The people of Iran do not need the United States of America

Some people think that the people of Iran, or the society of Iran is weak against the Seyyeds. So they state:

Paradoxically, to liberalize the theocratic state, the United States would do better to shelve its containment strategy and embark on a policy of unconditional dialogue and sanctions relief. A reduced American threat would deprive the hard-liners of the conflict they need to justify their concentration of power. In the meantime, as Iran became assimilated into the global economy, the regime's influence would inevitably yield to the private sector, with its demands for accountability and reform.

It is important to appreciate that Iran has a political system without precedent or parallel in modern history. The struggle there is not just between reactionaries and reformers, conservatives and liberals, but fundamentally between the state and society. A subtle means of diminishing the state and empowering the society is, in the end, the best manner of promoting not only democracy but also nuclear disarmament.

Where have these astute people been? Don't they realise that the young people of Iran have built a new internet network that has bypassed the Seyyed rulers. We do not need United States. It is non violent, and is a lot more subtle.

Dilip Hiro makes another stupid comment on Iran's Seyyeds - cheghadr khareh in mard?

One of the more startling comments I have just come across is this one from Dilip. You know he got his fame from supporting AK. He has been on my radar for so long. Well read this:

Specifically, if Iran were to target Israel, it would find itself annihilated since - equipped with submarine-borne nuclear weapons - Israel possesses the second-strike capability that Tehran does not.

It is as if the alien Seyyeds in Iran care. They know that once they have "wiped Israel off the map", their Mahdi will come and save them against anything. That includes an Israeli submarine nuclear attack.

Getting up Iran's Seyyeds' noses in Iraq

Someone is getting up the Seyyeds' noses badly. They are nicking their agents, and no one knows who it is that's doing it. That's funny.

"We've checked with our units and it was not an MNF-I (Multi-National Forces - Iraq) unit that participated in that event," military spokesman Lt. Col. Christopher Garver said, adding he could not confirm the diplomat was seized.

It is about time someone gave the Seyyeds a taste of their own medicine. After all, it was the likes of Ahmadinejad, who have taken so much, no too much credit, for the US Embassy hijacking.

Margin call for Ahmadinejad's account

I have always thought that Ahmadinejad primarily was supported by folks who wanted him to bring the price of oil up. Moreover no one supported anyone in opposition to him. Anyway, what have US oil companies, Islamist Fascists, neocons, Russians, Chinese, have in common? High oil prices. The news today that the oil price has dropped is quite interesting.

The dollar's fortunes, which had taken a drastic turn for the worse in late November, seemed to improve with the oil market's decline. The euro was down about 0.6 percent against the U.S. currency to trade at $1.3089.

"We've had very warm weather, and that's part of what's driving oil prices down," said Elisabeth Denison, economist at Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein.

But I have also noticed that once the drop becomes a slide, then major events take place to stem that free fall. Unfortunately the people who stand to lose money in the fall in the price of oil, have a lot of money and influence. So expect to see big flare ups of war and violence and terror, to create a scary rally in oil. But it won't work, and the producers will increase production.

Once the price of oil really starts to consolidate at lower prices, then OPEC will start to fall apart as countries will cheat on their quotas. With the higher US dollar and Islamist Fascists holding Euros, then Ahamdinejad's trade account will experience some serious margin calls.

With the US fleet in the Persian Gulf, beginning what looks like a campaign to hermetically seal the Islamist Fascists in Iran from all borders, the future for the Islamist Fascists does not look bright at all.

Ignore Ahmadinejad in 2007

With the start of 2007, I believe the world press must have one resolution. Ignore ignorant comments from anyone abusing the media. One great example is the idiot Ahmadinejad in Iran, who thinks that he can abuse the international media with such comments:

"I'm sure that soon we will observe the collapse of the Zionist regime (Israel)," the official IRNA news agency quoted him as saying, without elaborating.

"The Holocaust was fabricated by the West in order to reach its goals," state television quoted him as saying.

So could the editors at Reuters and AP not give this baffoon any space. All he does is to insult the intelligence of everyone on the planet. Most Iranians will tell you that the ignorance of the world press, has as much to do with changing the regime in Iran, as the policies of the Islamist Fascists themselves.

UN voted 15-0 to approve treaty against Islamist Fascists in Iran

UK's, Parry was right when he said:

"I expect the resolution to be adopted in the next hour," Ambassador Emyr Jones Parry told reporters.

Now the world has to comply to the list of sanctions. The Islamist Fascists were hoping to divide the world, and they have clearly failed.

Iranians did not vote, and won.

