Thursday, October 18, 2007

Putin's real friends are not the Seyyeds in Iran

Russia may not be with Iran, but it is not with America and Europe either.
Russia's foreign policy | Last tango in Tehran | Economist.com

So where is Russia?  Is it everything to everyone, or nothing to no one.  The funny part is that everyone thinks that the Russians are with them.  The Seyyeds will rejoice that the Russians have not disagreed about anything, and of course we all know that they have not agreed to anything either.  The US will also go on about how their relationship is fine, and yet the Russians will cut them down.  Finally look at the number of deals that the multinationals are doing in Iran, Russia and China.  So it has nothing to do with governments.  It is all about the various companies.   And the US has got it right by limiting the transaction with the Seyyeds.  It does not matter whether corporations or nations are dealing with the Seyyeds, they will get a warning and eventually forced to make a choice like the German banks had to a couple of months ago.  The Russians and Chinese, need to make a choice between the Seyyeds and the US.  And that is the bottom line.  It is strictly business, and the US Treasury is quite right to put the world corporations on the spot.  Mr Putin can come and go as much as he likes.  But if the US Treasury does not allow some of those US corporation to trade with Russia, then who is Mr Putin going to go to?

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Iran Seyyeds Face Warning Over Money Laundering

The task force, known by its initials FATF, decided to make a statement about its concerns during a Wednesday-Friday plenary meeting."The FATF has repeatedly attempted to engage with Iran," McDonell said. "To date this has proved impossible, although this is still our aim."In these circumstances, and given the risks, the FATF has no option but to express its concerns publicly," he said.
FOXNews.com - Iran Faces Warning Over Money Laundering - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News


So amazing that it has taken the world to realise now that the Seyyeds have been laundering money for so long.  Why is it that they are starting to talk about it just now.  Anything to do with ignoring the US dollar perhaps.

Seyyeds vs Peace

``Efforts are being made to once again make an imposition on the Palestinian people in the name of peace. ... The result of all conferences held in the name of peace so far have been to the detriment of the Palestinian nation,'' Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said in a speech marking the end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

More at:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6993760,00.html

Peace is never an imposition. But because Seyyeds are selective (or should I say racist), only their concept of peace is correct. What if the conference was organized by Eskimos. What would they have to say then? Fact is that peace is a universal language, and we all embrace it, no matter what your belief is.

Friday, October 12, 2007

US hits Seyyeds' Friends

"The fact that Iran continues to challenge the international community means that ... those who do business with Iran represent a threat," Rice added.

More at:

http://www.khaleejtimes.com/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/theworld/2007/October/theworld_October405.xml&section=theworld&col=

Well it is about time. However, the irony is that most of the trading is done via US proxies from Dubai. And then you've the oil that goes to China. So Dr Rice is going to go to the Chinese and tell them to stop trading with the Seyyeds. Now that would be a miracle. For crying out loud, why doesn't someone tell the Americans, to help the Iranians take care of their own business themselves. You know, talk about the other Iranians; that are cleverer and more intelligent and better than the Seyyeds. Fact is that if all the professional Iranians came and ran Iran, the Western companies would have a new Japan to deal with, and that is the last thing they want. No, these guys want Iran to become a pariah state. Only Iranians can help themselves, and we will. The last thing you want is for the Seyyeds to tell us (once they have been rejected), that the Americans changed Iran for the better.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

The tail wagging the dog

Ahmadinejad and his ilk are not interested in any negotiation, any compromise or any live-and-let-live final solution. They are determined to be the soldiers of Mahdi come-what-may. They have no problem with the total destruction of the world. They are headed for a life of eternal bliss in Allah's paradise. They hardly care, even rejoice, if the rest of humanity is subjected to a tragic death in the nuclear, biological and chemical wasteland of planet earth.

More at:

http://www.amilimani.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=79&Itemid=2

And the world, especially the Russians and Chinese deal with him. Why? Because he is giving the oil away. Are the Chinese happy to deal with such types? Do the Chinese want to responsible for paying him so much money? If the answer is yes, then China's role in the UNSC has to be debated. The Chinese are basically bank rolling many many horrible regimes, and the West, especially GWB never mention it. And the reason for that is that the Chinese are the biggest buyers of US debt. So if you knock out the Seyyeds, you will also put the US economy at risk. A case of the tail wagging the dog. So how do stop that from happening? We Iranians in the Opposition need to have a Iran Government in Exile (IGIE). It needs to have the support of all the major corporations in the world, including the Chinese. These corporations need to swear an oath of allegiance to IGIE, that they would not deal with Seyyed Inquisition Nation (SIN). At the moment the nearest thing to that are the two lists the UNSC has made of people and organizations, which are still able to travel and do business with SIN. So we have to have the UN clear the mess SIN has got Iran into, instead of doing it ourselves. That is why there is no IGIE. We think that once the UN has banned enough people and organizations, then everything will be honky dory. Wow how naïve is that? We need to be practical, clear and above board. The world needs to see an open clear government in exile. The internet can be a great tool for this, and we can have this IGIE represented there. People with contacts in the major corporations need to be represented at the IGIE website and be accounted for their activities in getting the support for a new Iran.

Seyyeds' Emperor's Disapproval

"I have supported (previous) governments. I support this government too. This also does not mean that I approve of every detail of the work that is being done," Khameini said.

