The Poor in Iran

"We are staying here," said a protester who gave his name as Abu Rish. "We have money and support from Iran and Syria and we can go on like this for another 50 years."

http://mobile.nytimes.com/article;jsessionid=11E107F08E5E992C7A7D4BB922D2444E.w6?a=163297&f=20&p=1

Fact is that the oil fund is being siphoned, and used more in Lebanon than on the poor secular Iranians. The poor in Iran abstained en-masse from the recent Seyyed selection process in Iran.

The rest of Iran barely survive, and are bombarded by propaganda everyday; on how the Seyyeds are winning the Nuclear argument for secular Iranians on the world scene. It creates a false sense of success, when less and less funding is available, and the economic depression worsens.

Quo Bene? Peak Oil advocates, and all those corporations making use of the cheap oil contracts, that the Chinese have established for the world corporations in China with all those prisoners.

Obliteration a phone call away?

We could obliterate Iran’s infrastructure and architecture with a simple phone call.

If you are an Iranian, ask yourself this. Why should Iran be in such a situation, to have people say such things?

What have the Seyyeds done to bring on this kind of reaction from your average commentator?

Why don't we have a decent group of people representing Iran, outside Iran, to bestow the respect this ancient nation deserves?

Who represents Iran?

Members of the United Iraqi Alliance had said the delegation was sent to Tehran to tell Iran to stop backing Shi'ite militias fighting U.S. and Iraqi security forces, underscoring Iraq's unease over the influence of its powerful neighbor.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080503/ts_nm/iraq_iran_dc

The Seyyeds oligarchy in Iran, are hardly in control of Iran, let alone some die-hards who have gone to Sadr City. But they are in control of the essential machinery of the state in Iran, to stop the regular army and the true Iranians to stop them.

I have already written at great length, about how Iranians can realise that they have the real power. Fact is that Iran has yet to have a social fabric on which it can create a instantaneous public outrage against the Seyyeds.

How do you create such a social fabric? Iranians are very good at making carpets, so why can't we weave one for all of us to stand on, and use to express our nationalistic sentiments? It is all part of being a primitive democracy. At the moment we have gone from voting to not voting.

Remember the first time the people of Iran went and voted; after Khomeini asked them to decide to trash Iran for an Islamic Republic. And they did, we are told. No one really knows. Nowadays people just abstain. So people do not participate socially any more.

Social participation will take time, but the new channels for it are being build along the modern networks such as internet blogging, and text messaging, which the Seyyeds are fighting. In this age of Aquarius the world will move forward via concensus. There really is no mouth piece such as a King anymore. So threads are started and concensus is sought.

Iranians have set up forums such as Iranian.com and the like, and are able to assimilate their thoughts. This process is fine for mutual understanding, but strategies to put into action any opposition for confrontation is difficult. It requires one of the Seyyeds to be part of the forum, and be defeated in a debate. That does not happen. And none of us can go on the Seyyed TV, to take them on and live.

So there needs to be as I have said, an appointment of a selected group of Iranians who are the best in the world at this time; who want to put Iran First and represent Iran in Exile. All forums will be linked in and concensus achieved. The UN needs to recognise this body, and kick out the Seyyed Rep.

It seems like a crazy idea, but there is no other non violent solution. Once the world listens and accepts this body, the Seyyeds, who are well known will be surrounded in their bunkers and faced with the threat of a General Strike. The rest is academic. No blood is spilled.

Disinformation for US attack on Iran

The immediate purpose of this disinformation campaign is apparently to help justify the planned US attack on a wide range of Iranian industrial and military targets.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8880

One the cleverest form of disinformation is to talk about disinformation.

Ultimately any nation can do whatever it likes to do. Media can write whatever. But people have the knowledge more than ever in human history to judge and share via internet. The world media is crumbling with the power of bloggers.

Politicians and their petty media supporters are playing a losing game. I am glad to say that we Iranians are the largest community of bloggers in the world. We know how the BBC put Khomeini in power.

It won't happen again. We are winning every day against the Seyyeds in Iran. The people of Iran have discovered a new Iran, after a lot of soul searching. Our new deeper roots have had to go to the realms of Vendidad in Zend Avesta to reignite the old Iranian flame that is 20000 years old which will inspire us forth. We happily ignore the Seyyeds.

