Financial situation of the Seyyeds in Iran

Below is a link, to a very good summary on the economic situation on Iran, with all the numbers you need.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21520466/

West Asia vs East Asia

Many Arabs argue that the Iranians actually want America to attack. Politically, that would help the hard-liners rally support. And militarily, it would lure the United States onto a battlefield where its immense firepower wouldn't do much good.

David Ignatius - Walking Into Iran's Trap - washingtonpost.com

Actually the argument is that, the US would like to get stuck in another protracted war, so that West Asia is totally destroyed.  It knows, like Vietnam and Cambodia, the out flow of cheap good labour, which it needs.  It will still carry getting the oil, just like it still does in Iraq.  The US oil companies and their Seyyed poodles, have no love for Iran or true Iranians.  The last thing they want is, for Iranians to have multinational oil companies, and multinational corporations, like those in East Asia.  The Chinese or the East Asians do not want that competition.  That is why China supports the Seyyeds.  Iranians and other Caspian people are young and extremely intelligent, with a culture that predates all of Asia.  We ruled Asia for centuries, and the last thing the rest of Asia, and their US backers want, is another Persian Empire, with it own splendour of multinational corporations, becoming The Bridge of Turquoise between Europe and Africa and the East, again.

FT's Philip Stephens miscalculation

Last month, at a conference hosted by the Konrad Adenauer Foundation’s Washington office, one of those present recalled being taught by Henry Kissinger at Harvard. China had just tested the bomb and a fellow student suggested that the answer was a pre-emptive strike against its nuclear installations. And just how frequently should the US repeat the exercise? Mr Kissinger asked in response. Mr Bush might ask himself the same question.

FT.com / Columnists / Philip Stephens - Bush heads for a dreadful miscalculation over Iran

Philip Stephens thinks he is really smart with this article, drawing correlation of pre nuclear China to Iran.  What he does not realise, is that present day China would not be where it is, if the US decided to isolate the Chinese banking system, as it has with the Iranian banks.

Sanctions after 20 million, why?

"The US sanctions can affect third parties, such as Russia or one of its companies, if their investment in Iran is more than 20 million dollars.

More at:

http://www.energy-daily.com/reports/Lukoil_to_continue_in_Iran_despite_sanctions_problems_999.html

What sort of sanctions is that? My argument for sanctions on the Seyyeds, is that they are sanctioning the ordinary real secular modern Iranians, who do not like the Seyyed dogma. So the Seyyeds who control the government sector, should be fully sanctioned, and not limited to any sum over US $20 million. The US is not doing enough. It's a cop out.

Media isolating Seyyeds' Forces

There have been at least half a dozen intense firefights between the SAS and arms smugglers, a mixture of Iranians and Shi'ite militiamen.

More at:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2691726.ece

It is becoming quite clear, that the world press wants to make sure, that there are distinctively different elements in Iran. It is good to see that Seyyeds' armed poodles are not being confused with Iran's traditional armed forces.

One nuke man idiot replaces another in Iran

“The resignation of Mr Larijani has been accepted and Saeed Jalili will be replacing him,” government spokesman Gholam Hossein Elham was quoted as saying by several Iranian news agencies.

Jalali was born in 1965 in Iran’s holy second city of Mashhad. He started his diplomatic career in 1989 and has worked in the office of the country’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Khaleej Times Online - Larijani successor Jalili is Ahmadinejad ally


One idiot replaces another.  Obviously Putin must have known what mess there was, and so he decided to hear it right from the horse's mouth, when he went straight to the top man Seyyed Khamenei.

Two faced Blair

"This ideology now has a state, Iran, that is prepared to back and finance terror in the pursuit of destabilising countries whose people wish to live in peace."

Blair accuses Iran of fuelling 'deadly ideology' of militant Islam | Iran | Guardian Unlimited

So why wasn't Tony Blair making such punchy statements last year?  Blair dared not say such things, when we had the boat hostage situation did we.  We now have the UK government openly critisizing the US in Iraq.  But more importantly, they let the Seyyeds' men creep into Basra, and inflitrate the forces.  Ask any modern Iranian, and they will tell you that the Brits are behind the Seyyeds.  So what in the world is he going on about?

Putin's real friends are not the Seyyeds in Iran

Russia may not be with Iran, but it is not with America and Europe either.

Russia's foreign policy | Last tango in Tehran | Economist.com

So where is Russia?  Is it everything to everyone, or nothing to no one.  The funny part is that everyone thinks that the Russians are with them.  The Seyyeds will rejoice that the Russians have not disagreed about anything, and of course we all know that they have not agreed to anything either.  The US will also go on about how their relationship is fine, and yet the Russians will cut them down.  Finally look at the number of deals that the multinationals are doing in Iran, Russia and China.  So it has nothing to do with governments.  It is all about the various companies.   And the US has got it right by limiting the transaction with the Seyyeds.  It does not matter whether corporations or nations are dealing with the Seyyeds, they will get a warning and eventually forced to make a choice like the German banks had to a couple of months ago.  The Russians and Chinese, need to make a choice between the Seyyeds and the US.  And that is the bottom line.  It is strictly business, and the US Treasury is quite right to put the world corporations on the spot.  Mr Putin can come and go as much as he likes.  But if the US Treasury does not allow some of those US corporation to trade with Russia, then who is Mr Putin going to go to?

Iran Seyyeds Face Warning Over Money Laundering

The task force, known by its initials FATF, decided to make a statement about its concerns during a Wednesday-Friday plenary meeting."The FATF has repeatedly attempted to engage with Iran," McDonell said. "To date this has proved impossible, although this is still our aim."In these circumstances, and given the risks, the FATF has no option but to express its concerns publicly," he said.

FOXNews.com - Iran Faces Warning Over Money Laundering - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News


So amazing that it has taken the world to realise now that the Seyyeds have been laundering money for so long.  Why is it that they are starting to talk about it just now.  Anything to do with ignoring the US dollar perhaps.

Seyyeds vs Peace

``Efforts are being made to once again make an imposition on the Palestinian people in the name of peace. ... The result of all conferences held in the name of peace so far have been to the detriment of the Palestinian nation,'' Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said in a speech marking the end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

More at:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6993760,00.html

Peace is never an imposition. But because Seyyeds are selective (or should I say racist), only their concept of peace is correct. What if the conference was organized by Eskimos. What would they have to say then? Fact is that peace is a universal language, and we all embrace it, no matter what your belief is.