U.S. losing credibility over Iran

It turned out to be another in the series of Bush administration big talk that time exposed as hollow.

http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=680408&category=OPINION&newsdate=4/13/2008

I tend to agree with that view. The US administration promised so many Iranian Americans, that it would deal with the Seyyeds, but it never did. This is now so obvious, that most Iranians see a collusion between the Seyyeds and the US.

Delusional predicate for Petraeus

Ever since President Nouri al-Maliki ordered the attacks in Basra on the Mahdi Army, Gen. David Petraeus has been laying the predicate for U.S. air strikes on Iran and a wider war in the Middle East

http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20080411/cm_uc_crpbux/op_335802

Let's look at what the US is doing. It thinks that somehow the Shiite world will support it, just because of Maliki's order to attack Basra. Fact is that the Shiites or Seyyeds, do not give two hoots about Iraqi nationalism. Seyyeds do not care for the 5000 years of ancient Iraq or Babylon. They only care for their 1400 year of dogma. It is about time the US supported the very ancient roots of the area.

Chinese-Seyyed military alliance

Imagine a Chinese-Iranian alliance for a second--with the latest and greatest Russian weapons in their respective land and naval arsenals. Not a pretty picture.The kicker is that some of China's Sizzler missiles are reported to be nuclear-tipped. Yeah, the story just keeps getting better, doesn't it?What if Iran successfully develops nuclear weapons technology, and can tip their Sizzlers with nuclear warheads?

http://www.defensereview.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1116

Well the author of this article could well be onto something. We know that the Seyyeds are driven by their dogma. So they will feel as if they are acting according to your consciousness. As true Iranians we cannot allow these weapons put Iran in harms way.

Sunnis complain about US and Seyyed collaboration

"Then suddenly something went wrong, and last week Maliki (who is now equally close to the Iranians) went to war against the Sadrists. Some claim that an under-the-table deal was hammered out in Baghdad in March between the Americans, Maliki and Iranian President Mahmud Ahmadinejad. The Iranian leader would let the Americans have their way - and crush the Sadrists - in exchange for softening pressure on the Iranian regime. In return, Ahmadinejad would help them bring better security to Iraq through a variety of methods stemming from Iranian cooperation. ...Other Shi'ite heavyweights in the Arab world, like Hasan Nasrallah of Hezbollah and Lebanese parliament speaker Nabih Berri, who are both very close to Iran, have been relatively silent over the ordeal."

http://uruknet.info/?p=m42790&s1=h1

It is marvelous to see how the Sunnis or Saddam Hussein heirs view the whole Iran-Iraq deal with the Sadr Brigade. Clearly the writer points to that Seyyed element, that is really out of place in Iran and Iraq. Ancient Iran and ancient Iraq (or Babylon) have a common peaceful root. It is only because of these younger religious dogmas and their bandits, that have served the pockets of oil companies, that the situation does not change. But the areas of Iraq where the Seyyed holy shrines are, will always be a bone of contention for them. Can one really call them "holy" if they have caused so much death? For me if anything causes death, then it is wrong. Nothing is above Life, and this has been said in our ancient Zend Avesta some 20000 years ago.

Russia is US's proxy against US

"I appreciate his leadership on the Iranian issue," Bush said at a joint news conference following talks with Putin at this southern Russian resort city, which had included discussion about Iran

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hIhJ6Mj6JCdZoAjLEuJ_rKCISugg

So we can hold the Russians completely responsible for any Seyyed beligerance. Will all the spent fuel go back to Russia for sure? Or will the Russians be building a monster out of the Seyyeds to fight the US with later. Remember what happened when they supported Saddam. We all know that Bush is doing all this to please internal dissent in US. But since when have we had the US ever agreeing with Russia. In the 70's Iran was supposed to be with the US against the menace to the North. Oil brings everyone together.

Putin is so naïve about the Seyyeds

"No one can seriously think that Iran would dare attack the United States," a source in the Russian delegation at the NATO-Russia summit in Bucharest quoted Putin as telling leaders.

http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=25222

How naïve can Putin be, when there is a proxy war going on between US and the Seyyeds' men in Iraq. Why doesn't he realise that, if the Seyyeds do finally make the warheads, they will point it to any nation, including Russia. Imagine the Chenchnya getting help from the Seyyeds.

Israel imports oil from Iran's Seyyeds

Israel imports Iranian oil on a large scale even though contacts with Iran and purchasing of its products are officially boycotted by Israel. Israel gets around the boycott by having the oil delivered via Europe.

Fact is, that the Seyyeds use Israel in their moral arguments, and yet they let the oil they control to get to them. Normal Iranians, have no qwalm with the Israelis, but these aliens, who are stealing our oil wealth, are being hypocrites, and no one in Iran writes about it. It seems the Seyyeds are not really good at imposing sanctions, and do not care. Why is it, that not one member of the Seyyed oligarchy is not picking up on this? There is no internal dissent. Very strange.

Iranians went to America first

From this article we can see that the pre-ice age Iranians went to the Americas. This fits with what is written Vendidad of the Zend Avesta.

read more | digg story

Babylon vs violent Iraq

"Petraeus is going to go very hard on Iran as the source of attacks on the American effort in Iraq," a British official said. "Iran is waging a war in Iraq. The idea that America can't fight a war on two fronts is wrong, there can be airstrikes and other moves," he said.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/05/wiran105.xml

Why is it that a British official making such a big deal of this? Fact is that the Brits have known about the Seyyed poodles' involvement in Basra, and have kept very quiet. That ensured that the Seyyeds could trickle in. Now they have become strong enough to cause havoc in the Green Zone.

But this war is just a money making fiasco. You have Seyyeds paying their poodles, and the Cheney people paying their toy soldiers. Their is very little control from Baghdad. Qom now controls Iraq. The Seyyeds have always wanted to rule Iraq and their orders stopped Badr.

But Badr is on the war path again and it wants to provoke the US again. It is powered by a 1400 year cult with no consideration of a much older heritage of that area. Ancient history is not being respected. The true spirit of Babylon was found by Cyrus the Great, not by Seyyeds. It produced a long lasting peace.

Seyyeds lose China card

Beijing is believed to have decided to assist the inspectors after documents seized from Iranian officials included blueprints for "shaping" uranium metal into warheads, the testing of high explosives used to detonate radioactive material and the procurement of dual-use technology.Much of the new material was presented to the governors of the Vienna-based IAEA last February. That meeting is said to have triggered China's change of heart, the paper added

http://www.kuna.net.kw/NewsAgenciesPublicSite/ArticleDetails.aspx?id=1896580&Language=en

So finally the world managed to convince the Chinese, who pretended that they did not no anything, that they did know what their Seyyed trading partners were doing, with all the money they have been giving to them via oil purchases.

Now they have no reason to do all that trading with the Seyyeds, who are not spending it on Iranian welfare, but on their own dogmatic agenda.