No media mogul can pull the wool over our eyes anymore.

US warns China without mentioning the Seyyeds

"If Beijing begins to accept greater responsibility for the health of the international system -- as all global powers should -- we will remain on a constructive, even if competitive, path. If not, the rise of China begins to look more adversarial," he said.

http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/national_world/stories/2008/05/01/CIA_director_0501.ART_ART_05-01-08_A6_D8A33T3.html?sid=101

Why doesn't Hayden not mention the Seyyeds' collusion with China? Fact is that it is not the Chinese, but the US corporations and other western companies, that are using China's cheap industrial zones, that are to blame.

Warmonerging US vs Non Violent Regime Change

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Tuesday that sending a second U.S. aircraft carrier to the Persian Gulf could serve as a "reminder" to Iran, but he said it's not an escalation of force.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080430/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/gates_iran

I suppose the best way to change the regime officially and respectively, is to first contain it, and then threaten it with gun boat diplomacy.

Normally that pisses off the liberals all over the world; starting from India, who are naturally anti-US, indirectly benefits the Seyyeds.

And that's been the story all along since the Seyyed take over. And that is why the oil price has gone through the roof and Exxon makes 1 billion a day.

Put all that together and you can see why they would rather not have a peaceful non violent regime change.

Mass Abstention of Seyyed selection in Iran will happen

Some 21 million Iranians are eligible to vote in the Friday run-offs.

http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/000200804250921.htm

No one but the Seyyeds and Basij will vote.

Wipe out vs Obliterated

"While it is reasonable to warn Iran of the consequence of it continuing to develop nuclear weapons and what those real consequences bring to its security, it is not probably prudent... in today's world to threaten to obliterate any other country and in many cases civilians resident in such a country," he said.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jEp2ukq1nzsx5Q...

Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, should really have pointed this out sooner. It is so embarrassing to see a seasoned politican, such as Hilary Clinton, who raves on about being so much more experienced, making a comment like this, just to get conservative votes from would be McCain supporters.

We Iranians have now gotten used to politicians throwing the name of Iran, and misrepresenting Iran. Obviously one is lead to believe that both the "Obliterated" comment will be seen along side the "Wipe Out" comment from now on. But would you think that Clinton is as irresponsible a person as that Seyyed poodle in Iran?

UN rules remove Seyyed missiles

Malaysian Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak said Iranian companies were ordered out of the Defense Services Asia show Tuesday because their exhibition was deemed "offensive."

"Unfortunately, when we came around to inspecting their stand, they displayed equipment that clearly contravened the UN resolution - equipment such as missiles and missile systems and others," Najib told reporters.

Najib said the exhibit was in defiance of UN resolutions that ban Iranian arms exports and forbid countries from providing Iran with technical and financial assistance that could contribute to its alleged nuclear weapons program.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1208870479864&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

It is with great thanks to UN and the Malaysians that we Iranians that have a peaceful nature have to look up to. We cannot fight these monsters in any other way but through the application of International Law, until decent ancient laws of Iran come back.

Does Anxiety Lead People to Religion?

An intriguing new vein of psychological research, however, does show that religion can act as a buffer against existential anxieties. Mike Friedman and W. Steven Rholes at Texas A&M University have shown that when Christian fundamentalists are shown inconsistencies in the Bible, those who acknowledge them become more anxious, compared with fundamentalists who maintain the inerrancy of the Bible.When asked to complete a number of word stems such as D E _ _, for example, fundamentalists who acknowledged the contradictions in their faith were more likely to reach for the word DEAD, as opposed to DEER, DEBT or DEED.The connection between faith and anxiety seems to run in both directions, in that increased religiosity predicts lower anxiety, while higher anxiety causes people to cling ever more tightly to their faith. Thomas Pyszczynski at the University of Colorado once found that when Islamic students in Iran were made to feel anxious, they were more likely to gravitate toward fundamentalist religious claims -- and endorse religiously motivated suicide attacks against the United States

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/20/AR2008042001893.html

It seems to make a lot of sense to me.