim countries … That's a legitimate right," said Gholam Hussein Elham when asked whether Iran will defend Syria if it were attacked by Israel.

More at

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3447223,00.html

Sad as it seems, the present highly dellusional theocratic regime in Iran, thinks it has the support of all Iranians. Or maybe the above statement is just another pathetic sound bite as more and more Sunnis are becoming anti Seyyed. The people of Iran hardly participated in the so called elections last time. People spit on mullahs in Iran. And Iranians carry on doing things their way in Iran, ignoring the Seyyeds. The Seyyeds are losing the war against the non believers. The Iranian puts Iran's peace first for Iranian reasons, as opposed to any other reason that is not part of the Nowrooz Spirit of Free Will and Peace for all.

Thank you Australia from all Free Iranians

Australia will not approve the sale of its uranium to Russia until it is assured that the nuclear fuel would not be sold to hostile countries like Iran and Syria for production of bomb, Prime Minister John Howard said today.

Central Chronicle--World


Good on ya Aussies.  Well done to the Australians.  Free Iranians will remember you.  Why don't the NAM do this?

Russia's man who loves Seyyeds

Vice Chairman of Russia's Parliament Duma, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, has urged the fast delivery of the sophisticated S-400 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran to enable the Middle Eastern country to defend its air space, the Press TV reported. Zhirinovsky was addressing the open session of Duma on Wednesday.

Company News Story


There are so many factions in Russia.  Mr Z is obviously the man to watch for any cooperation with the Seyyeds.

Brits vs Seyyeds in Iraq

British forces were engaged in a "proxy war with Iran" in the south of Iraq, the officer who planned this week's withdrawal from Basra Palace said today.

More at:

http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/politics/international_politics/british+troops+proxy+war+with+iran/771452

For so long the conspiracy was that the Brits were in it with the Seyyeds, shielding them from the US.

Does it really matter. I still think the Seyyeds and their kind, should go from Iran and rule southern Iraq, Yeah, leave Iran to the true Iranians, that put Iran over and above any belief system, unless of course the belief system is believing in Iran, like Zoroastrianism is.

Tone of the press on Iran's horrible regime

With the Islamist regime in Tehran making clear that it has no intention of complying with U.N. Security Council

Options on Iran -- The Washington Times, America's Newspaper


One look at the above tone, and you can see how the world is now clearly separating the Islamist regime from the people of Iran.  That was not the case not so long ago.

The more the Seyyeds are seggragated in the media as distinct from the rest of Iranians, the better and easier the regime change will be.