Sunday, January 20, 2008
Seyyeds buying votes and cooperation from Iranians
We all know how inefficient government and quasi-government organizations are in the best democracies. Countless books have been written comparing government services with private enterprises.
The religious domains that the Seyyeds have created, and use to channel funds to the poor, remains highly suspect. Dare one criticize a religious domain, or point the finger of suspicion to it? Will the poor and depraved have benefited from these handouts, when the inflation in Iran is so rampant.
Are Iranians truly going to get "ripped off" even more and do nothing, or have they been enlightened by the greater secular force, and will not vote. Can the Iranian nation discuss mass boycott and non cooperation via blogs? Can a public debate occur where the strength on nil participation be discussed? The Seyyeds know that if a public debate does arise, they will be out. Will the world have this debate?
Or will GWB say something to piss the people of Iran off, and make them vote, just to prove him wrong? It is funny how GWB can actually help the Seyyeds stay in power if he says the wrong things. Why don't the vociferous left wing that brought the Seyyeds to power, and hate GWB, not talk about the non violent regime change that can be made in Iran, via the media.
Why doesn't the world media make it, its responsibility to question the power of the Seyyeds against a mass boycott of all Iranians, and non cooperation in all areas of the Iranian economy that serve the Seyyeds. Why don't the left wing of the world not use Iran as a tool to critisize the US. Why doesn't the world media not show the Iranian people how easy it is to topple the Seyyeds by just talking about it in public.
Think of the lead article in the London Times, or the New York Times, addressing the people of Iran, and presenting a non violent solution to regime change in Iran. What is wrong with that? All it would do is to force the Seyyeds' own newspapers and government spokesmen to react. And their reaction against a mass general strike, where people do not leave their homes is hopeless. The Seyyeds cannot drag 70 millions out of their homes to keep the economy running.
Fact is that the world media does not want to remove the Seyyeds. Fact is that the US and China do not want to remove the Seyyeds. The people of Iran in the satellite TVs do not even talk along these lines. Why doesn't VOA bring this topic up?
It seems I am the only one. Nuts.
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Obama and Seyyeds
http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4886
So says Mr Obama. He likes to negotiate with the Seyyeds, but does not trust them with nukes.
Monday, January 07, 2008
Clash between Seyyed sailors and US
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080107/ts_nm/usa_iran_ship_dc
Making such provocative jestures to a force that could sqwash you is really dumb. It is just as well the US did not take these Seyyed sympathizers seriously. Of course there will be great stories like these to come to get the oil price up.
Good Deed Reminder for Israel
"Once you can reach with your missile double the distance between Iran and Israel, it means there is some farther target. Is it Egypt? Libya? Saudi Arabia? A European country?"
Iran is a strong and rich country, but not because of its oil or money, that the Seyyed rulers abuse. We actually do not need to have any of these very expensive weapons at all, if we had people representatives not believing in non violence and human rights or above all capital punishment.
The people representatives in the Seyyed rule follow rules that are alien to everyday Iranians. But what is most annoying in reading these Israeli reports, is that they do not point to the alternative peaceful regime change solutions that can happen. Iranians now are all inspired from the Good Deeds of Cyrus the Great for the Jews.
Sunday, January 06, 2008
Seyyed calls Norway inhuman
http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=160753
It absolute madness for anyone looking at the freedom of the Norwegians, to think that their laws are worse than Seyyeds' laws for Iranians.
It is also rediculous to assume that whatever happens between Israelis and Palestinians, should determine how the Seyyeds rule over Iranians.
These Seyyed sympathizers in Iran, have to say such things to satisfy the Seyyeds. The whole of Iran is ignoring the Seyyeds, with the women wearing makeup and as fashionable as ever, if not more. And the Seyyeds will never ever win the hearts and minds of Iranians.
Saturday, January 05, 2008
Who feeds the Seyyeds?
http://nation.ittefaq.com/issues/2008/01/06/news0440.htm
Did anyone suspected that Greece would be the greatest importer of Iranian oil. Now it is not just because the Greeks have the largest oil shipping network, and they just follow instructions. But Greek tycoons are the most philosophical in the world. Greece is supposed to be the most freedom loving culture in the world. So why are they blinded by greed to not look at what the Seyyeds are doing in Iran. And the same is true for all the others.
Getting money from the frozen assets
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080104/ap_on_re_us/iran_lawsuit
Can someone give us more info on getting money from the frozen assets.
Friday, January 04, 2008
Ironically it's Pakistan not Iran
http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4866
I am all for non violent regime change. I don't like saying this, but the passing away of Benazhir Bhutto, has frightened the Israelis. She was going to try to establish relations with Israel. Now that makes the nuclear threat more from Pakistan.
I and a lot of others have been saying this about Pakistan for such a long time. They supplied the stuff to the Seyyeds. All you need are some Sunni extremists to gain politically, and more importantly the Israelis to fret more and more over Pakistan's threat, then Iran will be out of the picture. Now if the PPP can establish itself again, then the Seyyeds will be enemy number one again. If not then expect a US attack on Pakistan to safeguard the nukes, and the Republicans to stay.
The Seyyeds and the Sunni extremists have their own "good" reasons for using nukes righteously. They believe they have to sort the world out don't they. Right now Iran is a proxy for all the major terrorist groups. The Chinese supply the cash without any concern. The US companies in the Chinese industrial zones, love it with slave labour and almost free rent and energy. We have seen the US clamp down on some of the Chinese arms suppliers.
But I hope that the focus does move to Pakistan and away from Iran. That way the Seyyeds cannot look so important to all of Iran. And that is the only reason they are ruling. It is all based on false fear. The people of Iran do not need nukes to get the world's ear. We have our own non Seyyed culture and morality, which will confront any form of violence internally and externally non violently. Less talk about a strike at Iran, and more talk about the power of non violent general strike please.
Thursday, January 03, 2008
Divestment from Iran
http://www.statesman.com/business/content/business/stories/other/01/03/0103sudan.html
With the overwhemling majority vote in the UN against Capital Punishment and condemnation of the state of Human Rights in Seyyed Iran, many of the US investment funds are having to sell shares in companies that do business in Iran. The Chinese companies are getting hit most. The Chinese have tried to delay the UN Security Council, but the real course of action, is within the US itself. So ironically the US's problem with the Seyyeds can be solved right from the US.
Monday, December 31, 2007
No Gas
Turkmenistan normally exports between 20 to 23 million cubic metres (706 to 812 million cubic feet) of gas daily to Iran, the spokesman said.
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5g8kprmWTGdlprL...
Total madness, that we have proven reserves second to Russia, and the only thing the Seyyeds are interested in, is siphoning the Oil income to make centrifuges.
And what are the Iranian people's reaction to all this? A lot. But is it being reported by anyone in the West? Does AFP go further than this? No. After all they don't want the French interests to be influenced in any way do they.