Perhaps one of the most embarrassing situations we Iranians abroad have is to witness modern educated Iranian reporters not reporting the whole truth.

One such person is Ali Akbar Dareini of AP. He very cunningly omits certain news. For example if you read his latest report, you get the feeling that, democracy took place in Iran, and then Ahmadinejad lost.

Fact is that the people of Iran did not vote. A look at the the following report from IRNA, the government news agency, gives the figures for the top five winners.

The election headquarters of the Interior Ministry here Wednesday released the result of its latest vote count for the Tehran City Council election as follows:

1- Mehdi Chamran: 413,216
2- Morteza Talaie: 374,161
3- Rasoul Khadem: 291,071
4- Hadi Sa'ie: 279,075
5- Abbas Sheibani: 268,552

And at the bottom of the report, it states very clearly states:

In this latest count, 1,254,608 votes were counted from 2.2 million ballots cast.

There are 15 million people in Teheran. We also know that there are 6 million members of the Basij, or the Islamist vigilantes (rather like the Hitler Youth). So what happened to them? It seems that no one really participated.

So why is it that reporters like Dareini do not highlight this? Why is it that the whole world is not made aware that the people of Iran were the real winners? They gave a resounding "No" to the bogus election by boycotting the elections. But do we have one report in AP or Reuters, or the liberal minded BBC? Of course not.

The situation in Iran is now in the hands of the Iranian people. They are in charge. For too long we have waited for the world to get its act together and condemn the Islamist Fascists. Nothing of the sort is happening. The major news agencies are not interested. Conspiracy theorists can say what they like; everything from Islamist Fascists filling PR agencies with money to all sorts of other ideas.

But it does not matter. The good news is that the Iranian people are the winners, and the tin pot rulers are standing on very very shaky ground - and they know it.

UN Bans Death Penalty

One hundred and four countries voted in favour of the draft resolution, 54 states voted against and 29 abstained.

http://southasia.oneworld.net/article/view/156273/1/1893

One day I hope that we do not have the death penalty in Iran. I hope the UN bans the Seyyed government. That would be another non violent way of removing this regime. The people of Iran are held at gun point inhumanely. Nothing is sacred enough to kill people for. Life takes care of life. Love and understanding for the sake of righteousness is what is needed. Righteousness for the sake of Righteousness, as stated in the Zend Avesta is what is needed. We Iranians said this thousands of years before everyone else.

No Hijab = death, where are you UN?

"I do not understand how these women who do not respect the hijab, 28 years after the birth of the Islamic Republic, are still alive," he said.

"These women and their husbands and their fathers must die," said Hassani, who is the representative of the Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei in eastern Azerbaijan.

http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Religion/?id=1.0.1687095144

How ironical, that a day after the UN votes to ban capital punishment, we get this Seyyed mouthing death. What is it about morality, that in its most potent form, it advocates the most uncivilized solutions. Surely the instrument of law should as honourable as the moral code it is advocating. Maybe sometimes there are perverts around, but to call all Iranian men, or other men, perverts, and then cover yourself up, is a false accusation. A women who refuses to shake my hand, or looks at me through a hole in the chador is insulting me, before she knows anything about me in the first place. Of course we all know that this is just crazy dogma at its best. But would that Seyyed really shoot some girl in a mini skirt if she walked passed him? Yes he would, and this same buffoon, would not hesitate to press the nuclear button, if he knew it was being fired at Israel. Does the UN Assembly care that they have such thinkers in their midst, illegally representing the oldest civilization in the world? And does the world media, whose job it is to point out these things, and make the world aware, do its bit? Well it is getting better, is the answer. It is not enough, but at least these monsters are making some "news" to some. You won't see this in the bulletins of corporations or national press of those doing business with the Seyyeds. If this news made front page all over the world, then something would be done about the fate of women in Iran. Ya Ahuramazda, we will be peaceful within, and continue with non violent conscious objection.

How to definitely win an election in Iran - again

Well am I really surprised to see the Ahmadinejad camp be at it again? Of course not.

Ahmadinejad took fright from initial reports that the Reform-Seekers camp headed by Tehran mayor (and former RG officer) Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf were pulling ahead of his own candidates. When this trend showed in the early returns from a small number of provincial towns, our Tehran sources report, Ahmadinejad tried approaching the supreme ruler for a directive to “adjust” the ballot count and switch votes to his supporters.

So of course folks, we can guess who, or should I say what, these bogus elections will produce as the "winner". And the people of Iran will just laugh it off as some sort of a joke, just like the people of Iraq thought that Saddam's election was a joke.