More at:


http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hUY2jT63mwB2Q1CHHJ5x6WXohozQ


We had recently two events, that are rather odd, in light of the almost thirty years of Seyyed Inquisition of Nations (SIN). SIN has managed to completely erradicate all kinds of descent, even before they started sometimes. But SIN seemed defeated, when some students raised their voice in the streets, against the Seyyed Poodle pretending to run Iran. No nation, including Iraq, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and many further afield have not managed to stop SIN. The Russian President is coming to beg them to adhere to NPT transparency rules, and Chinese whispers of flexibilty are not working. SIN is literally giving the secular Iranians birthright away from our soil, for the sake of their dogma. So could these voices of descent and opposition be pure fabrications from within to make SIN look good? Is this all theatre? Even if it is, it is good. For as we know in all despotic regimes, it is like a rice cooker, even the slightest loosening of the valve, and you get quite a lot of steam puffing out. SIN cannot control the 7000 year Iranians' Spirit Of Nowrooz (SON).

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

From the Horses Mouth

Turning to Iran's economic struggles, Rowhani said that despite high prices for Iran's oil, "we don't see a healthy and dynamic economy."


"If we had an accurate and comprehensive plan, most of the country's problems could have been resolvable," he said

More at:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071010/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_ahmadinejad

It is good to see that some bickering is beginning to take place. The silence of the Seyyeds is breaking, and people are jockeying for positions in the Seyyed elections in the Spring. More and more Seyyeds will voice their displeasure as the economic noose is tightened. Money talks. The people of Iran will have to build reserves for the day when national strikes will praralyse the country, and people power will reign over the Seyyeds.

Sunday, October 07, 2007

US$1000 for you Iranian

Iran's export revenues from crude oil, oil derivatives, and distilled natural gas have exceeded $20 billion during March 21-August 23 period, according to the Central Bank of Iran (CBI).

More:

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=154415

Well, if you do the maths you get to a figure of a million toman for each Iranian. Let me explain. $20bn divided by 20 weeks is $1bn per week. There are 70 million Iranians or 20 million three and a half member families. A billion is a thousand million. So each Iranian family should get $1000 per week.

I remember, Khomeini said something along these lines in 1978, and caught the imagination of everyone in Iran. He promised that he would deliver that amount to everyone. So what happened? Oh people criticized the Shahanshah for using the money for weapons, and misusing the funds for this and that etc etc. And you know the rest, and the mess it got us into now.

But now look at this pathetic lot. What can they do, now that they are at the helm of Iran? Just like every government in history, they will use the excuse of war or potential threat, to keep money from the poor. Ironically they create a moral duty for the poor, to enlist and fight for that ficticious threat. In the time of the Shah it was USSR, this time it is USA. Ah, but it never really happens. Something worse than war happens.

"Quo Bene?" as Machiavelli asked. And the reply sits squarely with the multinationals, and wheeler dealers who have no scruples. The wheeler dealers of the world should be careful who they give this money to.

I personally believe that there should be a fund outside Iran, that the UN should supervise, that makes sure that the Seyyeds do not use it for nukes. UN should be involved with the distribution of Iran's oil wealth, until these madmen are non violently removed. A similar concept was set up in times of Saddam for Iraq, and it was abused.

The other way, is to approach China directly over their wheeling and dealing with the Seyyeds. Tell them straight, "be careful who you give this money to". They will then say something like, "we are dealing with the government of Iran". At that point one can say, that the IRGC has been seen to support inhuman acts, such as suicide bombings and giving funds to activities in the Levant.

But then the Chinese would says, "hey it is your companies in the Chinese industrial zones that use the cheap energy, land and labour, that sell it to the Seyyeds via Dubai and such places." And then the ball is in the US court, and there is nothing that this Bush admin wants to do about it, as long as the oil price is up for the benefit of Texas. "Yup, yes sir'ee", as they say in Texas, "as long as we get the money, who cares about those ayrabs, those yankees or whateva...."

So what actually happens that is worse than war, is that we can see clearly the money going right back to the US, and the Iranian brains going there as well, as they give up on the Iranian economy. It is happening every day and is worse than war. Why, because we can do something about it. We can all address these issues clearly to the world. We can all not put up with the Seyyeds and their wheeler dealers via General Strikes.

I have written countless articles on non violent regime change, and we need the people of Iran to think and talk along such lines as General Strikes, so that the wealth and resources of Iran, be they natural or human are not siphoned away for the benefit of aliens.

Sunday, September 30, 2007

Newsweek insulting Iranians' intelligence

"He is still the elected president of my country," Amir says. "Insulting him in front of the world is insulting all Iranians."

More a:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21047612/site/newsweek/

What is more insulting? Reading an incorrect statement from an American media, or what Bollinger said? Let's look at the statement. AhMADinejad was not "elected" by the Iranian nation. In fact as the Iranians said, "delam khonak shod", or as we say in England, "I was right chuffed", to see AhMADinejad get cut up by Bollinger. And yes, he is a dictator, as the turnout was low, and the choice was awful.

But what is really insulting, is to see an Iranian reporter, report such a load of rubbish in AP and Newsweek. Our problem is not so much with the Seyyeds, but the incorrect reporting that is going on. And to the undeducated, they might think that the article was right, when it is outrageously wrong.

Saturday, September 29, 2007

Seyyeds and the ticking clock

In view of the fact that Iran has not fulfilled the requirements of UN Security Council Resolutions 1737 and 1747, including the suspension of its enrichment and reprocessing activities, we agree to finalize a text for a third UN Security Council Sanctions Resolution under Article 41 of Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations with the intention of bringing it to a vote in the UN Security Council unless the November reports of Dr. Solana and Dr. El Baradei show a positive outcome of their efforts.

More


http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5i1dgxJCrq3yXejUwtmwy5QopFsZgD8RUJ8180


So it is good to see the world out smarting the IAEA. ElBaradei have even been suspected of collusion with the Seyyeds.