Obama was wrong on Iran's Saadi

What Saadi said was this:

The Children of Adam are limbs of each other 
Having been created of one essence. 
When the calamity of time afflicts one limb 
The other limbs cannot remain at rest. 
If thou hast no sympathy for the troubles of others 
Thou art unworthy to be called by the name of a man.

Saadi wrote this to say that when someone suffers, others feel their suffering.  The whole purpose of this poem is to talk about suffering, and the sympathy we all should have for each other, wherever we are, and from whatever origin.

That brings up the question, "Does Mr Obama realise the calamity on Iranians that have tried to celebrate Nowruz for 1400 years?".  How dare he talk to the Seyyed/Theocrats about this truely Iranian occasion, when the Seyyeds/Theocrats' sole task is to destroy what is Iranian.

Mr Obama, you should be addressing the Iranians that put Nowruz over and above everything else.  You should not be trying to cut a deal with these people who hate Iran and its culture so symbolised by Nowruz.

Sphere: Related Content

Iran has The Best Calendar in the World

The Ancients of Iran chose to celebrate the beginning of each season, as it related to the inteplay of light and darkness, and the position of the Earth in the larger scheme of things in the Universe. This year Spring Equinox or Nowrooz will be celebrated at exactly 11:43:39 GMT today all over the world.

Ancient dualism or what they call Mithraic is part of the precession of Equinoxes as explained in this video.

Sphere: Related Content

The Economist tries to reason with the illegal Seyyed/Theocrat regime in Iran

This leads to speculation that the supreme leader may yet quietly promote a rival, but less controversial, principlist figure, such as Mohamed Qalibaf, who has proved himself a skilled administrator as mayor of Tehran, rather than Mr Ahmadinejad. Some leading principlists have also proposed a coalition conservative government that would dilute Mr Ahmadinejad’s role. Such quiet manoeuvring inside the principlist camp suggests a fear that either they, too, could find themselves split, or that the reformists will, despite Mr Khatami’s absence, actually succeed in galvanising new voters.

Quite amazing that a magazine like The Economist, takes these monsters in Iran seriously, when the people of Iran don't. The Economist even speculates about outcomes.

A Seyyed/Theocrat reading such articles, thinks he is being taken seriously by the Western press. It is a sad day when the decent Iranians living abroad have to witness such errors in Western press. No wonder these illegal monsters are still in Iran.

Sphere: Related Content

Iran's Seyyeds'/Theocrats' man advises Obama

Brzezinski bears more responsibility for the fact that the Iranian people are subjected to — and everyone else in the world is threatened by — an authoritarian Islamist regime than any single Westerner besides, perhaps, ex-President Carter. Eleven years ago, Brzezinski revealed the gaping breach in his brain through which the mullahs poured in 1979.

I suppose he thought that a Shah Abbas type of Iran was better, with Shiite doctrines being able to fend of USSR.

Sphere: Related Content