The resolution is not legally binding but carries moral weight and reflects the majority view of world opinion.
Thank goodness most of the world is with the Iranian Opposition. But the Seyyeds think that they are over and above the UN don't they.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1198517212331&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
What is utterly amazing is how no matter what strategy the Israelis, neocons, or whoever else has, they do not see the real problem. The real problem is that the Seyyeds, especially the likes of Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi and his echelon, will never be seen with the Israelis or American, agreeing about anything.
Now the Israelis and the US neocons know this. So all this rapproachment, is a precursor to the next and perhaps ultimate phase. They want to make sure that they cannot be critisized for not trying to be reasonable with the Seyyeds.
But we all know that they all could remove the Seyyeds in a week if they wanted to. So all this is political theatre. Why don't they recognise the true Iranians in opposition, and help the non violent regime change.
The reason is very clear. The last thing they want is for Iran to be run by an intelligence that would compete in all spheres of human activity. The brain and monetary drain must continue, and Iran must become a pariah state.
But the people of Iran are fighting this inhibition internally. Every Seyyed has been ear marked and is avoided. People will deal only with those who are not part of the ruling oligarchy. The change is already taking place and the so called coming Seyyed election will be totally ignored by all.
Unless of course the US President says something like the Iranians do not know how to vote, and gets everyone's back up. That would help the Seyyeds just like it did the last time. But the people of Iran will see through this.
http://www.iii.co.uk/news/?type=afxnews&articleid=6464495&action=article
And the US has threatened the Malaysians with withrawing the preferred trading status, and Malaysians didn't twitch. It is amazing how the Chinese and Malaysians have absolutely no regard for Human Rights. How can they be so materialistic?
Truly we live in a perverse world. So the US agencies are betting, that once the next media campaign to the pre-emptive strikes gets going, they are off the hook. The world would rather not blame them for getting involved in politics. But that's the whole point. If the US "intelligence" agencies gave credit to Iranian patriots, that are not involved with the Seyyeds, then maybe we Iranians could change our country in our own sweet peaceful way. But they would rather try to get themselves in that llittle spot where the newspapers write about Iran. Not one word is written about how, a public dialogue on the ways and means of non violent resistance, in itself would show up the Seyyeds weaknesses, and show the strength of non violent general strike.
"Their strategy was that if the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) found any one piece of this research program, it would be possible to justify it as civilian. But so long as it was all together, they wouldn't be able to."
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/933444.html
For the past many years it used to be the case, that every time the IAEA came around to give an "A OK" to the Seyyed stealth nuke program, someone - either a "defector" or the NCRI would release some new piece of information, and poor old Ayatollah ElBaradei would get pissed off that he had to rewrite his anti-US speech.
THE credibility of a major security conference talking place in Bahrain has been thrown in doubt after Iranian officials pulled out at the last minute.
But to keep the world on side, America may have to show new flexibility. For example, while tightening sanctions, it could offer to talk to Iran about all aspects of their troubled relations, even before work at Natanz stopped. Iran might refuse. But that would at least make it clear which side was the spoiler.
http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10251997
We know that the so called "spies" of United States, had seen some notes of some whisperings from some Seyyed thugs. That led them to deduce that the weaponization program, which is not that hard, has been halted. The world press, of course, the ones inside United States to begin with, and then the ones outside United States, used this as ammunition to beat neocons like Dick Cheney. What a shame that none of these correspondents actually know much about the nuclear cycle. As you can see from the article above, the crucial part of the nuclear cycle is the enrichment process. That bit has not stopped, and those centrifuges in Natanz have cost Iran so much both financially and internationally. We have let the Seyyeds ruin our reputation as the Birth Land of Human Rights. The fact that the enriched Uranium has no use for any power station in Iran, means that the Seyyeds want to use it for their own global Armaggeddon in respect of their Mahdi. They will press the button. The MAD (Multually Assured Destruction) principle does not apply for the Seyyeds. They see themselves as over and above UN or any international body that exists, has existed, or will exist. So what is the solution? The solution is that the world press should spend more time praising the Iranian diaspora, that has managed to create a new understanding of Iran for the future. We have people of incredibly high intellectual calibre who are keeping the dignity and respect of Iranians. These professionals are the future of Iran. We all want peaceful regime change. The one power we do not have is a world press that understands and appreciates the simplest way to get rid of the Seyyeds without bloodshed. We need the world press to not ask about the nuclear programs, but to ask what the Seyyeds could do in light of a non violent general strike. Once the Seyyeds are faced with questions centred on General Strikes, then they will realise that their bandits, can do nothing against a population of 65 million, if it decided to shut down Iran for even a couple of days. Our problem is not the Seyyeds, but the world press's blackout on forces of peaceful regime change in Iran.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601102&sid=aQKIB92PC240&refer=uk
What is the point of diplomacy with teeth that does not include oil trading? The Chinese have clearly stated, that they will not be party to any aggreement, that would stop the flow of oil. And then you have the UK being the centre of military precurement. Unlike the US, the UK is not forcing companies to choose between the Seyyeds and UK.
In a meeting Tuesday with Iranian nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili, Putin repeated his "call for freezing work on uranium enrichment," Interfax quoted Lavrov as saying.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071205/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpoliticsrussiaenrich
How strange that the Russians are toeing the US line. After China stopping a lot of credit lines to the Seyyeds, everyone was thinking that the Russians were going stump the coalition. Obviously the world values its trade relations with the US more than the Seyyeds. The US has made it quite clear that it will not allow companies that trade with the Seyyeds to trade with the US as well.
